pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22425 · v2 · pith:XQOUGM6Hnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.CV

Time-varying rPPG signal separation via block-sparse signal model

Kosuke Kurihara , Yoshihiro Maeda , Daisuke Sugimura , Takayuki Hamamoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 07:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.CV
keywords rPPGremote photoplethysmographyblock-sparse modeltime-frequency domainsignal separationquasi-periodic signalillumination fluctuations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modeling rPPG quasi-periodicity as block-sparse in the time-frequency domain enables adaptive separation from illumination noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an rPPG extraction method that treats the stable cardiac cycle as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain. It builds a time-varying framework to separate the weak pulse signal from fluctuating illumination. A reader would care because non-contact heart monitoring from video becomes practical only if the method holds up when lighting changes. The approach directly targets the noise susceptibility that has limited prior rPPG techniques.

Core claim

Our approach models quasi-periodicity of the rPPG signal, which arises from the stable cardiac cycle, as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain. To incorporate a block-sparse model and enable adaptive signal separation under illumination fluctuations, we construct a time-varying signal separation framework.

What carries the argument

The time-varying signal separation framework that models rPPG quasi-periodicity as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain.

If this is right

  • rPPG extraction adapts automatically to time-varying illumination without fixed assumptions on lighting.
  • The stable cardiac cycle provides a reliable block-sparse prior that isolates the pulse from stronger noise.
  • Signal separation operates continuously across frames rather than in fixed windows.
  • Public dataset experiments confirm the framework isolates the cardiac signal under realistic fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same block-sparse time-frequency construction could extend to other quasi-periodic signals such as respiration rate from video.
  • Integration with motion-robust preprocessing might further isolate the cardiac component when both illumination and head movement occur together.
  • The time-varying aspect suggests the method could handle gradual heart-rate changes without re-initialization.

Load-bearing premise

The quasi-periodic characteristics of rPPG signals can be modeled as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain that enables effective adaptive separation under illumination fluctuations.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on videos with sudden illumination shifts where the proposed method shows no improvement over standard rPPG techniques would falsify the utility of the block-sparse time-frequency model.

read the original abstract

Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) enables non-contact measurement of cardiac pulse signals by analyzing subtle color changes in facial videos. Nevertheless, extracting rPPG signals remains challenging because of their extremely weak signal strength and susceptibility to illumination noise. In this paper, we propose an rPPG signal extraction method that exploits the quasi-periodic characteristics of rPPG signals. Our approach models quasi-periodicity of the rPPG signal, which arises from the stable cardiac cycle, as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain. To incorporate a block-sparse model and enable adaptive signal separation under illumination fluctuations, we construct a time-varying signal separation framework. Experiments using a public dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an rPPG signal extraction method that models the quasi-periodicity arising from the stable cardiac cycle as a block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain. It constructs a time-varying signal separation framework to enable adaptive separation under illumination fluctuations, with effectiveness asserted via experiments on a public dataset.

Significance. If the empirical results hold with appropriate quantitative validation, the block-sparse modeling of quasi-periodicity combined with the time-varying framework could offer a principled approach to robust rPPG extraction, addressing a key challenge in non-contact vital sign monitoring under real-world lighting variations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'Experiments using a public dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method' supplies no quantitative results, baselines, error metrics (e.g., SNR, MAE on heart rate), or implementation details, which is load-bearing for the central claim of effectiveness and prevents assessment of whether the block-sparse model improves upon existing methods.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive comment. We agree that the abstract requires quantitative support for the effectiveness claim and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that 'Experiments using a public dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method' supplies no quantitative results, baselines, error metrics (e.g., SNR, MAE on heart rate), or implementation details, which is load-bearing for the central claim of effectiveness and prevents assessment of whether the block-sparse model improves upon existing methods.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should include quantitative results to support the central claim. The full manuscript contains experimental results on a public dataset with metrics such as SNR and heart-rate MAE, but these were not summarized in the abstract. In the revised manuscript we will update the abstract to report key quantitative outcomes (e.g., SNR improvement and MAE reduction relative to baselines) so that the effectiveness claim can be assessed directly from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling proposal is self-contained

