pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04739 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · stat.AP· stat.ML

Recognition: unknown

Confirmation of Binary Clustering in Gamma-Ray Bursts through an Integrated p-value from Multiple Nonparametric Tests of Hypotheses

Soumita Modak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE stat.APstat.ML
keywords gamma-ray burstsclusteringnonparametric testsBATSE catalogshort and long burstsp-value integrationinterpoint distance
0
0 comments X

The pith

An integrated p-value from multiple nonparametric tests on interpoint distances confirms gamma-ray bursts form exactly two clusters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a nonparametric interpoint distance-based measure and pairs it with Gaussian-mixture and K-means clustering to examine gamma-ray burst data from the BATSE catalog. For each burst the method runs a hypothesis test, then combines the resulting dependent p-values into one integrated statistic. This integrated value is used to decide whether the population contains more than two natural groups. A sympathetic reader would care because gamma-ray bursts are the brightest explosions known and their division into short and long classes has guided decades of progenitor and emission models.

Core claim

The integrated p-value achieved from the dependent nonparametric tests confirms the existence of precisely two inherent groups in the gamma-ray burst population, namely the short-duration and long-duration bursts.

What carries the argument

Interpoint distance-based measure used with Gaussian-mixture model and K-means clustering to generate and integrate p-values from one test per burst.

If this is right

  • Only the standard short and long classes are supported; additional subclasses are ruled out by the integrated test.
  • The result strengthens the physical separation between the two burst populations and the models built around it.
  • The same distance-plus-integration procedure can be applied directly to other large astronomical catalogs to test for intrinsic groups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeating the analysis on Fermi or Swift catalogs would test whether the binary result is catalog-independent.
  • Confirmation of exactly two groups would sharpen predictions for the relative rates of neutron-star and black-hole formation channels.
  • The p-value integration technique may prove useful for clustering detection in any high-dimensional astronomical dataset where sample sizes match or exceed the number of tests.

Load-bearing premise

The interpoint distance measure correctly captures the true clustering structure and the integration of p-values from many dependent tests produces an unbiased overall significance level.

What would settle it

If the same method applied to the BATSE catalog yields an integrated p-value that does not reject the possibility of three or more clusters, or if a statistically significant third group appears when the distance measure is recomputed, the binary-clustering claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04739 by Soumita Modak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Plot of log10(T90) (in s) vs. log10(FT ) (in ergs cm−2 ) for two clusters of GRBs from GMMBC, wherein the vertical blue line represents T90 = 2 s. 21 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plot of log10(T90) (in s) vs. log10(H32) for two clusters of GRBs from GMMBC. 22 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plot of log10(T90) (in s) vs. log10(FT ) (in ergs cm−2 ) for two clusters of GRBs from K-means clustering, wherein the vertical blue line represents T90 = 2 s. 23 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of log10(T90) (in s) vs. log10(H32) for two clusters of GRBs from K-means clustering. 24 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The paper applies a new, nonparametric, interpoint distance-based measure to confirm the inherent groups prevailing in the brightest source of light in the universe: gamma-ray bursts. Our effective metric, in association with clustering methods like Gaussian-mixture model-based and $K$-means algorithms, resolves the conflict regarding the possibility about existence of more than binary clusters in the gamma-ray burst population. Here we carry out multiple nonparametric statistical tests of hypotheses, as many as the number of bursts available from the `BATSE' catalog. An integrated $p$-value achieved from the aforesaid dependent tests solves our concern confirming two groups of short and long bursts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to confirm the binary (short/long) clustering structure in gamma-ray bursts from the BATSE catalog by introducing a nonparametric interpoint distance-based measure, applying it alongside Gaussian-mixture and K-means clustering algorithms, and computing an integrated p-value from a large number of dependent nonparametric hypothesis tests (one per burst) to resolve debates about the existence of more than two clusters.

