pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12121 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🧮 math.FA · math.AP· math.OC

Recognition: no theorem link

Implications of structured continuous maximal regularity

Department of Applied Mathematics, Enschede, Felix L. Schwenninger (1) ((1) Mathematics of Systems Theory, Philip Preu{\ss}ler (1), the Netherlands), University of Twente

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.FA math.APmath.OC
keywords maximal regularityinput-to-state stabilityC0-semigroupsweak compactnessmild solutionsperturbation theorycontrol theoryfunctional analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Maximal regularity estimates for continuous functions sharpen when the spatial norm differs from the supremum norm.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors examine how maximal regularity estimates improve automatically in settings where the spatial norm is not the supremum norm. They leverage weak compactness properties of convolution-type operators tied to mild solutions of linear evolution equations to refine a priori estimates. This approach yields new proofs for existing results on L1-maximal regularity and extends Baillon's theorem while simplifying perturbation results for semigroups. Most notably, it resolves an open problem regarding input-to-state stability for a broad class of abstract systems in control theory. Sympathetic readers would care as this offers a unified way to handle stability in infinite-dimensional systems without case-by-case analysis.

Core claim

When the spatial norm differs fundamentally from the supremum norm and the associated convolution-type operators possess the weak compactness property, continuous maximal regularity estimates can be sharpened. This sharpening leads to applications including a new proof of Guerre-Delabriere's result on L1-maximal regularity, an extension of Baillon's theorem, simplified perturbation theorems for the generation of C0-semigroups, and the resolution of an open problem on input-to-state stability for a general abstract class of systems.

What carries the argument

Structured continuous maximal regularity, which refers to sharpened maximal regularity estimates with respect to continuous functions obtained via weak compactness of convolution operators for mild solutions.

If this is right

  • New proof of Guerre-Delabriere's result on L1-maximal regularity.
  • Extension of Baillon's theorem.
  • Simplification of well-known perturbation theorems for generation of C0-semigroups.
  • Resolution of an open problem on input-to-state stability for general abstract systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could extend to other stability notions beyond input-to-state stability in control theory.
  • The framework may simplify numerical verification of stability for infinite-dimensional systems by relying on abstract properties rather than explicit computations.
  • Similar weak compactness arguments might apply to discrete-time or nonlinear extensions of these systems.

Load-bearing premise

The spatial norm must be fundamentally different from the supremum norm, and the convolution-type operators must have the weak compactness property to allow sharpening the estimates.

What would settle it

A counterexample consisting of a linear evolution equation where the spatial norm differs from the supremum norm but the maximal regularity estimates do not sharpen or the input-to-state stability fails to hold despite the weak compactness condition.

read the original abstract

We study how maximal regularity estimates with respect to the continuous functions improve automatically in cases where the spatial norm is fundamentally different from the supremum norm. More precisely, we invoke properties such as weak compactness of convolution-type operators related to the mild solutions of the underlying linear evolution equations to sharpen the a priori estimates. These results have several applications: such as a new proof of Guerre-Delabriere's result on $\mathrm{L}^1$-maximal regularity and an extension of Baillon's theorem; a simplification for well-known perturbation theorems for generation of $\mathrm{C}_0$-semigroups; and we resolve an open problem on input-to-state stability from control theory for a general abstract class of systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that continuous maximal regularity estimates for linear evolution equations improve automatically when the spatial norm differs from the supremum norm, by invoking weak compactness of convolution-type operators on mild solutions to sharpen a priori estimates. This yields a new proof of Guerre-Delabriere's L1-maximal regularity result, an extension of Baillon's theorem, simplifications to well-known perturbation theorems for C0-semigroup generation, and a resolution of an open problem on input-to-state stability for a general abstract class of systems.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a unified operator-theoretic framework for refining maximal regularity estimates via standard weak compactness properties, without circularity or ad-hoc parameters. The resolution of the input-to-state stability open problem for abstract systems is a concrete advance in control theory, while the applications to L1-maximal regularity and Baillon's theorem demonstrate the framework's reach. The approach leverages existing semigroup properties in a structured way that could extend to further perturbation and stability questions.

