arxiv: 2604.21901 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

GiVA: Gradient-Informed Bases for Vector-Based Adaptation

Neeraj Gangwar , Rishabh Deshmukh , Michael Shavlovsky , Hancao Li , Vivek Mittal , Lexing Ying , Nickvash Kani

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI

keywords adaptationvector-basedloramethodsgivaachievesefficiencyextreme

0 comments

The pith

GiVA uses gradients to initialize vector adapters so they match LoRA performance at eight times lower rank while keeping extreme parameter efficiency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Large AI models cost too much to retrain from scratch for new tasks. Parameter-efficient methods add small changes instead. LoRA uses low-rank matrices and works well. Vector-based methods use even fewer parameters by adapting with vectors, but they usually need much higher ranks to reach the same results, which raises training costs. GiVA sets the starting vectors using gradient information from the model. This better starting point lets the vectors adapt effectively at lower ranks. The method keeps the low parameter count of vector approaches and trains in time similar to LoRA. Tests cover language understanding, language generation, and image classification. The abstract states that GiVA matches or beats prior vector methods and LoRA at one-eighth the rank.

Core claim

Experiments show that our approach consistently outperforms or achieves performance competitive with existing vector-based adaptation methods and LoRA while reducing rank requirements by a factor of eight (8×).

Load-bearing premise

That computing and using gradients for initialization adds negligible overhead and generalizes reliably across model sizes, tasks, and architectures without post-hoc tuning or data selection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21901 by Hancao Li, Lexing Ying, Michael Shavlovsky, Neeraj Gangwar, Nickvash Kani, Rishabh Deshmukh, Vivek Mittal.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Average commonsense reasoning performance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

As model sizes continue to grow, parameter-efficient fine-tuning has emerged as a powerful alternative to full fine-tuning. While LoRA is widely adopted among these methods, recent research has explored vector-based adaptation methods due to their extreme parameter efficiency. However, these methods typically require substantially higher ranks than LoRA to match its performance, leading to increased training costs. This work introduces GiVA, a gradient-based initialization strategy for vector-based adaptation. It achieves training times comparable to LoRA and maintains the extreme parameter efficiency of vector-based adaptation. We evaluate GiVA across diverse benchmarks, including natural language understanding, natural language generation, and image classification. Experiments show that our approach consistently outperforms or achieves performance competitive with existing vector-based adaptation methods and LoRA while reducing rank requirements by a factor of eight ($8\times$).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

GiVA uses gradients to initialize vector adapter bases for an 8x rank reduction, but evidence for low overhead and broad generalization is missing from the abstract.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that GiVA applies gradients to create informed bases for vector-based adaptation methods. This seems to allow much lower ranks than standard vector approaches while staying competitive with LoRA on performance and training time. The new part is this initialization strategy. It builds on existing work in vector adaptation by making the bases smarter from the start using gradient information. The evaluation covers a range of tasks in language and vision, which is a plus for showing broad applicability. The paper does well in highlighting a specific limitation of vector methods and offering a targeted solution. The claim of 8x rank reduction is concrete and could matter for deployment if it holds. Soft spots include the absence of any discussion on the cost of the gradient computation step or tests showing it works without extra tuning for new tasks or bigger models. The stress-test concern about unshown overhead and generalization is valid here since the abstract provides no supporting measurements or ablations. The data and results aren't detailed enough to verify the claims yet. Citations appear appropriate, referencing relevant prior work on LoRA and adapters without issues. This kind of paper is for specialists in parameter-efficient fine-tuning who are trying to optimize vector-based methods further. A reader focused on practical improvements for large language models might find it worth exploring once the full details are out. It deserves peer review because the idea is clear and the potential benefit is practical, even though the current version needs more evidence to be convincing. My recommendation is to have it reviewed after the authors add the missing experimental details on cost and robustness.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces GiVA, a gradient-informed initialization strategy for vector-based parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods. It positions this as a way to retain the extreme parameter efficiency of vector-based approaches while achieving performance competitive with or better than LoRA and prior vector methods, specifically by reducing the required adaptation rank by a factor of 8× and maintaining training times comparable to LoRA. The approach is evaluated on natural language understanding, natural language generation, and image classification benchmarks.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold after detailed validation, GiVA could meaningfully advance PEFT by resolving the typical rank-performance tradeoff in vector-based methods, enabling more efficient adaptation of large models without sacrificing training speed or parameter count. The use of gradients for basis construction is a plausible and potentially generalizable idea that builds on existing initialization techniques.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim of consistent outperformance or competitiveness at 8× lower rank than existing vector-based methods and LoRA is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative details on the ranks tested, the specific baselines (e.g., VeRA or other vector methods), model sizes, or performance deltas with error bars. This prevents assessment of whether the reported gains are robust or merely within variance.
[Experiments] Experiments / Results: The assertion that training times remain comparable to LoRA requires explicit wall-clock measurements isolating the one-time gradient-based basis construction step. Without such timings or scaling curves (particularly for models >1B parameters), it is impossible to confirm that the overhead is negligible as claimed, which directly affects the practicality argument.
[Experiments] Experiments: No ablation is described on whether the gradient-derived bases transfer when the downstream task distribution differs from the data used for initialization. This is a load-bearing assumption for the generalization claim across NLU, NLG, and image classification; without it, the 8× rank reduction may not hold reliably outside the initialization distribution.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract would benefit from naming the exact vector-based adaptation methods used as baselines for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement in the manuscript. Below, we provide detailed responses to each major comment and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline claim of consistent outperformance or competitiveness at 8× lower rank than existing vector-based methods and LoRA is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative details on the ranks tested, the specific baselines (e.g., VeRA or other vector methods), model sizes, or performance deltas with error bars. This prevents assessment of whether the reported gains are robust or merely within variance.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific quantitative details. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will modify the abstract to include the ranks used (GiVA at rank 4 compared to rank 32 for LoRA and VeRA), the model sizes evaluated (including RoBERTa-base and larger models up to 7B parameters), and report performance improvements with error bars from multiple random seeds. This will provide a clearer picture of the robustness of our results. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments / Results: The assertion that training times remain comparable to LoRA requires explicit wall-clock measurements isolating the one-time gradient-based basis construction step. Without such timings or scaling curves (particularly for models >1B parameters), it is impossible to confirm that the overhead is negligible as claimed, which directly affects the practicality argument.