Significance. If the integrated p-value procedure is statistically valid, the work would provide a data-driven nonparametric confirmation of the standard two-group classification of GRBs, potentially strengthening the case against additional clusters and offering a new metric for duration-based grouping in high-energy astrophysics.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (statistical procedure description)] The central confirmation rests on integrating p-values from one nonparametric test per BATSE burst. Because each test statistic is tied to an individual data point, the tests are strongly dependent; the abstract acknowledges dependence but provides no explicit correction, simulation protocol, or analytic null distribution for the combined statistic. This directly affects the validity of the reported integrated p-value and the claim of confirming exactly two groups.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The interpoint distance-based measure and its association with the clustering algorithms are described at a high level; a more explicit definition or pseudocode would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract] Clarify whether the nonparametric tests are applied to the full sample or subsets, and how the integration accounts for the specific clustering output (e.g., GMM or K-means labels).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and for identifying an important point about the clarity of our statistical procedure. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central confirmation rests on integrating p-values from one nonparametric test per BATSE burst. Because each test statistic is tied to an individual data point, the tests are strongly dependent; the abstract acknowledges dependence but provides no explicit correction, simulation protocol, or analytic null distribution for the combined statistic. This directly affects the validity of the reported integrated p-value and the claim of confirming exactly two groups.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is brief and does not explicitly describe how dependence is handled in the integrated p-value. The full manuscript constructs the integrated statistic via a nonparametric combination of the per-burst p-values that is valid under dependence, with the null distribution obtained by Monte Carlo simulation of the entire distance matrix under the single-cluster null (resampling preserves the observed dependence structure). However, these details are not stated with sufficient clarity in the current text. In the revised version we will (i) expand the abstract to note the simulation-based calibration and (ii) add a dedicated subsection in Methods that specifies the simulation protocol, number of replicates, and verification that the procedure maintains the nominal type-I error rate. These additions will directly address the concern about validity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: data-driven nonparametric tests on external BATSE catalog

full rationale

The paper applies a new interpoint distance-based measure together with standard clustering algorithms (GMM, K-means) directly to the observed BATSE catalog. It then runs one nonparametric hypothesis test per burst and integrates the resulting p-values. This workflow is an external statistical procedure applied to fixed data; none of the load-bearing steps (metric definition, test construction, or p-value integration) is shown to reduce by construction to the target conclusion via self-definition, fitted-parameter renaming, or self-citation chains. The result remains falsifiable by the catalog itself and does not rely on uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. Full manuscript required for any assessment of what the claim rests upon beyond standard statistical assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5409 in / 1205 out tokens · 37294 ms · 2026-05-08T16:25:58.170228+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references

  1. [1]

    & Weaver, B

    Andreon, S. & Weaver, B. (2015), Bayesian Methods for the Ph ysical Sciences– Learning from Examples in Astronomy and Physics, Spring er Series in Astrostatistics, 4, Springer International Publishing, Sw itzerland

    2015

  2. [2]

    Balastegui, A., Ruiz-Lapuente, P., & Canal, R. (2001). Reclassification of gamma-ray bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 328, 283–290

    2001

  3. [3]

    and Modak, S

    Bandyopadhyay, U. and Modak, S. (2018). Bivariate density estimation using normal-gamma kernel with application to astronomy , Journal of Ap- plied Probability and Statistics, 13, 23-39

    2018

  4. [4]

    Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., and Govaert, G. (2000). Assessing a mixture model for clustering with the integrated completed likelihood . IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 719-725

    2000

  5. [6]

    Berger, E. (2011). The environments of short-duration gamma-ray bursts and implications for their progenitors. New Astronomy Reviews. 55, 1–22. 25

    2011

  6. [7]

    Berger, E. (2014). Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 52, 43–105

    2014

  7. [8]

    K., Berger, E., Fong, W.–f

    Blanchard, P. K., Berger, E., Fong, W.–f. (2016). The Offset and Host Light Distributions of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts: A New View from HST Observations of Swift Bursts . The Astrophysical Journal. 817, 144

    2016

  8. [9]

    & Harabasz, J

    Cali´ nski, T. & Harabasz, J. (1974). A Dendrite Method for Cluster Anal- ysis. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. 3, 1–27

    1974

  9. [10]

    K., and Chattopadhyay, T

    Chattopadhyay, A. K., and Chattopadhyay, T. (2014). Statistical meth- ods for astronomical data analysis . Springer: New York

    2014

  10. [11]

    & Maitra, R

    Chattopadhyay, S. & Maitra, R. (2017). Gaussian-mixture-model-based cluster analysis finds five kinds of gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE ca ta- logue. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 469, 3374–3389