minor comments (3)
  1. Introduction: the distinction between the spatial norm and the supremum norm is central to the weak compactness argument but is introduced only at a high level; a short explicit comparison (e.g., via a one-line example with the sup-norm case) would clarify why the property holds only in the former setting.
  2. Section on applications to input-to-state stability: the open problem is resolved as a corollary, yet the precise statement of the original open question is not restated; including it would make the contribution self-contained.
  3. Perturbation theorems section: several references to 'well-known' results are given without equation numbers or theorem labels from the literature; adding these citations would aid verification of the claimed simplifications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript on structured continuous maximal regularity. The referee's summary correctly identifies the core contributions: sharpening maximal regularity estimates via weak compactness of convolution operators on mild solutions, yielding a new proof of Guerre-Delabriere's L1-maximal regularity result, an extension of Baillon's theorem, simplifications to perturbation theorems for C0-semigroup generation, and resolution of the open input-to-state stability problem for abstract systems. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on standard weak compactness applied to mild solutions

full rationale

The paper's core chain invokes weak compactness of convolution operators (when the spatial norm differs from the supremum norm) to sharpen continuous maximal regularity estimates for mild solutions of linear evolution equations. These sharpened estimates are then applied directly to resolve input-to-state stability for the abstract class, with Guerre-Delabriere, Baillon extension, and perturbation results following as corollaries. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified; the supporting operator-theoretic properties are external and standard. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on domain-standard assumptions from semigroup theory and functional analysis; no free parameters or newly invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Convolution-type operators associated with mild solutions of linear evolution equations possess weak compactness when the spatial norm differs from the supremum norm.
    Invoked explicitly to sharpen a priori maximal regularity estimates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1302 out tokens · 55398 ms · 2026-05-13T04:42:04.325048+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fournier.Sobolev Spaces. 2nd edition. Pure and Applied Mathe- matics 140. Amsterdam, Boston: Academic Press, 2003.isbn: 978-0-12-044143-3

  2. [2]

    On Perturbations of Generators ofC0-Semigroups

    M. Adler, M. Bombieri, and K.-J. Engel. “On Perturbations of Generators ofC0-Semigroups”. In:Abstr. Appl. Anal.2014.1 (2014)

  3. [3]

    Albiac and N

    F. Albiac and N. J. Kalton.Topics in Banach Space Theory. 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 233. Cham: Springer, 2016.isbn: 978-3-319-31555-3

  4. [4]

    Arendt, C

    W. Arendt, C. J. K. Batty, M. Hieber, and F. Neubrander.Vector-valued Laplace Transforms and Cauchy Problems. Second Edition. Monographs in Mathematics volume 96. Basel: Birkh¨ auser, 2011.isbn: 978-3-0348-0086-0

  5. [5]

    Limit-case admissibility for positive infinite-dimensional systems

    S. Arora, J. Gl¨ uck, L. Paunonen, and F. L. Schwenninger. “Limit-case admissibility for positive infinite-dimensional systems”. In:J. Differ. Equations440 (2025), p. 113435

  6. [6]

    Arora and A

    S. Arora and A. Mironchenko.Input-to-state stability in integral norms for linear infinite- dimensional systems. 2026. arXiv: 2501.07680 [math.OC].url: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2501.07680

  7. [7]

    Admissible operators for sun-dual semigroups

    S. Arora and F. L. Schwenninger. “Admissible operators for sun-dual semigroups”. In:Math. Control Signals Syst.(2025)

  8. [8]

    Caract` ere born´ e de certains g´ en´ erateurs de semi-groupes lin´ eaires dans les espaces de Banach

    J.-B. Baillon. “Caract` ere born´ e de certains g´ en´ erateurs de semi-groupes lin´ eaires dans les espaces de Banach”. In:C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, S´ er. A290 (1980), pp. 757–760

  9. [9]

    On Structured Perturbations of Positive Semigroups

    A. Barbieri. “On Structured Perturbations of Positive Semigroups”. Dissertation. Universit` a degli Studi dell’Aquila, 2025

  10. [10]

    Perturbations of positive semigroups factorized via AM- and AL-spaces

    A. Barbieri and K. -J. Engel. “Perturbations of positive semigroups factorized via AM- and AL-spaces”. In:J. Evol. Equ.25.1 (2025), p. 25

  11. [11]

    Perturbations of positive semigroups on AM-spaces

    A. B´ atkai, B. Jacob, J. Voigt, and J. Wintermayr. “Perturbations of positive semigroups on AM-spaces”. In:Semigroup Forum96.2 (2018), pp. 333–347

  12. [12]

