arxiv: 2604.11887 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Spin Correlation and Quantum Entanglement of Fermion Pairs in Transversely Polarized e^-e^+ Collisions

Yi-Jing Fang , Amit Bhoonah , Kun Cheng , Tao Han , Yandong Liu , Hao Zhang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords quantum entanglementspin correlationstransverse polarizationelectron-positron collisionsQED processeselectroweak processesBhabha scatteringBell states

0 comments

The pith

Transversely polarized electron-positron beams produce maximally entangled fermion pairs across the full phase space in s-channel QED.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines spin correlations and entanglement in e+e- collisions when the incoming beams carry transverse polarization. It establishes that in pure electromagnetic s-channel annihilation to fermion pairs, the outgoing particles form a maximally entangled quantum state at every point in phase space. Polarization also strengthens entanglement in electroweak processes, although the exact spin alignments follow from the particles' chiral couplings. Even in Bhabha scattering, where t-channel diagrams dilute the effect, transverse polarization still raises the degree of entanglement. The authors conclude that beam polarization therefore offers a direct experimental handle for generating and tuning quantum entanglement at colliders.

Core claim

The s-channel QED process e−e+→f f-bar produces a maximally entangled state in the entire phase space when the initial beams are transversely polarized, while the quantum magic varies in different phase space points for the maximally entangled Bell states. For electroweak processes, the spin configuration of final states depends on chiral couplings, and the entanglement is also greatly enhanced by transverse polarization as in the QED process. For Bhabha scattering with additional t-channel contributions, the transverse polarization still increases the final state entanglement, although with some dilution.

What carries the argument

The spin density matrix of the final fermion pair, built from the scattering amplitudes that incorporate the transverse polarization vectors of the incoming beams, from which entanglement measures such as concurrence are extracted.

If this is right

Beam polarization can be used to generate Bell states for fermion pairs at every point in phase space in QED processes.
The same polarization enhances entanglement in electroweak processes while the spin patterns remain governed by chiral couplings.
Even when t-channel diagrams are present, transverse polarization raises entanglement despite partial dilution.
The sensitive dependence of final spin states on polarization direction allows experimental control of quantum entanglement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Angular distributions of decay products from the produced fermions could serve as a direct experimental probe of the predicted maximal entanglement.
Similar polarization techniques might be applied at future high-energy colliders to create controllable entangled states for quantum information tests.
The phase-space variation of quantum magic within the Bell states offers a way to study how entanglement manifests differently at different kinematics.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume that the beams maintain perfect transverse polarization and that higher-order corrections or depolarization effects can be ignored when claiming maximal entanglement throughout phase space.

What would settle it

A measurement of the spin correlation coefficients in transversely polarized e+e- collisions to muon pairs that falls below the maximum value required for Bell states at any production angle would falsify the claim of maximal entanglement over the entire phase space.

read the original abstract

We systematically study the spin correlations and quantum entanglement in transversely polarized electron-positron collisions. We find that the $s$-channel QED process $e^-e^+\to f\bar f$ produces a maximally entangled state in the entire phase space when the initial beams are transversely polarized, while the quantum magic varies in different phase space points for the maximally entangled Bell states. For electroweak processes, the spin configuration of final states depends on chiral couplings, and the entanglement is also greatly enhanced by transverse polarization as in the QED process. For Bhabha scattering with additional $t$-channel contributions, the transverse polarization still increases the final state entanglement, although with some dilution. The sensitive dependence of final spin states on the transverse polarization makes the beam polarization a powerful tool for generating and controlling quantum entanglement in collider experiments, opening up new opportunities for quantum information studies at high-energy colliders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Transverse polarization produces maximal spin entanglement for s-channel fermion pairs at every angle in tree-level QED.

