arxiv: 2605.08155 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 📊 stat.AP · math.PR· physics.data-an· physics.flu-dyn

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Structural and Lagrangian properties of analogue ensembles to characterize multifractality of stochastic processes

Carlos Granero-Belinchon (ODYSSEY, IMT Atlantique - MEE, Lab-STICC\_OSE)

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP math.PRphysics.data-anphysics.flu-dyn

keywords scale-invariancemultifractalitystochastic processesanalogue ensemblesphase space reconstructionTakens embeddingfractional Brownian motionmultifractal random walk

0 comments

The pith

The structure and dynamics of the phase space of scale-invariant stochastic processes are determined by their scale-invariance properties, as shown by the volumes and temporal dispersion of analogue ensembles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework that reconstructs the phase space of a stochastic process using time-delay embedding and then examines groups of analogue states, defined as the nearest neighbors to densely sampled target points. It measures the volumes of these groups and tracks how the states disperse forward in time, relating both the statistics of the volumes and the spreading rates to the process's scaling properties. The method is applied to regularized fractional Brownian motion and regularized multifractal random walks, showing that the geometry and evolution of the phase space are governed by the same scale-invariance that defines the original time series. This matters for a reader because it offers a geometric probe of memory and multifractality that works directly from the reconstructed attractor rather than from separate statistical estimators. The central result is that both static arrangement and dynamic behavior in the embedded space are fixed by the scaling rules of the process.

Core claim

The central claim is that for stationary dissipative scale-invariant processes, the volumes of nearest-neighbor analogue ensembles in the Takens-reconstructed phase space and the rate at which those ensembles spread in time are completely fixed by the scale-invariance properties of the driving process. This holds uniformly for both regularized fractional Brownian motion and regularized multifractal random walks: the probability distribution of ensemble volumes, its mean and variance, and the Lagrangian dispersion of successors are all direct consequences of the scaling, so that the structure and dynamics of the phase space are determined by the same invariance that characterizes the original

What carries the argument

Analogue ensembles formed by the k nearest neighbors to target states in a Takens-embedded phase space, whose volumes and time-dependent dispersion are used as direct probes of scale-invariance.

If this is right

The mean and variance of ensemble volumes become quantities that scale directly with the invariance properties, allowing extraction of scaling exponents from volume statistics alone.
The dispersion of analogue successors over time depends on the initial ensemble volume according to the same scaling rules that govern the process.
Both the static organization of states and their Lagrangian evolution in phase space are fixed by the scale-invariance for the tested processes.
The framework treats monofractal and multifractal cases through the same ensemble-volume and dispersion measures.
Phase-space structure and dynamics become interchangeable probes of the underlying scaling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be used to select an embedding dimension that best isolates the scaling behavior without prior knowledge of the process.
Ensemble statistics might offer a geometric route to forecast horizons that differ between multifractal and monofractal regimes.
The same volume and dispersion diagnostics could be applied to empirical series from turbulence or finance to test whether their effective scaling appears in the reconstructed geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The volumes and dispersion of nearest-neighbor analogue ensembles in the Takens-embedded space directly and exclusively reflect the scale-invariance properties without confounding effects from embedding dimension, regularization, or choice of k.

What would settle it

If the probability distribution of ensemble volumes or the dispersion rates change when the embedding dimension or regularization is varied while the process scaling is held fixed, the direct link between phase-space properties and scale-invariance would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08155 by Carlos Granero-Belinchon (ODYSSEY, IMT Atlantique - MEE, Lab-STICC\_OSE).

