pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.11892 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

A Post-starburst Galaxy Undergoing Ram-pressure Stripping at Redshift 3.06

Anton M. Koekemoer, Bjorn H. C. Emonts, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Eiichi Egami, Fengwu Sun, Franz E. Bauer, Fujiang Yu, Fuyan Bian, J. Xaiver Prochaska, Ming Sun, Mingyu Li, Seiji Fujimoto, Vasily Kokorev, Xiaohui Fan, Xiaojing Lin, Yunjing Wu, Zechang Sun, Zheng Cai, Zihao Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO
keywords ram-pressure strippingpost-starburst galaxieshigh-redshift galaxiesgalaxy quenchingenvironmental quenchingJWSTALMAgalaxy groups
0
0 comments X

The pith

A post-starburst galaxy at redshift 3.06 is undergoing ram-pressure stripping.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses JWST and ALMA observations to provide the first direct evidence of ram-pressure stripping acting on a post-starburst galaxy at redshift 3.06. This shows the removal of cold gas and dust happening at the same time as star formation shuts down in a galaxy group environment. If correct, ram-pressure stripping can quench galaxies much earlier in cosmic history than current hydrodynamical simulations predict. The results point to stripping occurring in a clumpy, filamentary medium around early groups, making environmental effects important during the main phase of galaxy assembly.

Core claim

The central discovery is the observation of ongoing ram-pressure stripping in galaxy A2744-JF-z3 at z=3.06. Using JWST and ALMA, the authors find evidence for the removal of cold gas and dust that coincides with the end of star formation, marking the earliest known case of this environmental quenching mechanism.

What carries the argument

Ram-pressure stripping driven by the galaxy's motion through the dense intra-group medium, which removes the interstellar gas and dust as shown by the spectroscopic and continuum observations.

If this is right

  • RPS operates effectively at z>3 despite simulation predictions of reduced incidence.
  • The stripping is highly stochastic and impulsive due to clumpy structures in the intra-group and circumgalactic medium.
  • Environmental quenching via RPS extends into the epoch of galaxy assembly in protoclusters.
  • RPS serves as a key pathway for rapid quenching in nascent galaxy groups at high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This mechanism could account for some of the massive quiescent galaxies found in early-universe surveys.
  • Galaxy formation models should include more detailed treatments of clumpy gas distributions to predict RPS rates at high redshift.
  • Targeted observations of other high-redshift groups might reveal how common this process is during cosmic dawn.

Load-bearing premise

The observed gas and dust removal is attributed to ram-pressure stripping based on spectroscopic diagnostics and SED modeling, rather than alternative mechanisms like AGN activity or mergers.

What would settle it

If additional data showed no evidence of stripped gas tails or velocity offsets expected from ram pressure, or if the dust and gas deficits could be fully explained by internal galaxy processes alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11892 by Anton M. Koekemoer, Bjorn H. C. Emonts, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Eiichi Egami, Fengwu Sun, Franz E. Bauer, Fujiang Yu, Fuyan Bian, J. Xaiver Prochaska, Ming Sun, Mingyu Li, Seiji Fujimoto, Vasily Kokorev, Xiaohui Fan, Xiaojing Lin, Yunjing Wu, Zechang Sun, Zheng Cai, Zihao Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: JWST NIRCam imaging of JF-z3 and the associated galaxy group at z=3.06. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: JWST NIRSpec prism spectra and spectral energy distribution modeling for JF-z3. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Observational evidence of ram pressure stripping in JF-z3. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Star formation rate (SFR) and stellar mass of JF-z3 as a function of cosmic time from spectral energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: JWST NIRSpec spectrum for the extended emission. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Key spectral features in the NIRSpec prism data. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Identification and overview of the galaxy group at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: JWST NIRCam imaging with and without emission line bands. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Surface brightness image for the continuum and emission lines. a-b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Chandra X-ray images of the A2744 cluster. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding how galaxies ignite and extinguish their star formation remains a cornerstone question in modern astrophysics. Recent JWST surveys have revealed an overabundance of massive quiescent galaxies in the first billion years of the Universe, challenging current models of galaxy evolution. In the nearby Universe, ram pressure stripping (RPS) is a major environmental mechanism capable of rapidly shutting down star formation, yet direct observation remains scarce at redshift $z\gtrsim1$, and its role at $z>2$ is even poorly constrained by simulations. Here, we utilize JWST and ALMA observations to present direct evidence of RPS in the post-starburst galaxy A2744-JF-z3, residing in a galaxy group at redshift 3.06, the earliest such detection to date. Spectroscopic diagnostics and spectral energy distribution modeling reveal the ongoing removal of cold gas and dust, coincident with the abrupt cessation of star formation. Contrary to hydrodynamical simulations that predict a reduced incidence of RPS at high redshift, our results instead imply that RPS can operate at $z>3$, suggesting a highly stochastic and impulsive stripping within a clumpy, filamentary intra-group and circumgalactic medium. These observations extend environmental quenching well into the epoch of galaxy assembly, highlighting RPS as a previously overlooked decisive pathway to rapid quenching in nascent groups and protoclusters in the early Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports JWST and ALMA observations of the post-starburst galaxy A2744-JF-z3 at z=3.06 in a galaxy group, claiming the earliest direct evidence of ram-pressure stripping (RPS). Spectroscopic diagnostics and SED modeling are used to infer ongoing removal of cold gas and dust coincident with abrupt quenching, implying RPS operates efficiently at z>3 in a clumpy intra-group medium contrary to simulations.

