arxiv: 2605.07585 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · hep-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector

ATLAS Collaboration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det hep-ex

keywords track reconstructionvertex reconstructionATLAS Inner DetectorLHC Run 2LHC Run 3pile-upefficiencyresolution

0 comments

The pith

ATLAS Inner Detector track and vertex reconstruction maintains high efficiency and resolution with up to 80 simultaneous collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper describes the algorithms used to reconstruct charged-particle tracks and primary vertices from the ATLAS Inner Detector. It evaluates performance on actual Run 2 and Run 3 collision data plus matching simulations, showing that efficiency stays high, key parameter resolutions remain good, and fake-track rates stay low even when 80 proton-proton interactions overlap in the same bunch crossing. A reader would care because every physics measurement at the LHC begins with finding the right tracks and vertices; without reliable reconstruction the entire analysis chain fails. The work therefore tests whether the current software configuration can continue to support physics goals as collision rates increase.

Core claim

The ATLAS track and vertex reconstruction algorithms, in the software version used for recent data taking, deliver high efficiency, accurate resolutions for track parameters, and low rates of mis-reconstructed candidates when applied to both Run 2 (2015-2018) and Run 3 (2022) data containing up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interactions.

What carries the argument

The pattern-recognition, track-fitting, and vertex-finding algorithms that process hits recorded in the ATLAS Inner Detector silicon and transition-radiation trackers.

If this is right

Physics analyses that rely on precise track momentum and impact-parameter measurements remain feasible in high-luminosity running.
Primary-vertex finding continues to locate the correct interaction point, supporting b-tagging and other secondary-vertex techniques.
Low rates of spurious tracks reduce background in rare-process searches even when many collisions overlap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The demonstrated performance indicates that the same algorithmic approach can be retained or modestly extended for the higher pile-up expected in future LHC runs.
Any observed differences between data and simulation can be used to improve the modeling of detector material and electronics response for the next data-taking periods.

Load-bearing premise

Simulated events accurately reproduce the real detector response, material distribution, and pile-up conditions so that efficiencies and resolutions measured in simulation can be trusted for real data.

What would settle it

A clear drop in measured track-reconstruction efficiency or a rise in fake-track rate in real data relative to simulation, especially at the highest pile-up values, would show the performance claims do not hold.

read the original abstract

Charged-particle reconstruction is a fundamental part of the event reconstruction in modern multi-purpose high-energy physics detectors. This paper describes the algorithms used to reconstruct charged particles and primary vertices with the ATLAS Inner Detector. The most recent software configuration deployed for data-taking is described, and the performance obtained when this software is used to process Run 2 (2015-2018) data, a subset (from 2022) of Run 3 (2022-2026) data, and corresponding simulated data is presented. The ATLAS track and vertex reconstruction performance is shown for up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interaction. It maintains a high efficiency, good resolution for key parameters, and low rates of mis-reconstructed candidates for Run 2 and Run 3 conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a standard ATLAS technical update on track and vertex reconstruction performance for Run 2 and early Run 3, with no new methods but useful documented numbers under high pile-up.

read the letter

This paper describes the current algorithms and performance of track and vertex reconstruction in the ATLAS Inner Detector. It focuses on the latest software configuration used for data taking and presents results from Run 2 data, a 2022 subset of Run 3, and matching simulations, all under pile-up conditions up to 80 interactions. The work does a good job laying out the reconstruction chain and showing that efficiency stays high, resolutions for key track parameters remain good, and fake rates are controlled even in dense events. Having these metrics documented for the specific Run 3 conditions is helpful, as it gives a baseline for analyses using that data. Nothing here is conceptually new. The methods are established ones, and the paper mainly reports how the existing tools perform on newer data periods rather than introducing fresh techniques or derivations. The soft spot is the reliance on simulation for validating performance. The claims about data performance come from data-MC comparisons, so they inherit any inaccuracies in how the Monte Carlo models the detector material, sensor response, or pile-up effects. The abstract mentions agreement, but without deeper discussion of potential mismatches in high-multiplicity environments, the robustness is hard to judge fully. This paper is for ATLAS internal use and for external groups who need to understand the reconstruction details when working with ATLAS results. It is not aimed at a broad audience looking for novel ideas. I would recommend sending it for peer review. These kinds of technical documentation papers are important for the field and benefit from external checks on the validation methods.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper describes the algorithms for charged-particle track and primary vertex reconstruction in the ATLAS Inner Detector using the most recent software configuration. It presents performance results obtained on Run 2 (2015-2018) data, a 2022 subset of Run 3 data, and corresponding Monte Carlo simulations, claiming that high efficiency, good resolution for key parameters, and low rates of mis-reconstructed candidates are maintained under pile-up conditions with up to 80 simultaneous proton-proton interactions.