    2017

  11. [12]

    & Maitra, R

    Chattopadhyay, S. & Maitra, R. (2018). Multivariate t-mixture-model- based cluster analysis of BATSE catalogue establishes importance o f all observed parameters, confirms five distinct ellipsoidal sub-popula tions of gamma-ray bursts . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481, 3196–3209

    2018

  12. [13]

    K., & Naskar , M

    Chattopadhyay, T., Misra, R., Chattopadhyay, A. K., & Naskar , M. (2007). Statistical evidence for three classes of gamma-ray bursts . The Astrophysical Journal. 667, 1017–1023

    2007

  13. [14]

    and Yang, L

    Cheng, D., Zhu, Q., Huang, J., Wu, Q. and Yang, L. (2021). Clustering with Local Density Peaks-Based Minimum Spanning Tree . IEEE Transac- tions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 33, 374–387

    2021

  14. [15]

    S., Fishman G

    Dezalay J.-P., Barat C., Talon R., Syunyaev R., Terekhov O., Kuzne tsov A.: (1992), in Paciesas W. S., Fishman G. J., eds, AIP Conf. Ser. Vol. 2 65, Huntsville GRB Workshop. Am. Inst. Phys., New York, Page: 304

    1992

  15. [16]

    Dunn, J. C. (1974). Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. Journal of Cybernetics. 4, 95–104

    1974

  16. [17]

    S., Landau, S

    Everitt, B. S., Landau, S. and Leese, M. (2001). Cluster Analysis. Arnold, London. 26

    2001

  17. [18]

    Frayley, C. and A. E., Raftery (1998). How many clusters? Which clus- tering method? Answers via model based cluster analysis. The Computer Journal, 41, 578–88

    1998

  18. [19]

    Feigelson, E. D. & Babu, G. J. (Eds.) (2013), Statistical Challen ges in Modern Astronomy V, Lecture Notes in Statistics - Proceedings, 209, Springer Science+Business Media, New York

    2013

  19. [20]

    S., Hamburg, R., Ko - cevski, D., Wilson-Hodge, C

    Goldstein, A., Veres, P., Burns, E., Briggs, M. S., Hamburg, R., Ko - cevski, D., Wilson-Hodge, C. A., Preece, R. D., Poolakkil, S., Roberts, O. J., Hui, C. M., Connaughton, V., Racusin, J., von Kienlin, A., Canton, T. D., Christensen, N., Littenberg, T., Siellez, K., Blackburn, L., Broida, J., Bissaldi, E., Cleveland, W. H., Gibby, M. H., Giles, M. M., K...

    2017

  20. [21]

    Gehrels, N., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Fox, D. B. (2009). Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 47, 567– 617

    2009

  21. [22]

    & Kell, D

    Handl, J., Knowles, K. & Kell, D. (2005). Computational cluster vali- dation in post-genomic data analysis . Bioinformatics. 21, 3201–3212

    2005

  22. [23]

    W., Roiger, R

    Hakkila, J., Giblin, T. W., Roiger, R. J., Haglin, D. J., Paciesas, W. S., Meegan, C. A. (2003). How Sample Completeness Affects Gamma-Ray Burst Classification. The Astrophysical Journal. 582, 320–329

    2003

  23. [24]

    J., Pendleton, G

    Hakkila, J., Haglin, D. J., Pendleton, G. N., Mallozzi, R. S., Meegan, C. A. & Roiger, R. J. (2000). Gamma-ray burst class properties . The Astrophysical Journal. 538, 165–180

    2000

  24. [25]

    Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA

    1975

  25. [26]

    Hartigan, J. A. and Wong, M. A. (1979). A K-means clustering algo- rithm. Applied Statistics. 28, 100–108

    1979

  26. [27]

    V., Mckean, J

    Hogg, R. V., Mckean, J. W. and Craig, A. T. (2019). Introduction to Mathematical Statistics . Pearson Education, Boston. 27

    2019

  27. [28]

    Horv´ ath , I. (2002). A further study of the BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst duration distribution , Astronomy & Astrophysics, 392, 791–793

    2002

  28. [29]

    Jain, A. K. , Murty, M. N. and Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: a review. ACM Computing Surveys. 31, 264–323