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) Mean [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. a) Logarithm of the mean volume occupied by the successors log( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Logarithm of the mean volume occupied by the successors log( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a framework for the scale-invariance characterization of stochastic processes in reconstructed finite-dimensional phase spaces. This framework analyses the structural and dynamical properties of the phase space and is based on a Takens embedding reconstruction followed by the definition of ensembles of analogue states. We define the analogues of a target state as its nearest neighbors. Then, we specify a collection of target states densely sampling the full phase space. For each target state, we search for the ensemble of its k-best analogues and we analyze its volume and dynamics. First, we study the probability distribution of the volumes and relate its mean and variance to the scale-invariance properties of the stochastic process. Second, we study the Lagrangian properties of the analogues by characterizing how they disperse in time. More particularly, we study the volume occupied by the analogue's successors in function of time and of their initial volume. We link these dynamical properties to the scale-invariance properties of the process. We analyze two types of stationary and dissipative 1-dimensional scale-invariant processes: regularized fractional Brownian motion and regularized multifractal random walk. For both processes, the structure and dynamics of the phase space are determined by their scale-invariant properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links analogue ensemble volumes and Lagrangian dispersion in Takens-reconstructed phase space to the scaling properties of regularized fBm and multifractal random walks, but the evidence for a direct, parameter-independent connection is still thin.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a framework that embeds scale-invariant processes via Takens, defines k-nearest analogue ensembles around densely sampled targets, and ties the distribution of those ensemble volumes plus their time dispersion to the Hurst exponent or multifractal spectrum. They demonstrate this on two regularized 1D processes and conclude that phase-space structure and dynamics are fixed by the scaling properties. The combination of volume statistics with Lagrangian tracking of successors is a distinct angle compared with standard moment or wavelet-based multifractal tools, and it could be useful for readers who already work with phase-space reconstructions in turbulence or time-series modeling. The steps are laid out clearly enough that the logic is easy to follow from the abstract and the two example processes show consistent behavior with their known scaling. The soft spot is the missing controls on reconstruction choices. Embedding dimension, regularization cutoff, and k are not shown to have been varied systematically while the scaling parameters are held fixed, nor are there obvious tests against non-scale-invariant processes that share similar correlation structure. Without those, it remains possible that the reported volume and dispersion relations partly reflect how the chosen parameters interact with power-law spectra rather than isolating the scale invariance itself. The paper also gives no quantitative error analysis or fit metrics in the summary, so the strength of the claimed determination is hard to judge yet. This is aimed at applied statisticians and physicists who analyze stationary scale-invariant series and want complementary diagnostics. A reader already comfortable with Takens embedding and nearest-neighbor methods would pick up usable ideas, but the work is still at the stage where the central claim needs tighter verification. It deserves peer review because the idea is coherent and the application to two standard processes is a reasonable starting point, even if the authors will have to strengthen the parameter-robustness checks and add concrete validation numbers.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a framework for characterizing the scale-invariance and multifractality of stationary stochastic processes via Takens embedding of time series into a finite-dimensional phase space, followed by construction of k-nearest-neighbour analogue ensembles. It defines structural properties through the probability distribution of ensemble volumes and Lagrangian properties through the time-dependent dispersion (volume growth) of the successors of those analogues. The central claim is that, for regularized fractional Brownian motion and regularized multifractal random walk, both the volume statistics and the dispersion dynamics are determined exclusively by the processes' scaling exponents (Hurst parameter or multifractal spectrum).

Significance. If the claimed direct mapping from scaling parameters to phase-space volumes and Lagrangian dispersion holds after proper controls, the method would supply a geometrically interpretable, reconstruction-based diagnostic for multifractality that complements traditional wavelet or increment-based estimators. The explicit use of analogue ensembles and their temporal evolution is a distinctive contribution that could be useful for detecting scale invariance in short or noisy observational series.

major comments (3)

