pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24706 · v1 · pith:X374BFQQnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 💻 cs.DB · q-bio.BM· q-bio.MN

MetaboKG: An Analysis-centric Knowledge Graph Framework for Untargeted Metabolomics

Matthieu F\'eraud , Dina Boukhajou , Fabien Gandon , Louis-F\'elix Nothias This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 11:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DB q-bio.BMq-bio.MN
keywords metabolomicsknowledge graphprovenancemass spectrometrydata integrationannotation identifierSPARQLuntargeted analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

MetaboKG creates a knowledge graph for metabolomics that preserves provenance links between data sources and annotations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a framework called MetaboKG to turn fragmented metabolomics data from repositories into an integrated graph. It does this with a data transformation workflow, a semantic model using standard ontologies for provenance and evidence, and a new identifier for annotations that allows linking across different analyses. If correct, this would let users run queries that trace back to original spectra and features while exploring biochemical and environmental connections. A reader would care because it solves the problem of data being scattered in tables and different systems, making reuse and discovery harder.

Core claim

MetaboKG contributes a transformation workflow that preserves links between repository exports, analytical files, spectra, features, and annotation results; a semantic model grounded in PROV-O and SIO aligned with domain ontologies to represent provenance, analytical evidence, metadata attributes, and controlled vocabulary terms; and a Universal Annotation Identifier strategy extending the Universal Spectrum Identifier with workflow-specific components for late binding, incremental ingestion, and post hoc linkage across analyses. Demonstration at public-repository scale on 680 GNPS molecular networking results shows that graph-based integration supports traceable annotation reuse and reprodu

What carries the argument

The Universal Annotation Identifier strategy extending the Universal Spectrum Identifier with workflow-specific components for late binding, incremental ingestion, and post hoc linkage across analyses.

If this is right

  • Traceable reuse of annotations across multiple analyses becomes feasible through the preserved links.
  • Reproducible SPARQL queries can explore biochemical relationships, environmental specificity, and analytical variation.
  • Competency questions covering biochemical enrichment and cross-instrument variation can be answered directly on the integrated graph.
  • The approach operates at the scale of hundreds of molecular networking results from public repositories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identifier strategy could extend to other scientific domains where data fragments across repositories and workflows.
  • Incremental updates to the graph might support ongoing addition of new analyses without rebuilding from scratch.
  • Query results could feed into downstream tools for automated validation of annotations against environmental or taxonomic context.

Load-bearing premise

The semantic model based on PROV-O, SIO, and the aligned ontologies can faithfully represent all necessary analytical evidence, metadata, and vocabulary terms from the original scattered repository and tabular artifacts without material loss or distortion of provenance and confidence information.

