pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20792 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

Angus Spalding, Anish Ghoshal, Graham White

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords primordial gravitational wavesearly matter dominationlong-lived particlesbeyond standard modelstochastic backgroundcosmological particle detectionnanohertz signals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral features in any primordial gravitational wave background directly determine the mass and decay rate of long-lived beyond-Standard-Model particles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that primordial gravitational wave backgrounds carry two characteristic frequency imprints from any temporary early matter domination caused by long-lived particles. These frequencies are fixed by the particles' initial abundance, mass, and decay rate, allowing the spectrum to reveal the underlying Lagrangian parameters. The reconstruction works for every transient source of gravitational waves and requires no knowledge of how the waves were originally produced. This turns gravitational wave observations into a direct probe of particle physics that reaches parameter regions inaccessible to laboratory experiments, including those connected to reported nanohertz signals.

Core claim

Spectral features of primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds can directly reconstruct Lagrangian parameters of beyond-the-Standard-Model particles for any transient gravitational-wave production mechanism. Sufficiently long-lived particles generically induce a temporary period of early matter domination in the thermal history of the Universe, which imprints two characteristic frequencies in any primordial GWB corresponding to the onset and end of this epoch. These frequencies are determined by the initial abundance, mass, and decay rate of the species. Once the underlying model and initial abundance are specified, the observed spectral features directly determine the particle mass and the

What carries the argument

The pair of frequency breaks imprinted on a primordial gravitational wave spectrum by the beginning and end of an early matter-dominated epoch.

Load-bearing premise

Long-lived particles always produce a detectable temporary early matter domination that leaves two frequency features in any primordial gravitational wave background.

What would settle it

A measured primordial gravitational wave spectrum that shows no pair of frequency features even though long-lived particles with the required lifetime and abundance are known to have existed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20792 by Angus Spalding, Anish Ghoshal, Graham White.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that spectral features of primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds (GWB) can directly reconstruct \textit{Lagrangian} parameters of beyond-the-Standard-Model (BSM) particles, for any transient gravitational-wave production mechanism, independent of the specific source of gravitational waves. Sufficiently long-lived particles generically induce a temporary period of early matter domination in the thermal history of the Universe, which imprints two characteristic frequencies in any primordial GWB corresponding to the onset and end of this epoch. These frequencies are determined by the initial abundance, mass, and decay rate of the species. Once the underlying model and initial abundance are specified, the observed spectral features directly determine the particle mass and decay rate. We find that gravitational-wave observations probe regions of parameter space both complementary to and far beyond the reach of upcoming laboratory searches for long-lived particles. Remarkably, frequencies in the nanohertz band, where a stochastic signal has recently been reported by pulsar timing arrays, map directly onto decay lengths accessible in upcoming long-lived-particle (LLP) searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that spectral features of any primordial gravitational-wave background (GWB) encode the Lagrangian parameters (mass and decay rate) of long-lived BSM particles. Long-lived particles induce a temporary early matter-dominated era whose onset and end imprint two characteristic frequencies in the GWB spectrum; once the underlying model and initial abundance are fixed, these frequencies directly determine the particle parameters. The result is presented as independent of the specific transient GW production mechanism and is argued to probe parameter space complementary to and beyond upcoming LLP searches, with nanohertz frequencies mapping to decay lengths accessible in laboratory experiments.

Significance. If the central mapping holds, the work provides a novel, source-independent probe of BSM physics via GW observations. It would allow direct reconstruction of particle properties from spectral breaks and could link PTA signals to LLP phenomenology, extending sensitivity far beyond collider reach. The approach treats the irreducible GWB as a cosmological particle detector and supplies falsifiable frequency-to-parameter relations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1 (central claim): the assertion that the two characteristic frequencies appear 'in any primordial GWB' for 'any transient gravitational-wave production mechanism, independent of the specific source' is not generally valid. When GW production occurs after particle decay (t_prod > t_end), the relevant modes experience only standard radiation-dominated expansion and lack breaks at the frequencies tied to t_start and t_end. The imprint exists only for production preceding or overlapping the early MD epoch, requiring explicit qualification of the 'any' and 'independent' statements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.2] §2.2: the mapping from observed frequencies to mass and decay rate assumes a fixed initial abundance; clarify how uncertainties in this parameter propagate into the reconstructed Lagrangian values and whether the reconstruction remains unique.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the plotted spectra would benefit from explicit annotation of the two break frequencies and the corresponding particle parameters for each curve to aid direct comparison with the analytic expressions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need to qualify our central claim regarding the applicability of the spectral features. We agree that the imprint requires GW production to precede or overlap the early matter-dominated era and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1 (central claim): the assertion that the two characteristic frequencies appear 'in any primordial GWB' for 'any transient gravitational-wave production mechanism, independent of the specific source' is not generally valid. When GW production occurs after particle decay (t_prod > t_end), the relevant modes experience only standard radiation-dominated expansion and lack breaks at the frequencies tied to t_start and t_end. The imprint exists only for production preceding or overlapping the early MD epoch, requiring explicit qualification of the 'any' and 'independent' statements.

