arxiv: 2604.12683 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 💻 cs.CV · q-bio.NC

Recognition: unknown

Brain-DiT: A Universal Multi-state fMRI Foundation Model with Metadata-Conditioned Pretraining

Junfeng Xia , Wenhao Ye , Xuanye Pan , Xinke Shen , Mo Wang , Quanying Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV q-bio.NC

keywords fMRIfoundation modeldiffusion transformermetadata conditioningbrain statesgenerative pretrainingneuroimagingdownstream tasks

0 comments

The pith

Metadata-conditioned diffusion pretraining on diverse fMRI states yields stronger foundation-model representations than reconstruction or alignment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors introduce Brain-DiT, a model pretrained on nearly 350,000 sessions drawn from 24 datasets that together cover resting, task, naturalistic, disease, and sleep brain states. They replace the common masked-reconstruction objective with a generative diffusion process inside a Diffusion Transformer, and they condition the diffusion steps on session metadata. Extensive tests across seven downstream tasks show that this generative route produces better task performance than prior approaches, and that the metadata signal helps the model separate individual neural patterns from population averages. The work also notes that some tasks draw more value from global semantic features while others rely more on fine local structure.

Core claim

Brain-DiT is a Diffusion Transformer pretrained with metadata-conditioned diffusion on 349,898 fMRI sessions spanning resting, task, naturalistic, disease, and sleep states. The generative pretraining objective learns multi-scale representations that capture both fine-grained functional structure and global semantics; ablations demonstrate that this diffusion-based approach outperforms masked reconstruction and alignment objectives, while metadata conditioning further lifts downstream accuracy by disentangling intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability.

What carries the argument

Metadata-conditioned diffusion inside a Diffusion Transformer that learns to denoise brain signals while receiving session metadata as conditioning input.

If this is right

Diffusion-based generative pretraining serves as a stronger learning signal for fMRI than masked reconstruction or contrastive alignment.
Metadata conditioning during pretraining improves downstream performance by isolating individual neural dynamics from group-level effects.
Downstream tasks differ in the representational scale they prefer: Alzheimer's classification benefits from global semantics while age or sex prediction benefits from fine local structure.
A single pretrained model can support prediction and classification across multiple brain-state categories without task-specific retraining.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the disentangling effect holds, the model could support more individualized clinical mapping by highlighting deviations from population norms.
Generative pretraining opens a route to simulating plausible brain-state transitions or modeling the effects of interventions.
The scale-preference finding suggests that future models could combine local and global pathways within the same network to improve multi-task results.

Load-bearing premise

The supplied metadata variables succeed in separating population-level sources of variation from the intrinsic neural dynamics of each individual.

What would settle it

Retrain an otherwise identical model without any metadata conditioning and measure whether the performance advantage on the seven downstream tasks disappears or reverses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12683 by Junfeng Xia, Mo Wang, Quanying Liu, Wenhao Ye, Xinke Shen, Xuanye Pan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Metadata-conditioned generation of Brain-DiT. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: State diversity ablation and contribution analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Current fMRI foundation models primarily rely on a limited range of brain states and mismatched pretraining tasks, restricting their ability to learn generalized representations across diverse brain states. We present \textit{Brain-DiT}, a universal multi-state fMRI foundation model pretrained on 349,898 sessions from 24 datasets spanning resting, task, naturalistic, disease, and sleep states. Unlike prior fMRI foundation models that rely on masked reconstruction in the raw-signal space or a latent space, \textit{Brain-DiT} adopts metadata-conditioned diffusion pretraining with a Diffusion Transformer (DiT), enabling the model to learn multi-scale representations that capture both fine-grained functional structure and global semantics. Across extensive evaluations and ablations on 7 downstream tasks, we find consistent evidence that diffusion-based generative pretraining is a stronger proxy than reconstruction or alignment, with metadata-conditioned pretraining further improving downstream performance by disentangling intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability. We also observe that downstream tasks exhibit distinct preferences for representational scale: ADNI classification benefits more from global semantic representations, whereas age/sex prediction comparatively relies more on fine-grained local structure. Code and parameters of Brain-DiT are available at \href{https://github.com/REDMAO4869/Brain-DiT}{Link}.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Brain-DiT scales fMRI pretraining across many brain states with a metadata-conditioned diffusion transformer, but the disentangling benefit is inferred from downstream gains rather than shown directly.

