arxiv: 2604.22558 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

SOLAR-RL: Semi-Online Long-horizon Assignment Reinforcement Learning

Guozhi Wang, Han Xiao, Hao Wang, Jichao Wang, Lingfang Zeng, Liuyang Bian, Shuai Ren, Xiaoxin Chen, Yafei Wen, Yue Pan, Yufeng Zhou, Zhaoxiong Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 12:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI

keywords reinforcement learningGUI agentsoffline RLreward shapingmultimodal modelslong-horizon taskstrajectory reconstructionsemi-online learning

0 comments

The pith

SOLAR-RL trains GUI agents by turning static data into simulated online trajectories with dense first-failure rewards.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to resolve the core tension in training multimodal agents for long GUI tasks: offline RL misses global task outcomes while online RL incurs high costs and instability. SOLAR-RL reconstructs multiple possible action sequences from existing step data, locates the earliest failure in each sequence using validity checks, and then retroactively distributes dense rewards shaped to the full trajectory goal. This produces a training signal that captures long-horizon quality without live environment rolls. The result is agents that finish more complex navigation sequences and handle variations better than prior methods, all while remaining sample-efficient.

Core claim

SOLAR-RL integrates global trajectory semantics into offline learning by reconstructing diverse rollout candidates from static data, detecting the first failure point with per-step validity signals, and retroactively assigning dense step-level rewards through target-aligned shaping that reflects overall execution quality, thereby simulating online feedback at low cost.

What carries the argument

The SOLAR-RL semi-online assignment mechanism: rollout reconstruction from static data combined with first-failure detection and target-aligned dense reward shaping.

If this is right

Long-horizon task completion rates rise substantially over strong offline and online baselines.
Robustness to environmental changes and partial observability improves in GUI navigation.
Training remains sample-efficient because no live interactions are required during learning.
The same dense reward signals can be applied to other MLLM-based agents facing extended sequences.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The first-failure detection idea could transfer to robotics or web-browsing agents where full online trials remain expensive.
Iterative data augmentation loops become feasible: initial static logs could be expanded with the reconstructed rollouts to bootstrap further improvement.
The approach invites testing on tasks of increasing length to determine how far the retroactive shaping remains reliable before bias accumulates.

Load-bearing premise

Reconstructing rollouts and assigning rewards via first-failure detection on static data will accurately capture trajectory quality without introducing bias that real online interactions would expose.

What would settle it

Run SOLAR-RL and a true online RL baseline on identical long-horizon GUI tasks, then compare final completion rates and the distribution of failure points; a large mismatch in either metric would show the simulation fails to replicate online dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22558 by Guozhi Wang, Han Xiao, Hao Wang, Jichao Wang, Lingfang Zeng, Liuyang Bian, Shuai Ren, Xiaoxin Chen, Yafei Wen, Yue Pan, Yufeng Zhou, Zhaoxiong Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Comparison of RL paradigms for GUI agents. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Illustration of the Trajectory-Aware Reward Shaping mechanism. The process consists of three stages: (1) view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Offline Trajectory Reconstruction. At each view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Direct-training ablation on Super Long trajec view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Mean action reward during training. GRPO view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Two-Stage Training Dynamics on High-Level view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Supplementary training curves for the six remaining action primitives. SOLAR-RL (Orange) demonstrates view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: A qualitative failure-case study on continuous decision recovery. Both trajectories start from the same view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Distribution of trajectory lengths in the train view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Complete direct-training ablation (Action SR). Long: L ∈ [6, 13]; Super Long: L ≥ 14. SOLAR-RL consistently outperforms GRPO, with a larger gap on longer and harder horizons. 14 view at source ↗