    Authors: We agree that the spectral breaks are imprinted only when GW production occurs before or during the temporary early matter-dominated era. Modes produced after particle decay (t_prod > t_end) evolve solely under radiation domination and do not exhibit the breaks at the frequencies set by t_start and t_end. We will revise the abstract and §1 to explicitly state that the result holds for any transient GW production mechanism with production preceding or overlapping the early MD epoch. Within this regime the frequency-to-parameter mapping remains independent of the specific source, since the features arise solely from the modified expansion history rather than the production details. This qualification preserves the source-independence of the probe while correcting the overstatement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation is self-contained in standard cosmology

full rationale

The paper derives that long-lived BSM particles induce a temporary early matter-dominated era whose onset and end imprint two characteristic frequencies on any primordial GWB spectrum. These frequencies are fixed by the particle's initial abundance, mass, and decay rate through the standard Friedmann equation and radiation-to-matter transition timing; the observed breaks then invert to recover the mass and decay rate. This chain uses only general-relativistic expansion history and does not fit parameters to the target GWB data, rename known results, or rely on self-citations for load-bearing uniqueness theorems. The claim of independence from the specific transient GW source follows from the fact that the MD epoch alters the scale-factor evolution for all modes that re-enter during or before that epoch, which is a direct consequence of the background cosmology rather than an ansatz or fitted input. No step reduces by construction to its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard early-universe cosmology plus the assumption that long-lived particles produce a detectable matter-dominated phase; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • initial abundance
    Must be specified by the user before the observed frequencies can be converted into mass and decay rate.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Long-lived particles generically induce a temporary period of early matter domination
    Invoked in the abstract as the mechanism that imprints the two characteristic frequencies.
  • domain assumption The gravitational-wave background is primordial and contains measurable spectral features from the matter-dominated epoch
    Required for the frequencies to be observable and mappable to particle parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5479 in / 1433 out tokens · 49163 ms · 2026-05-09T23:40:41.610892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Imprint of domain wall annihilation on induced gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Domain wall annihilation imprints a two-peaked spectrum on induced gravitational waves via an early matter-dominated phase and entropy dilution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This factor is therefore 1 for radiation domination and early matter domination is 9/16 so is anO(1) correction to the am- plitude

    As the return to radiation domination occurs from decays this is an accurate approximation 78. This factor is therefore 1 for radiation domination and early matter domination is 9/16 so is anO(1) correction to the am- plitude. The final form of the equation is found by the addition of this factor to Eq 13, ΩGW (af , f) = Ω RD GW C(w)Exp "Z lna f lna ent(f...

  2. [2]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 163001 (2018), ISSN 1361-6382, URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aac608

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aac608 2018

  3. [3]

    Bin´ etruy, A

    P. Bin´ etruy, A. Boh´ e, C. Caprini, and J.-F. Dufaux, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012, 027–027 (2012), ISSN 1475-7516, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/027

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/027 2012

  4. [4]

    Roshan and G

    R. Roshan and G. White, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 015001 (2025), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.97.015001

    2025

  5. [5]

    van Remortel, K

    N. van Remortel, K. Janssens, and K. Turbang, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics128, 104003 (2023), ISSN 0146-6410, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ppnp.2022.104003

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , author =

    N. Christensen, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 016903 (2018), ISSN 1361-6633, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1361-6633/aae6b5

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae6b5 2018

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), 1602.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241103 (2016), 1606.04855

    work page arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)], 1706.01812

    work page arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    B. . P. . Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astro- phys. J. Lett.851, L35 (2017), 1711.05578

    work page arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 141101 (2017), 1709.09660

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), 1710.05832

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Badurina, O

    L. Badurina, O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, C. McCabe, and V. Vaskonen, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.380, 20210060 (2021), 2108.02468

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, and S. Ra- jendran, Phys. Rev. D94, 104022 (2016), 1606.01860