[§3.2] §3.2 (Analogue ensemble construction): the volume and dispersion statistics are reported as functions of the scaling parameters, yet the manuscript does not present any systematic scan of embedding dimension m or neighbour count k at fixed Hurst exponent or fixed multifractal spectrum. Consequently it remains possible that the observed relations are partly or wholly induced by the geometry of nearest-neighbour search in the chosen reconstruction rather than by the intrinsic scaling.
[§4.1–4.2] §4.1–4.2 (Results for regularized fBM and MRW): no control experiments are shown with non-scale-invariant processes that possess comparable power-law spectra or correlation structure (e.g., fractional Gaussian noise with matched Hurst parameter but no multifractal spectrum). Without such controls the claim that the phase-space properties are “determined by” the scale-invariance properties cannot be distinguished from a generic dependence on the power spectrum.
[§2.3] §2.3 (Regularization procedure): the cutoff parameter that regularizes the fractional and multifractal processes is introduced but its value is not varied while the scaling exponents are held fixed; any interaction between the regularization scale and the embedding window therefore remains unquantified.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the analogue volume V_k(t) and its time-evolved counterpart is introduced without an explicit equation number in the methods section, making cross-references in the results difficult to follow.
[Figures 3–6] Figure captions for the volume histograms and dispersion curves do not state the numerical values of m, k and the regularization cutoff used, which are essential for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important aspects for strengthening the robustness of our claims. We address each major comment point by point below and outline the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Analogue ensemble construction): the volume and dispersion statistics are reported as functions of the scaling parameters, yet the manuscript does not present any systematic scan of embedding dimension m or neighbour count k at fixed Hurst exponent or fixed multifractal spectrum. Consequently it remains possible that the observed relations are partly or wholly induced by the geometry of nearest-neighbour search in the chosen reconstruction rather than by the intrinsic scaling.

Authors: We agree that a systematic scan over embedding dimension m and neighbour count k at fixed scaling parameters is required to rule out artifacts from the Takens reconstruction or nearest-neighbour geometry. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix containing results for a range of m (e.g., 3–10) and k (e.g., 5–50) values, with all other parameters held constant. These will include quantitative measures of how the volume-distribution moments and dispersion exponents change (or remain invariant) with m and k, thereby confirming that the reported relations are driven by the intrinsic scaling properties. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.1–4.2] §4.1–4.2 (Results for regularized fBM and MRW): no control experiments are shown with non-scale-invariant processes that possess comparable power-law spectra or correlation structure (e.g., fractional Gaussian noise with matched Hurst parameter but no multifractal spectrum). Without such controls the claim that the phase-space properties are “determined by” the scale-invariance properties cannot be distinguished from a generic dependence on the power spectrum.

Authors: This point is well taken. To isolate the contribution of multifractality from that of the power spectrum, we will incorporate control experiments using fractional Gaussian noise (fGn) whose Hurst parameters are matched to those of the regularized fBM cases. The revised version will present side-by-side comparisons of volume statistics and Lagrangian dispersion for fGn versus the multifractal processes, demonstrating that the phase-space signatures differ when the multifractal spectrum is absent. This will support the claim that the observed properties are specifically tied to the scale-invariance characteristics under study. revision: yes
Referee: [§2.3] §2.3 (Regularization procedure): the cutoff parameter that regularizes the fractional and multifractal processes is introduced but its value is not varied while the scaling exponents are held fixed; any interaction between the regularization scale and the embedding window therefore remains unquantified.

Authors: We acknowledge that the interaction between the regularization cutoff and the embedding parameters has not been quantified. In the revision we will perform a sensitivity analysis in which the cutoff is varied over a suitable range while the scaling exponents are held fixed. The resulting changes (or lack thereof) in the volume-distribution parameters and dispersion dynamics will be reported, thereby clarifying any dependence on the regularization scale relative to the embedding window. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework applies independent embedding analysis to known processes

full rationale

The paper defines a Takens-based analogue ensemble procedure and computes volume/dispersion statistics on two standard scale-invariant processes (regularized fBM, MRW) whose scaling properties are independently known. No equation reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled. The reported links between ensemble volumes and scaling exponents are presented as empirical/numerical relations derived from the reconstruction, not as tautological re-statements of the input scaling. Parameter choices (m, k, regularization) are acknowledged as part of the method but not shown to force the outcome.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Insufficient information from abstract alone to identify specific free parameters, axioms or invented entities; no equations or implementation details given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1130 out tokens · 69419 ms · 2026-05-12T02:44:15.015357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
We use both proposed approaches to characterize the multifractal properties of two stationary and dissipative scale-invariant stochastic processes: a regularized fractional Brownian motion (r-fBm)... and a regularized multifractal random walk (r-MRW)... the structure and dynamics of the phase space are determined by their scale-invariant properties.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
Takens embedding... p=3... k=50... volume occupied by the analogues δa(t)... successors δs(t+τ)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