read the letter

Transverse polarization of the incoming beams turns the s-channel QED process e+e- to f f-bar into a source of maximal spin entanglement for the outgoing pair, and this holds at every scattering angle. The paper works out the same pattern for electroweak channels and shows a milder but still positive effect in Bhabha scattering once the t-channel piece is added. They compute the concurrence and quantum magic directly from the helicity amplitudes and polarization vectors, so the result follows from standard matrix elements without extra assumptions beyond tree level. The systematic comparison across processes is the clearest new piece; earlier spin-correlation studies existed, but the uniform maximal entanglement over phase space for pure s-channel transverse polarization had not been stated this way. The calculations use ordinary chiral couplings and density-matrix methods, with no free parameters or circular definitions. The stress-test note is right that no internal inconsistency appears in the amplitudes. The main limitation is the leading-order restriction. Real beams carry some depolarization and energy spread, and higher-order corrections could introduce angle-dependent decoherence that lowers the concurrence below one. The paper notes these idealizations but does not quantify them or discuss detector-level measurement of the entanglement. This work is for theorists who already follow both high-energy phenomenology and quantum-information applications at colliders. A reader who wants explicit formulas showing how beam polarization acts as a control parameter will get concrete value from the phase-space results. I would send it to peer review. The central claim is traceable to the amplitudes, the evidence is reproducible at tree level, and the topic is timely enough to merit referee time even if the experimental reach needs further work.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates spin correlations and quantum entanglement for fermion pair production in transversely polarized e^{-}e^{+} collisions. It claims that s-channel QED processes (e^{-}e^{+} → f f-bar) produce maximally entangled states throughout the entire phase space, while quantum magic varies across phase-space points. For electroweak processes the final-state spin configuration depends on chiral couplings and entanglement is enhanced by transverse polarization; for Bhabha scattering the enhancement persists but is diluted by t-channel contributions. The work concludes that transverse beam polarization provides a controllable means to generate and study quantum entanglement at colliders.

Significance. If the tree-level results hold, the paper supplies a clean, parameter-free example of maximal entanglement generated by initial-state polarization, independent of scattering angle in the QED case. This offers falsifiable predictions for spin observables and could motivate quantum-information measurements at future e^{+}e^{-} facilities. The explicit contrast between s-channel and t-channel contributions is a useful addition to the literature on high-energy entanglement.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and Conclusions] The experimental claim that transverse polarization constitutes a 'powerful tool' for generating entanglement in collider experiments (Abstract and Conclusions) rests on the assumption of ideal, fully maintained transverse polarization. The manuscript provides no quantitative estimate of how partial polarization, beam depolarization, or O(α) radiative corrections would reduce the concurrence below unity, which is load-bearing for the stated collider relevance.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The term 'quantum magic' appears without a definition or literature citation; a one-sentence explanation or reference to the relevant quantum-information measure would aid readers outside that subfield.
[Section 3 (QED calculation)] Explicit expressions for the two-fermion spin density matrix and the concurrence formula (as functions of scattering angle and polarization) should be collected in a dedicated subsection or appendix to allow direct verification of the 'maximally entangled' claim.
[Figures] Figures showing entanglement measures versus angle would be strengthened by including the unpolarized baseline and curves for polarization degrees below 100 % to illustrate robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. The positive assessment of the theoretical results is appreciated. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate a revision to clarify the scope and limitations of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and Conclusions] The experimental claim that transverse polarization constitutes a 'powerful tool' for generating entanglement in collider experiments (Abstract and Conclusions) rests on the assumption of ideal, fully maintained transverse polarization. The manuscript provides no quantitative estimate of how partial polarization, beam depolarization, or O(α) radiative corrections would reduce the concurrence below unity, which is load-bearing for the stated collider relevance.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript is a tree-level theoretical study and does not include quantitative estimates of depolarization, partial polarization (e.g., P<1), or O(α) corrections. Such effects would indeed reduce the observed concurrence from its ideal value of 1. The paper demonstrates that, under perfect transverse polarization, s-channel QED processes yield maximal entanglement independent of scattering angle, while electroweak and Bhabha cases show enhancement relative to the unpolarized baseline. This establishes the mechanism and provides a clean benchmark. A full phenomenological study incorporating beam dynamics and radiative corrections lies beyond the present scope. In the revised version we will add a short paragraph in the Conclusions explicitly stating these limitations, noting that the ideal-case results represent an upper bound, and emphasizing that the findings motivate dedicated experimental efforts at future facilities where high transverse polarization can be maintained. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper computes the final-state spin density matrix and entanglement measures (concurrence, magic) directly from the tree-level QED and electroweak amplitudes for e+e- → f f-bar and related processes. The maximal entanglement result for transversely polarized beams follows from the explicit helicity structure of the s-channel matrix elements and the resulting pure Bell-like state across phase space, without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions of the observables, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the claim to its inputs. All steps remain within standard perturbative QFT techniques and are externally verifiable via independent amplitude calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard perturbative calculations in QED and the Standard Model together with the assumption that transverse beam polarization can be treated as ideal.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard perturbative QED and electroweak matrix elements govern the spin correlations
Invoked throughout the abstract when stating results for s-channel and electroweak processes.
domain assumption Transverse polarization of initial beams can be maintained without significant depolarization
Required to claim maximal entanglement in the entire phase space.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1396 out tokens · 79965 ms · 2026-05-10T15:33:48.021787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Spin-flavor entanglement in $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda D$ and weak phase extraction
hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Spin-flavor entanglement in Lambda_b to Lambda D decays supplies a method to extract the CKM weak phase gamma with uncertainty scaling as 1 over the Wootters concurrence.
Radiation effects on the entanglement of fermion pairs at colliders
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Energetic radiation induces decoherence that significantly reduces entanglement in fermion pairs at colliders, with statistically significant signals observable in ttbar(g) at the LHC and tau pairs at Belle II.
Disentangling new physics with quantum entanglement in $t\bar{t}$ production at future lepton colliders
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Entanglement in ttbar production at lepton colliders is typically reduced by scalar mediators but shows sizable deviations in U(1)B-L and Randall-Sundrum models, positioning quantum-information observables as probes f...
Quantum Tomography and Entanglement in Semi-Leptonic $h\to VV^*$ Decays at Higher Orders
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Semi-leptonic h to VV* decays retain an effective two-qutrit description for quantum tomography and entanglement after including finite fermion masses and NLO corrections.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Schr¨ odinger,Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems,Math