Significance. If the attribution to RPS holds after rigorous exclusion of alternatives, the result would be significant as the highest-redshift direct detection of environmental quenching via RPS, extending such processes into the epoch of galaxy assembly and indicating that simulations may underestimate the role of stochastic stripping in nascent groups and protoclusters.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and spectroscopic diagnostics section] Abstract and the section presenting spectroscopic diagnostics: the claim of 'direct evidence' of RPS relies on line ratios, gas masses, and morphological features, but the manuscript does not quantify how these observables uniquely exclude AGN-driven outflows or merger-induced gas removal; at z=3.06 the expected intra-group medium density is low, so a concrete test (e.g., comparison of observed velocity gradients or tail orientations to RPS versus wind models) is needed to support the central attribution.
  2. [SED modeling and ALMA analysis] The SED modeling and ALMA gas-mass section: the inference of ongoing cold-gas removal is load-bearing for the RPS interpretation, yet the text does not report the full posterior distributions, systematic uncertainties from dust-temperature assumptions, or explicit comparison to post-starburst templates that could mimic the observed deficit without external stripping.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the spatial resolution of the JWST and ALMA data and whether the reported morphological features (e.g., tails) are resolved or inferred from integrated spectra.
  2. [Introduction] The introduction would benefit from a brief reference to the specific hydrodynamical simulations cited as predicting reduced RPS incidence at high redshift.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and insightful report. Their comments have prompted us to clarify and strengthen several aspects of our analysis. Below, we respond point by point to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and spectroscopic diagnostics section] Abstract and the section presenting spectroscopic diagnostics: the claim of 'direct evidence' of RPS relies on line ratios, gas masses, and morphological features, but the manuscript does not quantify how these observables uniquely exclude AGN-driven outflows or merger-induced gas removal; at z=3.06 the expected intra-group medium density is low, so a concrete test (e.g., comparison of observed velocity gradients or tail orientations to RPS versus wind models) is needed to support the central attribution.

    Authors: We have revised the spectroscopic diagnostics section to include a quantitative assessment of how the line ratios, gas masses, and morphological features distinguish ram-pressure stripping from AGN-driven outflows and merger-induced processes. Specifically, we compare the observed [OIII]/Hβ and other line ratios to standard AGN diagnostic diagrams and outflow models, showing consistency with star-formation dominated ionization rather than AGN. For the morphological features, we now present a direct comparison of the velocity field and tail orientation with both RPS and galactic wind models, finding better agreement with RPS predictions. Regarding the intra-group medium density, we discuss that while average densities are low, the clumpy nature inferred from the group environment allows for localized high-density regions capable of efficient stripping, consistent with our observations of gas removal. We believe these additions provide the concrete test requested. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [SED modeling and ALMA analysis] The SED modeling and ALMA gas-mass section: the inference of ongoing cold-gas removal is load-bearing for the RPS interpretation, yet the text does not report the full posterior distributions, systematic uncertainties from dust-temperature assumptions, or explicit comparison to post-starburst templates that could mimic the observed deficit without external stripping.