read the letter

The core move here is swapping masked reconstruction for diffusion-based generative pretraining on a Diffusion Transformer, then adding metadata conditioning to handle the mix of resting, task, naturalistic, disease, and sleep data from 24 datasets. That combination looks new relative to earlier fMRI foundation models, and the scale (nearly 350k sessions) plus the release of code and weights are clear positives. The observation that different downstream tasks favor different representational scales is also useful to note for anyone building pipelines around these models. The paper reports consistent improvements from the diffusion objective over reconstruction or alignment baselines, and further gains from the metadata conditioning, across seven tasks. That pattern is worth checking in detail. The main soft spot is that the headline interpretation—metadata conditioning disentangles intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability—rests on performance deltas rather than direct diagnostics such as mutual information between latents and metadata or invariance tests under metadata swaps. Without those, the mechanism remains plausible but not isolated from other factors like optimization differences. The abstract gives no numbers, error bars, or split details, so the full paper needs to supply those to make the claims verifiable. This work is aimed at neuroimaging groups already using or extending fMRI foundation models, especially those open to generative pretraining. Readers who want concrete baselines and ablations on multi-state data will get something from it. The scale and the architecture shift are substantial enough that it deserves a serious referee, even if revisions will be needed on the mechanistic claims and quantitative reporting.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Brain-DiT, a universal multi-state fMRI foundation model pretrained via metadata-conditioned diffusion using a Diffusion Transformer (DiT) on 349,898 sessions from 24 datasets spanning resting, task, naturalistic, disease, and sleep states. It claims that this generative pretraining approach outperforms masked reconstruction and alignment baselines on 7 downstream tasks, with metadata conditioning providing additional gains by disentangling intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability; it further observes that tasks differ in preference for global semantic versus fine-grained local representations.

Significance. If the central claims hold with rigorous validation, the work would represent a meaningful advance in fMRI foundation modeling by shifting from reconstruction-based pretraining to generative diffusion objectives and by explicitly incorporating metadata to handle cross-dataset variability. The public release of code and model parameters is a clear strength for reproducibility and follow-on research.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that metadata-conditioned pretraining 'disentangles intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability' is supported only by downstream performance deltas over unconditioned diffusion and reconstruction baselines. No direct diagnostics are described (e.g., mutual information between latents and metadata, linear probing of metadata from frozen representations, or invariance metrics under metadata swaps), leaving open alternative explanations such as richer conditioning signals or optimization differences.
[Abstract] Abstract / Evaluations: The statement of 'consistent evidence' from 'extensive evaluations and ablations' on 7 tasks provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, dataset splits, or ablation tables in the summary, undermining the ability to judge effect sizes, statistical reliability, or whether improvements generalize beyond the specific 24 datasets.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The GitHub link in the abstract should be verified for permanent accessibility and inclusion of all training scripts, hyperparameters, and dataset preprocessing details.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions that will be incorporated into the next version of the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and evidence.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim that metadata-conditioned pretraining 'disentangles intrinsic neural dynamics from population-level variability' is supported only by downstream performance deltas over unconditioned diffusion and reconstruction baselines. No direct diagnostics are described (e.g., mutual information between latents and metadata, linear probing of metadata from frozen representations, or invariance metrics under metadata swaps), leaving open alternative explanations such as richer conditioning signals or optimization differences.

