pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15598 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌊 nlin.CG · q-bio.QM· stat.AP

Recognition: unknown

When do trajectories matter? Identifiability analysis for stochastic transport phenomena

Matthew J Simpson, Michael J Plank

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CG q-bio.QMstat.AP
keywords stochastic transportidentifiability analysisrandom walkdiffusiontrajectory datacount datapopulation dispersalmean-field approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

In stochastic diffusion models, count data from fixed regions can fail to uniquely identify parameters due to structural non-identifiability, but trajectory data resolves it.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a lattice-based random walk model for population dispersal and tests how well different data types pin down the underlying parameters. It shows that count data collected over fixed sampling areas sometimes produces structural non-identifiability, where distinct parameter combinations generate identical observations. Adding data on individual movement paths removes this ambiguity and lets the model parameters be estimated reliably. The work also compares several protocols for collecting trajectory data to show how design choices affect the precision of those estimates.

Core claim

For the lattice-based random walk and its mean-field approximation, likelihood-based identifiability analysis reveals that count data alone can be structurally non-identifiable for some experimental designs, while supplementing with trajectory data makes the parameters identifiable and allows comparison of practical identifiability across different trajectory collection schemes.

What carries the argument

Likelihood-based estimation combined with structural identifiability checks on the random walk model and its mean-field PDE limit, using both agent-based simulations and analytical approximations.

If this is right

  • Model parameters become estimable when trajectory data supplement count data.
  • Different protocols for recording trajectories change the resulting precision of parameter estimates.
  • Predictions from the fitted model improve once identifiability is achieved.
  • The same analysis framework can be applied to other experimental layouts to test identifiability before data collection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Researchers modeling cell or animal movement may need to collect at least some individual paths rather than relying solely on population snapshots.
  • The non-identifiability result could extend to continuous-space diffusion models if similar count-based sampling is used.
  • Open implementations of the estimation and identifiability routines make it straightforward to test the same question on new data sets.
  • The trade-off between count data volume and trajectory data volume could be optimized for cost in field studies.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice-based random walk and its mean-field PDE are assumed to correctly represent the real stochastic transport process for the designs being studied.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which count data alone produces a unique maximum-likelihood estimate with narrow confidence intervals while the true parameters are known would show that the claimed structural non-identifiability does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15598 by Matthew J Simpson, Michael J Plank.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic snapshot of a random walk process involving a population of individuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Visualization of the random walk model. Snapshots in the left column correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Continuum-discrete comparison for the simulation data from Figure 2. Profiles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Estimation and identifiability for unbiased motility using data from Figure 2. (a)– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Likelihood-based prediction for unbiased motion with data taken from Figure 2(e) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stochastic models of diffusion are routinely used to study dispersal of populations, including populations of animals, plants, seeds and cells. Advances in imaging and field measurement technologies mean that data are often collected across a range of scales, including count data collected across a series of fixed sampling regions to characterize population-level dispersal, as well as individual trajectory data to examine at the motion of individuals within a diffusive population. In this work we consider a lattice-based random walk model and examine the extent to which model parameters can be determined by collecting count data and/or trajectory data. Our analysis combines agent-based stochastic simulations, mean-field partial differential equation approximations, likelihood-based estimation, identifiability analysis, and model-based prediction. These combined tools reveal that working with count data alone can sometimes lead to challenges involving structural non-identifiability that can be alleviated by collecting trajectory data. Furthermore, these tools allow us to explore how different experimental designs impact inferential precision by comparing how different trajectory data collection protocols affects practical identifiability. Open source implementations of all algorithms used in this work are available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines identifiability in a lattice-based random walk model of stochastic transport/diffusion. It combines agent-based stochastic simulations, mean-field PDE approximations, likelihood estimation, and identifiability analysis to show that count data alone can produce structural non-identifiability in some regimes, which is alleviated by adding trajectory data; it also compares how different trajectory sampling protocols affect practical identifiability.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work offers practical guidance on experimental design for dispersal studies in ecology, cell biology, and related fields by clarifying when trajectory data is required for reliable parameter recovery. The open-source GitHub implementations of the simulation, estimation, and identifiability algorithms are a clear strength, supporting reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [identifiability analysis / methods] The structural non-identifiability conclusions appear to be obtained via likelihood analysis on the mean-field PDE approximation (abstract and methods description). However, the data-generating process is the discrete stochastic lattice random walk; it is not shown whether the degeneracy structure diagnosed in the continuum limit is preserved under the exact stochastic likelihood (including finite-population fluctuations). This is load-bearing for the claim that trajectory data alleviates non-identifiability for the model under study.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that 'open source implementations of all algorithms used in this work are available on GitHub' but does not provide the repository URL or commit hash; this should be added for immediate reproducibility.
  2. Clarify the precise definition of 'structural non-identifiability' versus 'practical non-identifiability' used in the analysis, and state explicitly whether the former is diagnosed symbolically on the PDE or via profile-likelihood on simulated data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important methodological point. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The structural non-identifiability conclusions appear to be obtained via likelihood analysis on the mean-field PDE approximation (abstract and methods description). However, the data-generating process is the discrete stochastic lattice random walk; it is not shown whether the degeneracy structure diagnosed in the continuum limit is preserved under the exact stochastic likelihood (including finite-population fluctuations). This is load-bearing for the claim that trajectory data alleviates non-identifiability for the model under study.