E. Schr¨ odinger,Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems,Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.31(2008) 555

2008
[2]

Bell,On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,Physics Physique Fizika1(1964) 195

J.S. Bell,On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,Physics Physique Fizika1(1964) 195

1964
[3]

Einstein, B

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen,Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,Phys. Rev.47(1935) 777

1935
[4]

Afik and J

Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907 [2003.02280]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

A.J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024) 104134 [2402.07972]

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo,Testing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 161801 [2102.11883]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Severi, C

C. Severi, C.D.E. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli,Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 285 [2110.10112]

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

Afik and J

Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD,Quantum6 (2022) 820 [2203.05582]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

Afik and J

Y. Afik and J.R.M.n. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801 [2209.03969]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

T. Han, M. Low and T.A. Wu,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi-leptonic top decays,JHEP07(2024) 192 [2310.17696]

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A

J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A. Casas,Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 666 [2205.00542]

work page arXiv 2022
[12]

Z. Dong, D. Gon¸ calves, K. Kong and A. Navarro,Entanglement and Bell inequalities with boosted tt¯,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115023 [2305.07075]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipartite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116005 [2311.09166]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing entanglement and Bell inequality violation in top antitop events,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 033004 [2407.01672]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring quantum discord at the LHC,JHEP05 (2025) 081 [2412.21158]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Y. Afik, R. Demina, A. Herrera, O. Heinz Hindrichs, J.R.M. de Nova and B. Ravina, Experimental characterization of the hierarchy of quantum correlations in top quark pairs, 2602.15115. [17]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector,Nature633(2024) 542 [2311.07288]. [18]CMScollaboration,Observation of quant...

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

Altakach, P

M.M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and K. Sakurai,Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ- at future lepton colliders,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 093002 [2211.10513]

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

Ehatäht, M

K. Ehat¨ aht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken,Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 032005 [2311.17555]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Ma and T

K. Ma and T. Li,Testing Bell inequality throughh→τ τat CEPC*,Chin. Phys. C48 (2024) 103105 [2309.08103]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Fabbrichesi and L

M. Fabbrichesi and L. Marzola,Quantum tomography withτleptons at the FCC-ee: Entanglement, Bell inequality violation, sinθW, and anomalous couplings,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 076004 [2405.09201]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality inτ +τ − at the BEPC, 2501.04801

work page arXiv
[22]

Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality in $\tau^+ \tau^-$ at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction

Y. Zhang, B.-H. Zhou, Q.-B. Liu, S. Li, S.-C. Hsu, T. Han et al.,Entanglement and Bell Nonlocality inτ +τ − at the LHC using Machine Learning for Neutrino Reconstruction, 2504.01496

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

T. Ai, Q. Bi, Y. He, J. Liu and X.-P. Wang,Ultimate Quantum Precision Limit at Colliders: Conditions and Case Studies,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 241804 [2506.10673]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Barr,Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs boson decays,Phys

A.J. Barr,Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs boson decays,Phys. Lett. B825(2022) 136866 [2106.01377]

work page arXiv 2022
[25]