Significance. If the results hold, this work is significant for documenting the reconstruction performance essential to all ATLAS physics analyses in the high-luminosity Run 3 environment. The explicit data/MC comparisons provide a basis for assessing systematic uncertainties in track and vertex observables. The empirical validation on real data strengthens the assessment, though no machine-checked proofs or open code are provided.

major comments (1)

[§5] §5 (Performance results): The central claims of maintained high efficiency, good resolution, and low fake rates for Run 3 rest on the assumption that simulated samples accurately reproduce the Inner Detector material budget, sensor response, and pile-up overlay. The manuscript provides no quantitative data/MC agreement metrics (e.g., efficiency ratios or pull distributions) specifically in the highest multiplicity bins (>60 interactions) for the 2022 subset, which directly affects the reliability of the reported performance numbers.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The statement that performance 'maintains a high efficiency, good resolution... and low rates' is qualitative; specific numerical values or references to the relevant figures/tables should be added for precision.
Figure captions and legends: Several performance plots comparing Run 2 and Run 3 would benefit from explicit labels distinguishing data from simulation and indicating the pile-up range shown.
References: The manuscript should cite the previous ATLAS Inner Detector performance papers (e.g., from Run 1 or early Run 2) to clearly delineate what is new in the current software configuration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§5] §5 (Performance results): The central claims of maintained high efficiency, good resolution, and low fake rates for Run 3 rest on the assumption that simulated samples accurately reproduce the Inner Detector material budget, sensor response, and pile-up overlay. The manuscript provides no quantitative data/MC agreement metrics (e.g., efficiency ratios or pull distributions) specifically in the highest multiplicity bins (>60 interactions) for the 2022 subset, which directly affects the reliability of the reported performance numbers.

Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative data/MC agreement metrics in the highest multiplicity bins would strengthen the assessment of simulation fidelity for Run 3 conditions. The current manuscript presents performance results and data/MC comparisons for the 2022 subset across a range of pile-up values up to 80 interactions, but does not include binned ratio or pull values specifically above 60 interactions. In the revised manuscript we will add efficiency ratios and pull distributions for the >60 interaction bins using the 2022 data and corresponding simulations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: performance metrics obtained from independent data/MC comparisons

full rationale

The paper describes the track and vertex reconstruction algorithms and reports measured efficiencies, resolutions, and fake rates obtained by running the software on real Run 2/Run 3 data and on corresponding simulated samples. These quantities are extracted via direct comparison to truth information in simulation or via data-driven methods; they are not derived from the algorithms by construction, nor are they obtained by fitting parameters to the very quantities being reported. Prior ATLAS publications are cited for context and for the description of earlier configurations, but the central performance claims rest on the new processing of the present datasets rather than on any self-citation chain or ansatz that would render the results tautological. The evaluation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (data and independent simulation).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a technical performance report on established reconstruction software; no new physical axioms, free parameters fitted to data, or invented entities are introduced beyond standard detector modeling assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5413 in / 1013 out tokens · 35632 ms · 2026-05-11T01:48:42.420339+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Search for charginos and neutralinos with $B-L$ $R$-parity violating decays in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $13.6$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
hep-ex 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

No evidence for charginos and neutralinos in R-parity violating Higgs-decay channels; masses 150-1100 GeV excluded at 95% CL assuming equal lepton branching fractions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 126 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

[1]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

work page 2008
[2]

ATLAS Collaboration,Charged-particle distributions in √𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝interactions measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B758(2016) 67, arXiv:1602.01633 [hep-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[3]

ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon efficiencies in LHC Run 2 with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP05(2024) 162, arXiv:2308.13362 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[4]

ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 2 data, JINST19(2024) P02009, arXiv:2309.05471 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv:2012.00578 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[6]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies of the muon momentum calibration and performance of the ATLAS detector with𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 686, arXiv:2212.07338 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[7]

ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[8]

ATLAS Collaboration,Optimisation of large-radius jet reconstruction for the ATLAS detector in 13TeV proton–proton collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 334, arXiv:2009.04986 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

ATLAS Collaboration,Improved reconstruction of highly boosted𝜏-lepton pairs in the 𝜏𝜏→ (𝜇𝜈 𝜇𝜈𝜏) (hadrons+𝜈 𝜏)decay channels with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 706, arXiv:2412.14937 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