What would settle it

Build the graph from the 680 GNPS results, run the competency questions via SPARQL, and verify whether every returned annotation and relationship correctly traces back to its originating spectra, features, and files without broken links or lost context; any systematic failure to retrieve complete provenance would falsify the framework's utility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24706 by Dina Boukhajou, Fabien Gandon, Louis-F\'elix Nothias, Matthieu F\'eraud.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sample metadata layout linking sample description (blue), sampling process (green), source organism and environment (yellow), and experimental protocol (purple). In this and following figures: plain-border filled nodes are data entities and dashed￾border nodes are individuals shown via their parent concept. These choices fit the scope of MetaboKG, focused on chemical analysis rather than the full biologica… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Unified layout for GNPS Molecular Networking (MN, top) and Feature-Based Molecular Networking (FBMN, bottom): spectral data (blue), FBMN-specific features (red), annotation metadata (purple), annotation data including chemical class and structural level (yellow), and processing software (green). 4 Extracting Heterogeneous Metabolomics Resources into the MetaboKG Knowledge Graph 4.1 Standardizing and Semant… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Layout for a public spectral library spectrum, linking precursor and adduct information, molecular descriptors, acquisition and instrument context, resource meta￾data, and quality assessment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Percentage of missing values per Pan-ReDU metadata field, sorted by missing￾ness. Highly populated fields (e.g., SampleType, NCBI Taxonomy ranks) contrast with sparse ones (e.g., ENVOEnvironmentBiome, HealthStatus, LifeStage) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: GNPS jobs and MASSIVE datasets in the analyzed PubMed literature. (a) Proportion of articles by data availability: none, GNPS only, MASSIVE only, or both. (b) Absolute frequency of presence (green, bottom) vs. absence (red, top) for GNPS jobs and MASSIVE datasets. This process yields 680 GNPS jobs covering both molecular network (MN) and feature-based molecular network (FBMN) analyses, which produce CSV fi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Universal Annotation Identifier (UAI) schema. Each annotation links to a UAI node aggregating identifier components (collectionID, mzML, annotation file, hit num￾ber, featureID, feature table). In current GNPS workflows the hit number is always 1, since a single annotation is returned per cluster/spectrum; the field is kept for future ingestion of tools such as SIRIUS that report multiple candidates per sp… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Untargeted metabolomics generates large volumes of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data and computational annotations that can reveal molecular mechanisms across organisms and environments. Public reuse has improved through harmonized repository metadata and access infrastructures such as Pan-ReDU, and through metabolomics knowledge graphs such as ENPKG and METRIN-KG. Yet the analytical layer remains fragmented: spectra, features, workflow outputs, annotations, confidence evidence, and contextual metadata are still scattered across repositories and tabular artifacts. We present MetaboKG, an analysis-centric knowledge graph framework for engineering reusable metabolomics knowledge from public repositories, metadata, and GNPS molecular network results. MetaboKG contributes a transformation workflow that preserves links between repository exports, analytical files, spectra, features, and annotation results; a semantic model grounded in PROV-O and SIO and aligned with the Mass Spectrometry ontology (MS), ChEBI, NCBITaxon, ENVO, and NCIT to represent provenance, analytical evidence, metadata attributes, and controlled vocabulary terms; and a Universal Annotation Identifier strategy extending the Universal Spectrum Identifier (USI) with workflow-specific components for late binding, incremental ingestion, and post hoc linkage across analyses. We demonstrate MetaboKG at the public-repository scale on 680 GNPS molecular networking results and evaluate it through competency questions covering biochemical enrichment, environmental specificity, and cross instrument analytical variation. Results show that graph-based integration supports traceable annotation reuse and reproducible SPARQL exploration of biochemical relationships that remain fragmented across repository-native resources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents MetaboKG, an analysis-centric knowledge graph framework for untargeted metabolomics. It contributes (1) a transformation workflow that preserves links between repository exports, analytical files, spectra, features, and annotation results from sources such as GNPS; (2) a semantic model grounded in PROV-O and SIO and aligned with the MS, ChEBI, NCBITaxon, ENVO, and NCIT ontologies to represent provenance, analytical evidence, metadata, and controlled terms; and (3) a Universal Annotation Identifier extending the USI with workflow-specific components for late binding and incremental ingestion. The framework is demonstrated at scale on 680 GNPS molecular networking results and evaluated via competency questions on biochemical enrichment, environmental specificity, and cross-instrument variation, with the claim that the resulting graph supports traceable annotation reuse and reproducible SPARQL exploration of relationships fragmented in repository-native resources.

Significance. If the preservation and fidelity claims hold, the work would offer a practical contribution to metabolomics data integration by enabling graph-based, provenance-aware reuse of analytical outputs that are currently scattered across repositories and tabular files. The explicit grounding in established ontologies (PROV-O, SIO, MS, ChEBI) and the extension of the USI identifier are strengths, as is the demonstration at the scale of 680 public results together with competency-question evaluation showing that SPARQL queries can traverse biochemical and environmental relationships. These elements could support reproducible downstream analyses if the mapping is shown to be lossless.