Authors: We agree that the original claim would be more robust with direct supporting diagnostics rather than relying solely on downstream performance. In the revised manuscript we have added two new analyses: (1) linear probing experiments that attempt to recover metadata variables from frozen representations with and without conditioning, and (2) invariance metrics computed under controlled metadata swaps. These results are presented in a new subsection of the experimental analysis and are summarized briefly in the updated abstract. The added evidence shows that metadata conditioning reduces the predictability of population-level factors while preserving task-relevant information, thereby addressing the alternative explanations raised. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / Evaluations: The statement of 'consistent evidence' from 'extensive evaluations and ablations' on 7 tasks provides no quantitative metrics, error bars, dataset splits, or ablation tables in the summary, undermining the ability to judge effect sizes, statistical reliability, or whether improvements generalize beyond the specific 24 datasets.

Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract as written does not convey quantitative details. We have revised the abstract to include concise statements of key effect sizes (average improvement and standard deviation across the seven tasks), explicit reference to the cross-dataset evaluation protocol, and pointers to the ablation tables and error-bar results that appear in the main text. These changes allow readers to immediately assess magnitude and reliability while preserving the abstract's brevity; full numerical results, splits, and statistical tests remain in Sections 4 and 5 and the supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical claims rest on observed performance, not definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper advances no mathematical derivation chain or equations. Its headline result—that metadata-conditioned diffusion pretraining disentangles intrinsic dynamics from population variability—is an interpretive gloss on measured downstream gains across 7 tasks and ablations. This interpretation does not reduce by construction to any fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz; the performance deltas are external observables. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described methodology. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger reflects the high-level approach described; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named, but the method implicitly relies on standard transformer and diffusion assumptions.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Diffusion models can learn useful multi-scale representations from fMRI time series when conditioned on metadata.
Central to the claimed advantage over reconstruction pretraining.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5550 in / 1266 out tokens · 29054 ms · 2026-05-10T15:27:23.269983+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Pretraining Induces a Reusable Spectral Basis for Downstream Task Adaptation
cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Pretraining induces stable leading singular vectors that form a reusable spectral basis inherited by downstream tasks, enabling competitive performance with 0.2% trainable parameters on GLUE.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Nature neuroscience25(1), 116– 126 (2022)

Allen, E.J., St-Yves, G., Wu, Y., Breedlove, J.L., Prince, J.S., Dowdle, L.T., Nau, M., Caron, B., Pestilli, F., Charest, I., et al.: A massive 7T fMRI dataset to bridge cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Nature neuroscience25(1), 116– 126 (2022)

2022
[2]

De- velopmental cognitive neuroscience32, 43–54 (2018)

Casey,B.J.,Cannonier,T.,Conley,M.I.,Cohen,A.O.,Barch,D.M.,Heitzeg,M.M., Soules, M.E., Teslovich, T., Dellarco, D.V., Garavan, H., et al.: The adolescent brain cognitive development (abcd) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites. De- velopmental cognitive neuroscience32, 43–54 (2018)

2018
[3]

Molecular psychiatry19(6), 659–667 (2014)

Di Martino, A., Yan, C.G., Li, Q., Denio, E., Castellanos, F.X., Alaerts, K., An- derson, J.S., Assaf, M., Bookheimer, S.Y., Dapretto, M., et al.: The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain ar- chitecture in autism. Molecular psychiatry19(6), 659–667 (2014)

2014
[4]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 86048–86073 (2024)

Dong, Z., Li, R., Wu, Y., Nguyen, T.T., Chong, J., Ji, F., Tong, N., Chen, C., Zhou, J.H.: Brain-jepa: Brain dynamics foundation model with gradient positioning and spatiotemporal masking. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 86048–86073 (2024)

2024
[5]

CineBrain: A large-scale multi-modal brain dataset during naturalistic audiovisual narrative pro- cessing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06940, 2025

Gao, J., Liu, Y., Yang, B., Feng, J., Fu, Y.: Cinebrain: A large-scale multi-modal brain dataset during naturalistic audiovisual narrative processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06940 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