    Authors: We agree that the structural identifiability analysis relies on the mean-field PDE approximation rather than the exact stochastic likelihood. This choice was made because the exact likelihood for the full lattice random walk is intractable for the population sizes considered, owing to the combinatorial explosion of the state space. The mean-field limit provides the appropriate deterministic setting in which to diagnose structural non-identifiability. In the manuscript we already complement this analysis with agent-based stochastic simulations that demonstrate the same practical estimation difficulties with count data and their alleviation by trajectory data. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that (i) explicitly states the scope of the structural analysis, (ii) derives the mean-field limit from the underlying stochastic process, and (iii) presents additional numerical comparisons of profile-likelihood contours obtained from stochastic realizations against the mean-field predictions, thereby confirming that the degeneracy structure carries over to the discrete stochastic setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: identifiability conclusions derived from external simulations and likelihood analysis

full rationale

The paper applies agent-based stochastic simulations, mean-field PDE approximations, likelihood-based estimation, and identifiability analysis to compare count data versus trajectory data. These are independent computational and statistical tools applied to the lattice random walk model, not reductions of the target claim to fitted parameters or self-citations defined by the claim itself. The abstract and description contain no self-definitional steps, no renaming of known results as new predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations that collapse the central result. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks (simulations and profile likelihood), consistent with a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the chosen stochastic model class and mean-field limit are appropriate for the dispersal phenomena studied; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • random walk jump probabilities or diffusion coefficients
    These are the target parameters whose identifiability is being tested; their values are fitted from data in the analysis.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The lattice-based random walk accurately captures the stochastic transport process
    Invoked throughout the model setup and mean-field approximation.
  • domain assumption Mean-field PDE provides a valid deterministic approximation to the stochastic agent-based model
    Used to support analytical identifiability insights alongside simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5493 in / 1318 out tokens · 30954 ms · 2026-05-10T08:00:21.874724+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance

    Mantegna RN, Stanley HE. Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755767

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755767 1999

  2. [2]

    Cambri dge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Redner S. A Guide to First-Passage Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606014

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606014 2001

  3. [3]

    An Introduction , 3rd edn

    Murray JD. Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction. vol. 17 of Interdisciplinary Ap- plied Mathematics. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2002. doi:10.1007/b98868

    work page doi:10.1007/b98868 2002

  4. [4]

    Random Walks in Biology

    Berg HC. Random Walks in Biology. Expanded ed. Princeton University Press; 1983

    1983

  5. [5]