    Authors: In response to this comment, we have updated the SED modeling and ALMA gas-mass section to report the full posterior distributions from our fits. We now explicitly discuss the systematic uncertainties associated with dust temperature assumptions and how they affect the derived gas masses. Furthermore, we include a comparison with post-starburst templates from the literature, which shows that while some internal quenching can reduce star formation, the observed deficit in cold gas and dust requires an external mechanism such as ram-pressure stripping to fully account for the data. These revisions make the inference of ongoing cold-gas removal more robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational evidence from independent telescope data

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on JWST and ALMA observations interpreted via standard spectroscopic diagnostics and SED modeling to attribute gas/dust removal to ram-pressure stripping. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the authors' own prior fits, self-citations, or ansatzes; the evidence chain is self-contained through external empirical data without any equations or parameters that are redefined as predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard astrophysical interpretations of gas kinematics and dust content rather than new fitted parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spectroscopic line ratios and velocity fields at high redshift can be unambiguously attributed to ram-pressure stripping when coincident with post-starburst signatures.
    Invoked to link the observed cold gas removal directly to RPS.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1156 out tokens · 33910 ms · 2026-05-10T16:28:41.750587+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2016, AJ, 152, 32, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/32

    Abramson, A., Kenney, J., Crowl, H., & Tal, T. 2016, AJ, 152, 32, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/32

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/32 2016

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1062 , eprint =

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., Georgakakis, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 1892, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1062

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1062 2015

  3. [3]

    2022, Univ, 8, 554, doi: 10.3390/universe8110554 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Colina, L., Crespo-Gomez, A., et al

    Alberts, S., & Noble, A. 2022, Univ, 8, 554, doi: 10.3390/universe8110554 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Colina, L., Crespo-Gomez, A., et al. 2026, arXiv, arXiv:2602.02323, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02323

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8110554 2022

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 2009

  5. [5]

    J., Jonsson, P., Primack, J

    Baldry, I. K., Balogh, M. L., Bower, R. G., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 469, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11081.x 2006

  6. [6]

    K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \'c Z ., Lupton R

    Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, 681, doi: 10.1086/380092

    work page doi:10.1086/380092 2004

  7. [7]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf Bogd´ an,´A., Goulding, A. D., Natarajan, P., et al. 2024, NatAs, 8, 126, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02111-9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  8. [8]

    2022, A&ARv, 30, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., & Sun, M. 2022, A&ARv, 30, 3, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00140-3 2022

  9. [9]

    C., Fossati, M., et al

    Boselli, A., Cuillandre, J. C., Fossati, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 587, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527795

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527795 2016

  10. [10]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    Brinchmann, J. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 2087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1704

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1704 2023

  11. [11]

    J., White, S

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  12. [12]

    2023,, 1.11.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8140011 Calabr` o, A., Pentericci, L., Feltre, A., et al

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023,, 1.11.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8140011 Calabr` o, A., Pentericci, L., Feltre, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347190

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8140011 2023

  13. [13]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Dav´ e, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2169 2018

  15. [15]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 490, 417, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2544

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2544 2019

  16. [16]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, Natur, 619, 716, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6 2023

  17. [17]

    D., & Prochaska, J

    Lehnert, M. D., & Prochaska, J. X. 2021, ApJ, 923, 200, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b9d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2b9d 2021

  18. [18]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    Chevallard, J., & Charlot, S. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1756

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1756 2016

  19. [19]

    2021, PASA, 38, e035, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.18

    Cortese, L., Catinella, B., & Smith, R. 2021, PASA, 38, e035, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.18

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.18 2021

  20. [20]

    J., Kenney, J

    Cramer, W. J., Kenney, J. D. P., Sun, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 870, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaefff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaefff 2019

  21. [21]

    J., Kenney, J

    Cramer, W. J., Kenney, J. D. P., Tonnesen, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1793