Scientific Data9(1), 286 (2022)

Gao,P.,Dong,H.M.,Liu,S.M.,Fan,X.R.,Jiang,C.,Wang,Y.S.,Margulies,D.,Li, H.F., Zuo, X.N.: A chinese multi-modal neuroimaging data release for increasing diversity of human brain mapping. Scientific Data9(1), 286 (2022)

2022
[7]

Nature Neuroscience26(1), 163–172 (2023)

Ge, J., Yang, G., Han, M., Zhou, S., Men, W., Qin, L., Lyu, B., Li, H., Wang, H., Rao, H., et al.: Increasing diversity in connectomics with the chinese human connectome project. Nature Neuroscience26(1), 163–172 (2023)

2023
[8]

simultaneous eeg and fmri signals during sleep from humans

Gu, Y., Han, F., Sainburg, L.E., Schade, M.M., Liu, X.: "simultaneous eeg and fmri signals during sleep from humans" (2026).https://doi.org/doi:10.18112/ openneuro.ds003768.v1.0.13

2026
[9]

Scientific data3(1), 160092 (2016)

Hanke, M., Adelhöfer, N., Kottke, D., Iacovella, V., Sengupta, A., Kaule, F.R., Nigbur, R., Waite, A.Q., Baumgartner, F., Stadler, J.: A studyforrest extension, simultaneous fmri and eye gaze recordings during prolonged natural stimulation. Scientific data3(1), 160092 (2016)

2016
[10]

Elife12, e82580 (2023)

Hebart, M.N., Contier, O., Teichmann, L., Rockter, A.H., Zheng, C.Y., Kidder, A., Corriveau, A., Vaziri-Pashkam, M., Baker, C.I.: Things-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior. Elife12, e82580 (2023)

2023
[11]

Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al.: The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods

Jack Jr, C.R., Bernstein, M.A., Fox, N.C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P.J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al.: The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods. Journal of Magnetic Reso- nance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Res- onance in Medicine27(4), 685–691 (2008)

2008
[12]

Scientific data4(1), 170017 (2017)

Liu, W., Wei, D., Chen, Q., Yang, W., Meng, J., Wu, G., Bi, T., Zhang, Q., Zuo, X.N., Qiu, J.: Longitudinal test-retest neuroimaging data from healthy young adults in southwest china. Scientific data4(1), 170017 (2017)

2017
[13]

In2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

Luo, Y., Kobayashi, I.: Brainlm: Estimation of brain activity evoked linguistic stimuli utilizing large language models. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). pp. 1904–1909 (2023).https://doi.org/ 10.1109/SMC53992.2023.10394227 10 J. Xia et al

work page doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10394227 2023
[14]

Progress in neurobiology95(4), 629–635 (2011)

Marek, K., Jennings, D., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A., Tanner, C., Simuni, T., Coffey, C., Kieburtz, K., Flagg, E., Chowdhury, S., et al.: The parkinson progression marker initiative (ppmi). Progress in neurobiology95(4), 629–635 (2011)

2011
[15]

Frontiers in Systems NeuroscienceV olume 6 - 2012(2012)

Milham, M.P., Fair, D., Mennes, M., Mostofsky, S.H.: The adhd-200 consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuro- science. Frontiers in Systems NeuroscienceV olume 6 - 2012(2012)

2012
[16]

Scientific Data12(1), 684 (2025)

Morgenroth, E., Moia, S., Vilaclara, L., Fournier, R., Muszynski, M., Ploumit- sakou, M., Almató-Bellavista, M., Vuilleumier, P., Van De Ville, D.: Emo-film: a multimodal dataset for affective neuroscience using naturalistic stimuli. Scientific Data12(1), 684 (2025)

2025
[17]