    1999

  29. [30]

    and Kalina, J

    Jureˇ ckov´ a, J. and Kalina, J. (2012). Nonparametric multivariate rank tests and their unbiasedness. Bernoulli, 18, 229—251

    2012

  30. [31]

    and Rousseeuw, P

    Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    2005

  31. [32]

    King, A., Olsson, E., & Davies, M. B. (2007). A new type of long gamma- ray burst. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 374, L34

    2007

  32. [33]

    Kost, J. T. and McDermott, M. P. (2002). Combining dependent p- values. Statistics & Probability Letters, 60, 183—190

    2002

  33. [34]

    A., Fishman, G

    Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C. A., Fishman, G. J., Bhat, N. P., Briggs , M. S., Koshut, T. M., Paciesas, W. S., & Pendleton, G. N. (1993). Iden- tification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts. The Astrophysical Journal. 413, L101

    1993

  34. [35]

    Kulkarni, S., and Desai, S. (2017). Classification of gamma-ray burst du- rations using robust model-comparison techniques . Astrophysics and Space Science, 362, Article no. 70

    2017

  35. [36]

    P., Tanvir, N

    Lamb, G. P., Tanvir, N. R., Levan, A. J., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Kawaguchi, K., Corsi, A., Evans, P. A., Gompertz, B., Malesani, D. B., Page, K. L., Wiersema, K., Rosswog, S., Shibata, M., Tanaka, M., van der Horst, A. J., Cano, Z., Fynbo, J. P. U., Fruchter, A. S., Greiner , J., Heintz, K. E., Higgins, A., Hjorth, J., Izzo, L., Jakobsson, P., Kann, D. A....

    2019

  36. [37]

    Levan, A., Crowther, P., de Grijs, R., Langer, N., Xu, D., Yoon, S .– C. (2016). Gamma-Ray Burst Progenitors. Space Science Reviews. 202, 33–78. 28

    2016

  37. [38]

    Luo, J.-W., Wang, F.-F., Zhu-Ge, J.-M., Li, Y., Zou, Y.-C., Zhang, B. (2023). Identifying the Physical Origin of Gamma-Ray Bursts with Supervised Machine Learning , The Astrophysical Journal, 959, Article No. 44, Pages: 17

    2023

  38. [39]

    P., Golenetskii, S

    Mazets, E. P., Golenetskii, S. V., Ilyinskii, V. N., Panov, V. N., Apte kar, R. L., Guryan, Yu. A., Proskura, M. P., Sokolov, I. A., Sokolova, Z. Y a., Kharitonova, T. V., Dyatchkov, A. V., & Khavenson, N. G (1981). Cat- alog of cosmic gamma-ray bursts from the KONUS experiment data. As- trophysics and Space Science. 80, 119–143

    1981

  39. [40]

    C., Santos, S

    Matioli, L. C., Santos, S. R., Kleina, M. & Leite, E. A. (2018). A new algorithm for clustering based on kernel density estimation . Journal of Applied Statistics. 45, 347–366

    2018

  40. [41]

    and Peel, D

    McLachlan, G. and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models . John Wiley and Sons, New York

    2000

  41. [42]

    and Iyyani, S

    Mehta, N. and Iyyani, S. (2024). Exploring Gamma-Ray Burst Diversity: Clustering Analysis of the Emission Characteristics of Fermi- and BAT SE- detected Gamma-Ray Bursts . The Astrophysical Journal, 969, Article id: 88, 12 pages

    2024

  42. [43]

    B., Izzo, L., Japelj, J., Vergani, S

    Melandri, A., Malesani, D. B., Izzo, L., Japelj, J., Vergani, S. D., Sc hady, P., Sagu´ es Carracedo, A., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Anderson, J. P., Bar- barino, C., Bolmer, J., Breeveld, A., Calissendorff, P., Campana, S., Ca no, Z., Carini, R., Covino, S., D’Avanzo, P., D’Elia, V., della Valle, M., De Pasquale, M., Fynbo, J. P. U., Gromadzki, M., Hammer, F....