    Integraldarstellungen linearer Transformationen und schwache Kompaktheit

    J. Batt. “Integraldarstellungen linearer Transformationen und schwache Kompaktheit”. In: Math. Ann.174 (1967), pp. 291–304

  13. [13]

    Linear Bounded Transformations on the Space of Continuous Functions

    J. Batt and E. J. Berg. “Linear Bounded Transformations on the Space of Continuous Functions”. In:J. Funct. Anal.4.2 (1969), pp. 215–239

  14. [14]

    Darstellung linearer Transformationen durch vektorwertige Riemann- Stieltjes-Integrale

    J. Batt and H. K¨ onig. “Darstellung linearer Transformationen durch vektorwertige Riemann- Stieltjes-Integrale”. In:Arch. Math.X (1959), pp. 273–287

  15. [15]

    On bases and unconditional convergence of series in Banach spaces

    C. Bessaga and A. Pe lczy´ nski. “On bases and unconditional convergence of series in Banach spaces”. In:Stud. Math.17.2 (1958), pp. 151–164

  16. [16]

    On ( V ∗) sets and Pelczynski’s property ( V ∗)

    F. Bombal. “On ( V ∗) sets and Pelczynski’s property ( V ∗)”. In:Glasgow Math. J.32.1 (1990), pp. 109–120. 28

  17. [17]

    A class of special L∞ spaces

    J. Bourgain and F. Delbaen. “A class of special L∞ spaces”. In:Acta Math.145 (1980), pp. 155–176

  18. [18]

    Regular Linear Systems Governed by a Boundary Controlled Heat Equation

    C. I. Byrnes, D. S. Gilliam, V. I. Shubov, and G. Weiss. “Regular Linear Systems Governed by a Boundary Controlled Heat Equation”. In:J. Dyn. Control Syst.8.3 (2002), pp. 341–370

  19. [19]

    Pelczynski’s Property ( V ) on C(Ω, E) Spaces

    P. Cembranos, N. J. Kalton, E. Saab, and P. Saab. “Pelczynski’s Property ( V ) on C(Ω, E) Spaces.” In:Math. Ann.271 (1985), pp. 91–97

  20. [20]

    Chafa¨ ı.De La Vall´ ee Poussin on Uniform Integrability

    D. Chafa¨ ı.De La Vall´ ee Poussin on Uniform Integrability. Mar. 9, 2014.url: https : / / djalil . chafai . net / blog / 2014 / 03 / 09 / de - la - vallee - poussin - on - uniform - integrability/(visited on 10/07/2025)

  21. [21]

    Sobolev–Orlicz Imbeddings, Weak Compactness, and Spectrum

    F. Cipriani. “Sobolev–Orlicz Imbeddings, Weak Compactness, and Spectrum”. In:J. Funct. Anal.177.1 (2000), pp. 89–106

  22. [22]

    Maximal regularity in continuous interpolation spaces and quasilinear parabolic equations

    P. Cl´ ement and G. Simonett. “Maximal regularity in continuous interpolation spaces and quasilinear parabolic equations”. In:J. Evol. Equ.1 (2001), pp. 39–67

  23. [23]

    J. B. Conway.A Course in Functional Analysis. 2nd ed. Vol. 96. Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2007.isbn: 978-1-4757-4383-8

  24. [24]

    Equations d’´ evolution abstraites non lin´ eaires de type parabolique

    G. Da Prato and P. Grisvard. “Equations d’´ evolution abstraites non lin´ eaires de type parabolique”. In:Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.120 (1979), pp. 329–396

  25. [25]

    Danchin, M

    R. Danchin, M. Hieber, P. B. Mucha, and P. Tolksdorf.Free Boundary Problems via Da Prato–Grisvard Theory. Vol. 311. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 1578 (seventh of 7 numbers). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2025.isbn: 978-1- 4704-8397-5

  26. [26]

    Dellacherie and P.-A

    C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer.Probabilities and Potential. North-Holland Mathematics Studies 29. Amsterdam New York Oxford: North-Holland, 1978.isbn: 978-0-7204-0701-3

  27. [27]

    R. Denk, M. Hieber, and J. Pr¨ uss.R-Boundedness, Fourier Multipliers and Problems of Elliptic and Parabolic Type. Vol. 166. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 788 (first of 3 numbers). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2003.isbn: 0-8218-3378-2

  28. [28]

    Some Generation Results for Perturbed Semigroups

    W. Desch and W. Schappacher. “Some Generation Results for Perturbed Semigroups”. In: Semigroup Theory and Applications. Proceedings of the meeting “Trends in Semigroup Theory and Applications” (University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy). Ed. by P. Cl´ ement, S. Invernizzi, E. Mitideri, and I. I. Vrabie. Vol. 116. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics....