major comments (2)
  1. [Demonstration on 680 GNPS results and competency-question evaluation] The demonstration on 680 GNPS molecular networking results and the competency-question evaluation (described in the abstract and results): while the queries illustrate that integration and exploration are possible, the evaluation supplies no metrics, example mappings, or tests confirming that every original field—such as per-feature confidence scores, workflow-specific parameters, or non-controlled metadata—is preserved without loss or coarsening when mapped to the PROV-O/SIO representation. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the transformation workflow 'preserves links' and supports 'traceable annotation reuse' without material distortion.
  2. [Semantic model description] Semantic model section: the alignment with PROV-O, SIO, MS, ChEBI, NCBITaxon, ENVO, and NCIT is described at the level of high-level classes and relations, but no explicit mapping table, schema diagram, or worked example is provided showing how a complete GNPS export (including all analytical evidence and metadata attributes) is transformed into RDF. Without this, it remains unclear whether the model can represent the full set of original attributes without omission.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from a table or figure summarizing the 680-result corpus (e.g., number of features, annotations, and instruments represented) to allow readers to assess the scale and diversity of the demonstration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and commit to revisions that will strengthen the presentation of our evaluation and semantic model.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Demonstration on 680 GNPS results and competency-question evaluation] The demonstration on 680 GNPS molecular networking results and the competency-question evaluation (described in the abstract and results): while the queries illustrate that integration and exploration are possible, the evaluation supplies no metrics, example mappings, or tests confirming that every original field—such as per-feature confidence scores, workflow-specific parameters, or non-controlled metadata—is preserved without loss or coarsening when mapped to the PROV-O/SIO representation. This is load-bearing for the central claim that the transformation workflow 'preserves links' and supports 'traceable annotation reuse' without material distortion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of data preservation is essential to support our claims of lossless transformation and traceable reuse. Although the competency questions demonstrate practical utility of the integrated graph, we acknowledge the absence of direct fidelity metrics in the current version. In the revised manuscript, we will add a new subsection under Results that provides example mappings for representative GNPS fields (including confidence scores, workflow parameters, and metadata), along with verification tests or counts showing that these attributes are preserved in the RDF representation without coarsening. This will be accompanied by supplementary data files containing the mappings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Semantic model description] Semantic model section: the alignment with PROV-O, SIO, MS, ChEBI, NCBITaxon, ENVO, and NCIT is described at the level of high-level classes and relations, but no explicit mapping table, schema diagram, or worked example is provided showing how a complete GNPS export (including all analytical evidence and metadata attributes) is transformed into RDF. Without this, it remains unclear whether the model can represent the full set of original attributes without omission.

    Authors: We recognize that the current description of the semantic model is at a high level and would benefit from more concrete illustrations. To address this, we will revise the Semantic Model section to include: (1) an explicit mapping table that lists GNPS export attributes and their corresponding ontology classes/properties; (2) a schema diagram (to be added as a new figure) depicting the key classes, relations, and ontology alignments; and (3) a worked example showing the transformation of a complete GNPS molecular networking result into RDF triples. These additions will clarify the model's capacity to represent the full set of attributes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework construction with external ontologies and no fitted derivations

full rationale

The paper describes a construction (transformation workflow, PROV-O/SIO semantic model aligned to external ontologies MS/ChEBI/NCBITaxon/ENVO/NCIT, and USI-extending identifier strategy) rather than any derivation chain. No equations, parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear as load-bearing steps that reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The 680-result demonstration and competency-question evaluation are presented as empirical validation of the built artifact, not as outputs forced by prior fits or author-unique theorems. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks (standard ontologies and repository data).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated beyond the high-level use of existing ontologies and the new identifier strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5829 in / 1227 out tokens · 29656 ms · 2026-06-30T11:44:49.948930+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ball, Judith A

    Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Eppig, J.T., Harris, M.A., Hill, D.P., Issel- Tarver, L., Kasarskis, A., Lewis, S., Matese, J.C., Richardson, J.E., Ringwald, M., Rubin, G.M., Sherlock, G.: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortiu...

    work page doi:10.1038/75556 2000

  2. [2]

    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 20(3), 200–216 (Mar 2021)

    Atanasov, A.G., Zotchev, S.B., Dirsch, V.M., Supuran, C.T.: Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 20(3), 200–216 (Mar 2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z, https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z 2021

  3. [3]

    Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society18(12), 94 (Nov 2022)

    Bittremieux, W., Wang, M., Dorrestein, P.C.: The critical role that spectral li- braries play in capturing the metabolomics community knowledge. Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society18(12), 94 (Nov 2022). https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11306-022-01947-y, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article s/PMC10284100/

    work page doi:10.1007/s11306-022-01947-y 2022

  4. [4]

    Journal of Separation Science33(3), 290–304 (Feb 2010)

    Boccard, J., Veuthey, J.L., Rudaz, S.: Knowledge discovery in metabolomics: an overview of MS data handling. Journal of Separation Science33(3), 290–304 (Feb 2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900609

    work page doi:10.1002/jssc.200900609 2010

  5. [5]

    Journal of Biomedical Semantics4(1), 43 (Dec 2013)

    Buttigieg, P.L., Morrison, N., Smith, B., Mungall, C.J., Lewis, S.E., the ENVO Consortium: The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities. Journal of Biomedical Semantics4(1), 43 (Dec 2013). https://doi.org/10 .1186/2041-1480-4-43, https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-43

    work page doi:10.1186/2041-1480-4-43 2013

  6. [6]

