pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20097 · v1 · pith:S7BY2T4Inew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🧮 math.QA · math-ph· math.AG· math.DG· math.MP

The Hitchin and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connections are projectively equivalent in the genus zero case

J{\o}rgen Ellegaard Andersen , Tim Henke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 02:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.QA math-phmath.AGmath.DGmath.MP
keywords Hitchin connectionKnizhnik-Zamolodchikov connectionPauly isomorphismconformal blocksVerlinde bundlegenus zeroprojective equivalencemetaplectic correction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pauly's isomorphism intertwines the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov and Hitchin connections up to a scalar one-form in genus zero.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proves that in the genus zero case with at least three marked points, Pauly's isomorphism between the sheaf of conformal blocks and the Verlinde bundle makes the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection and the Hitchin connection projectively equivalent. The Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection is defined on conformal blocks using the Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model from conformal field theory, while the Hitchin connection is defined on the Verlinde bundle via geometric quantization of the moduli space of flat connections. If this holds, the two constructions of projectively flat connections on vector bundles over the moduli space differ only by a scalar adjustment, unifying the approaches. The result also shows that the auxiliary metaplectic construction of the Hitchin connection is projectively unique and projectively flat.

Core claim

The paper proves that Pauly's isomorphism between the sheaf of conformal blocks in the Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model and the Verlinde bundle intertwines the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection and the Hitchin connection up to a scalar-valued one-form. This establishes their projective equivalence in genus zero with at least three marked points. As a result, the auxiliary metaplectic construction of the Hitchin connection is both projectively unique and projectively flat.

What carries the argument

Pauly's isomorphism, which identifies the sheaf of conformal blocks with the Verlinde bundle while intertwining the two connections up to a scalar one-form.

If this is right

  • The metaplectic-corrected Hitchin connection is projectively unique.
  • The construction is projectively flat.
  • The two bundles carry projectively equivalent flat connections in genus zero.
  • No further corrections are needed to achieve projective flatness from the given models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result may motivate checking whether analogous projective equivalences exist for positive genus, even if the paper restricts to genus zero.
  • Explicit low-point computations, such as for four marked points on the sphere, could provide independent verification of the scalar adjustment.
  • The unification tightens the link between conformal field theory constructions and geometric quantization beyond what was previously established.

Load-bearing premise

Pauly's isomorphism between the sheaf of conformal blocks and the Verlinde bundle extends without additional obstructions from the Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model or geometric quantization in the genus-zero case.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that the difference between the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection and the Hitchin connection, after transport by Pauly's isomorphism, fails to be a scalar one-form would refute the projective equivalence.

read the original abstract

This paper establishes the projective equivalence between the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection and the Hitchin connection in genus 0 with at least 3 marked points. The Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection is defined on the sheaf of conformal blocks in the Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model of conformal field theory. The Hitchin connection is defined on the Verlinde bundle via geometric quantisation of the moduli space of flat connections. Pauly's isomorphism establishes the equivalence of these two vector bundles. The main theorem of this paper is that the isomorphism intertwines these two connections up to a scalar-valued one-form. In addition, this theorem is used to construct a Hitchin connection through an auxiliary metaplectic correction. As a corollary of the main theorem, this construction of the Hitchin connection is projectively unique and projectively flat.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper establishes that Pauly's isomorphism between the sheaf of conformal blocks (Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model) and the Verlinde bundle intertwines the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov connection and the Hitchin connection up to a scalar-valued one-form, in the genus-zero case with n ≥ 3 marked points. As a corollary, an auxiliary metaplectic construction of the Hitchin connection is projectively unique and projectively flat.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result provides a direct bridge between the conformal-field-theory definition of the KZ connection and the geometric-quantization definition of the Hitchin connection. It confirms projective flatness and supplies a uniqueness statement for the metaplectic correction without introducing new parameters. The approach is efficient because it leverages the existing Pauly isomorphism rather than constructing a new map.

