arxiv: 2605.10498 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· stat.ML

Recognition: no theorem link

Simultaneous Long-tailed Recognition and Multi-modal Fusion for Highly Imbalanced Multi-modal Data

Heegeon Yoon, Heeyoung Kim

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIstat.ML

keywords long-tailed recognitionmulti-modal fusionclass-imbalanced dataconfidence-guided weightsheterogeneous data fusionmulti-expert models

0 comments

The pith

A framework fuses multi-modal inputs using confidence estimates from modality-specific networks to handle long-tailed class imbalance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a method that simultaneously addresses long-tailed class distributions and multi-modal data fusion. It extends multi-expert models by adding separate networks for each modality that assess how useful that modality is for the current input. These assessments create weights that blend the features from images, tables, or other sources into one representation for classification. The framework includes custom training steps that let it work with any mix of modalities present or absent. If successful, it would allow AI systems to use all available data types more effectively even when some classes are rare, which is common in practical applications.

Core claim

The approach fuses heterogeneous multi-modal data into a unified representation by leveraging modality-specific networks to estimate the informativeness of each modality and generate confidence-guided weights that dynamically modulate the fusion process, while incorporating specialized training and test procedures to accommodate diverse modality combinations in long-tailed scenarios.

What carries the argument

The confidence-guided fusion using modality-specific informativeness estimators, which extends multi-expert architectures to the multi-modal case by weighting contributions based on estimated reliability.

Load-bearing premise

Modality-specific networks can accurately estimate each modality's informativeness, and the resulting weights lead to stable fusion that works across varying modality sets and imbalance ratios.

What would settle it

Run the method on a dataset where one modality is deliberately made uninformative by heavy noise or corruption, and check whether the fusion weights correctly assign near-zero weight to it while maintaining or improving accuracy over using the good modality alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10498 by Heegeon Yoon, Heeyoung Kim.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Test-time training procedure of the proposed model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Modified training strategy with one image modality and one ta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Representative examples of skin lesions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Long-tailed distributions in class-imbalanced data present a fundamental challenge for deep learning models, which tend to be biased toward majority classes. While recent methods for long-tailed recognition have mitigated this issue, they are largely restricted to single-modal inputs and cannot fully exploit complementary information from diverse data sources. In this work, we introduce a new framework for long-tailed recognition that explicitly handles multi-modal inputs. Our approach extends multi-expert architectures to the multi-modal setting by fusing heterogeneous data into a unified representation while leveraging modality-specific networks to estimate the informativeness of each modality. These confidence-guided weights dynamically modulate the fusion process, ensuring that more informative modalities contribute more strongly to the final decision. To further enhance performance, we design specialized training and test procedures that accommodate diverse modality combinations, including images and tabular data. Extensive experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach not only effectively integrates multi-modal information but also outperforms existing methods in handling long-tailed, class-imbalanced scenarios, highlighting its robustness and generalization capability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends multi-expert long-tailed methods to multi-modal data with a confidence-guided fusion step, but the reliability of per-modality confidence on tail classes remains the unproven link.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a framework that fuses image and tabular inputs for long-tailed recognition by training modality-specific networks to produce dynamic weights based on estimated informativeness. This is a direct extension of multi-expert ideas into the multi-modal imbalance setting, with the twist of using those weights to modulate the unified representation during both training and inference. The specialized procedures for handling varying modality combinations are a practical addition that could matter in deployed systems where not every sample has all modalities available. If the experiments back the claims, the approach offers a straightforward way to let stronger modalities dominate on a per-sample basis without manual tuning. The paper does a reasonable job framing the intersection of two active areas and positions the method against prior single-modal long-tailed work and basic multi-modal fusion baselines. The real-world dataset experiments are a plus for relevance. The central soft spot is the one flagged in the stress test. Tail classes have too few samples for modality-specific networks to produce stable confidence scores, and nothing in the abstract indicates explicit fixes such as head-to-tail knowledge transfer, heavy regularization on the estimators, or pseudo-labeling to reduce variance. Without those, the dynamic weights risk adding noise rather than signal on minority classes, which would undermine the robustness claim. The abstract also gives no equations or training details, so it is impossible to judge whether the fusion is implemented in a way that avoids circularity or post-hoc tuning. A reader working on applied multi-modal classifiers with class imbalance would get the most from this, mainly for the fusion idea and the experimental setup on heterogeneous data. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, who could then ask for ablations isolating the confidence module on tail classes and checks that the gains are not driven by the head classes alone. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a framework for long-tailed recognition on multi-modal data that extends multi-expert models by training modality-specific networks to estimate per-modality informativeness, then applies the resulting confidence scores as dynamic weights during fusion of heterogeneous inputs (e.g., images and tabular data). Specialized training and inference procedures are introduced to handle varying modality combinations, and experiments on benchmark and real-world datasets are claimed to demonstrate superior performance over prior long-tailed and multi-modal methods.