    Briefings in Bioinformatics18(3), 498–510 (2017)

    Cambiaghi, A., Ferrario, M., Masseroli, M.: Analysis of metabolomic data: tools, current strategies and future challenges for omics data integration. Briefings in Bioinformatics18(3), 498–510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw031

    work page doi:10.1093/bib/bbw031 2017

  7. [7]

    Current Opin- ion in Biotechnology55, 44–50 (Feb 2019)

    Chaleckis, R., Meister, I., Zhang, P., Wheelock, C.E.: Challenges, progress and promises of metabolite annotation for LC–MS-based metabolomics. Current Opin- ion in Biotechnology55, 44–50 (Feb 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.201 8.07.010, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166918300764

    work page doi:10.1016/j.copbio.201 2019

  8. [8]

    Nature Proto- cols20(10), 2960–2993 (Oct 2025)

    Charron-Lamoureux, V., Mannochio-Russo, H., Lamichhane, S., Xing, S., Patan, A., Portal Gomes, P.W., Rajkumar, P., Deleray, V., Caraballo-Rodríguez, A.M., Chua, K.V., Lee, L.S., Liu, Z., Ching, J., Wang, M., Dorrestein, P.C.: A guide to reverse metabolomics—a framework for big data discovery strategy. Nature Proto- cols20(10), 2960–2993 (Oct 2025). https:...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41596-024-01136-2 2025

  9. [9]

    Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge1(1), 5:1–5:33 (2023)

    Chen, J., Dong, H., Hastings, J., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., López, V., Monnin, P., Pesquita, C., Škoda, P., Tamma, V.: Knowledge Graphs for the Life Sciences: Re- cent Developments, Challenges and Opportunities. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge1(1), 5:1–5:33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.5, https://doi.org/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.5

    work page doi:10.4230/tgdk.1.1.5 2023

  10. [10]

    Computational and structural biotechnology journal4, e201301007 (Feb 2013)

    Commisso, M., Strazzer, P., Toffali, K., Stocchero, M., Guzzo, F.: Untargeted metabolomics: An emerging approach to determine the composition of herbal products. Computational and structural biotechnology journal4, e201301007 (Feb 2013). https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201301007

    work page doi:10.5936/csbj.201301007 2013

  11. [11]

    The New phytologist241(5), 1910–1921 (Mar 2024)

    Delory, B.M., Callaway, R.M., Semchenko, M.: A trait-based framework linking the soil metabolome to plant-soil feedbacks. The New phytologist241(5), 1910–1921 (Mar 2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19490, http://fox.leuphana.de/portal/d e/publications/a-traitbased-framework-linking-the-soil-metabolome-to-plantsoil -feedbacks(9bce25d9-48c2-4f37-bed4-ab54e...

    work page doi:10.1111/nph.19490 1910

  12. [12]

    Nature Meth- ods16(4), 299–302 (Apr 2019)

    Dührkop, K., Fleischauer, M., Ludwig, M., Aksenov, A.A., Melnik, A.V., Meusel, M., Dorrestein, P.C., Rousu, J., Böcker, S.: SIRIUS 4: a rapid tool for turn- ing tandem mass spectra into metabolite structure information. Nature Meth- ods16(4), 299–302 (Apr 2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0344-8, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-019-0344-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0344-8 2019

  13. [13]

    Nature Biotechnology39(4), 462–471 (Apr 2021)

    Dührkop, K., Nothias, L.F., Fleischauer, M., Reher, R., Ludwig, M., Hoffmann, M.A., Petras, D., Gerwick, W.H., Rousu, J., Dorrestein, P.C., Böcker, S.: Sys- tematic classification of unknown metabolites using high-resolution fragmentation mass spectra. Nature Biotechnology39(4), 462–471 (Apr 2021). https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41587-020-0740-8, https://www.n...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0740-8 2021

  14. [14]

    uhrkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., B

    D"uhrkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., B"ocker, S.: Searching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI:FingerID. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(41), 12580–12585 (Oct 2015). https: //doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509788112, https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pn as.1509788112

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1509788112 2015

  15. [15]

    Journal of Biomedical Semantics5(1), 14 (Mar 2014)

    Dumontier, M., Baker, C.J., Baran, J., Callahan, A., Chepelev, L., Cruz-Toledo, J., Del Rio, N.R., Duck, G., Furlong, L.I., Keath, N., Klassen, D., McCusker, J.P., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Samwald, M., Villanueva-Rosales, N., Wilkinson, M.D., Hoehndorf, R.: The Semanticscience Integrated Ontology (SIO) for biomedical re- search and knowledge discovery. Journ...

