arxiv: 2605.13819 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Search for charginos and neutralinos with B-L R-parity violating decays in sqrt{s}=13 TeV and 13.6 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 17:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords supersymmetryR-parity violationcharginosneutralinosB-L gauge symmetryATLASLHCHiggs boson

0 comments

The pith

ATLAS excludes charginos and neutralinos with masses between 150 and 1100 GeV in a B-L R-parity violating supersymmetry model when they decay to Higgs bosons with equal lepton branching fractions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper searches for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos that decay through R-parity violating couplings to a lepton plus a W, Z or Higgs boson. It focuses on the Higgs decay mode using proton-proton collision data at 13 and 13.6 TeV, selecting events with three or more b-tagged jets and one or two leptons. The observed event yields match Standard Model predictions, allowing the experiment to set 95% confidence level limits on the masses of these particles. The results constrain a specific Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model extension with an additional B-L gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken.

Core claim

No deviation from Standard Model background expectations is observed in the selected final states, which leads to 95% confidence level exclusions of charginos and neutralinos with masses from 150 GeV to 1100 GeV for the scenario in which they decay via Higgs bosons assuming equal branching fractions to each lepton flavor; additional limits are set for flavor-specific decay scenarios and on model-independent cross sections.

What carries the argument

Event selection requiring three or more b-tagged jets together with one or two electrons or muons, used to extract limits on R-parity violating decays of charginos and neutralinos in the B-L extended MSSM.

If this is right

Model-independent limits are placed on the cross sections of any beyond-Standard-Model process producing the same final state.
Flavor-specific branching-fraction scenarios receive separate exclusion curves.
The mass exclusion range of 150–1100 GeV applies specifically to the Higgs-mediated decay channel under equal lepton-flavor branching ratios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These limits reduce the allowed parameter space for supersymmetric models that attempt to explain neutrino masses via R-parity violation.
Higher-luminosity runs at the LHC could push the mass reach beyond 1 TeV if background modeling remains reliable.
Analogous searches in other decay channels, such as those involving W or Z bosons, would complement the current Higgs-focused results.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that Monte Carlo simulations and data-driven methods correctly predict both signal efficiencies and Standard Model backgrounds in events with multiple b-tagged jets and one or two leptons, and that the decays have equal branching fractions to each lepton flavor.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of events above the predicted background in the three-or-more b-tagged jets plus one-or-two leptons selection would invalidate the mass exclusions.

read the original abstract

A search is performed for the electroweak pair production of charginos and associated production of a chargino and neutralino, each of which decays through an $R$-parity-violating coupling into a lepton and a $W$, $Z$, or Higgs boson. This search targets the Higgs boson decay channel of the charginos and neutralinos, using events with three or more $b$-tagged jets and one or two electrons or muons. The analyzed data corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ and 56 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data produced by the Large Hadron Collider at center-of-mass energies of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV respectively, collected by the ATLAS experiment between 2015 and 2023. The data are found to be consistent with predictions from the Standard Model. The results are interpreted as limits at 95% confidence level on model-independent cross sections for processes beyond the Standard Model. Limits are also set on the production of charginos and neutralinos for a Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with an additional $B-L$ gauge symmetry that is spontaneously broken. Charginos and neutralinos with masses between 150 GeV and 1100 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for a scenario in which they decay via Higgs bosons, assuming equal decay branching fractions to each lepton flavor. Additional limits are derived for flavor-specific decay scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ATLAS combines 13 and 13.6 TeV data to set tighter mass limits on charginos and neutralinos in a B-L RPV model, with data matching Standard Model expectations and no excess seen.

read the letter

This ATLAS paper updates limits on charginos and neutralinos in a B-L extended MSSM with R-parity violation. They target Higgs-mediated decays using events with three or more b-tagged jets and one or two leptons, combining 140 fb^{-1} at 13 TeV with 56 fb^{-1} at 13.6 TeV. No deviation from Standard Model predictions appears, so they exclude masses from 150 to 1100 GeV at 95% CL assuming equal lepton-flavor branching fractions, plus flavor-specific variants and model-independent cross-section bounds.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a search for electroweak pair production of charginos and chargino-neutralino associated production in a B-L R-parity violating supersymmetric model. The analysis targets decays through an R-parity violating coupling to a lepton plus W/Z/Higgs boson, with emphasis on the Higgs decay channel. Events are selected with three or more b-tagged jets and one or two electrons or muons in 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV and 56 fb^{-1} of 13.6 TeV ATLAS data. Observed yields are consistent with Standard Model expectations, yielding 95% CL limits on model-independent cross sections and on chargino/neutralino masses (150-1100 GeV excluded for equal lepton-flavor branching fractions in the Higgs scenario), with additional flavor-specific limits provided.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies updated and competitive constraints on charginos and neutralinos in B-L RPV SUSY models by combining higher luminosity with the new 13.6 TeV dataset. The use of standard ATLAS simulation-plus-data-driven background methods, together with explicit limit-setting on both model-independent and model-specific cross sections, adds directly usable information for global SUSY fits and motivates further theoretical exploration of R-parity violating scenarios.