ATLAS Collaboration,Constituent-Based𝑊-boson Tagging with the ATLAS Detector, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-020, 2023,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2860189

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

ATLAS Collaboration,Accuracy versus precision in boosted top tagging with the ATLAS detector, JINST19(2024) P08018, arXiv:2407.20127 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance and efficiency of a transformer-based quark/gluon jet tagger in the ATLAS experiment, (2025), arXiv:2512.03949 [hep-ex]. 48

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

ATLAS Collaboration,Transforming jet flavour tagging at ATLAS, Nature Commun.17(2026) 541, arXiv:2505.19689 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[14]

ATLAS Collaboration,Transformer Neural Networks for Identifying Boosted Higgs Bosons decaying into𝑏 ¯𝑏and𝑐¯𝑐in ATLAS, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-021, 2023, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2866601

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of pile-up mitigation techniques for jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 581, arXiv:1510.03823 [hep-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[16]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the𝑊-boson mass in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 110, arXiv:1701.07240 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 898

work page arXiv 2018
[17]

ATLAS Collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607(2022) 52, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature612(2022) E24

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and multiple jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06(2023) 200, arXiv:2301.13866 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Light Long-Lived Particles in𝑝 𝑝Collisions at√𝑠=13TeV Using Displaced Vertices in the ATLAS Inner Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 161803, arXiv:2403.15332 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

ATLAS Collaboration, Search for emerging jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13.6TeV with the ATLAS experiment, Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 097801, arXiv:2505.02429 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS inner detector trigger performance in𝑝 𝑝collisions at13TeV during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 206, arXiv:2107.02485 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

ATLAS Collaboration,Operation of the ATLAS trigger system in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P10004, arXiv:2007.12539 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19(2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Inner Detector: Technical Design Report, Volume 1, ATLAS-TDR-4; CERN-LHCC-97-016, 1997,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/331063

work page 1997
[25]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software Performance of the ATLAS Track Reconstruction for LHC Run 3, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 9, arXiv:2308.09471 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the reconstruction of large impact parameter tracks in the inner detector of ATLAS, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1081, arXiv:2304.12867 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into𝑊(ℓ𝜈)𝑏 in 𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP12(2025) 012, arXiv:2506.15515 [hep-ex]. 49

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for single vector-like𝐵quark production and decay via 𝐵 𝑡𝑜𝑏𝐻(𝑏 ¯𝑏)in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11(2023) 168, arXiv:2308.02595 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

ATLAS Collaboration,Study of High-Transverse-Momentum Higgs Boson Production in Association with a Vector Boson in the𝑞𝑞𝑏𝑏Final State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 131802, arXiv:2312.07605 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

work page arXiv 2010
[32]

Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2018
[33]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker in Run 1 of the LHC: tracker properties, JINST12(2017) P05002, arXiv:1702.06473 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2017
[34]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Collaboration Software and Firmware, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2021-001, 2021,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2767187

work page arXiv 2021
[35]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

ATLAS Collaboration,Study of the material of the ATLAS inner detector for Run 2 of the LHC, JINST12(2017) P12009, arXiv:1707.02826 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

ATLAS Collaboration,Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector in Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1194, arXiv:2007.07624 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

ATLAS Collaboration,A neural network clustering algorithm for the ATLAS silicon pixel detector, JINST9(2014) P09009, arXiv:1406.7690 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2014
[39]

ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[40]

ATLAS Collaboration,Modelling radiation damage to pixel sensors in the ATLAS detector, JINST14(2019) P06012, arXiv:1905.03739 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2019
[41]

ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of sensor radiation damage in the ATLAS inner detector using leakage currents, JINST16(2021) P08025, arXiv:2106.09287 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[42]

ATLAS Collaboration,Calibration of the ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker, ATLAS-CONF-2011-006, 2011,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1330712

work page arXiv 2011
[43]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]. 50

work page arXiv 2015
[44]

Battaglia,ATLAS Planar and 3D Pixel Sensor Performance and Operational Experience at the Large Hadron Collider, PoSEPS-HEP2023(2023) 527

M. Battaglia,ATLAS Planar and 3D Pixel Sensor Performance and Operational Experience at the Large Hadron Collider, PoSEPS-HEP2023(2023) 527

work page 2023
[45]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[46]

A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[47]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[48]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[49]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[50]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168

work page arXiv 2016
[51]