major comments (1)
  1. The manuscript should supply an explicit local computation (in a suitable trivialization of the bundle over the genus-zero moduli space) showing that the difference of the two connection forms, after transport by Pauly's isomorphism, is indeed a scalar multiple of the identity endomorphism; without this step the claim that the intertwining is only up to a scalar one-form remains formal.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the scalar one-form (e.g., whether it is denoted ω or α) should be introduced once and used consistently in the statement of the main theorem and in the proof.
  2. The introduction would benefit from a short paragraph recalling the precise definition of 'projective equivalence' of connections used in the paper, with a reference to the relevant equation or section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive recommendation of minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the main result and its corollaries. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript should supply an explicit local computation (in a suitable trivialization of the bundle over the genus-zero moduli space) showing that the difference of the two connection forms, after transport by Pauly's isomorphism, is indeed a scalar multiple of the identity endomorphism; without this step the claim that the intertwining is only up to a scalar one-form remains formal.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit local computation would render the argument more transparent and less reliant on abstract properties alone. While the current proof establishes the projective intertwining by comparing the characterizing properties of the two connections after transport by Pauly's isomorphism (leveraging their projective flatness and the uniqueness of such connections on the genus-zero moduli space), we acknowledge that a direct verification in local coordinates strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing an explicit local computation in a suitable trivialization of the bundle over the genus-zero configuration space, confirming that the difference of the transported connection forms is a scalar multiple of the identity endomorphism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation rests on Pauly's independently established isomorphism between the sheaf of conformal blocks (TUY model) and the Verlinde bundle, followed by direct comparison of the two connection forms in genus zero. The main theorem shows the isomorphism intertwines the connections up to a scalar one-form, and the corollary on projective uniqueness of the metaplectic construction follows from this comparison. No equation or step reduces the claimed projective equivalence to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is unverified outside the paper. The cited prior results (Pauly isomorphism, standard definitions of KZ and Hitchin connections) are external to the present derivation and remain falsifiable by independent means.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Pauly's isomorphism between conformal blocks and Verlinde bundle, plus the standard definitions of KZ and Hitchin connections in the cited models. No free parameters or invented entities are apparent from the abstract. Axioms include background properties of flat connections and conformal blocks in genus zero.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Pauly's isomorphism identifies the sheaf of conformal blocks with the Verlinde bundle in a manner compatible with the connections up to projective factors.
    Invoked as the key bridge between the two constructions in the main theorem.
  • standard math The Tsuchiya-Ueno-Yamada model and geometric quantization of flat connections yield well-defined vector bundles and connections in genus zero with >=3 marked points.
    Background assumption from prior literature on which the equivalence is built.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5699 in / 1576 out tokens · 47231 ms · 2026-05-20T02:51:10.569001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The main theorem of this paper, Theorem 9.1, proves that Pauly’s isomorphism gives a projective equivalence of the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov connection on the bundle of covacua over Teichmüller space and the Hitchin connection on the Verlinde bundle... their difference can be determined to vanish in both the second and the first order. Thus the difference is given by multiplication by a holomorphic function... therefore be constant, proving their projective equivalence.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Mathématique, vol

    Anton Alekseev and Florian Naef,Goldman–Turaev formality from the Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov connection, Comptes Rendus. Mathématique, vol. 355, no. 11, pp. 1138–1147, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Andersen,Asymptotic faithfulness of the quantumSU(n)representations of the mapping class groups,Annals of Mathematics, pp

    Jørgen E. Andersen,Asymptotic faithfulness of the quantumSU(n)representations of the mapping class groups,Annals of Mathematics, pp. 347–368, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Andersen,Hitchin’s connection, Toeplitz operators, and symmetry invariant deformation quanti- zation,Quantum Topology, vol

    Jørgen E. Andersen,Hitchin’s connection, Toeplitz operators, and symmetry invariant deformation quanti- zation,Quantum Topology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 293–325, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    The Hitchin-Witten Connection and Complex Quantum Chern-Simons Theory

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Niels L. Gammelgaard,The Hitchin–Witten connection and complex quantum Chern–Simons theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1035, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Andersen, Niels L

    Jørgen E. Andersen, Niels L. Gammelgaard, and Magnus R. Lauridsen,Hitchin’s connection in metaplectic quantization,Quantum Topology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 327–357, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Andersen and William E