minor comments (2)

[Section 6] The breakdown of systematic uncertainties on signal efficiency and background yields in the 3b+1l and 3b+2l channels could be presented in a dedicated table to improve transparency of the dominant contributions.
[Introduction] A short paragraph comparing the new mass limits with the most recent ATLAS and CMS RPV searches in similar final states would help readers assess the incremental improvement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition that the results provide updated and competitive constraints on charginos and neutralinos in B-L RPV SUSY models. We appreciate the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

This is a standard experimental search paper that compares observed data in the 3+ b-tagged jet + 1-2 lepton channel to Standard Model background predictions obtained from simulation and data-driven methods. Limits on chargino/neutralino masses are set by direct comparison of data to expected background plus signal cross-sections; no derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The equal lepton-flavor branching-fraction assumption is an explicit model input for one scenario, not a result derived from the data. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks (observed events vs. SM expectation) with no internal reduction of the central exclusion claim to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Standard Model background modeling and detector simulation calibrated to control regions; the only notable model assumption is equal lepton branching fractions.

free parameters (1)

equal lepton-flavor branching fractions
Assumed for the quoted exclusion limits; not fitted from data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Standard Model predictions accurately describe backgrounds in the signal region
Used to declare data consistent with SM and to set limits.
domain assumption Monte Carlo simulation correctly models signal acceptance and efficiency
Required to translate observed limits into mass exclusions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5593 in / 1272 out tokens · 57554 ms · 2026-05-14T17:37:10.229552+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

[1]

Gol’fand and E

Y. Gol’fand and E. Likhtman, Extension of the Algebra of Poincare Group Generators and Violation of P Invariance, JETP Lett.13(1971) 323, [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.13(1971) 452]

1971
[2]

D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov,Is the neutrino a goldstone particle?Phys. Lett. B46(1973) 109

1973
[3]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge transformations in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B70(1974) 39

1974
[4]

Wess and B

J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge invariant extension of quantum electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B78(1974) 1

1974
[5]

Ferrara and B

S. Ferrara and B. Zumino,Supergauge invariant Yang-Mills theories, Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 413

1974
[6]

Salam and J

A. Salam and J. Strathdee,Super-symmetry and non-Abelian gauges, Phys. Lett. B51(1974) 353

1974
[7]

Sakai,Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS, Z

N. Sakai,Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS, Z. Phys. C11(1981) 153

1981
[8]

Dimopoulos, S

S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek,Supersymmetry and the scale of unification, Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 1681

1981
[9]

L. E. Ibáñez and G. G. Ross,Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories, Phys. Lett. B105(1981) 439

1981
[10]

Dimopoulos and H

S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi,Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B193(1981) 150

1981
[11]

G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet,Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B76(1978) 575

1978
[12]

Evans and P

L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3(2008) S08001

2008
[13]

Spontaneous R-Parity Breaking, Stop LSP Decays and the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy

Z. Marshall, B. A. Ovrut, A. Purves, and S. Spinner, Spontaneous𝑅-Parity Breaking, Stop LSP Decays and the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B732(2014) 325, arXiv:1401.7989 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[14]

R. Deen, B. A. Ovrut, and A. Purves, The minimal SUSY B−L model: simultaneous Wilson lines and string thresholds, JHEP07(2016) 043, arXiv:1604.08588 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[15]

New Paradigm for Baryon and Lepton Number Violation

P. Fileviez Perez,New Paradigm for Baryon and Lepton Number Violation, Phys. Rept.597(2015) 1, arXiv:1501.01886 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[16]

B. A. Ovrut, A. Purves, and S. Spinner, The minimal SUSY𝐵−𝐿model: from the unification scale to the LHC, JHEP06(2015) 182, arXiv:1503.01473 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[17]

The $R$-parity Violating Decays of Charginos and Neutralinos in the B-L MSSM

S. Dumitru, B. A. Ovrut, and A. Purves, The𝑅-parity Violating Decays of Charginos and Neutralinos in the𝐵−𝐿MSSM, JHEP02(2019) 124, arXiv:1810.11035 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[18]

$R$-parity Violating Decays of Wino Chargino and Wino Neutralino LSPs and NLSPs at the LHC

S. Dumitru, B. A. Ovrut, and A. Purves, 𝑅-parity Violating Decays of Wino Chargino and Wino Neutralino LSPs and NLSPs at the LHC, JHEP06(2019) 100, arXiv:1811.05581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[19]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for trilepton resonances from chargino and neutralino pair production in√𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 112003, arXiv:2011.10543 [hep-ex]. 23