A.J. Barr, P. Caban and J. Rembieli´ nski,Bell-type inequalities for systems of relativistic vector bosons,Quantum7(2023) 1070 [2204.11063]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Ashby-Pickering, A.J

R. Ashby-Pickering, A.J. Barr and A. Wierzchucka,Quantum state tomography, entanglement detection and Bell violation prospects in weak decays of massive particles, JHEP05(2023) 020 [2209.13990]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Aguilar-Saavedra, A

J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J.A. Casas and J.M. Moreno,Testing entanglement and Bell inequalities in H→ZZ,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016012 [2209.13441]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 823 [2302.00683]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Fabbri, J

F. Fabbri, J. Howarth and T. Maurin,Isolating semi-leptonicH→W W ∗decays for Bell inequality tests,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 20 [2307.13783]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Bi, Q.-H

Q. Bi, Q.-H. Cao, K. Cheng and H. Zhang,New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 036022 [2307.14895]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Bernal, P

A. Bernal, P. Caban and J. Rembieli´ nski,Entanglement and Bell inequality violation in vector diboson systems produced in decays of spin-0 particles,Sci. Rep.15(2025) 23410 [2405.16525]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Grossi, G

M. Grossi, G. Pelliccioli and A. Vicini,From angular coefficients to quantum observables: a phenomenological appraisal in di-boson systems,JHEP12(2024) 120 [2409.16731]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

‘Quantum entangle- ment is quantum: ZZ production at the LHC’

D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan, F. Krauss and A. Navarro,Quantum Entanglement is Quantum: ZZ Production at the LHC,2505.12125. – 31 –

work page arXiv
[34]

Gon¸ calves, A

D. Gon¸ calves, A. Kaladharan and A. Navarro,Higher-Order Corrections to Quantum Observables inh→W W ∗,2506.19951

work page arXiv
[35]

Du, X.-G

Y. Du, X.-G. He, C.-W. Liu and J.-P. Ma,Impact of parity violation on quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1255 [2409.15418]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J.R.M. de Nova, A. Soffer and D. Uzan,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L111902 [2406.04402]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

S. Chen, Y. Nakaguchi and S. Komamiya,Testing Bell’s Inequality using Charmonium Decays,PTEP2013(2013) 063A01 [1302.6438]

work page arXiv 2013
[38]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequality is violated in charmonium decays,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 053008 [2406.17772]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

J. Pei, X. Hao, X. Wang and T. Li,Observation of quantum entanglement inΛ ¯Λpair production via electron-positron annihilation,2505.09931

work page arXiv
[40]

J. Pei, T. Li, L. Wu, X. Hao and X. Wang,Quantum Entanglement without Spin-Analyzing Power Dependence at the Colliders,2510.08031

work page arXiv
[41]

Spin-spin entanglement in diffractive heavy-quark production,

M. Fucilla and Y. Hatta,Spin-spin entanglement in diffractive heavy-quark production,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L031504 [2509.05267]

work page arXiv 2026
[42]

Cheng and B

K. Cheng and B. Yan,Bell Inequality Violation of Light Quarks in Dihadron Pair Production at Lepton Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011902 [2501.03321]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Lin, M.-J

S.-J. Lin, M.-J. Liu, D.Y. Shao and S.-Y. Wei,Spin correlations and Bell nonlocality inΛ ¯Λ wpair production frome +e− collisions with a thrust cut,2507.15387

work page arXiv
[44]

Q.-H. Cao, G. Li, X.-K. Wen and B. Yan,Probing Quark Electromagnetic Properties via Entangled Quark Pairs in Fragmentation Hadrons at Lepton Colliders,2509.18276

work page arXiv
[45]

Aoude, E

R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055007 [2203.05619]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and E. Gabrielli,Constraining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 162 [2208.11723]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

Severi and E

C. Severi and E. Vryonidou,Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,JHEP01(2023) 148 [2210.09330]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Stringent bounds on HWW and HZZ anomalous couplings with quantum tomography at the LHC,JHEP09(2023) 195 [2304.02403]

work page arXiv 2023
[49]

Bernal, P

A. Bernal, P. Caban and J. Rembieli´ nski,Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation in H→ZZwith anomalous coupling,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1050 [2307.13496]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

‘Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production’

R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production,JHEP12(2023) 017 [2307.09675]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

Maltoni, C

F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099 [2401.08751]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

Fabbrichesi, M

M. Fabbrichesi, M. Low and L. Marzola,Trace distance between density matrices: A nifty tool in new-physics searches,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 013003 [2501.03311]. – 32 –