    work page doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-14 2014

  16. [16]

    Nature Communications16(1), 4838 (May 2025)

    El Abiead, Y., Strobel, M., Payne, T., Fahy, E., O’Donovan, C., Subramamiam, S., Vizcaíno, J.A., Yurekten, O., Deleray, V., Zuffa, S., Xing, S., Mannochio-Russo, H., Mohanty,I.,Zhao,H.N.,Caraballo-Rodriguez,A.M.,Gomes,P.W.P.,Avalon,N.E., Northen, T.R., Bowen, B.P., Louie, K.B., Dorrestein, P.C., Wang, M.: Enabling pan-repository reanalysis for big data sc...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-6 2025

  17. [17]

    Nucleic Acids Research40(Database issue), D136–D143 (Jan 2012)

    Federhen, S.: The NCBI Taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Research40(Database issue), D136–D143 (Jan 2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178, https: //doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1178 2012

  18. [18]

    Fiehn,O.:Metabolomics–thelinkbetweengenotypesandphenotypes.PlantMolec- ular Biology48(1-2), 155–171 (Jan 2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    Bioinformatics40(4), btae174 (Apr 2024)

    Galgonek, J., Vondrážek, J.: The IDSM mass spectrometry extension: searching mass spectra using SPARQL. Bioinformatics40(4), btae174 (Apr 2024). https: 18 M. Féraud et al. //doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae174, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article s/PMC11034985/

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae174 2024

  20. [20]

    ACS Central Science10(3), 494–510 (Mar 2024)

    Gaudry, A., Pagni, M., Mehl, F., Moretti, S., Quiros-Guerrero, L.M., Cappelletti, L., Rutz, A., Kaiser, M., Marcourt, L., Queiroz, E.F., Ioset, J.R., Grondin, A., David, B., Wolfender, J.L., Allard, P.M.: A Sample-Centric and Knowledge-Driven Computational Framework for Natural Products Drug Discovery. ACS Central Science10(3), 494–510 (Mar 2024). https:/...

    work page doi:10.1021/acscentsci.3c00800 2024

  21. [21]

    Nature626(7998), 419–426 (Feb 2024)

    Gentry, E.C., Collins, S.L., Panitchpakdi, M., Belda-Ferre, P., Stewart, A.K., Carrillo Terrazas, M., Lu, H.h., Zuffa, S., Yan, T., Avila-Pacheco, J., Plichta, D.R., Aron, A.T., Wang, M., Jarmusch, A.K., Hao, F., Syrkin-Nikolau, M., Vla- makis, H., Ananthakrishnan, A.N., Boland, B.S., Hemperly, A., Vande Casteele, N., Gonzalez, F.J., Clish, C.B., Xavier, ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06906-8 2024

  22. [22]

    https://doi.org/10.2 139/ssrn.3199007, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3199007

    Golbeck, J., Fragoso, G., Hartel, F., Hendler, J., Oberthaler, J., Parsia, B.: The National Cancer Institute’s Thesaurus and Ontology (2003). https://doi.org/10.2 139/ssrn.3199007, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3199007

    2003

  23. [23]

    Metabolomics3(3), 231–241 (Sep 2007)

    Goodacre, R., Broadhurst, D., Smilde, A.K., Kristal, B.S., Baker, J.D., Beger, R., Bessant, C., Connor, S., Capuani, G., Craig, A., Ebbels, T., Kell, D.B., Manetti, C., Newton, J., Paternostro, G., Somorjai, R., Sj"ostr"om, M., Trygg, J., Wulfert, F.: Proposed minimum reporting standards for data analysis in metabolomics. Metabolomics3(3), 231–241 (Sep 20...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11306-007-008 2007

  24. [24]

    World Wide Web Consortium (10 2017), https://www

    Haller, A., Janowicz, K., Cox, S., Phuoc, D., Taylor, K., Lefrançois, M.: Semantic Sensor Network Ontology. World Wide Web Consortium (10 2017), https://www. w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/

    2017

  25. [25]

    Nucleic Acids Research41(D1), D456–D463 (Jan 2013)

    Hastings, J., de Matos, P., Dekker, A., Ennis, M., Harsha, B., Kale, N., Muthukr- ishnan, V., Owen, G., Turner, S., Williams, M., Steinbeck, C.: The ChEBI reference database and ontology for biologically relevant chemistry: Enhancements for 2013. Nucleic Acids Research41(D1), D456–D463 (Jan 2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ nar/gks1146