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1793 2021

  22. [22]

    D., Emonts, B., et al

    Dannerbauer, H., Lehnert, M. D., Emonts, B., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730449 D’Eugenio, F., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, NatAs, 8, 1443, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02345-1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730449 2017

  23. [23]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Duras, F., Bongiorno, A., Ricci, F., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936817 2020

  25. [25]

    N., & Edge, A

    Ebeling, H., Stephenson, L. N., & Edge, A. C. 2014, ApJL, 781, L40, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L40

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/l40 2014

  26. [26]

    E., Bialek, J., Busha, M., et al

    Evrard, A. E., Bialek, J., Busha, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 672, 122, doi: 10.1086/521616 Falc´ on-Barroso, J., S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Vazdekis, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842

    work page doi:10.1086/521616 2008

  27. [27]

    2016, MNRAS, 455, 2028, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2400

    Fossati, M., Fumagalli, M., Boselli, A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 2028, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2400

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2400 2016

  28. [28]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    work page doi:10.1117/12.671760 2006

  29. [29]

    J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 4568, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1627 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1627 2023

  30. [30]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 , arxivId =

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Schreiber, C., et al. 2024, Natur, 628, 277, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9 2024

  31. [31]

    , year = 1972, month = aug, volume =

    Gunn, J. E., & Gott, III, J. R. 1972, ApJ, 176, 1, doi: 10.1086/151605

    work page doi:10.1086/151605 1972

  32. [32]

    L., McLure, R

    Hamadouche, M. L., McLure, R. J., Carnall, A., et al. 2024, arXiv, arXiv:2412.09592, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.09592

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.09592 2024

  33. [33]

    I., Nelson, E

    Hartley, A. I., Nelson, E. J., Suess, K. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3138, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1162

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1162 2023

  34. [34]

    R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C

    Hunter, T. R., Indebetouw, R., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 074501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ace216

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ace216 2023

  35. [35]

    K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M

    Inoue, A. K., Shimizu, I., Iwata, I., & Tanaka, M. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1805, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu936 2014

  36. [36]

    I., & Thuan, T

    Izotov, Y. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 64, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2957 J´ achym, P., Sun, M., Kenney, J. D. P., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af5 J´ achym, P., Kenney, J. D. P., Sun, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 145, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e6c 18M. Li et al

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2957 2016

  37. [37]

    B., Magdis, G

    Jin, S., Sillassen, N. B., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348540

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348540 2024

  38. [38]

    P., & Nuth, J

    Jones, A. P., & Nuth, J. A. 2011, A&A, 530, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014440

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014440 2011

  39. [39]

    Kenney, J. D. P., Abramson, A., & Bravo-Alfaro, H. 2015, AJ, 150, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/2/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/2/59 2015

  40. [40]

    C., Remus, R.-S., Seidel, B., et al

    Kimmig, L. C., Remus, R.-S., Seidel, B., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9472

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9472 2025

  41. [41]

    C., & Kim, H.-J

    Koo, B.-C., Raymond, J. C., & Kim, H.-J. 2016, JKAS, 49, 109, doi: 10.5303/JKAS.2016.49.3.109

    work page doi:10.5303/jkas.2016.49.3.109 2016

  42. [42]

    V., & Borgani, S

    Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 353, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 2012

  43. [43]

    Kron, R. G. 1980, ApJS, 43, 305, doi: 10.1086/190669

    work page doi:10.1086/190669 1980

  44. [44]

    G., Staveley-Smith, L., de Blok, W

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x Labb´ e, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Natur, 616, 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  45. [45]

    Lagos, C. d. P., Bravo, M., Tobar, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 3551, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1024

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1024 2024

  46. [46]

    2022, MNRAS, 509, 3938, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3280

    Laudari, S., J´ achym, P., Sun, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 3938, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3280

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3280 2022

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe 2017

  48. [48]

    2024, ApJS, 275, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad812c

    Li, M., Zhang, H., Cai, Z., et al. 2024, ApJS, 275, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad812c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad812c 2024

  49. [49]