    2019

  43. [44]

    Minaev, P. Y. and Pozanenko, A. S. (2020). The Ep,i –Eiso correlation: type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method . Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 492, 1919–1936. 29

    2020

  44. [45]

    Modak, S. (2019). Uncovering astrophysical phenomena related to galax- ies and other objects through statistical analysis. Doctoral Thesis, Univer- sity of Calcutta, URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/314773

    2019

  45. [46]

    Modak, S. (2021). Distinction of groups of gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE catalog through fuzzy clustering . Astronomy and Computing. 34, Article id 100441, 1–7

    2021

  46. [47]

    Modak, S. (2022). A new nonparametric interpoint distance-based mea- sure for assessment of clustering . Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 9, 1062–1077

    2022

  47. [48]

    Modak, S. (2023a). Pointwise norm-based clustering of data in arbi- trary dimensional space . Communications in Statistics - Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 9, 121–134

  48. [49]

    Modak, S. (2023b). A new measure for assessment of clustering based on kernel density estimation . Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 52, 5942-5951

  49. [50]

    (2023c), Validity index for clustered data in non-negative space, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 75, 60–71

    Modak, S. (2023c), Validity index for clustered data in non-negative space, Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 75, 60–71

  50. [51]

    Modak, S. (2023d), Statistical Methods for Astronomical Data Anal- ysis authored by Asis Kumar Chattopadhyay & Tanuka Chattopadh yay, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 65, 394–395

  51. [52]

    Modak, S. (2024a). Book Review: Finding Groups in Data: An Intro- duction to Cluster Analysis, Leonard Kaufman & Peter J. Rousseeu w, Journal of Applied Statistics, 51, 1618–1620

  52. [53]

    (2024b), Evaluation of the number of clusters in a data set us- ing p-values from multiple tests of hypotheses , Communications in Statis- tics - Theory and Methods, 53, 8878-8889

    Modak, S. (2024b), Evaluation of the number of clusters in a data set us- ing p-values from multiple tests of hypotheses , Communications in Statis- tics - Theory and Methods, 53, 8878-8889

  53. [54]

    Modak, S. (2024c). A new interpoint distance-based clustering algorithm using kernel density estimation , Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 53, 5323-5341

  54. [55]

    Modak, S. (2024d). Determination of the number of clusters through logistic regression analysis . Journal of Applied Statistics, 51, 2344-2363. 30

  55. [56]

    Modak, S. (2024e). A New Clustering Accuracy Measure Based on Rela- tive Distances and its Cross-Validation Using Dirichlet Distribution , Jour- nal of Statistical Theory and Practice. 18, Article no. 43, 14 Pages

  56. [57]

    & Bandyopadhyay, U

    Modak, S. & Bandyopadhyay, U. (2019). A new nonparametric test for two sample multivariate location problem with application to astronomy . Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications. 18, 136–146

    2019

  57. [58]

    & Chattopadhyay, A

    Modak, S., Chattopadhyay, T. & Chattopadhyay, A. K. (2017 ). Two phase formation of massive elliptical galaxies: study through cross - correlation including spatial effect , Astrophysics and Space Science. 362, Article id: 206, pages 1–10

    2017

  58. [59]

    Modak, S., Chattopadhyay, A. K. & Chattopadhyay, T. (2018 ). Clus- tering of gamma-ray bursts through kernel principal component analysis. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation. 47, 1088– 1102

    2018

  59. [60]

    & Chattopadhyay, A

    Modak, S., Chattopadhyay, T. & Chattopadhyay, A. K. (2020 ). Unsu- pervised classification of eclipsing binary light curves through k-med oids clustering. Journal of Applied Statistics. 47, 376–392

    2020

  60. [61]

    & Chattopadhyay, A

    Modak, S., Chattopadhyay, T. & Chattopadhyay, A. K. (2022 ). Cluster- ing of eclipsing binary light curves through functional principal comp onent analysis. Astrophysics and Space Science. 367, Article id: 19, pages 1–10

    2022

  61. [62]

    D., Babu, G

    Mukherjee, S., Feigelson, E. D., Babu, G. J., Murtagh, F., Fraley , C. & Raftery, A. (1998). Three types of gamma-ray bursts . The Astrophysical Journal. 508, 314–327

    1998

  62. [63]