read the original abstract

As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) mature, GUI agents are evolving from static interactions to complex navigation. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training MLLM agents on dynamic GUI tasks, its effective application faces a dilemma. Standard Offline RL often relies on static step-level data, neglecting global trajectory semantics such as task completion and execution quality. Conversely, Online RL captures the long-term dynamics but suffers from high interaction costs and potential environmental instability. To bridge this gap, we propose SOLAR-RL (Semi-Online Long-horizon Assignment Reinforcement Learning). Instead of relying solely on expensive online interactions, our framework integrates global trajectory insights directly into the offline learning process. Specifically, we reconstruct diverse rollout candidates from static data, detect the first failure point using per-step validity signals, and retroactively assign dense step-level rewards with target-aligned shaping to reflect trajectory-level execution quality, effectively simulating online feedback without interaction costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SOLAR-RL significantly improves long-horizon task completion rates and robustness compared to strong baselines, offering a sample-efficient solution for autonomous GUI navigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SOLAR-RL retrofits dense rewards onto static GUI trajectories by reconstructing rollouts and shaping around the first detected failure, which is a practical workaround for long-horizon costs but rests on how faithfully the static signals match live execution.

read the letter

The core move is straightforward: pull candidate trajectories from existing static logs, use per-step validity to mark the first failure point, then spread a shaped dense reward backward that reflects whether the whole run hit the target. This avoids fresh online rollouts while trying to inject trajectory-level information that plain offline RL misses. That combination is the actual new piece; prior work on offline RL for agents usually stays at step-level or requires full online interaction for long tasks like GUI navigation. The paper shows this can lift completion rates over baselines in their setup, which is useful if the gains hold up under closer inspection. It gives a concrete way to make offline data more informative for MLLM agents without the full expense of live environments. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags. Reconstructing candidates and assigning rewards from static validity signals only works if those signals are complete proxies for execution quality and if the sampled paths cover the failure modes that actually appear in deployment. GUI logs often miss rare branches or full state feedback, so the retroactive shaping could systematically over- or under-value trajectories compared with real online feedback. The abstract gives no numbers or ablation details, so the experiments will need to demonstrate that the method does not just reward the reconstruction process itself. This is aimed at people building RL pipelines for multimodal GUI agents who already have static interaction logs and want to stretch them further. It is worth sending to referees because the problem is real, the method is explicit, and the claims are testable; a reviewer can check the reconstruction details and the baseline comparisons directly. I would ask the authors to add ablations on the failure detection step and to report how sensitive results are to the quality of the static corpus.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SOLAR-RL, a semi-online RL framework for MLLM-based GUI agents on long-horizon navigation tasks. It reconstructs diverse rollout candidates from static data, detects first-failure points via per-step validity signals, and retroactively assigns dense step-level rewards using target-aligned shaping to simulate online feedback without actual interactions, claiming this yields significantly higher task completion rates and robustness than strong baselines.

Significance. If the semi-online simulation is shown to produce unbiased reward signals equivalent to live interaction and the reported gains are reproducible, the work could provide a practical, lower-cost bridge between offline and online RL for dynamic GUI environments, improving sample efficiency for autonomous agents.

major comments (2)

Abstract: the central claim that 'SOLAR-RL significantly improves long-horizon task completion rates and robustness' is unsupported by any quantitative results, baseline names, metrics, or experimental setup details, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the method delivers the stated gains.
Method (reconstruction and reward assignment paragraph): the assertion that retroactive first-failure detection plus target-aligned shaping on static rollouts 'effectively simulates online feedback' lacks justification or empirical check against true online trajectories; static logs typically omit full state-transition feedback and under-represent rare failure branches, risking systematic bias in the dense rewards that directly supports the sample-efficiency claim.

minor comments (1)