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for𝐵−𝐿 𝑅-parity-violating top squarks in √𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝 collisions with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 032003, arXiv:1710.05544 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for𝑅-parity violating supersymmetric decays of the top squark to a 𝑏-jet and a lepton in√𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 092004, arXiv:2406.18367 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

ATLAS Collaboration,Transforming jet flavour tagging at ATLAS, Nature Commun.17(2026) 541, arXiv:2505.19689 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[23]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

2008
[24]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider: a description of the detector configuration for Run 3, JINST19(2024) P05063, arXiv:2305.16623 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[26]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS trigger system for LHC Run 3 and trigger performance in 2022, JINST19(2024) P06029, arXiv:2401.06630 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

ATLAS Collaboration, Preliminary analysis of the luminosity calibration for the ATLAS13.6TeV data recorded in 2023, ATL-DAPR-PUB-2024-001, 2024,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2900949

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

2018
[31]

ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2015
[32]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[35]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

2003
[36]

B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering, Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of8TeV, JHEP10(2012) 081, arXiv:1207.2159 [hep-ph]. 24

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[37]

B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea, and M. Rothering, Precisionpredictionsforelectroweaksuperpartnerproductionathadroncolliderswithresummino, Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2480, arXiv:1304.0790 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[38]

Fiaschi, B

J. Fiaschi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen, and A. Neuwirth, Electroweak superpartner production at 13.6 Tev with Resummino, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 707, arXiv:2304.11915 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[40]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball, et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[42]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014
[43]

T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, N. Moretti, and S. Pozzorini, New NLOPS predictions for𝑡¯𝑡+𝑏-jet production at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 502, arXiv:1802.00426 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[44]

Buccioni, J.-N

F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[45]

Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer, and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[46]

Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212(2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[47]

A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi, and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[48]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[49]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[50]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[51]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[52]

Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation

M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein, and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation, Nucl. Phys. B855(2012) 695, arXiv:1109.1536 [hep-ph]. 25

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[53]

Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation

M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov, and P. Nason,Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation, Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 612, arXiv:1111.5869 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[54]

Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: first genuine NNLO QCD corrections to q qbar -> t tbar + X

P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon, and A. Mitov,Percent-Level-Precision Physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to𝑞¯𝑞→𝑡¯𝑡+𝑋, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 132001, arXiv:1204.5201 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[55]

NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels

M. Czakon and A. Mitov,NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels, JHEP12(2012) 054, arXiv:1207.0236 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[56]

NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction

M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction, JHEP01(2013) 080, arXiv:1210.6832 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[57]

The total top quark pair production cross-section at hadron colliders through O(alpha_S^4)

M. Czakon, P. Fiedler, and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO (𝛼4 𝑆), Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 252004, arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[58]

Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[59]

Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[60]

Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[61]

ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, Reference Single Top-Quark Cross-Sections for ATLAS and CMS Analyses, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2025-035, 2025,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2942746

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H-

N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a𝑊 − or 𝐻 −, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 054018, arXiv:1005.4451 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[63]

Top Quark Production

N. Kidonakis, “Top Quark Production,”Proceedings, Helmholtz International Summer School on Physics of Heavy Quarks and Hadrons (HQ2013)(JINR, Dubna, Russia, July 15–28, 2013) 139, arXiv:1311.0283 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[64]

High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO

C. Anastasiou, L. Dixon, K. Melnikov, and F. Petriello,High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 094008, arXiv:hep-ph/0312266

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[65]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168

work page arXiv 2016
[66]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball, et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[67]

The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv:0802.1189 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[68]

FastJet user manual

M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv:1111.6097 [hep-ph]. 26

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[69]

R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663, arXiv:1706.00428 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[70]

H. B. Hartanto, B. Jäger, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth, Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 094003, arXiv:1501.04498 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[71]

Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W boson

S. Frixione, E. Laenen, P. Motylinski, C. White, and B. R. Webber, Single-top hadroproduction in association with a𝑊boson, JHEP07(2008) 029, arXiv:0805.3067 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[72]

A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv:1111.1220 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[73]

QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr, and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv:1207.5030 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[74]

QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber, and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[75]

QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann, and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[76]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

2001
[77]

ATLAS Collaboration,Emulating the impact of additional proton–proton interactions in the ATLAS simulation by presampling sets of inelastic Monte Carlo events, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.6(2022) 3, arXiv:2102.09495 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[78]

Parton Ladder Splitting and the Rapidity Dependence of Transverse Momentum Spectra in Deuteron-Gold Collisions at RHIC

K. Werner, F.-M. Liu, and T. Pierog, Parton ladder splitting and the rapidity dependence of transverse momentum spectra in deuteron–gold collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C74(2006) 044902, arXiv:hep-ph/0506232

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[79]

EPOS LHC : test of collective hadronization with LHC data

T. Pierog, I. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner,EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 034906, arXiv:1306.0121 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[80]

ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

work page arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.