[1]

the probability distribution of the volumes occupied by ensembles of analogues and 2) the Lagrangian properties of these ensembles. Contrary to classical approaches that compute statistics by varying the database where searching for analogues [36], we made statistics on the ensemble of target-states for a fixed database. These statistics characterize the ...

work page
[2]

Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N

U. Frisch, Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov, Cambridge University Press, 1995

work page 1995
[3]

Chevillard, B

L. Chevillard, B. Castaing, A. Arneodo, E. L´ evˆ eque, J. F. Pinton, S. G. Roux, A phenomenological theory of Eulerian and Lagrangian velocity fluctuations in turbulent flows, Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (9) (2012) 899–928

work page 2012
[4]

Venugopal, S

V. Venugopal, S. G. Roux, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, A. Arneodo, Revisiting multifractality of high-resolution temporal rainfall using a wavelet-based formalism, Water Resources Research 42 (2006) W06D14

work page 2006
[5]

L. J. Freischem, P.Weiss, H. M. Christensen, P. Stier, Multifractal analysis for evaluating the representation of clouds in global kilometer-scale models, Geophysical Research Letters 51 (20) (2024) e2024GL110124

work page 2024
[6]

Rammal, G

R. Rammal, G. Toulouse, Random walks on fractal structures and percolation clusters, Journal de Physique Lettres 44 (1) (1983) 13–22. 10 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 log(⟨δs(t + τ )⟩) 2 1.40 a) -6 -4 -2 0 2 2 0.60b) c2 = 0 c2 = 0.025 c2 = 0.05 c2 = 0.075 c2 = 0.1 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 log(τ /T) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8α(τ ) −0.045 −0.083 c) -8 -6 -4 -2 0 log(τ /T) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 ...

work page 1983
[7]

Lovejoy, D

S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, The weather and climate: emergent laws and multifractal cascades, Cambridge University Press, 2013

work page 2013
[8]

Mandelbrot, J

B. Mandelbrot, J. Van Ness, Fractional brownian motions fractional noises and applications, SIAM Review 10 (4) (1968) 422–437

work page 1968
[9]

Bacry, J

E. Bacry, J. F. Muzy, Multifractal stationary random measures and multifractal random walk with log-infinitely divisible scaling laws, Physical Review E 66 (5) (2002) 056121

work page 2002
[10]

Robert, V

R. Robert, V. Vargas, Hydrodynamic turbulence and intermittent random fields, Communications in Mathematical Physics 284 (2008) 649–673

work page 2008
[11]

Chevillard, R

L. Chevillard, R. Robert, V. Vargas, A stochastic representation of the local structure of turbulence, Europhysics Letters 89 (2010) 54002

work page 2010
[12]

Paladin, A

G. Paladin, A. Vulpiani, Anomalous scaling laws in multifractal objects, Physics Reports 156 (4) (1987) 147–225

work page 1987
[13]

J. F. Muzy, E. Bacry, A. Arneodo, Multifractal formalism for fractal signals: the structure-function approach versus the wavelet-transform modulus-maxima method, Physical Review E 47 (2) (1993) 875–884

work page 1993
[14]

Granero-Belinchon, S

C. Granero-Belinchon, S. G. Roux, N. B. Garnier, Structure functions and flatness of streamwise velocity in a turbulent channel flow, Physics of Fluids 37 (8) (2025) 085225

work page 2025
[15]

Castaing, Y

B. Castaing, Y. Gagne, M. Marchand, Log-similarity for turbulent flows?, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 68 (3) (1993) 387–400

work page 1993
[16]

R. F. Leonarduzzi, M. E. Torres, P. Abry, Scaling range automated selection for wavelet leader multifractal analysis, Signal processing 105 (2014) 243–257

work page 2014
[17]