    Random walk models in biology

    Codling EA, Plank MJ, Benhamou S. Random walk models in biology. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2008;5:813-34. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 2008

  6. [6]

    Random walk models in the life sciences: in- cluding births, deaths and local interactions

    Plank MJ, Simpson MJ, Baker RE. Random walk models in the life sciences: in- cluding births, deaths and local interactions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2025;22(222):20240422. doi:10.1098/rsif.2024.0422

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2024.0422 2025

  7. [7]

    Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives

    Okubo A, Levin SA. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2001. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4978-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4978-6 2001

  8. [8]

    Lattice population dynamics for plants with dispersing seeds and vegetative propagation

    Harada Y, Iwasa Y. Lattice population dynamics for plants with dispersing seeds and vegetative propagation. Researches on Population Ecology. 1994;36:237-49. doi:10.1007/BF02514940

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02514940 1994

  9. [9]

    A mechanistic simulation model of seed dispersal by animals

    Will H, Tackenberg O. A mechanistic simulation model of seed dispersal by animals. Journal of Ecology. 2008;96(5):1011-22. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01341.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01341.x 2008

  10. [10]

    Mechanistic models of seed dispersal by animals

    Morales JM, Mor´ an L´ opez T. Mechanistic models of seed dispersal by animals. Oikos. 2022;2022(2):e08328. doi:10.1111/oik.08328. 36

    work page doi:10.1111/oik.08328 2022

  11. [11]

    Stochastic Modelling of Reaction–Diffusion Processes; 2020

    Erban R, Chapman SJ. Stochastic Modelling of Reaction–Diffusion Processes; 2020. doi:10.1017/9781108628389

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108628389 2020

  12. [12]

    Modeling and simulating chemical reactions

    Higham DJ. Modeling and simulating chemical reactions. SIAM Review. 2008;50(2):347-

    2008

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1137/060666457

    work page doi:10.1137/060666457

  14. [14]

    Quan- tifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay

    Simpson MJ, Treloar KK, Binder BJ, Haridas P, Manton KJ, Leavesley DI, et al. Quan- tifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2013;10(82):20130007. doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0007

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0007 2013

  15. [15]

    Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial ex- pansion of melanoma cell colonies

    Treloar KK, Simpson MJ, Haridas P, Manton KJ, Leavesley DI, McElwain DLS, et al. Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial ex- pansion of melanoma cell colonies. BMC Systems Biology. 2013;7:137. doi:10.1186/1752- 0509-7-137

    work page doi:10.1186/1752- 2013

  16. [16]

    A review of estimating animal abundance

    Seber GAF. A review of estimating animal abundance. Biometrics. 1986;42(2):267-92. doi:10.2307/2531049

    work page doi:10.2307/2531049 1986

  17. [17]

    Choice of size and number of quadrats to estimate density and fre- quency in Poisson and binomially dispersed populations

    Swindel BF. Choice of size and number of quadrats to estimate density and fre- quency in Poisson and binomially dispersed populations. Biometrics. 1983;39(2):455-64. doi:10.2307/2531018

    work page doi:10.2307/2531018 1983

  18. [18]

    Rapid behavioral matura- tion accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies

    Perry CJ, Søvik E, Myerscough MR, Barron AB. Rapid behavioral matura- tion accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112(11):3427-32. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422089112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1422089112 2015

  19. [19]

    The pattern of neural crest advance in the cecum and colon

    Druckenbrod NR, Epstein ML. The pattern of neural crest advance in the cecum and colon. Developmental Biology. 2005;287(1):125-33. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.040 2005

  20. [20]

    Behavior of enteric neural crest-derived cells varies with respect to the migratory wavefront

    Druckenbrod NR, Epstein ML. Behavior of enteric neural crest-derived cells varies with respect to the migratory wavefront. Developmental Dynamics. 2007;236(1):84-92. doi:10.1002/dvdy.20974

    work page doi:10.1002/dvdy.20974 2007

  21. [21]