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Aoude, H

R. Aoude, H. Banks, C.D. White and M.J. White,Probing new physics in the top sector using quantum information,2505.12522

work page arXiv
[54]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Quantum tomography at colliders: With or without decays, Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139675 [2410.08303]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han, M. Low and T.A. Wu,Quantum Tomography in Neutral Meson and Antimeson Systems,2507.12513

work page arXiv
[56]

Altakach, P

M.M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni and K. Sakurai,Quantum properties of heavy-fermion pairs at a lepton collider with polarised beams,2601.09558

work page arXiv
[57]

Y.-C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Quantum Tomography of Fermion Pairs ine +e− Collisions: Longitudinal Beam Polarization Effects,2602.02719

work page arXiv
[58]

Zhang, X

H.-W. Zhang, X. Cao and T.-F. Feng,Manipulating Bell nonlocality and entanglement in polarized electron-positron annihilation,2602.10389

work page arXiv
[59]

X.-K. Wen, B. Yan, Z. Yu and C.P. Yuan,Single Transverse Spin Asymmetry as a New Probe of Standard-Model-Effective-Field-Theory Dipole Operators,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 241801 [2307.05236]

work page arXiv 2023
[60]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and S. Trifinopoulos,Quantum Information at the Electron-Ion Collider, 2510.23773

work page arXiv
[61]

Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press (6, 2012), 10.1017/cbo9780511976667

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2012
[62]

Abdallah et al

A.A. Sokolov and I.M. Ternov,On polarization and spin effects in the theory of synchrotron radiation,Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR153(1963) 1052. [65]CEPC Study Groupcollaboration,CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator,Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods8(2024) 1 [2312.14363]

work page arXiv 1963
[63]

Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

A. Accardi et al.,Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier: Understanding the glue that binds us all,Eur. Phys. J. A52(2016) 268 [1212.1701]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[64]

Peres,Separability criterion for density matrices,Phys

A. Peres,Separability criterion for density matrices,Phys. Rev. Lett.77(1996) 1413 [quant-ph/9604005]

work page arXiv 1996
[65]

Horodecki, Phys

P. Horodecki,Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition,Phys. Lett. A232(1997) 333 [quant-ph/9703004]

work page arXiv 1997
[66]

Wootters,Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys

W.K. Wootters,Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 2245 [quant-ph/9709029]

work page arXiv 1998
[67]

Aoude, A.J

R. Aoude, A.J. Barr, F. Maltoni and L. Satrioni,Decoherence effects in entangled fermion pairs at colliders,2504.07030

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[68]

Gu, S.-J

J. Gu, S.-J. Lin, D.Y. Shao, L.-T. Wang and S.-X. Yang,Decoherence in high energy collisions as renormalization group flow,2510.13951

work page arXiv
[69]

Parke and Y

S.J. Parke and Y. Shadmi,Spin correlations in top quark pair production ate +e− colliders, Phys. Lett. B387(1996) 199 [hep-ph/9606419]

work page arXiv 1996
[70]

Mahlon and S.J

G. Mahlon and S.J. Parke,Maximizing spin correlations in top quark pair production at the Tevatron,Phys. Lett. B411(1997) 173 [hep-ph/9706304]

work page arXiv 1997
[71]

Leone, S

L. Leone, S.F.E. Oliviero and A. Hamma,Stabilizer R´ enyi Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 050402 [2106.12587]. – 33 –

work page arXiv 2022
[72]

White and M.J

C.D. White and M.J. White,Magic states of top quarks,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 116016 [2406.07321]

work page arXiv 2024
[73]

Bardin, A

D.Y. Bardin, A. Leike, T. Riemann and M. Sachwitz,Energy Dependent Width Effects in e+ e- Annihilation Near the Z Boson Pole,Phys. Lett. B206(1988) 539

1988
[74]

Borrelli, M

A. Borrelli, M. Consoli, L. Maiani and R. Sisto,Model Independent Analysis of theZLine Shape ine +e− Annihilation,Nucl. Phys. B333(1990) 357. [78]CMScollaboration,Characterization of the quantum state of top quark pairs produced in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV using the beam and helicity bases,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) L051101 [2512.17557]

work page arXiv 1990
[75]

Aiet al., Nucl

J. Bao et al.,Conceptual Design Report of Super Tau-Charm Facility: The Accelerator, 2509.11522. [80]FCCcollaboration,FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,Eur. Phys. J. ST228(2019) 261. – 34 –

work page arXiv 2019