    Jørgen E. Andersen and William E. Petersen,Construction of Modular Functors from Modular Tensor Categories,Travaux Mathématiques, no. 25, pp. 147-211, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Andersen and Benjamin Himpel and Søren F

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Benjamin Himpel and Søren F. Jørgensen and Johan Martens and Brendan McLel- lanThe Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariant for links in finite order mapping tori I,Advances in Mathe- matics, vol. 304, pp. 131–178, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Geometric construction of modular functors from conformal field theory,Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications, vol

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Geometric construction of modular functors from conformal field theory,Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 127–202, 2007

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Abelian conformal field theory and determinant bundles,International Journal of Mathematics, vol

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Abelian conformal field theory and determinant bundles,International Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 919–993, 2007. 14

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Modular functors are determined by their genus zero data,Quantum Topology, vol

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Modular functors are determined by their genus zero data,Quantum Topology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 255–291, 2012

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Construction of the Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev TQFT from conformal field theory,Inventiones Mathematicae, vol

    Jørgen E. Andersen and Kenji Ueno,Construction of the Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev TQFT from conformal field theory,Inventiones Mathematicae, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 519–559, 2015

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Scott Axelrod, Steve Della Pietra, and Edward Witten,Geometric quantization of Chern–Simons gauge theory,Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 787–902, 1991

    work page 1991

  13. [13]

    Arnaud Beauville and Yves Laszlo,Conformal blocks and generalized theta functions,Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 385–419, 1994

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    Differential Geom, vol

    Prakash Belkale,Strange duality and the Hitchin/WZW connection,Journal of Differential Geometry, J. Differential Geom, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 445-465, 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Besse,Einstein Manifolds,Springer, 2007

    Arthur L. Besse,Einstein Manifolds,Springer, 2007

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Usha Bhosle and Annamalai Ramanathan,Moduli of parabolic G-bundles on curves,Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 1989

    work page 1989

  17. [17]

    Olivier Biquard,Fibrés paraboliques stables et connexions singulieres plates,Bulletin de la Société Mathé- matique de France, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 231–257, 1991

    work page 1991

  18. [18]

    Indranil Biswas and Krishnamurthi Guruprasad,Principal bundles on open surfaces and invariant functions on Lie groups,International Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 535–544, 1993

    work page 1993

  19. [19]

    2023, no

    Indranil Biswas, Swarnava Mukhopadhyay, and Richard Wentworth,Ginzburg algebras and the Hitchin connection for parabolicG-bundles,Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), vol. 2023, no. 803, pp. 137–181, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    2023, no

    Indranil Biswas, Swarnava Mukhopadhyay, and Richard Wentworth,A Hitchin connection on nonabelian theta functions for parabolicG-bundles,Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), vol. 2023, no. 803, pp. 137–181, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Indranil Biswas, Swarnava Mukhopadhyay, and Richard Wentworth,Geometrization of the TUY/WZW/KZ connection,Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 114, no. 3, page 85, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    203–248, 1957

    Raoul Bott,Homogeneous vector bundles,Annals of Mathematics, pp. 203–248, 1957

    work page 1957

  23. [23]

    Nathaniel Bushek,Some conditions for descent of line bundles to GIT quotients(G/B×G/B×G/B) G, Differential Geometry and its Applications, vol. 55, pp. 2–12, 2017

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Laurent Charles,A note on Chern-Simons bundles and the Mapping Class Group, Preprint,https:// webusers.imj-prg.fr/~laurent.charles/Articles/Chern_Simons.pdf, 2013

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Shiing-Shen Chern and James Simons,Characteristic forms and geometric invariants,Annals of Mathe- matics, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 48–69, 1974

    work page 1974

  26. [26]

    Daskalopoulos and Richard A

    Georgios D. Daskalopoulos and Richard A. Wentworth,Geometric quantization for the moduli space of vector bundles with parabolic structure, inGeometry, Topology and Physics, pp. 119–156, De Gruyter, 2011

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Templeton,Three-dimensional massive gauge theories,Physical Re- view Letters, vol