  29. [29]

    Factoring multi-sublinear maps

    G. Diestel. “Factoring multi-sublinear maps”. In:J. Funct. Anal.266.4 (2014), pp. 1928– 1947

  30. [30]

    Grothendieck Spaces and Vector Measures

    J. Diestel. “Grothendieck Spaces and Vector Measures”. In:Vector and Operator Valued Measures and Applications. Ed. by D. H. Tucker and H. B. Maynard. New York London: Academic Press, 1973, pp. 97–108.isbn: 978-0-12-702450-9

  31. [31]

    Remarks on Weak Compactness in L1(µ, X)

    J. Diestel. “Remarks on Weak Compactness in L1(µ, X)”. In:Glasgow Math. J.18.1 (1977), pp. 87–91

  32. [32]

    Uniform Integrability: An Introduction

    J. Diestel. “Uniform Integrability: An Introduction”. In:Rend. Ist. Mat. Univ. Trieste23.1 (1991), pp. 41–80

  33. [33]

    Weak Compactness in L1(µ, X)

    J. Diestel, W. M. Ruess, and W. Schachermayer. “Weak Compactness in L1(µ, X)”. In:Proc. Am. Math. Soc.118.2 (1993), pp. 447–453. 29

  34. [34]

    Diestel.Geometry of Banach Spaces - Selected Topics

    J. Diestel.Geometry of Banach Spaces - Selected Topics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 485. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1975.isbn: 978-0-387-07402-3

  35. [35]

    Diestel, H

    J. Diestel, H. Jarchow, and A. Tonge.Absolutely Summing Operators. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.isbn: 978-0-521- 43168-2

  36. [36]

    Diestel and J

    J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl.Vector Measures. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs v. 15. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1977.isbn: 978-0-8218-1515-1

  37. [37]

    Dinculeanu.Vector Measures

    N. Dinculeanu.Vector Measures. First English edition. International Series of Monographs in Pure and Applied Mathematics 95. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967

  38. [38]

    Baillon’s Theorem on Maximal Regularity

    B. Eberhardt and G. Greiner. “Baillon’s Theorem on Maximal Regularity”. In:Acta Appl. Math27.1–2 (1992), pp. 47–54

  39. [39]

    G. A. Edgar and L. Sucheston.Stopping Times and Directed Processes. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.isbn: 978-0-521-35023-5

  40. [40]

    On the Banach Spaces with the Property (V ∗) of Pelczynski

    G. Emmanuele. “On the Banach Spaces with the Property (V ∗) of Pelczynski”. In:Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.152.1 (1988), pp. 171–181

  41. [41]

    Engel and R

    K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel.One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 194. New York, Heidelberg: Springer, 2000.isbn: 978-0- 387-22642-2

  42. [42]

    ¨Uber schwache totalstetige Operatoren

    V. Gantmacher. “ ¨Uber schwache totalstetige Operatoren”. In:Rec. Math. Moscou, n. Ser.7 (49).2 (1940), pp. 301–308

  43. [43]

    Grothendieck spaces: the landscape and perspectives

    M. Gonz´ alez and T. Kania. “Grothendieck spaces: the landscape and perspectives”. In: Japan. J. Math.16.2 (2021), pp. 247–313

  44. [44]

    Perturbing the Boundary Conditions of a Generator

    G. Greiner. “Perturbing the Boundary Conditions of a Generator”. In:Houston J. Math. 13.2 (1987), pp. 213–229

  45. [45]

    Lp-regularity of the Cauchy problem and the geometry of Banach spaces

    S. Guerre-Delabriere. “ Lp-regularity of the Cauchy problem and the geometry of Banach spaces”. In:Illinois J. Math.39.4 (1995), pp. 556–566

  46. [46]

    A. J. Guirao, V. Montesinos, and V. Zizler.Renormings in Banach Spaces. A Toolbox. Vol. 75. Monografie Matematyczne. Cham: Birkh¨ auser, 2022.isbn: 978-3-031-08654-0