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    P. W. Graham, J. M. Hogan, M. A. Kasevich, S. Rajen- dran, and R. W. Romani (MAGIS) (2017), 1711.02225

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Badurina et al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), 1911.11755

    L. Badurina et al., JCAP05, 011 (2020), 1911.11755

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Punturo et al., Class

    M. Punturo et al., Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  18. [18]

    Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,Class

    S. Hild et al., Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094013 (2011), 1012.0908

    work page arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044001 (2017), 1607.08697

    work page arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

    D. Reitze et al., Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), 1907.04833

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    and Berti, Emanuele and Caldwell, Robert and Camp, Jordan and Conklin, John W

    J. Baker et al. (2019), 1907.06482

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Y. A. El-Neaj et al. (AEDGE), EPJ Quant. Technol.7, 6 (2020), 1908.00802

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies,Exper

    A. Sesana et al., Exper. Astron.51, 1333 (2021), 1908.11391

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Garcia-Bellido, H

    J. Garcia-Bellido, H. Murayama, and G. White, JCAP 12, 023 (2021), 2104.04778

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    C. L. Carilli and S. Rawlings, New Astron. Rev.48, 979 (2004), astro-ph/0409274

    work page arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Janssenet al., PoSAASKA14, 037 (2015), arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM]

    G. Janssen et al., PoSAASKA14, 037 (2015), 1501.00127

    work page arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Weltman et al.,Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,Publ

    A. Weltman et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37, e002 (2020), 1810.02680

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Lentati et al

    L. Lentati et al. (EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 453, 2576 (2015), 1504.03692

    work page arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Babak et al

    S. Babak et al. (EPTA), Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 455, 1665 (2016), 1509.02165

    work page arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    arXiv , doi =:1801.02617 , keywords =

    Z. Arzoumanian et al. (NANOGRAV), Astrophys. J. 859, 47 (2018), 1801.02617

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Aggarwal et al., Astrophys

    K. Aggarwal et al., Astrophys. J.880, 2 (2019), 1812.11585

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background,

    Z. Arzoumanian et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 905, L34 (2020), 2009.04496

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), 2306.16213

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), Astrophys

    A. Afzal et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett. 951, L11 (2023), [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)], 2306.16219

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Caprini, M

    C. Caprini, M. Hindmarsh, S. Huber, T. Konstandin, J. Kozaczuk, G. Nardini, J. M. No, A. Petiteau, P. Schwaller, G. Servant, et al., Journal of Cosmol- ogy and Astroparticle Physics2016, 001–001 (2016), 7 ISSN 1475-7516, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2016/04/001

    2016

  36. [36]

    R. R. Caldwell, T. L. Smith, and D. G. E. Walker, Phys. Rev. D100, 043513 (2019), 1812.07577

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    L. A. Boyle and P. J. Steinhardt, Physical Review D77 (2008), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.77.063504

    2008

  38. [38]

    L. A. Boyle and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D77, 063504 (2008), astro-ph/0512014

    work page arXiv 2008

  39. [39]

    Barman, A

    B. Barman, A. Ghoshal, B. Grzadkowski, and A. Socha, JHEP07, 231 (2023), 2305.00027

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    Hindmarsh, S

    M. Hindmarsh, S. J. Huber, K. Rummukainen, and D. J. Weir, Phys. Rev. D92, 123009 (2015), 1504.03291

    work page arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D23, 852 (1981)

    1981

  42. [42]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D31, 3052 (1985)

    1985

  43. [43]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Physical Review D 96(2017), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104046

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.104046 2017

  44. [44]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, and K. Saikawa, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010, 032–032 (2010), ISSN 1475-7516, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1475-7516/2010/05/032

    2010

  45. [45]

    M., Crawford, T

    M. Pearce, L. Pearce, G. White, and C. Bal´ azs, Jour- nal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024, 021 (2024), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024/06/021

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024

  46. [46]

    Barenboim and W.-I

    G. Barenboim and W.-I. Park, Physics Let- ters B759, 430 (2016), ISSN 0370-2693, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S037026931630260X

    2016

  47. [47]

    Assadullahi and D

    H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, Physical Review D79 (2009), ISSN 1550-2368, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.79.083511

    2009

  48. [48]

    Alabidi, K

    L. Alabidi, K. Kohri, M. Sasaki, and Y. Sendouda, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013, 033–033 (2013), ISSN 1475-7516, URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/033

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/05/033 2013

  49. [49]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, Physical Review D97(2018), ISSN 2470-0029, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.123532