    2013

  26. [26]

    Nucleic Acids Research48(D1), D440–D444 (Jan 2020)

    Haug, K., Cochrane, K., Nainala, V.C., Williams, M., Chang, J., Jayaseelan, K.V., O’Donovan, C.: MetaboLights: a resource evolving in response to the needs of its scientific community. Nucleic Acids Research48(D1), D440–D444 (Jan 2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1019, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1019

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1019 2020

  27. [27]

    Zapata Trujillo and Laura K

    Hoffmann, N., Rein, J., Sachsenberg, T., Hartler, J., Haug, K., Mayer, G., Alka, O., Dayalan, S., Pearce, J.T.M., Rocca-Serra, P., Qi, D., Eisenacher, M., Perez-Riverol, Y., Vizcaíno, J.A., Salek, R.M., Neumann, S., Jones, A.R.: mzTab-M: A Data Standard for Sharing Quantitative Results in Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics. Analytical Chemistry91(5), 3302–331...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2019

  28. [28]

    Nature Methods17(9), 901–904 (Sep 2020)

    Jarmusch, A.K., Wang, M., Aceves, C.M., Advani, R.S., Aguirre, S., Aksenov, A.A., Aleti, G., Aron, A.T., Bauermeister, A., Bolleddu, S., Bouslimani, A., Cara- ballo Rodriguez, A.M., Chaar, R., Coras, R., Elijah, E.O., Ernst, M., Gauglitz, J.M., Gentry, E.C., Husband, M., Jarmusch, S.A., Jones, K.L., Kamenik, Z., Le Gouellec, A., Lu, A., McCall, L.I., McPh...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592 2020

  29. [29]

    Bioinformatics Advances12(1), vbac029 (Jan 2022)

    Johnson, D., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Rocca-Serra, P., Sansone, S.A.: ISA API: An open platform for interoperable life science experimental metadata. Bioinformatics Advances12(1), vbac029 (Jan 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bta b560, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8964007/

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bta 2022

  30. [30]

    Datenbank- Spektrum24(1), 43–52 (Mar 2024)

    Kleinsteuber, E., Al Mustafa, T., Zander, F., K"onig-Ries, B., Babalou, S.: Man- aging Provenance Data in Knowledge Graph Management Platforms. Datenbank- Spektrum24(1), 43–52 (Mar 2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-023-00463-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-023-00463-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s13222-023-00463-0 2024

  31. [31]

    https://github.com/skorokithakis/shortuuid (2011)

    Korokithakis, S.: shortuuid: A generator library for concise, unambiguous and URL-safe UUIDs. https://github.com/skorokithakis/shortuuid (2011)

    2011

  32. [32]

    W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, United States (Apr 2013), https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/

    Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D., Belhajjame, K., Cheney, J., Corsar, D., Gar- ijo, D., Soiland-Reyes, S., Zednik, S., Zhao, J.: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, United States (Apr 2013), https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/

    2013

  33. [33]

    Scientific Reports9(1), 2741 (Feb 2019)

    Manier, S.K., Keller, A., Sch"aper, J., Meyer, M.R.: Untargeted metabolomics by high resolution mass spectrometry coupled to normal and reversed phase liquid chromatography as a tool to study the in vitro biotransformation of new psychoac- tive substances. Scientific Reports9(1), 2741 (Feb 2019). https://doi.org/10.103 8/s41598-019-39235-w, https://www.na...

    2019

  34. [34]

    Molecular & Cellular Proteomics10(1), R110.000133 (Jan 2011)

    Martens, L., Chambers, M., Sturm, M., Kessner, D., Levander, F., Shofstahl, J., Tang, W.H., Römpp, A., Neumann, S., Pizarro, A.D., Montecchi-Palazzi, L., Tasman, N., Coleman, M., Reisinger, F., Souda, P., Hermjakob, H., Binz, P.A., Deutsch, E.W.: mzML—a Community Standard for Mass Spectrometry Data*. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics10(1), R110.000133 (Jan ...

    work page doi:10.1074/mcp.r110.000133 2011

  35. [35]

    Bioinformatics41(5), btaf279 (May 2025)