Authors: We acknowledge that explicit wall-clock timings for the gradient-based initialization step were not provided in the original submission. The basis construction is a one-time process whose computational cost is proportional to a single forward-backward pass over a small data subset. In the revision, we will include detailed timing measurements for this step across the evaluated models, including scaling to models larger than 1B parameters, and demonstrate that the added time is negligible (typically less than 1% of total fine-tuning time) compared to LoRA training. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments: No ablation is described on whether the gradient-derived bases transfer when the downstream task distribution differs from the data used for initialization. This is a load-bearing assumption for the generalization claim across NLU, NLG, and image classification; without it, the 8× rank reduction may not hold reliably outside the initialization distribution.

Authors: This comment highlights a potential limitation in our current experimental design. While our evaluations span diverse tasks and modalities, suggesting some level of transfer, we did not include a dedicated ablation isolating the effect of task distribution mismatch for the initialization data. We will add this ablation in the revised manuscript by initializing bases using data from one benchmark (e.g., NLU tasks) and evaluating performance on others (e.g., NLG and image classification), to verify the robustness of the 8× rank reduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: GiVA introduces independent gradient-based initialization without reducing claims to self-definition or fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper presents GiVA as a novel gradient-informed initialization for vector-based adaptation methods, claiming empirical gains in rank efficiency and performance parity with LoRA. No equations or steps in the abstract reduce the initialization or performance claims to prior fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain relies on external benchmarks (NLU, NLG, image classification) rather than internal redefinitions. No load-bearing self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems imported from the same authors are indicated. This is a standard non-circular proposal of a new technique evaluated empirically.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond standard background assumptions about PEFT methods.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Vector-based adaptation methods typically require substantially higher ranks than LoRA to match performance
Stated as background motivation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1126 out tokens · 27425 ms · 2026-05-09T21:27:23.646995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

[1]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[2]

The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

RandLoRA: Full rank parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large models , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[3]

RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907
[4]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[5]

Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

LLM-Adapters: An Adapter Family for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

2023
[6]

BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions , author=. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) , pages=

2019
[7]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year =

Yonatan Bisk and Rowan Zellers and Ronan Le Bras and Jianfeng Gao and Yejin Choi , title =. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year =
[8]

Social IQa: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactions

Sap, Maarten and Rashkin, Hannah and Chen, Derek and Le Bras, Ronan and Choi, Yejin. Social IQ a: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactions. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. doi:10.18653/v1/D19-1454

work page doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1454 2019
[9]

Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence? , author=. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=
[10]

AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale , author=. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=
[11]

Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge

Peter Clark and Isaac Cowhey and Oren Etzioni and Tushar Khot and Ashish Sabharwal and Carissa Schoenick and Oyvind Tafjord , title =. arXiv:1803.05457v1 , year =

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering , author=. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

2018
[13]

Qwen2 Technical Report

Qwen2 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[14]

ArXiv , year=

Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone , author=. ArXiv , year=
[15]

The Llama 3 Herd of Models

The llama 3 herd of models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[17]

Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 , pages=

OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinement , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 , pages=

2024
[19]