ATLAS Collaboration, Simulation of top-quark production for the ATLAS experiment at√𝑠=13TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-004, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2120417

work page arXiv 2016
[52]

ATLAS Collaboration, Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling with Sherpa and MG5_aMC@NLO, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-007, 2017,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2261938

work page arXiv 2017
[53]

ATLAS Collaboration, Improvements in𝑡¯𝑡modelling using NLO+PS Monte Carlo generators for Run 2, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-009, 2018,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2630327

work page arXiv 2018
[54]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[55]

ATLAS Collaboration,Multijet simulation for13TeV ATLAS Analyses, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-017, 2019,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2672252

work page arXiv 2019
[56]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[57]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

work page 2003
[58]

Salzburger, S

A. Salzburger, S. Todorova and M. Wolter,The ATLAS Tracking Geometry Description, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2007-004, 2007,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1038098

work page arXiv 2007
[59]

ATLAS Collaboration,Emulating the impact of additional proton–proton interactions in the ATLAS simulation by presampling sets of inelastic Monte Carlo events, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.6(2022) 3, arXiv:2102.09495 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Parton Ladder Splitting and the Rapidity Dependence of Transverse Momentum Spectra in Deuteron-Gold Collisions at RHIC

K. Werner, F.-M. Liu and T. Pierog, Parton ladder splitting and the rapidity dependence of transverse momentum spectra in deuteron–gold collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C74(2006) 044902, arXiv:hep-ph/0506232. 51

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[61]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[62]

EPOS LHC : test of collective hadronization with LHC data

T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko and K. Werner,EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[63]

ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

work page arXiv 2016
[64]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[65]

P. F. Åkesson et al.,ATLAS Tracking Event Data Model, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2006-004, 2006, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/973401

work page 2006
[66]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[67]

ATLAS Collaboration,Characterization of Interaction-Point Beam Parameters Using the𝑝 𝑝 Event-Vertex Distribution Reconstructed in the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2010-027, 2010,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1277659

work page arXiv 2010
[68]

Ai et al.,A Common Tracking Software Project, Computing and Software for Big Science6(2022) 8, arXiv:2106.13593 [hep-ex]

X. Ai et al.,A Common Tracking Software Project, Computing and Software for Big Science6(2022) 8, arXiv:2106.13593 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

Aleksa et al.,Measurement of the ATLAS solenoid magnetic field, JINST3(2008) P04003

M. Aleksa et al.,Measurement of the ATLAS solenoid magnetic field, JINST3(2008) P04003

work page 2008
[70]

R. E. Kalman,A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems, Transactions of the ASME–Journal of Basic Engineering82(1960) 35

work page 1960
[71]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Run 3 charged particle track seed finding performance, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-034, 2023,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2882156

work page arXiv 2023
[72]

Frühwirth,Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting, Nucl

R. Frühwirth,Application of Kalman filtering to track and vertex fitting, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A262(1987) 444

work page 1987
[73]

Nyström,Über die numerische Integration von Differentialgleichungen, Acta Societatis scientiarum Fennicae, Druck der Finnischen Literaturgesellschaft, 1925

E. Nyström,Über die numerische Integration von Differentialgleichungen, Acta Societatis scientiarum Fennicae, Druck der Finnischen Literaturgesellschaft, 1925

work page 1925
[74]

E. Lund, L. Bugge, I. Gavrilenko and A. Strandlie,Track parameter propagation through the application of a new adaptive Runge-Kutta-Nyström method in the ATLAS experiment, JINST4(2009) P04001

work page 2009
[75]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of𝛿rays in ATLAS silicon detectors, ATLAS-CONF-2013-005, 2013,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1509553

work page arXiv 2013
[76]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS Silicon Pattern Recognition Algorithm in Data and Simulation at√𝑠=7TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2010-072, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1281363

work page arXiv 2010
[77]

E. E. Khoda,ATLAS pixel cluster splitting using Mixture Density Networks, tech. rep., CERN, 2019,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2687968

work page arXiv 2019
[78]

T. G. Cornelissen et al.,The global𝜒2 track fitter in ATLAS, Journal of Physics: Conference Series119(2008) 032013. 52

work page 2008
[79]

Billoir,Track fitting with multiple scattering: A new method, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research225(1984) 352

P. Billoir,Track fitting with multiple scattering: A new method, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research225(1984) 352

work page 1984
[80]

Bethe and W

H. Bethe and W. Heitler,On the stopping of fast particles and on the creation of positive electrons, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character146(1934) 83

work page 1934

Showing first 80 references.