Significance. If the dynamic weighting mechanism proves reliable, the work would fill a notable gap at the intersection of long-tailed recognition and multi-modal fusion, with potential applicability to domains such as medical diagnostics or autonomous systems where both class imbalance and heterogeneous sensors are common. The explicit handling of modality combinations is a positive design choice.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (modality-specific confidence networks): the central claim that confidence-guided weights improve long-tailed performance rests on the assumption that modality-specific estimators remain accurate for tail classes. With only a handful of samples per tail class, these networks are prone to high variance or bias in their outputs; the manuscript must specify any stabilization techniques (regularization, pseudo-labeling, or head-to-tail transfer) and include an ablation that isolates the effect of the weighting on tail-class accuracy.
[§4] §4 (experiments): no ablation tables or statistical significance tests are referenced that quantify the contribution of the confidence-weighted fusion versus a simple concatenation baseline, nor are results broken down by imbalance ratio and modality subset. Without these, the reported outperformance cannot be verified as robust rather than an artifact of post-hoc hyper-parameter choices.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'specialized training and test procedures' is used without even a one-sentence characterization; a brief parenthetical description would improve readability.
[Notation] Notation: define the fusion weight computation (e.g., softmax over per-modality logits) explicitly before its first use to avoid ambiguity when multiple modalities are present.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of our confidence-guided fusion approach and the need for stronger experimental validation. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (modality-specific confidence networks): the central claim that confidence-guided weights improve long-tailed performance rests on the assumption that modality-specific estimators remain accurate for tail classes. With only a handful of samples per tail class, these networks are prone to high variance or bias in their outputs; the manuscript must specify any stabilization techniques (regularization, pseudo-labeling, or head-to-tail transfer) and include an ablation that isolates the effect of the weighting on tail-class accuracy.

Authors: We agree that the reliability of modality-specific confidence estimators on tail classes is fundamental to our claims. The manuscript already introduces specialized training procedures to accommodate long-tailed multi-modal data, including balanced sampling strategies across modalities. In the revision, we will expand Section 3 to explicitly describe the stabilization techniques used (such as regularization and head-to-tail transfer from head-class experts). We will also add a dedicated ablation study that isolates the effect of the confidence-weighted fusion on tail-class accuracy, reporting per-class metrics for tail classes under varying conditions. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (experiments): no ablation tables or statistical significance tests are referenced that quantify the contribution of the confidence-weighted fusion versus a simple concatenation baseline, nor are results broken down by imbalance ratio and modality subset. Without these, the reported outperformance cannot be verified as robust rather than an artifact of post-hoc hyper-parameter choices.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current experimental section lacks explicit ablations and statistical tests comparing against a concatenation baseline, as well as breakdowns by imbalance ratio and modality subset. In the revised manuscript, we will include new ablation tables that directly quantify the contribution of confidence-weighted fusion versus simple concatenation. Results will be further disaggregated by imbalance ratio and modality combinations, and we will report statistical significance (e.g., paired t-tests across multiple runs with different seeds) to confirm robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical framework with no self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper introduces a multi-modal fusion framework for long-tailed recognition using modality-specific confidence networks and dynamic weighting. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or derivations are present that reduce any claimed prediction or performance gain to a quantity defined by the same inputs or by self-citation chains. The approach is justified through specialized training procedures and experimental results on benchmarks, remaining independent of tautological constructions. Central claims rest on generalization across datasets rather than any load-bearing self-definition or renamed empirical pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no mathematical derivations, parameters, or explicit assumptions are stated, so the ledger remains empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1073 out tokens · 22587 ms · 2026-05-12T04:43:06.023910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[1]