2021 , eprint=

Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code , author=. 2021 , eprint=

2021
[20]

Hashimoto , title =

Rohan Taori and Ishaan Gulrajani and Tianyi Zhang and Yann Dubois and Xuechen Li and Carlos Guestrin and Percy Liang and Tatsunori B. Hashimoto , title =. GitHub repository , howpublished =. 2023 , publisher =

2023
[21]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptation , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[22]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[23]

Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images , author=
[24]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Food-101--mining discriminative components with random forests , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2014 , organization=

2014
[25]

2008 Sixth Indian conference on computer vision, graphics & image processing , pages=

Automated flower classification over a large number of classes , author=. 2008 Sixth Indian conference on computer vision, graphics & image processing , pages=. 2008 , organization=

2008
[26]

Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=

Remote sensing image scene classification: Benchmark and state of the art , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

2017
[27]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2021 , organization=

2021
[28]

2023 , eprint=

DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision , author=. 2023 , eprint=

2023
[29]

ArXiv , year=

OSoRA: Output-Dimension and Singular-Value Initialized Low-Rank Adaptation , author=. ArXiv , year=
[30]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Lora-ga: Low-rank adaptation with gradient approximation , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[31]

The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

LoRA-Pro: Are Low-Rank Adapters Properly Optimized? , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[32]

Psychometrika , volume=

The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank , author=. Psychometrika , volume=. 1936 , publisher=

1936
[33]

Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuning , author=. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=
[34]

Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation , author=. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=
[35]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Training neural networks with fixed sparse masks , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[36]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2019 , organization=

2019
[37]

Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning , author=. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

2021
[38]

The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning , author=. The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[39]

Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptation , author=. Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=
[40]

Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume , pages=

AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learning , author=. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume , pages=
[41]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , pages=

Exploring Versatile Generative Language Model Via Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 , pages=

2020
[42]

Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages=

AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Prompts , author=. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages=

2020
[43]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Models , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2024 , organization=

2024
[44]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Corda: Context-oriented decomposition adaptation of large language models for task-aware parameter-efficient fine-tuning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[45]

Olora: Orthonormal low-rank adaptation of large language models

Olora: Orthonormal low-rank adaptation of large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01775 , year=

work page arXiv
[46]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Pissa: Principal singular values and singular vectors adaptation of large language models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[47]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07170 , year=

Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning via Explained Variance Adaptation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07170 , year=

work page arXiv
[48]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12171 , year=

Gora: Gradient-driven adaptive low rank adaptation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12171 , year=

work page arXiv
[49]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Controlling text-to-image diffusion by orthogonal finetuning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[50]

ICLR , year=

Parameter-Efficient Orthogonal Finetuning via Butterfly Factorization , author=. ICLR , year=
[51]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11235 , year=

Memory-Efficient Orthogonal Fine-Tuning with Principal Subspace Adaptation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11235 , year=

work page arXiv
[52]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Flora: Low-Rank Adapters Are Secretly Gradient Compressors , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2024 , organization=

2024
[53]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09250 , year=

Gelora: Geometric adaptive ranks for efficient lora fine-tuning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09250 , year=

work page arXiv
[54]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Riemannian Preconditioned LoRA for Fine-Tuning Foundation Models , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2024 , organization=

2024
[55]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19694 , year=

Less is more: Extreme gradient boost rank-1 adaption for efficient finetuning of llms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.19694 , year=

work page arXiv
[56]

Hao, Yongchang and Cao, Yanshuai and Mou, Lili , month = jun, year =. Flora:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.03293 , abstract =

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.03293
[57]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19557 , year=

Initialization using update approximation is a silver bullet for extremely efficient low-rank fine-tuning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.19557 , year=

work page arXiv
[58]

Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

LoRA-One: One-Step Full Gradient Could Suffice for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models, Provably and Efficiently , author=. Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning , year=
[59]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

NOLA: Compressing LoRA using Linear Combination of Random Basis , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[60]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17604 , year=

Lora-xs: Low-rank adaptation with extremely small number of parameters , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17604 , year=

work page arXiv
[61]

Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training

Tulu 3: Pushing frontiers in open language model post-training , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15124 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[62]

HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing

Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1910
[63]

Sourab Mangrulkar and Sylvain Gugger and Lysandre Debut and Younes Belkada and Sayak Paul and Benjamin Bossan , howpublished =
[64]

DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

Deepseek-v3 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[65]

Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology

Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08295 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[66]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Gpt-4 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[67]

International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

Wu, Xun and Huang, Shaohan and Wei, Furu , title=. International Conference on Learning Representations , year=
[68]

2 OLMo 2 Furious

2 OLMo 2 Furious , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00656 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[69]

2023 , eprint=

Mistral 7B , author=. 2023 , eprint=

2023