    McLaughlin, J., Lagrimas, J., Iqbal, H., Parkinson, H., Harmse, H.: OLS4: a new Ontology Lookup Service for a growing interdisciplinary knowledge ecosystem. Bioinformatics41(5), btaf279 (May 2025). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformati cs/btaf279, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf279

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformati 2025

  36. [36]

    Identification Probability

    Metz, T.O., Chang, C.H., Gautam, V., Anjum, A., Tian, S., Wang, F., Colby, S.M., Nunez, J.R., Blumer, M.R., Edison, A.S., Fiehn, O., Jones, D.P., Li, S., Morgan, E.T., Patti, G.J., Ross, D.H., Shapiro, M.R., Williams, A.J., Wishart, D.S.: Intro- ducing “Identification Probability” for Automated and Transferable Assessment of Metabolite Identification Conf...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.4 2025

  37. [37]

    GigaScience15, giaf152 (Jan 2026)

    Moxon,S.A.T.,Solbrig,H.,Harris,N.L.,Kalita,P.,Miller,M.A.,Patil,S.,Schaper, K., Bizon, C., Caufield, J.H., Cuesta, S.C., Cox, C., Dekervel, F., Dooley, D.M., Duncan, W.D., Fliss, T., Gehrke, S., Graefe, A.S.L., Hegde, H., Ireland, A.J., Jacobsen, J.O.B., Krishnamurthy, M., Kroll, C., Linke, D., Ly, R., Matentzoglu, N., Overton, J.A., Saunders, J.L., Unni,...

    work page doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaf152 2026

  38. [38]

    Nature Methods17(9), 905–908 (Sep 2020)

    Nothias, L.F., Petras, D., Schmid, R., Dührkop, K., Rainer, J., Sarvepalli, A., Prot- syuk,I.,Ernst,M.,Tsugawa,H.,Fleischauer,M.,Aicheler,F.,Aksenov,A.A.,Alka, O., Allard, P.M., Barsch, A., Cachet, X., Caraballo-Rodriguez, A.M., Da Silva, R.R., Dang, T., Garg, N., Gauglitz, J.M., Gurevich, A., Isaac, G., Jarmusch, A.K., Kameník, Z., Kang, K.B., Kessler, N...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0933-6 2020

  39. [39]

    https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ (2013)

    Noy, R.: Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/ (2013)

    2013

  40. [40]

    Rücknagel, J., Vierkant, P., Ulrich, R., Kloska, G., Schnepf, E., Fichtmüller, D., Reuter, E., Semrau, A., Kindling, M., Pampel, H., Witt, M., Fritze, F., Van De Sandt, S., Klump, J., Goebelbecker, H.J., Skarupianski, M., Bertelmann, R., Schirmbacher, P., Scholze, F., Kramer, C., Fuchs, C., Spier, S., Kirchhoff, A.: Metadata Schema for the Description of ...

    work page doi:10.2312/re3.008 2015

  41. [41]

    eLife11, e70780 (May 2022)

    Rutz, A., Sorokina, M., Galgonek, J., Mietchen, D., Willighagen, E., Gaudry, A., Graham, J.G., Stephan, R., Page, R., Vondrážek, J., Steinbeck, C., Pauli, G.F., Wolfender, J.L., Bisson, J., Allard, P.M.: The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research. eLife11, e70780 (May 2022). https: //doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70780, https:...

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.70780 2022

  42. [42]

    Nature Biotechnology 25(8), 846–848 (Aug 2007)

    Sansone, S.A., Fan, T., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J.L., Hardy, N.W., Kaddurah-Daouk, R., Kristal, B.S., Lindon, J., Mendes, P., Morrison, N., Nikolau, B., Robertson, D., Sumner, L.W., Taylor, C., van der Werf, M., van Ommen, B., Fiehn, O., MSI Board Members:: The Metabolomics Standards Initiative. Nature Biotechnology 25(8), 846–848 (Aug 2007). https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1038/nbt0807-846b 2007

  43. [43]

    BioChem4(2), 90–114 (Jun 2024)

    Santamaria, G., Pinto, F.R.: Bioinformatic Analysis of Metabolomic Data: From Raw Spectra to Biological Insight. BioChem4(2), 90–114 (Jun 2024). https://do i.org/10.3390/biochem4020005, https://doi.org/10.3390/biochem4020005

    work page doi:10.3390/biochem4020005 2024

  44. [44]

    Nature Biotechnology40(5), 692–702 (May 2022)