    Design and interpretation of cell tra- jectory assays

    Bowden LG, Simpson MJ, Baker RE. Design and interpretation of cell tra- jectory assays. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2013;10(88):20130630. doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0630. 37

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0630 2013

  22. [22]

    Multi-scale modeling of a wound- healing cell migration assay

    Cai AQ, Landman KA, Hughes BD. Multi-scale modeling of a wound- healing cell migration assay. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2007;245(3):576-94. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.024 2007

  23. [23]

    Cell migration and proliferation during monolayer formation and wound healing

    Tremel A, Cai A, Tirtaatmadja N, Hughes BD, Stevens GW, Landman KA, et al. Cell migration and proliferation during monolayer formation and wound healing. Chemical Engineering Science. 2009;64:247-53. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.008 2009

  24. [24]

    Migration of individual microvessel en- dothelial cells: stochastic model and parameter measurement

    Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA, Williams SK. Migration of individual microvessel en- dothelial cells: stochastic model and parameter measurement. Journal of Cell Science. 1991;99(2):419-30. doi:10.1242/jcs.99.2.419

    work page doi:10.1242/jcs.99.2.419 1991

  25. [25]

    Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothelial cell random motility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis

    Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA. Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothelial cell random motility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1991;152(3):377-403. doi:10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80201-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80201-2 1991

  26. [26]

    GDNF is a chemoattractant for enteric neural cells

    Young HM, Hearn CJ, Farlie PG, Canty AJ, Thomas PQ, Newgreen DF. GDNF is a chemoattractant for enteric neural cells. Developmental Biology. 2001;229(2):503-16. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0100

    work page doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.0100 2001

  27. [27]

    Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the Escherichia coli biofilm matrix

    Birjiniuk A, Billings N, Nance E, Hanes J, Ribbeck K, Doyle PS. Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the Escherichia coli biofilm matrix. New Journal of Physics. 2014;16(8):085014. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/085014

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/8/085014 2014

  28. [28]

    Bio- physical aspects underlying the swarm to biofilm transition

    Worlitzer VM, Jose A, Grinberg I, B¨ ar M, Heidenreich S, Eldar A, et al. Bio- physical aspects underlying the swarm to biofilm transition. Science Advances. 2022;8(24):eabn8152. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn8152

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abn8152 2022

  29. [29]

    Flexible continuous-time modelling for heterogeneous animal movement

    Harris KJ, Blackwell PG. Flexible continuous-time modelling for heterogeneous animal movement. Ecological Modelling. 2013;255:29-37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.01.020 2013

  30. [30]

    State-space models of individual animal move- ment,

    Patterson TA, Thomas L, Wilcox C, Ovaskainen O, Matthiopoulos J. State-space mod- els of individual animal movement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2008;23:87-94. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 2008

  31. [31]

    Tracking butterfly movements with harmonic radar reveals an effect of population age on movement distance

    Ovaskainen O, Smith AD, Osborne JL, Reynolds DR, Carreck NL, Martin AP, et al. Tracking butterfly movements with harmonic radar reveals an effect of population age on movement distance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(49):19090-5. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802066105. 38

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0802066105 2008

  32. [32]

    Diffusion of indi- vidual birds in starling flocks

    Cavagna A, Duarte Queir´ os SM, Giardina I, Stefanini F, Viale M. Diffusion of indi- vidual birds in starling flocks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013;280(1756):20122484. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2484

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2484 2013

  33. [33]

    Determination of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biophysical models: A Bayesian approach

    Hines KE, Middendorf TR, Aldrich RW. Determination of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biophysical models: A Bayesian approach. Journal of General Physiology. 2014;143(4):401-16. doi:10.1085/jgp.201311116

    work page doi:10.1085/jgp.201311116 2014

  34. [34]

    On structural and practical identifiability

    Wieland FG, Hauber AL, Rosenblatt M, T¨ onsing C, Timmer J. On structural and practical identifiability. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. 2021;25:60-9. doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.005 2021

  35. [35]

    On structural and practical identifiability: Current status and update of results