  47. [47]

    On Kato’s Method for Navier–Stokes Equations

    B. H. Haak and P. C. Kunstmann. “On Kato’s Method for Navier–Stokes Equations”. In:J. Math. Fluid Mech.11.4 (2009), pp. 492–535

  48. [48]

    Weighted Admissibility and Wellposedness of Linear Systems in Banach Spaces

    B. H. Haak and P. C. Kunstmann. “Weighted Admissibility and Wellposedness of Linear Systems in Banach Spaces”. In:SIAM J. Control Optim.45.6 (2007), pp. 2094–2118

  49. [49]

    The Green function of a linear differential equation with a lateral condition

    C. S. H¨ onig. “The Green function of a linear differential equation with a lateral condition”. In:Bull. Am. Math. Soc.79.3 (1973), pp. 587–593

  50. [50]

    Input-to-State Stability for Classes of Nonlinear PDEs: An Operator-Theoretic Approach

    R. Hosfeld. “Input-to-State Stability for Classes of Nonlinear PDEs: An Operator-Theoretic Approach”. Dissertation. Bergische Universit¨ at Wuppertal, 2025

  51. [51]

    Characterization of Orlicz admissibility

    R. Hosfeld, B. Jacob, and F. L. Schwenninger. “Characterization of Orlicz admissibility”. In: Semigroup Forum106.3 (2023), pp. 633–661

  52. [52]

    Input-to-State Stability for Bilinear Feedback Systems

    R. Hosfeld, B. Jacob, F. L. Schwenninger, and M. Tucsnak. “Input-to-State Stability for Bilinear Feedback Systems”. In:SIAM J. Control Optim.62.3 (2024), pp. 1369–1389. 30

  53. [53]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach Spaces. Volume I: Martingales and Littlewood-Paley Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete,

  54. [54]

    Cham: Springer, 2016.isbn: 978-3-319-48519-5

    Folge 63. Cham: Springer, 2016.isbn: 978-3-319-48519-5

  55. [55]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach Spaces. Volume II: Probabilistic Methods and Operator Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge 67. Cham: Springer, 2018.isbn: 978-3-319-69807-6

  56. [56]

    Hyt¨ onen, J

    T. Hyt¨ onen, J. van Neerven, M. Veraar, and L. Weis.Analysis in Banach Spaces. Volume III: Harmonic Analysis and Spectral Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete,

  57. [57]

    Cham: Springer, 2023.isbn: 978-3-031-46597-0

    Folge 76. Cham: Springer, 2023.isbn: 978-3-031-46597-0

  58. [58]

    On input-to-state-stability and integral input-to-state-stability for parabolic boundary control systems

    B. Jacob, R. Nabiullin, J. Partington, and F. Schwenninger. “On input-to-state-stability and integral input-to-state-stability for parabolic boundary control systems”. In:2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). 2016, pp. 2265–2269

  59. [59]

    Infinite-Dimensional Input-to-State Stability and Orlicz Spaces

    B. Jacob, R. Nabiullin, J. R. Partington, and F. L. Schwenninger. “Infinite-Dimensional Input-to-State Stability and Orlicz Spaces”. In:SIAM J. Control Optim.56.2 (2018), pp. 868–889

  60. [60]

    Admissibility of Control and Observation Operators for Semigroups: A Survey

    B. Jacob and J. R. Partington. “Admissibility of Control and Observation Operators for Semigroups: A Survey”. In:Current Trends in Operator Theory and Its Applications. Ed. by J. A. Ball, M. Klaus, J. W. Helton, and L. Rodman. Vol. 149. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications. Basel: Birkh¨ auser, 2004, pp. 199–221.isbn: 978-3-0348-9608-5

  61. [61]

    Jacob, J

    B. Jacob, J. R. Partington, S. Pott, E. Rydhe, and F. L. Schwenninger.Laplace-Carleson embeddings and infinity-norm admissibility. Accepted for publication inAnal. Math. Phys

  62. [62]

    arXiv:2109.11465 [math.FA].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11465

  63. [63]

    A refinement of Baillon’s theorem on maximal regularity

    B. Jacob, F. L. Schwenninger, and J. Wintermayr. “A refinement of Baillon’s theorem on maximal regularity”. In:Stud. Math.263 (2022), pp. 141–158

  64. [64]

    On continuity of solutions for parabolic control systems and input-to-state stability