    2018

  50. [50]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri, T. Nakama, and T. Terada, Physical Review D100(2019), ISSN 2470-0029, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043532

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.043532 2019

  51. [51]

    Seto and J

    N. Seto and J. Yokoyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jap.72, 3082 (2003), gr-qc/0305096

    work page arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D78, 043531 (2008), 0708.2279

    work page arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    Kuroyanagi, T

    S. Kuroyanagi, T. Chiba, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D79, 103501 (2009), 0804.3249

    work page arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Nakayama and J

    K. Nakayama and J. Yokoyama, JCAP01, 010 (2010), 0910.0715

    work page arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Kuroyanagi, C

    S. Kuroyanagi, C. Ringeval, and T. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D87, 083502 (2013), 1301.1778

    work page arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Jinno, T

    R. Jinno, T. Moroi, and K. Nakayama, JCAP01, 040 (2014), 1307.3010

    work page arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Saikawa and S

    K. Saikawa and S. Shirai, JCAP05, 035 (2018), 1803.01038

    work page arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    C. Chen, K. Dimopoulos, C. Er¨ oncel, and A. Ghoshal, Phys. Rev. D110, 063554 (2024), 2405.01679

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Physical Review D60(1999), ISSN 1089-4918, URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.063504 1999

  60. [60]

    Datta, A

    S. Datta, A. Ghoshal, A. Spalding, and G. White (2025), 2511.01779

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Ghoshal, A

    A. Ghoshal, A. Spalding, and G. White (2025), 2512.14684

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    McDonald, Phys

    J. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D43, 1063 (1991)

    1991

  63. [63]

    Moroi and L

    T. Moroi and L. Randall, Nucl. Phys. B570, 455 (2000), hep-ph/9906527

    work page arXiv 2000

  64. [64]

    Visinelli and P

    L. Visinelli and P. Gondolo, Phys. Rev. D81, 063508 (2010), 0912.0015

    work page arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    A. L. Erickcek, Phys. Rev. D92, 103505 (2015), 1504.03335

    work page arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    A. E. Nelson and H. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D98, 063516 (2018), 1807.07176

    work page arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Cheek, J

    A. Cheek, J. K. Osi´ nski, and L. Roszkowski, JCAP03, 061 (2024), 2310.16087

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Cirelli, Y

    M. Cirelli, Y. Gouttenoire, K. Petraki, and F. Sala, JCAP02, 014 (2019), 1811.03608

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    BSM with Cosmic Strings: Heavy, up to EeV mass, Unstable Particles,

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, JCAP 07, 016 (2020), 1912.03245

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Allahverdiet al., The First Three Seconds: a Re- view of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Uni- verse, Open J

    R. Allahverdi et al., Open J. Astrophys.4, as- tro.2006.16182 (2021), 2006.16182

    work page arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    Allahverdi and J

    R. Allahverdi and J. K. Osi´ nski, Phys. Rev. D105, 023502 (2022), 2108.13136

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Allahverdi, N

    R. Allahverdi, N. P. D. Loc, and J. K. Osi´ nski, Phys. Rev. D107, 123510 (2023), 2212.11303

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Gonzalez Suarez, Acta Physica Polonica B52, 953 (2021), ISSN 1509-5770, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10

    R. Gonzalez Suarez, Acta Physica Polonica B52, 953 (2021), ISSN 1509-5770, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 5506/APhysPolB.52.953

    2021

  74. [74]

    Jeanty and B

    L. Jeanty and B. Shuve,Long-lived particles: theory and experimental probes(2025), 2511.17934, URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2511.17934

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    L. Lee, C. Ohm, A. Soffer, and T.-T. Yu, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics106, 210–255 (2019), ISSN 0146-6410, URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp. 2019.02.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp 2019

  76. [76]

    Alimena et al., Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics47, 090501 (2020), URLhttps://doi

    J. Alimena et al., Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics47, 090501 (2020), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1088/1361-6471/ab4574

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab4574 2020

  77. [77]

    C. B. Verhaaren et al., Frontiers in PhysicsVol- ume 10 - 2022(2022), ISSN 2296-424X, URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/ articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.967881

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.967881 2022

  78. [78]

    Okada, P

    N. Okada, P. Sanyal, and R. K. Verma (2026), 2604.00866

    work page arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, Phys. Rev. D97, 055034 (2018), 1710.09387

    work page arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Ariga et al

    A. Ariga et al. (FASER), Phys. Rev. D99, 095011 (2019), 1811.12522

    work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.