Granero-Belinchon, S

C. Granero-Belinchon, S. G. Roux, N. B. Garnier, Kullback-Leibler divergence measure of intermittency: Application to turbulence, Physical Review E 97 (2018) 013107

work page 2018
[18]

F. Takens, Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in: Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University of Warwick 1979/80, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981, pp. 366–381. 11

work page 1979
[19]

H. D. I. Abarbanel, R. Brown, M. B. Kennel, Local Lyapunov exponents computed from observed data, Journal of Nonlinear Science 2 (1992) 343–365

work page 1992
[20]

Ouala, D

S. Ouala, D. Nguyen, L. Drumetz, B. Chapron, A. Pascual, F. Collard, L. Gaultier, R. Fablet, Learning latent dynamics for partially observed chaotic systems, Chaos 30 (10) (2020) 103121

work page 2020
[21]

Sutulovic, D

U. Sutulovic, D. Proverbio, R. Katz, G. Giordano, Efficient and faithful reconstruction of dynamical attractors using homogeneous differentiators, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 199 (3) (2025) 116798

work page 2025
[22]

Eckmann, D

J.-P. Eckmann, D. Ruelle, Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors, Review of Modern Physics 57 (1985) 617

work page 1985
[23]

Grassberger, I

P. Grassberger, I. Procaccia, Charcterization of strange attractors, Physical Review Letters 50 (5) (1983) 346–349

work page 1983
[24]

Balatoni, A

J. Balatoni, A. Renyi, Remarks on entropy, Publications of the Matehmatical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 1 (1956) 9–40

work page 1956
[25]

Badii, A

R. Badii, A. Politi, Statistical description of chaotic attractors - the dimension function, Journal of Statistical Physics 40 (1985) 725–750

work page 1985
[26]

Arneodo, G

A. Arneodo, G. Grasseau, E. J. Kostelich, Fractal dimensions and f(α) spectrum of the Henon attractor, Physics Letters A 124 (8) (1987) 426–432

work page 1987
[27]

R. H. Riedi, An improved multifractal formalism and self-similar measures, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Appli- cations 189 (2) (1995) 462–490

work page 1995
[28]

Alber, J

M. Alber, J. Peinke, Improved multifractal box-counting algorithm, virtual phase transitions and negative dimensions, Physical Review E 57 (1998) 5489

work page 1998
[29]

Hadyn, J

N. Hadyn, J. Luevano, G. Mantica, S. Vaienti, Multifractal properties of return time statistics, Physical Review Letters 88 (22) (2002) 224502

work page 2002
[30]

Mantica, The global statistics of return times: return time dimensions versus generalized measure dimensions, Journal of statistical Physics 138 (2010) 701–727

G. Mantica, The global statistics of return times: return time dimensions versus generalized measure dimensions, Journal of statistical Physics 138 (2010) 701–727

work page 2010
[31]

T. Caby, D. F. andG. Mantica, S. Vaienti, P. Yiou, Generalized dimensions, large deviations and the distribution of rare events, Physica D 400 (2019) 132143

work page 2019
[32]

Faranda, S

D. Faranda, S. Vaienti, Correlation dimension and phase space contraction via extreme value theory, Chaos 28 (4) (2018) 041103

work page 2018
[33]

T. Caby, D. Faranda, S. Vaienti, P. Yiou, Extreme value distributions of observation recurrences, Nonlinearity 34 (2020) 118–163

work page 2020
[34]

Alberti, D

T. Alberti, D. Faranda, V. Lucarini, R. V. Donner, B. Dubrulle, F. Daviaud, Scale dependence of fractal dimension in deterministic and stochastic Lorenz-63 systems, Chaos 33 (2023) 023144

work page 2023
[35]

Lucarini, D

V. Lucarini, D. Faranda, G. Turchetti, S. Vaienti, Extreme value theory for singular measures, Chaos 22 (2012) 023135

work page 2012
[36]

Moloney, D

N. Moloney, D. Faranda, Y. Sato, An overview of the extremal index, Chaos 29 (2) (2019) 022101

work page 2019
[37]