    Stanley Deser, Roman Jackiw, and S. Templeton,Three-dimensional massive gauge theories,Physical Re- view Letters, vol. 48, no. 15, page 975, 1982

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Narasimhan,Groupe de Picard des variétés de modules de fibrés semi-stables sur les courbes algébriques,Inventiones mathematicae, vol

    Jean-Marie Drezet and Mudumbai S. Narasimhan,Groupe de Picard des variétés de modules de fibrés semi-stables sur les courbes algébriques,Inventiones mathematicae, vol. 97, pp. 53–94, 1989

    work page 1989

  29. [29]

    Algebraic Geom, vol

    Gerd Faltings,Stable G-bundles and projective connections,J. Algebraic Geom, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 507–568, 1993

    work page 1993

  30. [30]

    Freed,Classical Chern–Simons theory, Part 1,Advances in Mathematics, volo.113, no.2, pp

    Daniel S. Freed,Classical Chern–Simons theory, Part 1,Advances in Mathematics, volo.113, no.2, pp. 237– 303, 1995

    work page 1995

  31. [31]

    Freedman, Michael Larsen, and Zhenghan Wang,A modular functor which is universal for quantum computation.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227:605 – 622, 2002

    Michael H. Freedman, Michael Larsen, and Zhenghan Wang,A modular functor which is universal for quantum computation.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 227:605 – 622, 2002

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    Freedman, Alexei Kitaev, Michael J

    Michael H. Freedman, Alexei Kitaev, Michael J. Larsen, and Zhenghan WangTopological quantum compu- tation. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 40, no.1, pp. 31 – 38, 2003

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    William Fulton and Joe Harris,Representation theory: a first course,Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,

    Daniel Gottesman, “Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction,” Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, 1997. [Online]. Available: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-07162004-113028

    work page 1997

  35. [35]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant overhead,

    Daniel Gottesman, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant overhead,” Quantum Info. Comput., vol. 14, no. 15–16, p. 1338–1372, Nov. 2014. 15

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Hitchin,Flat connections and geometric quantization,Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol

    Nigel J. Hitchin,Flat connections and geometric quantization,Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 347–380, 1990

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    31, 2012

    Alan Huckleberry and Tilmann Wurzbacher,Infinite Dimensional Kähler Manifolds,Birkhäuser, vol. 31, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Noboru Kawamoto, Yukihiko Namikawa, Akihiro Tsuchiya, and Yasuhiko Yamada,Geometric realization of conformal field theory on Riemann surfaces,Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 247–308, 1988

    work page 1988

  39. [39]

    Knizhnik and Alexander B

    Vadim G. Knizhnik and Alexander B. Zamolodchikov,Current algebra and Wess–Zumino model in two dimensions,Nuclear Physics B, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 83–103, 1984

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    1–49, Springer, 1997

    Shrawan Kumar,Infinite Grassmannians and moduli spaces ofG-bundles,Vector Bundles on Curves—New Directions, pp. 1–49, Springer, 1997

    work page 1997

  41. [41]

    42, 2021

    Shrawan Kumar,Conformal Blocks, Generalized Theta Functions and the Verlinde Formula,Cambridge University Press, vol. 42, 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Yves Laszlo and Christoph Sorger,The line bundles on the moduli of parabolicG-bundles over curves and their sections,Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 499–525, 1997

    work page 1997

  43. [43]

    Yves Laszlo,Hitchin’s and WZW connections are the same,Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 547–576, 1998

    work page 1998

  44. [44]

    Yves Laszlo, Christian Pauly, and Christoph Sorger,On the monodromy of the Hitchin connection,Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 64, pp. 64–78, 2013

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Rémi Lodh,Birational invariance ofH 1(O),Archiv der Mathematik, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 163–170, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Sparse-graph codes for quantum error correction,

    David J.C. MacKay, Graeme Mitchison, and Paul L. McFadden, “Sparse-graph codes for quantum error correction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2315 – 2330, Oct. 2004

    work page 2004

  47. [47]