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a modeling proposal: quasi-periodicity of rPPG (arising from stable cardiac cycle) is represented as block-sparse structure in the time-frequency domain, with a time-varying separation framework added for illumination fluctuations. This is an explicit construction based on known signal properties, not a derivation chain that reduces to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit the patterns of circularity (e.g., no fitted input called prediction or ansatz smuggled via citation). Validity is tied to experiments on a public dataset, which is an external benchmark, so the work is self-contained with no internal reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; insufficient detail to populate the ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5660 in / 963 out tokens · 27969 ms · 2026-07-01T07:45:01.566151+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals are time-series signals that represent blood volume changes associated with cardiac cycles [1]. Traditionally, contact-type sensors have been used as the gold standard for PPG signal measurement; however, these sensors require continuous physical contact during mea- surement, imposing constraints on daily us...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    In the following, we describe each step in detail

    PROPOSED METHOD Our method consists mainly of three steps after preprocess- ing: (1) constructing a time-varying signal separation frame- work, (2) formulating an objective function with our block- sparse model, and (3) optimizing via alternating minimiza- tion. In the following, we describe each step in detail. 2.1. Preprocessing We first obtain input RG...

  3. [3]

    Experimental settings 3.1.1

    EXPERIMENTS 3.1. Experimental settings 3.1.1. Dataset We conducted experiments using the UBFC-RPPG dataset [14]. This dataset comprises 49 videos of 47 subjects who were in- structed to sit. Each video was captured for approximately 1 minute. The illumination conditions were natural and not strictly controlled. The captured videos are in an uncom- pressed...

  4. [4]

    CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK We proposed an rPPG signal extraction method that ex- ploits the quasi-periodic characteristics of rPPG signals. We Green ICA CHRO POS PVMM MTTS Phys Ours SNR [dB] -40 -20 0 20 40 w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca Green ICA CHRO POS PVMM MTTS Phys Ours MAE [bpm] 0 50 100 w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca w/pca Green ICA CHRO POS P...

  5. [5]

    Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement,

    J. Allen, “Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement,”Physiol. Meas., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. R1–R39, 2007

    2007

  6. [6]

    Remote photoplethysmography for heart rate measure- ment: A review,

    H. Xiao, T. Liu, Y . Sun, Y . Li, S. Zhao, and A. Avolio, “Remote photoplethysmography for heart rate measure- ment: A review,”Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 88, 2024, Art. no. 105608

    2024

  7. [7]

    Dis- tancePPG: Robust non-contact vital signs monitoring using a camera,

    M. Kumar, A. Veeraraghavan, and A. Sabharwal, “Dis- tancePPG: Robust non-contact vital signs monitoring using a camera,”Biomed. Opt. Exp., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1565–1588, 2015

    2015

  8. [8]

    Re- mote plethysmographic imaging using ambient light,

    W. Verkruysse, L. O. Svaasand, and J. S. Nelson, “Re- mote plethysmographic imaging using ambient light,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 21434–21445, 2008

    2008

  9. [9]

    Algorithmic principles of remote ppg,

    W. Wang, A. C. D. Brinker, S. Stuijk, and G. D. Haan, “Algorithmic principles of remote ppg,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 1479–1491, 2017

    2017

  10. [10]

    Robust pulse rate from chrominance-based rppg,

    G. D. Haan and V . Jeanne, “Robust pulse rate from chrominance-based rppg,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2878–2886, 2013

    2013

  11. [11]

    Advancements in noncontact, multiparameter physiological measure- ments using a webcam,

    M. Poh, D. McDuff, and R. W. Picard, “Advancements in noncontact, multiparameter physiological measure- ments using a webcam,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2011

    2011

  12. [12]

    Periodic variance maximization us- ing generalized eigenvalue decomposition applied to remote photoplethysmography estimation,

    R. Macwan, S. Bobbia, Y . Benezeth, J. Dubois, and A. Mansouri, “Periodic variance maximization us- ing generalized eigenvalue decomposition applied to remote photoplethysmography estimation,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Work- shops (CVPRW), 2018, pp. 1445–1453

    2018

  13. [13]

    Remote photoplethysmography with constrained ica using peri- odicity and chrominance constraints,