    Heinrich M, Rosenblatt M, Wieland FG, Stigter H, Timmer J. On structural and practical identifiability: Current status and update of results. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. 2025;41:100546. doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100546

    work page doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100546 2025

  36. [36]

    Parameter identifiability, parameter estimation and model prediction for differential equation models

    Simpson MJ, Baker RE. Parameter identifiability, parameter estimation and model prediction for differential equation models. SIAM Review. 2026;68:153-71. doi:10.1137/24M1667968

    work page doi:10.1137/24m1667968 2026

  37. [37]

    A Bayesian computational approach to explore the optimal duration of a cell proliferation assay

    Browning AP, McCue SW, Simpson MJ. A Bayesian computational approach to explore the optimal duration of a cell proliferation assay. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2017;79:1888-906. doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0311-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538-017-0311-4 2017

  38. [38]

    Bayesian inference of agent-based models: a tool for studying kidney branching morphogenesis

    Lambert B, MacLean AL, Fletcher AG, Coombes AN, Little MH, Byrne HM. Bayesian inference of agent-based models: a tool for studying kidney branching morphogenesis. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 2018;76:1673-97. doi:10.1007/s00285-018-1208-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00285-018-1208-z 2018

  39. [39]

    Inference and prediction for stochastic models of biological pop- ulations undergoing migration and proliferation

    Simpson MJ, Plank MJ. Inference and prediction for stochastic models of biological pop- ulations undergoing migration and proliferation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2025;22(231):20250536. doi:10.1098/rsif.2025.0536

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2025.0536 2025

  40. [40]

    Multi-species simple exclusion pro- cesses

    Simpson MJ, Landman KA, Hughes BD. Multi-species simple exclusion pro- cesses. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2009;388(4):399-406. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.10.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.10.038 2009

  41. [41]

    In: Dancer, A., Garc´ıa-Prada, O., Kirwan, F

    Pawitan Y. In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood. Oxford Science Publications; 2001. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198507659.001.0001. 39

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198507659.001.0001 2001

  42. [42]

    Random dispersal in theoretical populations

    Skellam JG. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika. 1951;38(1–2):196-

    1951

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.196

    work page doi:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.196

  44. [44]

    Mathematical Models in Biology

    Edelstein-Keshet L. Mathematical Models in Biology. vol. 46. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2005

    2005

  45. [45]

    Elements of Mathematical Ecology

    Kot M. Elements of Mathematical Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001

    2001

  46. [46]

    Traveling waves in a coarse-grained model of volume-filling cell invasion: Simulations and comparisons

    Crossley RM, Maini PK, Lorenzi T, Baker RE. Traveling waves in a coarse-grained model of volume-filling cell invasion: Simulations and comparisons. Studies in Applied Mathematics. 2023;151(4):1471-97. doi:10.1111/sapm.12635

    work page doi:10.1111/sapm.12635 2023

  47. [47]

    Phenotypic switch- ing mechanisms determine the structure of cell migration into extracellular ma- trix under the ‘go-or-grow’ hypothesis

    Crossley RM, Painter KJ, Lorenzi T, Maini PK, Baker RE. Phenotypic switch- ing mechanisms determine the structure of cell migration into extracellular ma- trix under the ‘go-or-grow’ hypothesis. Mathematical Biosciences. 2024;374:109240. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109240

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109240 2024

  48. [48]

    Reconciling transport models across scales: The role of volume exclusion

    Taylor PR, Yates CA, Simpson MJ, Baker RE. Reconciling transport models across scales: The role of volume exclusion. Physical Review E. 2015;92(4):040701. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.92.040701

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.040701 2015

  49. [49]

    Physics of transport and traffic phenom- ena in biology: From molecular motors and cells to organisms

    Chowdhury D, Schadschneider A, Nishinari K. Physics of transport and traffic phenom- ena in biology: From molecular motors and cells to organisms. Physics of Life Reviews. 2005;2:318-52. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2005.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2005.09.001 2005

  50. [50]