    Santos, A., Colaço, A.R., Nielsen, A.B., Niu, L., Strauss, M., Geyer, P.E., Coscia, F., Wewer Albrechtsen, N.J., Mundt, F., Jensen, L.J., Mann, M.: A knowledge graph to interpret clinical proteomics data. Nature Biotechnology40(5), 692–702 (May 2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01145-6, https://doi.org/10.103 8/s41587-021-01145-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01145-6 2022

  45. [45]

    https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/ (2013)

    Sauermann, C.: Cool URIs for the Semantic Web. https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/ (2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    Metabolomics 18(1), 4 (Jan 2022)

    Stancliffe, E., Patti, G.J.: Quick tips for re-using metabolomics data. Metabolomics 18(1), 4 (Jan 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-021-01899-9, https://doi.or g/10.1007/s11306-021-01899-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11306-021-01899-9 2022

  47. [47]

    Nucleic Acids Research44(D1), D463–D470 (Jan 2016)

    Sud,M.,Fahy,E.,Cotter,D.,Azam,K.,Vadivelu,I.,Burant,C.,Edison,A.,Fiehn, O., Higashi, R., Nair, K.S., Sumner, S., Subramaniam, S.: Metabolomics Work- bench: An international repository for metabolomics data and metadata, metabo- MetaboKG 21 lite standards, protocols, tutorials and training, and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research44(D1), D463–D470 (Jan 2...

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1042 2016

  48. [48]

    Giga- Science p

    Tandon, D., De Farias, T.M., Allard, P.M., Defossez, E.: METRIN-KG: A knowl- edge graph integrating plant metabolites, traits, and biotic interactions. Giga- Science p. giag051 (Apr 2026). https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giag051, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giag051

    work page doi:10.1093/gigascience/giag051 2026

  49. [49]

    arXiv.org (Jul 2024)

    Thalhammer, A.: Cool URIs for FAIR Knowledge Graphs. arXiv.org (Jul 2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC69, 52–61 (Jun 2015)

    Vaniya, A., Fiehn, O.: Using fragmentation trees and mass spectral trees for iden- tifying unknown compounds in metabolomics. Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC69, 52–61 (Jun 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.002, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4509603/

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.002 2015

  51. [51]

    Journal of Ecology110(1), 4–20 (Jan 2022)

    Walker, T.W.N., Alexander, J.M., Allard, P.M., Baines, O., Baldy, V., Bardgett, R.D., Capdevila, P., Coley, P.D., David, B., Defossez, E., Endara, M.J., Ernst, M., Fernandez, C., Forrister, D., Gargallo-Garriga, A., Jassey, V.E.J., Marr, S., Neumann, S., Pellissier, L., Peñuelas, J., Peters, K., Rasmann, S., Roessner, U., Sardans, J., Schrodt, F., Schuman...

    work page doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13826 2022

  52. [52]

    Nature Biotechnology34(8), 828–837 (Aug 2016)

    Wang, M., Carver, J.J., Phelan, V.V., Sanchez, L.M., Garg, N., Peng, Y., Nguyen, D.D., Watrous, J., Kapono, C.A., Luzzatto-Knaan, T., Porto, C., Bouslimani, A., Melnik, A.V., Meehan, M.J., Liu, W.T., Cr"usemann, M., Boudreau, P.D., Esque- nazi, E., Sandoval-Calderón, M., Kersten, R.D., Pace, L.A., Quinn, R.A., Dun- can, K.R., Hsu, C.C., Floros, D.J., Gavi...

    work page doi:10.1038/nbt.3597 2016

  53. [53]

    Féraud et al

    Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., Bouw- man, J., Brookes, A.J., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C.T., Finkers, R., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gray, A.J.G., Groth, P., Goble, C., Grethe, J.S., Heringa, J., Hoen, P.A.C.t., Ho...

    work page doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 2016

  54. [54]

    Talanta295, 128327 (Dec 2025)

    Xu, R., Zhu, J.: Unveiling the dark matter of the metabolome: A narrative review of bioinformatics tools for LC-HRMS-based compound annotation. Talanta295, 128327 (Dec 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128327, https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914025008173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128327 2025

  55. [55]

    Nucleic Acids Research52(D1), D640–D646 (Jan 2024)

    Yurekten, O., Payne, T., Tejera, N., Amaladoss, F.X., Martin, C., Williams, M., O’Donovan, C.: MetaboLights: open data repository for metabolomics. Nucleic Acids Research52(D1), D640–D646 (Jan 2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gk ad1045, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1045

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gk 2024