A. A. Alani, G. Cosma, and A. Taherkhani. Classifying imbalanced mu lti-modal sensor data for human activity recognition in a smart home using deep learnin g. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , pages 1–8. IEEE, 2020

work page 2020
[2]

J. Cai, Y. Wang, and J.-N. Hwang. Ace: Ally complementary expert s for solving long-tailed recognition in one-shot. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 112–121, 2021

work page 2021
[3]

K. Cao, C. Wei, A. Gaidon, N. Arechiga, and T. Ma. Learning imbalan ced datasets with label-distribution-aware margin loss. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019

work page 2019
[4]

N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. Smot e: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artiﬁcial Intelligence Research , 16:321– 357, 2002

work page 2002
[5]

H. Cho, W. Koo, and H. Kim. Prediction of highly imbalanced semicond uctor chip- level defects in module tests using multimodal fusion and logit adjust ment. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing , 36(3):425–433, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

M. Choy, D. Kim, J.-G. Lee, H. Kim, and H. Motoda. Looking back on the current day: interruptibility prediction using daily behavioral features. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ub iquitous computing, pages 1004–1015, 2016

work page 2016
[7]

Chung and H

J. Chung and H. Kim. Crime risk maps: A multivariate spatial analysis of crime data. Geographical analysis, 51(4):475–499, 2019

work page 2019
[8]

J. Cui, S. Liu, Z. Tian, Z. Zhong, and J. Jia. Reslt: Residual learnin g for long- 22 tailed recognition. IEEE transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellig ence, 45(3):3695–3706, 2022

work page 2022
[9]

Y. Cui, M. Jia, T.-Y. Lin, Y. Song, and S. Belongie. Class-balanced lo ss based on eﬀective number of samples. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 9268–9277, 2019

work page 2019
[10]

Z. Han, F. Yang, J. Huang, C. Zhang, and J. Yao. Multimodal dy namics: Dynami- cal fusion for trustworthy multimodal classiﬁcation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 20707–20717, 2022

work page 2022
[11]

D. Hong, L. Gao, N. Yokoya, J. Yao, J. Chanussot, Q. Du, and B. Zhang. More diverse means better: Multimodal deep learning meets remote-sensing imag ery classiﬁcation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 59(5):4340–4354, 2020

work page 2020
[12]

Huang, C

Y. Huang, C. Du, Z. Xue, X. Chen, H. Zhao, and L. Huang. What makes multi-modal learning better than single (provably). Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, 34:10944–10956, 2021

work page 2021
[13]

Kim and H

H. Kim and H. Kim. Contextual anomaly detection for high-dimens ional data using dirichlet process variational autoencoder. IISE Transactions, 55(5):433–444, 2023

work page 2023
[14]

K. Kim, J. Shin, and H. Kim. Locally most powerful bayesian test f or out-of-distribution detection using deep generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:14913–14924, 2021

work page 2021
[15]

Koo, E.-Y

W. Koo, E.-Y. Ma, and H. Kim. Deep latent factor model for spat io-temporal forecast- ing. Technometrics, 66(3):470–482, 2024

work page 2024
[16]

H. Lee, J. Lee, and H. Kim. Semi-supervised learning for simultan eous location detection and classiﬁcation of mixed-type defect patterns in wafer bin maps. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing , 36(2):220–230, 2023. 23

work page 2023
[17]

H. Lee, T. Park, and H. Kim. Learnable logit adjustment for imba lanced semi-supervised learning under class distribution mismatch. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision , pages 2664–2674, 2025

work page 2025
[18]

H. Lee, S. Shin, and H. Kim. Abc: Auxiliary balanced classiﬁer for c lass-imbalanced semi-supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:7082– 7094, 2021

work page 2021
[19]

K. Lee, A. Gray, and H. Kim. Dependence maps, a dimensionality r eduction with dependence distance for high-dimensional data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 26(3):512–532, 2013

work page 2013
[20]

H. Li, F. Yang, X. Xing, Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, M. Han, J. Hua ng, L. Wang, and J. Yao. Multi-modal multi-instance learning using weakly correlated h istopathological images and tabular clinical information. In Medical Image Computing and Computer As- sisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conf erence, Strasbourg, France, September 27–Oct...