Platzer, P

P. Platzer, P. Yiou, P. Naveau, J.-F. Filipot, M. Thi´ ebaut, P. Tandeo, Probability Distributions for Analog-To-Target Distances, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 78 (10) (2021) 3317–3335

work page 2021
[38]

Platzer, P

P. Platzer, P. Yiou, P. Naveau, P. Tandeo, Y. Zhen, P. Ailliot, J.-F. Filipot, Using local dynamics to explain analog forecasting of chaotic systems, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 78 (7) (2021) 2117–2133

work page 2021
[39]

Lguensat, P

R. Lguensat, P. Tandeo, P. Ailliot, M. Pulido, R. Fablet, The Analog Data Assimilation, Monthly Weather Review 145 (2017) 4093–4107

work page 2017
[40]

T. P. Sapsis, Attractor local dimensionality, nonlinear energy transfers and finite-time instabilities in unstable dynamical systems with applications to two-dimensional fluid flows, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 469 (2013) 20120550

work page 2013
[41]

Granero-Belinchon, Analog-based ensembles to characterise turbulent dynamics from observed data, Journal of Turbu- lence 27 (2026) 17–28

C. Granero-Belinchon, Analog-based ensembles to characterise turbulent dynamics from observed data, Journal of Turbu- lence 27 (2026) 17–28

work page 2026
[42]

F. M. E. Pons, G. Messori, M. C. Alvarez-Castro, D. Faranda, Sampling hyperspheres via extreme value theory: implications for measuring attractor dimensions, Journal of Statistical Physics 179 (2020) 1698–1717

work page 2020
[43]

Platzer, B

P. Platzer, B. Chapron, Density-induced variations of local dimension estimates for absolutely continuous random variables, Journal of Statistical Physics 192 (34) (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Platzer, B

P. Platzer, B. Chapron, G. Messori, Disentangling density and geometry in weather regime dimensions using stochastic twins, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 8 (203) (2025)

work page 2025
[45]

del Amo, G

I. del Amo, G. Datseris, M. Holland, Limitations of estimatig local dimension and extremal index using exceedances in dynamical systems, Chaos 35 (4) (2025) 043128

work page 2025
[46]

L. V. Meisel, M. A. Johnson, Multifractal analysis of imprecise data: Badii-Politi and correlation integral approaches, Physical Review E 50 (1994) 4214

work page 1994
[47]

R. M. Pereira, C. Garban, L. Chevillard, A dissipative random velocity field for fully developed fluid turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 794 (2016) 369–408

work page 2016
[48]

D. B. Saakian, A. Martirosyan, C.-K. Hu, Z. R. Struzik, Exact probability distribution function for multifractal random walk models of stocks, Europhysics Letters 95 (2) (2011) 28007

work page 2011
[49]

Sattarhoff, T

C. Sattarhoff, T. Lux, Forecasting the variability of stock index returns with the multifractal random walk model for realized volatilities, International Journal of Forecasting 39 (4) (2023) 1678–1697

work page 2023
[50]

Platzer, A

P. Platzer, A. Avenas, B. Chapron, L. Drumetz, A. Mouche, P. Tandeo, L. Vinour, Distance learning for analog methods, Monthly Weather Review 153 (10) (2025) 2167–2182

work page 2025
[51]

Cecconi, M

F. Cecconi, M. Cencini, M. Falcioni, A. Vulpiani, Predicting the future from the past: An old problem from a modern perspective, Americal Journal of Physics 80 (11) (2012) 1001–1008

work page 2012
[52]

Chibbaro, L

S. Chibbaro, L. Rondoni, A. Vulpiani, On the foundations of statistical mechanics: Ergodicity, many degrees of freedom and inference, Communications in Theoretical Physics 62 (4) (2014) 469–475. 12

work page 2014
[53]

Badii, A

R. Badii, A. Politi, Hausdorff dimension and uniformity factor of strange attractors, Physical Review Letters 52 (1984) 1661

work page 1984
[54]

E. J. Kostelich, H. L. Swinney, Practical considerations in estimating dimension from time series data, Physica Scripta 40 (3) (1989) 436

work page 1989