    Mehta and Conjeevaram S

    Vikram B. Mehta and Conjeevaram S. Seshadri,Moduli of vector bundles on curves with parabolic structures, Mathematische Annalen, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 205–239, 1980

    work page 1980

  48. [48]

    Eckhard Meinrenken and Christopher Woodward,Hamiltonian loop group action and Verlinde factorization, J. Diff. Geom.vol. 50, pp. 417 – 469, 1998

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Zakaria Ouaras,Parabolic Hitchin connection,Journal of Algebra, vol. 665, pp. 628–678, 2025

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Christian Pauly,Espaces de modules de fibrés paraboliques et blocs conformes,Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 217–235, 1996

    work page 1996

  51. [51]

    Christian Pauly and Johan Martens and Michele Bolognesi and Thomas Baier,The Hitchin connection in arbitrary characteristic,Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 449–492, 2023

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Ramadas and Isadore M

    Trivandrum R. Ramadas and Isadore M. Singer and Jonathan Weitsman,Some comments on Chern-Simons gauge theory,Communications in mathematical physics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 409–420, 1989

    work page 1989

  53. [53]

    Ramadas,Faltings’ construction of the K-Z connection Communications in mathematical physicsvol

    Trivandrum R. Ramadas,Faltings’ construction of the K-Z connection Communications in mathematical physicsvol. 196, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 1998

    work page 1998

  54. [54]

    Harder-Narasimhan trace

    Trivandrum R. Ramadas,The" Harder-Narasimhan trace" and unitarity of the KZ/Hitchin connection: genus 0,Annals of mathematics, pp. 1–39, 2009

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Annamalai Ramanthan,Moduli for principal bundles over algebraic curves: I.,Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences-Mathematical Sciences.vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 301–328, 1996

    work page 1996

  56. [56]

    Ziv Ran,Jacobi cohomology, local geometry of moduli spaces, and Hitchin connections,Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 545–580, 2006

    work page 2006

  57. [57]

    Schonfeld,A mass term for three-dimensional gauge fields,Nuclear Physics B, vol

    Jonathan F. Schonfeld,A mass term for three-dimensional gauge fields,Nuclear Physics B, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 157–171, 1981

    work page 1981

  58. [58]

    Seshadri,Moduli ofπ-vector bundles over an algebraic curve,Questions on algebraic vari- eties, pp

    Conjeevaram S. Seshadri,Moduli ofπ-vector bundles over an algebraic curve,Questions on algebraic vari- eties, pp. 139–260, 1969

    work page 1969

  59. [59]

    Xiaotao Sun and I-Hsun Tsai,Hitchin’s connection and differential operators with values in the determinant bundle,Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 303–343, 2004

    work page 2004

  60. [60]

    1–43, 2000

    Constantin Teleman,The quantization conjecture revisited,Annals of Mathematics, pp. 1–43, 2000

    work page 2000

  61. [61]

    Constantin Teleman and Christopher Woodward,Parabolic bundles, products of conjugacy classes, and Gromov–Witten invariants,Annales de l’Institut Fourier, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 713–748, 2003

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    459–566, Elsevier, 1989

    Akihiro Tsuchiya, Kenji Ueno, and Yasuhiko Yamada,Conformal field theory on universal family of stable curves with gauge symmetries,Integrable Systems in Quantum Field Theory, pp. 459–566, Elsevier, 1989. 16

    work page 1989

  63. [63]

    24, American Mathematical Society, 2008

    Kenji Ueno,Conformal Field Theory with Gauge Symmetry, vol. 24, American Mathematical Society, 2008

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    de Jong,On Hitchin’s connection,Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol

    Bert van Geemen and Aise J. de Jong,On Hitchin’s connection,Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 189–228, 1998

    work page 1998

  65. [65]

    Bane Vasic, Valentin Savin, Michele Pacenti, Shantom Borah, Nithin Raveendran, Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes, arXiv:2510.14090

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Julius Wess and Bruno Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Physics Letters B, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 95–97, 1971

    work page 1971

  67. [67]

    Edward Witten,Global aspects of current algebra,Nuclear Physics B, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 422–432, 1983

    work page 1983

  68. [68]

    Edward Witten,Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 351–399, 1989. 17

    work page 1989