The abstract introduces the acronym SOLAR-RL without spelling out the full expansion on first use, which reduces immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the central claim that 'SOLAR-RL significantly improves long-horizon task completion rates and robustness' is unsupported by any quantitative results, baseline names, metrics, or experimental setup details, which is load-bearing for assessing whether the method delivers the stated gains.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific quantitative results, baseline names, and metrics. In the revised version we will update the abstract to report key experimental outcomes, such as the task completion rates achieved by SOLAR-RL relative to the baselines evaluated and the primary metrics used, drawn directly from the experiments section. revision: yes
Referee: Method (reconstruction and reward assignment paragraph): the assertion that retroactive first-failure detection plus target-aligned shaping on static rollouts 'effectively simulates online feedback' lacks justification or empirical check against true online trajectories; static logs typically omit full state-transition feedback and under-represent rare failure branches, risking systematic bias in the dense rewards that directly supports the sample-efficiency claim.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current method description provides limited justification for the simulation claim. We will expand the reconstruction and reward assignment paragraph to explain in greater detail how per-step validity signals combined with target-aligned shaping on reconstructed diverse rollouts approximate online feedback, and how this reconstruction step is intended to mitigate under-representation of failure branches. We will also add an explicit discussion of assumptions and potential biases. A full side-by-side empirical check against live online trajectories is not present in the current work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct empirical comparison of the assigned dense rewards to rewards obtained from true online trajectories, as such a comparison would require the very online interactions the semi-online framework is designed to avoid.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithmic proposal with no self-referential derivations or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper presents SOLAR-RL as a framework that reconstructs rollouts from static data, detects first-failure points via validity signals, and applies target-aligned reward shaping to simulate online feedback. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked in the provided text to derive the method; the central claim is an empirical integration of offline and simulated-online elements whose validity rests on experimental outcomes rather than definitional reduction. The approach does not rename known results or smuggle ansatzes via prior self-work, leaving the derivation chain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard RL concepts such as trajectory semantics and reward shaping but introduces new procedural steps whose details are not provided.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Static step-level data contains sufficient information to reconstruct meaningful long-horizon rollouts
Implicit in the reconstruction step described in the abstract.
domain assumption Per-step validity signals reliably indicate the first failure point in a trajectory
Central to the failure detection mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1213 out tokens · 25778 ms · 2026-05-08T12:04:26.125350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

[1]

Hao Bai, Yifei Zhou, Jiayi Pan, Mert Cemri, Alane Suhr, Sergey Levine, and Aviral Kumar. 2024. Digirl: Training in-the-wild device-control agents with autonomous reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:12461--12495

2024
[2]

Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, and 1 others. 2025. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[3]

Zhangxuan Gu, Zhengwen Zeng, Zhenyu Xu, Xingran Zhou, Shuheng Shen, Yunfei Liu, Beitong Zhou, Changhua Meng, Tianyu Xia, Weizhi Chen, and 1 others. 2025. Ui-venus technical report: Building high-performance ui agents with rft. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10833

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Haoyang Hong, Jiajun Yin, Yuan Wang, Jingnan Liu, Zhe Chen, Ailing Yu, Ji Li, Zhiling Ye, Hansong Xiao, Yefei Chen, and 1 others. 2025 a . Multi-agent deep research: Training multi-agent systems with m-grpo. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13288

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Wenyi Hong, Weihan Wang, Qingsong Lv, Jiazheng Xu, Wenmeng Yu, Junhui Ji, Yan Wang, Zihan Wang, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding, and 1 others. 2024. Cogagent: A visual language model for gui agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14281--14290

2024
[6]

Wenyi Hong, Wenmeng Yu, Xiaotao Gu, Guo Wang, Guobing Gan, Haomiao Tang, Jiale Cheng, Ji Qi, Junhui Ji, Lihang Pan, and 1 others. 2025 b . Glm-4.1 v-thinking: Towards versatile multimodal reasoning with scalable reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01006

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[7]

Sergey Levine, Aviral Kumar, George Tucker, and Justin Fu. 2020. Offline reinforcement learning: Tutorial, review, and perspectives on open problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01643

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020
[8]

Wei Li, William Bishop, Alice Li, Chris Rawles, Folawiyo Campbell-Ajala, Divya Tyamagundlu, and Oriana Riva. 2024. On the effects of data scale on computer control agents. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv--2406

2024
[9]

Yuhang Liu, Pengxiang Li, Congkai Xie, Xavier Hu, Xiaotian Han, Shengyu Zhang, Hongxia Yang, and Fei Wu. 2025. Infigui-r1: Advancing multimodal gui agents from reactive actors to deliberative reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14239

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Quanfeng Lu, Wenqi Shao, Zitao Liu, Lingxiao Du, Fanqing Meng, Boxuan Li, Botong Chen, Siyuan Huang, Kaipeng Zhang, and Ping Luo. 2025 a . Guiodyssey: A comprehensive dataset for cross-app gui navigation on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22404--22414

2025
[11]