    R. Macwan, Y . Benezeth, and A. Mansouri, “Remote photoplethysmography with constrained ica using peri- odicity and chrominance constraints,”Biomed. Eng. On- line, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2018

    2018

  14. [14]

    On the analysis of fingertip photoplethys- mogram signals,

    M. Elgendi, “On the analysis of fingertip photoplethys- mogram signals,”Curr . Cardiol. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2012

    2012

  15. [15]

    Block-sparse recovery with optimal block partition,

    H. Kuroda and D. Kitahara, “Block-sparse recovery with optimal block partition,”IEEE Trans. Signal Pro- cess., vol. 70, pp. 1506–1520, 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    Proximal algorithms,

    N. Parikh and S. Boyd, “Proximal algorithms,”F ound. Trends Optim., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 127–239, 2014

    2014

  17. [17]

    M. J. Kochenderfer and T. A. Wheeler,Algorithms for Optimization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019

    2019

  18. [18]

    Unsupervised skin tissue segmentation for remote photoplethysmography,

    S. Bobbia, R. Macwan, Y . Benezeth, A. Mansouri, and J. Dubois, “Unsupervised skin tissue segmentation for remote photoplethysmography,”Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2019

    2019

  19. [19]

    Non- contact heart rate estimation via adaptive rgb/nir signal fusion,

    K. Kurihara, D. Sugimura, and T. Hamamoto, “Non- contact heart rate estimation via adaptive rgb/nir signal fusion,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 30, pp. 6528– 6543, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    Spatio-temporal structure extraction of blood volume pulse using dynamic mode decomposition for heart rate estimation,

    K. Kurihara, Y . Maeda, D. Sugimura, and T. Hamamoto, “Spatio-temporal structure extraction of blood volume pulse using dynamic mode decomposition for heart rate estimation,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 59081–59096, 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    Self-adaptive matrix completion for heart rate estimation from face videos under realis- tic conditions,

    S. Tulyakov, X. Alameda-Pineda, E. Ricci, L. Yin, J. F. Cohn, and N. Sebe, “Self-adaptive matrix completion for heart rate estimation from face videos under realis- tic conditions,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2016, pp. 2396–2404

    2016

  22. [22]

    Multi-task temporal shift attention networks for on-device contact- less vitals measurement,

    X. Liu, J. Fromm, S. Patel, and D. McDuff, “Multi-task temporal shift attention networks for on-device contact- less vitals measurement,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Pro- cess. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2020, vol. 33, pp. 19400–19411

    2020

  23. [23]

    Physformer: Facial video-based physiological mea- surement with temporal difference transformer,

    Z. Yu, Y . Shen, J. Shi, H. Zhao, P. Torr, and G. Zhao, “Physformer: Facial video-based physiological mea- surement with temporal difference transformer,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), 2022, pp. 4176–4186

    2022

  24. [24]

    Need for a revision of the normal limits of resting heart rate,

    P. Palatini, “Need for a revision of the normal limits of resting heart rate,”Hypertension, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 622–625, 1999

    1999

  25. [25]

    Rhythmnet: End-to-end heart rate estimation from face via spatial- temporal representation,

    X. Niu, S. Shan, H. Han, and X. Chen, “Rhythmnet: End-to-end heart rate estimation from face via spatial- temporal representation,”IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 29, pp. 2409–2423, 2020

    2020

  26. [26]

    Unified physiological and illumination modeling for heart rate estimation using dynamic mode decomposi- tion and rgb/nir sensor,

    K. Kurihara, Y . Maeda, D. Sugimura, and T. Hamamoto, “Unified physiological and illumination modeling for heart rate estimation using dynamic mode decomposi- tion and rgb/nir sensor,”IEICE Trans. Inf. & Syst., vol. E109.D, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2026

    2026

  27. [27]

    Model- based deep learning: On the intersection of deep learn- ing and optimization,

    N. Shlezinger, Y . C. Eldar, and S. P. Boyd, “Model- based deep learning: On the intersection of deep learn- ing and optimization,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 115384–115398, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Deep unfolding-based image reconstruction for quanta image sensors,

    W. Otobe, K. Kurihara, Y . Maeda, and T. Hamamoto, “Deep unfolding-based image reconstruction for quanta image sensors,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), 2025, pp. 2648–2653

    2025