Mukhopadhyay, S., Gwilliam, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Agarwal, V., Padmanabhan, N., Swaminathan,A.,Zhou,T.,Ohya,J.,Shrivastava,A.:Dotext-freediffusionmodels learn discriminative visual representations? In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 253–272. Springer (2024)

2024
[18]

Nature communications11(1), 1142 (2020)

Nakai, T., Nishimoto, S.: Quantitative models reveal the organization of diverse cognitive functions in the brain. Nature communications11(1), 1142 (2020)

2020
[19]

IScience23(1) (2020)

Nemati, S., Akiki, T.J., Roscoe, J., Ju, Y., Averill, C.L., Fouda, S., Dutta, A., McKie, S., Krystal, J.H., Deakin, J.W., et al.: A unique brain connectome finger- print predates and predicts response to antidepressants. IScience23(1) (2020)

2020
[20]

Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry47, e20243867 (2025)

de Oliveira, I.P., Fernandéz, A.C., Salum, G.A., Gadelha, A., Pan, P.M., Miguel, E.C.,Mograbi,D.C.,Bado,P.:Longitudinalpatternsofdisorderedeatingbehaviors in children and adolescents from the brazilian high-risk cohort study for mental conditions. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry47, e20243867 (2025)

2025
[21]

In: International Workshop on Human Brain and Artificial Intelligence

Qu, Y., Xia, J., Jian, X., Li, W., Peng, K., Liang, Z., Wu, H., Liu, Q.: Uncover- ing cognitive taskonomy through transfer learning in masked autoencoder-based fmri reconstruction. In: International Workshop on Human Brain and Artificial Intelligence. pp. 35–50. Springer (2024)

2024
[22]

Cerebral cortex28(9), 3095–3114 (2018)

Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E.M., Laumann, T.O., Zuo, X.N., Holmes, A.J., Eickhoff, S.B., Yeo, B.T.: Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity mri. Cerebral cortex28(9), 3095–3114 (2018)

2018
[23]

Scientific data8(1), 85 (2021)

Snoek, L., van der Miesen, M.M., Beemsterboer, T., Van Der Leij, A., Eigenhuis, A., Steven Scholte, H.: The amsterdam open mri collection, a set of multimodal mri datasets for individual difference analyses. Scientific data8(1), 85 (2021)

2021
[24]

Scientific Data10(1), 554 (2023)

Telesford, Q.K., Gonzalez-Moreira, E., Xu, T., Tian, Y., Colcombe, S.J., Cloud, J., Russ, B.E., Falchier, A., Nentwich, M., Madsen, J., et al.: An open-access dataset of naturalistic viewing using simultaneous eeg-fmri. Scientific Data10(1), 554 (2023)

2023
[25]

Neuroimage80, 62–79 (2013)

Van Essen, D.C., Smith, S.M., Barch, D.M., Behrens, T.E., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K., Consortium, W.M.H., et al.: The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An Overview. Neuroimage80, 62–79 (2013)

2013
[26]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.21881 (2025)

Wang, M., Xia, J., Ye, W., Liu, E., Peng, K., Feng, J., Liu, Q., Wen, H.: SLIM- Brain: A Data-and Training-Efficient Foundation Model for fMRI Data Analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.21881 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Scientific Data5(1), 180134 (Jul 2018)

Wei, D., Zhuang, K., Ai, L., Chen, Q., Yang, W., Liu, W., Wang, K., Sun, J., Qiu, J.: Structural and functional brain scans from the cross-sectional Southwest University adult lifespan dataset. Scientific Data5(1), 180134 (Jul 2018)

2018
[28]

IEEE transactions on medical imaging43(11), 4004–4016 (2024)

Yang, Y., Ye, C., Su, G., Zhang, Z., Chang, Z., Chen, H., Chan, P., Yu, Y., Ma, T.: Brainmass: Advancing brain network analysis for diagnosis with large-scale self-supervised learning. IEEE transactions on medical imaging43(11), 4004–4016 (2024)

2024