    Nakar, E. (2007). Short-hard gamma-ray bursts . Physics Reports. 442, 166–236. Narayana Bhat, P., Meegan, C. A., von Kienlin, A., et al. (20 16). The third Fermi GBM gamma-ray burst catalog: The first six years . As- trophysics and Space Science. 223, Article id: 28, 18 pages

    2007

  63. [64]

    P., Cline, T

    Norris, J. P., Cline, T. L., Desai, U. D., & Teegarden, B. J. (1984) . Frequency of fast, narrow γ-ray bursts. Nature. 308, 434–435

    1984

  64. [65]

    (2016), Suzaku Wide-band All-sky Monitor measurements of duration distributions of gamma-r ay 31 bursts, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 68, S30, 11 pages

    Ohmori, N., Yamaoka, K., Ohno, M., et al. (2016), Suzaku Wide-band All-sky Monitor measurements of duration distributions of gamma-r ay 31 bursts, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 68, S30, 11 pages

    2016

  65. [66]

    Are gamma-ray bursts in star-forming regions ?

    Paczy´ nski, B., (1998). Are gamma-ray bursts in star-forming regions ?. The Astrophysical Journal. 494, L45

    1998

  66. [67]

    K., Bandyopadhyay, S

    Pakhiraa, M. K., Bandyopadhyay, S. and Maulik, U. (2004). Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters . Pattern Recognition. 37, 487–501

    2004

  67. [68]

    L., Shmulevich,

    Poole, W., Gibbs, D. L., Shmulevich,. I., Bernard, B., Knijnenburg, T. A. (2016). Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown’s method. Bioinformatics, 32, i430—i436

    2016

  68. [69]

    Rajaniemi, H. J. & M¨ ah¨ onen, P. (2002).Classifying Gamma-Ray Bursts using Self-organizing Maps. The Astrophysical Journal. 566, 202–209

    2002

  69. [70]

    ˇR ´ ıpa, J., M´ esz´ aros, A., Veres, P., & Park, I. H. (2012).On the spectral lags and peak countsof the gamma-ray bursts detected by the RH ESSI satellite. The Astrophysical Journal, 756, Article No. 44, 13 pages

    2012

  70. [71]

    Ripley, B. D. (1996). Pattern recognition and neural networks . Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge

    1996

  71. [72]

    Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpre- tation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 20, 53–65

    1987

  72. [73]

    Silva, L. E. Brito Da, Melton, N. M. and Wunsch, D. C. (2020). Incre- mental Cluster Validity Indices for Online Learning of Hard Partitions : Extensions and Comparative Study . Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 8, 22025–22047

    2020

  73. [74]

    Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B. and Raftery, A. E. (2016) . mclust 5: Clustering, Classification and Density Estimation Using Gaussian Finite Mixture Models . The R Journal, 8, 289–317

    2016

  74. [75]

    and Hastie, T

    Tibshirani, R., Walther, G. and Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating of the number of clusters in data set via the gap statistic , Journal of Royal Sta- tistical Society, Series B, 63, 411-423

    2001

  75. [76]

    Tarnopolski, M. (2015). On the limit between short and long GRBs , Astrophysics and Space Science. 359:, 20. 32

    2015

  76. [77]

    Tarnopolski, M. (2016a). Analysis of gamma-ray burst duration distribu- tion using mixtures of skewed distributions , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 458, 2024–2031

    2024

  77. [78]

    Tarnopolski, M. (2016b). Analysis of the observed and intrinsic dura- tions of Swift/BAT gamma-ray bursts , New Astronomy, 46, 54–59

  78. [79]

    Tarnopolski, M. (2019). Analysis of the Duration–Hardness Ratio Plane of Gamma-Ray Bursts Using Skewed Distributions , The Astrophysical Journal. 870, Article id: 105, 9 pages

    2019

  79. [80]

    Tarnopolski, M. (2022). Graph-based clustering of gamma-ray bursts . Astronomy & Astrophysics, 657, Article No. A13, 8 pages

    2022

  80. [81]

    G., R´ acz, I

    T´ oth, B. G., R´ acz, I. I. & Horv´ ath, I. (2019).Gaussian-mixture-model- based cluster analysis of gamma-ray bursts in the BATSE catalog . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 486, 4823–4828

    2019

Showing first 80 references.