    A one-dimensional model of cell diffusion and aggregation, incorporating volume filling and cell-to-cell adhesion

    Anguige K, Schmeiser C. A one-dimensional model of cell diffusion and aggregation, incorporating volume filling and cell-to-cell adhesion. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 2009;58(3):395-427. doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0197-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0197-8 2009

  51. [51]

    Excluded-volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres

    Bruna M, Chapman SJ. Excluded-volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres. Phys- ical Review E. 2012;85(1):011103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.85.011103 2012

  52. [52]

    A stochastic model for wound healing

    Callaghan T, Khain E, Sander LM, Ziff RM. A stochastic model for wound healing. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2006;122(5):909-24. doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9022-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9022-1 2006

  53. [53]

    Modeling tumor cell migra- tion: From microscopic to macroscopic models

    Deroulers C, Aubert M, Badoual M, Grammaticos B. Modeling tumor cell migra- tion: From microscopic to macroscopic models. Physical Review E. 2009;79(3):031917. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031917. 40

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.79.031917 2009

  54. [54]

    Multicellular computer simulation of morphogenesis: blastocoel roof thinning and matrix assembly in Xenopus laevis

    Longo D, Peirce SM, Skalak TC, Davidson L, Marsden M, Dzamba B, et al. Multicellular computer simulation of morphogenesis: blastocoel roof thinning and matrix assembly in Xenopus laevis. Developmental Biology. 2004;271(1):210-22. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.021 2004

  55. [55]

    Rec- onciling diverse mammalian pigmentation patterns with a fundamental mathematical model

    Mort RL, Ross RJH, Hainey KJ, Harrison OJ, Keighren MA, Landini G, et al. Rec- onciling diverse mammalian pigmentation patterns with a fundamental mathematical model. Nature Communications. 2016;7:10288. doi:10.1038/ncomms10288

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms10288 2016

  56. [56]

    Volume-filling and quorum-sensing in models for chemosensitive movement

    Painter KJ, Hillen T. Volume-filling and quorum-sensing in models for chemosensitive movement. Canadian Applied Mathematics Quarterly. 2002;10(4):501-43

    2002

  57. [57]

    Modelling stripe formation in zebrafish: an agent- based approach

    Volkening A, Sandstede B. Modelling stripe formation in zebrafish: an agent- based approach. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2015;12(112):20150812. doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0812

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0812 2015

  58. [58]

    From individual to collective behavior in bacte- rial chemotaxis

    Erban R, Othmer HG. From individual to collective behavior in bacte- rial chemotaxis. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2004;65(1):361-91. doi:10.1137/S003613990343241X

    work page doi:10.1137/s003613990343241x 2004

  59. [59]

    The diffusion limit of transport equations derived from velocity-jump processes

    Hillen T, Othmer HG. The diffusion limit of transport equations derived from velocity-jump processes. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2000;61(3):751-75. doi:10.1137/S0036139999358167

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036139999358167 2000

  60. [60]

    Lattice and non-lattice models of tumour angiogenesis

    Plank MJ, Sleeman BD. Lattice and non-lattice models of tumour angiogenesis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2004;66(6):1785-819. doi:10.1016/j.bulm.2004.04.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bulm.2004.04.001 2004

  61. [61]

    Random walks of swarming on monotonic resource distri- bution in a landscape

    Shi Z, Jiang D, Wang H. Random walks of swarming on monotonic resource distri- bution in a landscape. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2025;85(3):1287-313. doi:10.1137/24M1708826

    work page doi:10.1137/24m1708826 2025

  62. [62]

    The derivation of chemotaxis equations as limit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particle systems

    Stevens A. The derivation of chemotaxis equations as limit dynamics of moderately interacting stochastic many-particle systems. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2000;61:183-212. doi:10.1137/S0036139998342065

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036139998342065 2000

  63. [63]

    The role of cell-cell adhesion in wound healing

    Khain E, Sander LM, Schneider-Mizell CM. The role of cell-cell adhesion in wound healing. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2007;128:209-18. doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9194- 8. 41