work page 2021
[21]

Y. Li, P. Branco, and H. Zhang. Imbalanced multimodal attentio n-based system for multiclass house price prediction. Mathematics, 11(1):113, 2022

work page 2022
[22]

T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Doll´ ar. Focal loss f or dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Comput er Vision , pages 2980–2988, 2017

work page 2017
[23]

Z. Liu, Y. Shen, V. B. Lakshminarasimhan, P. P. Liang, A. Zadeh , and L.-P. Morency. Eﬃcient low-rank multimodal fusion with modality-speciﬁc factors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00064, 2018. 24

work page arXiv 2018
[24]

A. K. Menon, S. Jayasumana, A. S. Rawat, H. Jain, A. Veit, and S. Kumar. Long-tail learning via logit adjustment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07314 , 2020

work page arXiv 2007
[25]

Z. Ou, W. Chai, L. Wang, R. Zhang, J. He, M. Song, L. Yuan, S. Z hang, Y. Wang, H. Li, et al. M 2 lc-net: A multi-modal multi-disease long-tailed classiﬁca tion network for real clinical scenes. China Communications , 18(9):210–220, 2021

work page 2021
[26]

S. Park, K. Kim, and H. Kim. Prediction of highly imbalanced semicon ductor chip-level defects using uncertainty-based adaptive margin learning. IISE Transactions, 55(2):147– 155, 2022

work page 2022
[27]

T. Park, H. Lee, and H. Kim. Rebalancing using estimated class dis tribution for imbal- anced semi-supervised learning under class distribution mismatch. I n European Confer- ence on Computer Vision , pages 388–404. Springer, 2024

work page 2024
[28]

J. Ren, C. Yu, X. Ma, H. Zhao, S. Yi, et al. Balanced meta-softm ax for long-tailed visual recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:4175–4186, 2020

work page 2020
[29]

W. Soh, H. Kim, and B.-J. Yum. Application of kernel principal com ponent analy- sis to multi-characteristic parameter design problems. Annals of Operations research , 263(1):69–91, 2018

work page 2018
[30]

Suresh, N

H. Suresh, N. Hunt, A. Johnson, L. A. Celi, P. Szolovits, and M. Ghassemi. Clin- ical intervention prediction and understanding using deep network s. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08498, 2017

work page arXiv 2017
[31]

M. A. Wajid and A. Zafar. Multimodal fusion: A review, taxonomy , open challenges, research roadmap and future directions. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems , 45(1):8, 2021

work page 2021
[32]

T. Wang, W. Shao, Z. Huang, H. Tang, J. Zhang, Z. Ding, and K. Huang. Mogonet 25 integrates multi-omics data using graph convolutional networks allo wing patient classi- ﬁcation and biomarker identiﬁcation. Nature Communications, 12(1):3445, 2021

work page 2021
[33]

Xiang, G

L. Xiang, G. Ding, and J. Han. Learning from multiple experts: Se lf-paced knowledge distillation for long-tailed classiﬁcation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th Eu- ropean Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Procee dings, Part V 16 , pages 247–263. Springer, 2020

work page 2020
[34]

Yoon and H

H. Yoon and H. Kim. Label-noise robust deep generative model f or semi-supervised learning. Technometrics, 65(1):83–95, 2023

work page 2023
[35]

Hubert, and P

H. Yoon and H. Kim. Multimodal deep generative model for semi-s upervised learning under class imbalance. Technometrics https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2026.2637593, 2026

work page doi:10.1080/00401706.2026.2637593 2026
[36]

Yoon and H

T. Yoon and H. Kim. Uncertainty estimation by density aware evid ential deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08754 , 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07250 (2017)

A. Zadeh, M. Chen, S. Poria, E. Cambria, and L.-P. Morency. Te nsor fusion network for multimodal sentiment analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07250 , 2017

work page arXiv 2017
[38]

Zhang, B

Y. Zhang, B. Hooi, L. Hong, and J. Feng. Self-supervised aggr egation of diverse experts for test-agnostic long-tailed recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:34077–34090, 2022

work page 2022
[39]

Zhang, B

Y. Zhang, B. Kang, B. Hooi, S. Yan, and J. Feng. Deep long-taile d learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellig ence, 2023. 26

work page 2023