    J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al

    Looser, T. J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Natur, 629, 53, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07227-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07227-0 2024

  50. [50]

    M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al

    Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97 2017

  51. [51]

    C., Roper, W., Vijayan, A

    Lovell, C. C., Roper, W., Vijayan, A. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 5520, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2550

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2550 2023

  52. [52]

    2025, NatAs, 9, 128, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9

    Lu, S., Daddi, E., Maraston, C., et al. 2025, NatAs, 9, 128, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02391-9 2025

  53. [53]

    2018, NatAs, 2, 695, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1

    Man, A., & Belli, S. 2018, NatAs, 2, 695, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0558-1 2018

  54. [54]

    2006, ApJ, 652, 85, doi: 10.1086/508143

    Maraston, C., Daddi, E., Renzini, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 85, doi: 10.1086/508143

    work page doi:10.1086/508143 2006

  55. [55]

    M., et al

    Moretti, A., Paladino, R., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab616a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab616a 2020

  56. [56]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f

    Morishita, T., Liu, Z., Stiavelli, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb30f 2025

  57. [57]

    P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al. 2024, arXiv, arXiv:2410.01874, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01874

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01874 2024

  58. [58]

    2024, NatSR, 14, 3724, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    Nanayakkara, T., Glazebrook, K., Jacobs, C., et al. 2024, NatSR, 14, 3724, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4 2024

  59. [59]

    2024, ApJL, 960, L1, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    Natarajan, P., Pacucci, F., Ricarte, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 960, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e76 2024

  60. [60]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    work page doi:10.1086/160817 1983

  61. [61]

    J., Kovaˇ c, K., et al

    Peng, Y.-j., Lilly, S. J., Kovaˇ c, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/1/193 2010

  62. [62]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. J. M. Oschmann, Jr., M. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, & H. A. MacEwen, 91433X, doi: 10.1117/12.2056689 Planck Collaboratio...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056689 2014

  63. [63]

    M., Ignesti, A., Gitti, M., et al

    Poggianti, B. M., Ignesti, A., Gitti, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5224

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5224 2019

  64. [64]

    H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al

    Price, S. H., Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaec1 2025

  65. [65]

    J., Kelly, D

    Rieke, M. J., Kelly, D. M., Misselt, K., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 028001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acac53

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acac53 2023

  66. [66]

    D., Balogh, M

    Roberts, I. D., Balogh, M. L., Sok, V., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 285, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3824

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3824 2026

  67. [67]

    Sage, L. J. 1990, A&A, 239, 125

    1990

  68. [68]

    E., Sanders, R

    Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., Topping, M. W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, 242, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adad68

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adad68 2025

  69. [69]

    F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al

    Shen, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3252, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1381

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1381 2020

  70. [70]

    C., Peeples, M

    Simons, R. C., Peeples, M. S., Tumlinson, J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc5b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc5b8 2020

  71. [71]

    L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al

    Steinhardt, C. L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab75ed

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab75ed 2020

  72. [72]

    A., Weaver, J

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75fe 2024

  73. [73]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    Treu, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Bradac, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158 2022

  74. [74]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 777, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2625

    Vani, A., Ayromlou, M., Kauffmann, G., & Springel, V. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 777, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2625

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2625 2025

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610 2005

  76. [76]

    2015, A&A, 582, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526551

    Verdugo, C., Combes, F., Dasyra, K., Salom´ e, P., & Braine, J. 2015, A&A, 582, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526551

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526551 2015

  77. [77]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 1299, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae323

    Vikaeus, A., Zackrisson, E., Wilkins, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1299, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae323

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae323 2024

  78. [78]

    2025, NatAs, 9, 165, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02376-8

    Wang, B., Peng, Y., & Cappellari, M. 2025, NatAs, 9, 165, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02376-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02376-8 2025

  79. [79]

    and Henry, Alaina and Brammer, Gabriel and Strait, Victoria and Brada

    Wang, X., Jones, T., Vulcani, B., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac959e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac959e 2022

  80. [80]

    M., Lovell, C

    Wilkins, S. M., Lovell, C. C., Irodotou, D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3558

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3558 2024

Showing first 80 references.