Zhengxi Lu, Jiabo Ye, Fei Tang, Yongliang Shen, Haiyang Xu, Ziwei Zheng, Weiming Lu, Ming Yan, Fei Huang, Jun Xiao, and 1 others. 2025 b . Ui-s1: Advancing gui automation via semi-online reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11543

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

Yujia Qin, Yining Ye, Junjie Fang, Haoming Wang, Shihao Liang, Shizuo Tian, Junda Zhang, Jiahao Li, Yunxin Li, Shijue Huang, and 1 others. 2025. Ui-tars: Pioneering automated gui interaction with native agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12326

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[13]

Christopher Rawles, Sarah Clinckemaillie, Yifan Chang, Jonathan Waltz, Gabrielle Lau, Marybeth Fair, Alice Li, William Bishop, Wei Li, Folawiyo Campbell-Ajala, and 1 others. 2024. Androidworld: A dynamic benchmarking environment for autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14573

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[14]

Christopher Rawles, Alice Li, Daniel Rodriguez, Oriana Riva, and Timothy Lillicrap. 2023. Androidinthewild: A large-scale dataset for android device control. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:59708--59728

2023
[15]

St \'e phane Ross, Geoffrey Gordon, and Drew Bagnell. 2011. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 627--635. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings

2011
[16]

Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Yang Wu, and 1 others. 2024. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[17]

Yucheng Shi, Wenhao Yu, Zaitang Li, Yonglin Wang, Hongming Zhang, Ninghao Liu, Haitao Mi, and Dong Yu. 2025. Mobilegui-rl: Advancing mobile gui agent through reinforcement learning in online environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05720

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Hao Wang, Guozhi Wang, Han Xiao, Yufeng Zhou, Yue Pan, Jichao Wang, Ke Xu, Yafei Wen, Xiaohu Ruan, Xiaoxin Chen, and 1 others. 2026. Skill-sd: Skill-conditioned self-distillation for multi-turn llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10674

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[19]

Kangrui Wang, Pingyue Zhang, Zihan Wang, Yaning Gao, Linjie Li, Qineng Wang, Hanyang Chen, Chi Wan, Yiping Lu, Zhengyuan Yang, and 1 others. 2025. Vagen: Reinforcing world model reasoning for multi-turn vlm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16907

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Han Xiao, Guozhi Wang, Yuxiang Chai, Zimu Lu, Weifeng Lin, Hao He, Lue Fan, Liuyang Bian, Rui Hu, Liang Liu, and 1 others. 2025. Ui-genie: A self-improving approach for iteratively boosting mllm-based mobile gui agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21496

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Han Xiao, Guozhi Wang, Hao Wang, Shilong Liu, Yuxiang Chai, Yue Pan, Yufeng Zhou, Xiaoxin Chen, Yafei Wen, and Hongsheng Li. 2026. Ui-mem: Self-evolving experience memory for online reinforcement learning in mobile gui agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05832

work page arXiv 2026
[22]

Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, Siheng Zhao, Ruisheng Cao, Toh J Hua, Zhoujun Cheng, Dongchan Shin, Fangyu Lei, and 1 others. 2024. Osworld: Benchmarking multimodal agents for open-ended tasks in real computer environments. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:52040--52094

2024
[23]

Yiheng Xu, Zekun Wang, Junli Wang, Dunjie Lu, Tianbao Xie, Amrita Saha, Doyen Sahoo, Tao Yu, and Caiming Xiong. 2024. Aguvis: Unified pure vision agents for autonomous gui interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04454

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Jiabo Ye, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu, Haowei Liu, Junyang Wang, Zhaoqing Zhu, Ziwei Zheng, Feiyu Gao, Junjie Cao, Zhengxi Lu, and 1 others. 2025. Mobile-agent-v3: Fundamental agents for gui automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15144

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Zhong Zhang, Yaxi Lu, Yikun Fu, Yupeng Huo, Shenzhi Yang, Yesai Wu, Han Si, Xin Cong, Haotian Chen, Yankai Lin, and 1 others. 2025. Agentcpm-gui: Building mobile-use agents with reinforcement fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01391

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

online" 'onlinestring :=

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint eprinttype howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRING...
[27]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...