    B. Jacob, F. L. Schwenninger, and H. Zwart. “On continuity of solutions for parabolic control systems and input-to-state stability”. In:J. Differ. Equations266.10 (2019), pp. 6284–6306

  65. [65]

    Nonreflexive spaces of type 2

    R. C. James. “Nonreflexive spaces of type 2”. In:Israel J. Math.30.1–2 (1978), pp. 1–13

  66. [66]

    Remarks on ℓ1 and ℓ∞-maximal regularity for power-bounded operators

    N. J. Kalton and P. Portal. “Remarks on ℓ1 and ℓ∞-maximal regularity for power-bounded operators”. In:J. Aust. Math. Soc.84.3 (2008), pp. 345–365

  67. [67]

    Type and cotype in Musielak-Orlicz spaces

    A. Kami´ niska and B. Turett. “Type and cotype in Musielak-Orlicz spaces”. In:Geometry of Banach Spaces: Proceedings of the Conference Held in Strobl, Austria 1989. Ed. by P. F. X. M¨ uller and W. Schachermayer. Vol. 158. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 165–180

  68. [68]

    M. A. Krasnosel’skii and Ya. B. Rutickii.Convex Functions and Orlicz Spaces. Groningen: P. Noordhoff, 1961

  69. [69]

    Continuous maximal regularity in locally convex spaces

    K. Kruse and F. L. Schwenninger. “Continuous maximal regularity in locally convex spaces”. In:Stud. Math.285 (2025), pp. 41–89

  70. [70]

    Perturbation Theorems for Maximal Lp-Regularity

    P. C. Kunstmann and L. Weis. “Perturbation Theorems for Maximal Lp-Regularity”. In: Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4)30.2 (2001), pp. 415–435

  71. [71]

    Continuous maximal regularity and analytic semigroups

    J. LeCrone and G. Simonett. “Continuous maximal regularity and analytic semigroups”. In: Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.Supplement 2011 (2011), pp. 963–970

  72. [72]

    On quasilinear parabolic equations and continuous maximal regularity

    J. LeCrone and G. Simonett. “On quasilinear parabolic equations and continuous maximal regularity”. In:Evol. Equ. Control Theory9.1 (2020), pp. 61–86. 31

  73. [73]

    Lindenstrauss and L

    J. Lindenstrauss and L. Tzafriri.Classical Banach Spaces I. Sequence Spaces. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 92. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977.isbn: 978-0-387-08072-7

  74. [74]

    Uniform Convergence of Operators on L∞ and Similar Spaces

    H. P. Lotz. “Uniform Convergence of Operators on L∞ and Similar Spaces”. In:Math. Z. 190.1 (1985), pp. 207–220

  75. [75]

    Lunardi.Interpolation Theory

    A. Lunardi.Interpolation Theory. 3rd ed. Publications of the Scuola Normale Superiore 16. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale Pisa, 2018.isbn: 978-88-7642-638-4

  76. [76]

    R. E. Megginson.An Introduction to Banach Space Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics

  77. [77]

    New York Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1998.isbn: 978-0-387-98431-5

  78. [78]

    Sur Le Lemme de La Vallee Poussin et un theoreme de Bismut

    P. A. Meyer. “Sur Le Lemme de La Vallee Poussin et un theoreme de Bismut”. In:S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es XII. Ed. by C. Dellacherie, P. A. Meyer, M. Weil, A. Dold, and B. Eckmann. Vol. 649. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1978, pp. 770–774. isbn: 978-3-540-08761-8

  79. [79]

    Input-to-State Stability of Infinite-Dimensional Systems: Recent Results and Open Questions

    A. Mironchenko and C. Prieur. “Input-to-State Stability of Infinite-Dimensional Systems: Recent Results and Open Questions”. In:SIAM Rev.62.3 (2020), pp. 529–614

  80. [80]

    Maximal Regularity as a Tool for Partial Differential Equations

    S. Monniaux. “Maximal Regularity as a Tool for Partial Differential Equations”. In:Modern Problems in PDEs and Applications. Extended Abstracts of the 2023 GAP Center Summer School. Ed. by M. Chatzakou, J. Restrepo, M. Ruzhansky, B. Torebek, and K. Van Bockstal. Trends in Mathematics. Research Perspectives Ghent Analysis and PDE Center 4. Cham: Birkh¨ aus...

Showing first 80 references.