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-006-9194- 2007

  64. [64]

    Modelling count data with partial differ- ential equation models in biology

    Simpson MJ, Murphy RJ, Maclaren OJ. Modelling count data with partial differ- ential equation models in biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2024;580:111732. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111732

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111732 2024

  65. [65]

    Correcting mean-field approximations for birth-death-movement processes

    Baker RE, Simpson MJ. Correcting mean-field approximations for birth-death-movement processes. Physical Review E. 2010;82(4):041905. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.041905

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.82.041905 2010

  66. [66]

    Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales

    Ellner SP. Pair approximation for lattice models with multiple interaction scales. Jour- nal of Theoretical Biology. 2001;210(4):435-47. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2322

    work page doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2322 2001

  67. [67]

    Continuum models describing probabilistic motion of tagged agents in exclusion processes

    Plank MJ, Simpson MJ. Continuum models describing probabilistic motion of tagged agents in exclusion processes. Physical Review E. 2026;113:014137. doi:10.1103/lzqy- n5mw

    work page doi:10.1103/lzqy- 2026

  68. [68]

    Statistical Inference

    Casella G, Berger R. Statistical Inference. 2nd ed.; 2024. doi:10.1201/9781003456285

    work page doi:10.1201/9781003456285 2024

  69. [69]

    Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formu- las, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables

    Abramowitz M, Stegun IA, editors. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formu- las, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. vol. 55 of National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series; 1964

    1964

  70. [70]

    The Likelihood Test of Independence in Contingency Tables,

    Wilks SS. The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1938;9(1):60-2. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732360

    work page doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732360 1938

  71. [71]

    Profile likelihood for estimation and confidence intervals

    Royston P. Profile likelihood for estimation and confidence intervals. The Stata Journal. 2007;7(3):376-87. doi:10.1177/1536867X0700700305

    work page doi:10.1177/1536867x0700700305 2007

  72. [72]

    Making predictions using poorly identified mathematical models

    Simpson MJ, Maclaren OJ. Making predictions using poorly identified mathematical models. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2024;86(7):80. doi:10.1007/s11538-024-01294- 0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538-024-01294- 2024

  73. [73]

    Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription

    Miles CE. Incorporating spatial diffusion into models of bursty stochastic transcription. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2025;22(225):20240739. doi:10.1098/rsif.2024.0739

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2024.0739 2025

  74. [74]

    Pro- file likelihood-based parameter and predictive interval analysis guides model choice 42 for ecological population dynamics

    Simpson MJ, Walker SA, Studerus EN, McCue SW, Murphy RJ, Maclaren OJ. Pro- file likelihood-based parameter and predictive interval analysis guides model choice 42 for ecological population dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences. 2023;355:108950. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108950

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2022.108950 2023

  75. [75]

    What about the other intervals? The American Statistician

    Vardeman SB. What about the other intervals? The American Statistician. 1992;46(3):193-7. doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475882

    work page doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475882 1992

  76. [76]

    Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanis- tic mathematical models

    Simpson MJ, Maclaren OJ. Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanis- tic mathematical models. PLOS Computational Biology. 2023;19(9):e1011515. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515 2023

  77. [77]

    Likelihood-based inference, identifiability, and pre- diction using count data from lattice-based random walk models

    Liu Y, Warne DJ, Simpson MJ. Likelihood-based inference, identifiability, and pre- diction using count data from lattice-based random walk models. Physical Review E. 2024;110(4):044405. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.110.044405

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.110.044405 2024

  78. [78]

    DifferentialEquations.jl—A Performant and Feature-Rich Ecosystem for Solving Differential Equations in Julia,

    Rackauckas C, Nie Q. DifferentialEquations.jl: A performant and feature-rich ecosys- tem for solving differential equations in Julia. Journal of Open Research Software. 2017;5(1):15. doi:10.5334/jors.151. 43

    work page doi:10.5334/jors.151 2017