pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26991 · v1 · pith:SPNEGSECnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 💻 cs.RO

Towards Shared Embodied Intelligence in Humanoid Robots through Optimization Development and Testing of the Human Aware ergoCub Robot

Carlotta Sartore , Mohamed Elobaid , Lorenzo Rapetti , Giulio Romualdi , Stefano Dafarra , Nicola A. Piga , Ines Sorrentino , Paolo Maria Vicecone
show 8 more authors
Silvio Traversaro Ugo Pattacini Luca Fiorio Francesco Draicchio Giovanna Tranfo Lorenzo Natale Marco Maggiali Daniele Pucci
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 17:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords humanoid robotsshared intelligenceembodied cognitionhuman-robot collaborationergonomic optimizationphysical intelligenceergoCub
0
0 comments X

The pith

An architecture optimizes humanoid robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics by modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an architecture that unifies shared intelligence and embodied cognition to let humanoid robots collaborate physically with humans. It optimizes the robot's hardware and control parameters according to human ergonomic metrics rather than robot-centric ones. This optimization works by treating the interaction as dependent on hardware choices and by incorporating models of the human body and motion into the robot's physical intelligence. A sympathetic reader would care because the result could produce robots suited for industrial or assistive tasks where safety and comfort for the human partner are primary. The approach is instantiated in the ergoCub robot whose morphology and control follow these principles.

Core claim

The central claim is that designing humanoid robots for safe physical collaboration requires integrating shared intelligence with embodied cognition, so that robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters are optimized for human ergonomic metrics. This is accomplished by modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models into the robot's physical intelligence, with the ergoCub robot presented as a concrete implementation whose morphology and control have been optimized for collaborative tasks with humans.

What carries the argument

The architecture that models human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embeds human models into the robot's physical intelligence.

If this is right

  • Humanoid robots can be designed so that human ergonomics is prioritized at both the hardware morphology level and the physical intelligence control level.
  • The same optimization process applies to industrial and assistive robotics settings where physical collaboration occurs.
  • Representations of the human body and motion intelligence become part of the robot's own physical intelligence parameters.
  • The ergoCub serves as an existence proof that hardware and control can be jointly tuned to human-centric metrics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the optimization succeeds, workspaces could reduce reliance on external safety barriers because the robot itself is tuned to human comfort.
  • The method suggests that robot morphology could be adapted per task or per human partner rather than fixed at manufacture.
  • Extending the same modeling step to include cognitive shared-intelligence representations might allow joint planning as well as joint motion.

Load-bearing premise

That modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models will produce safe and effective shared embodied intelligence.

What would settle it

Empirical measurements on the ergoCub robot during collaborative tasks that show no measurable improvement in human ergonomic scores or safety indicators relative to a non-optimized humanoid robot would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Collaboration is central to human behavior, enabling tasks beyond individual capability. This ability arises from coordinating actions through internal representations of others, a concept known as shared intelligence. Additionally, humans are characterized by physical bodies and cognitive abilities that are optimized in response to their environment, a phenomenon referred to as embodied cognition. Designing humanoid robots that collaborate safely and effectively with people requires unifying these principles. Here we propose an architecture that integrates shared intelligence and embodied cognition to enable robots to physically collaborate with humans, where robot hardware and control are optimized for human metrics, using representations of the human body and motion intelligence. The ultimate goal is to achieve a form of shared embodied intelligence. Specifically, our architecture optimizes robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics. This is accomplished by modeling human-robot interaction as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models into the robot's physical intelligence. As a concrete implementation, we present the humanoid robot ergoCub, whose morphology and control have been optimized for collaborative tasks with humans. Our approach provides a framework for designing humanoid robots that prioritize human ergonomics at both the hardware and physical intelligence levels, with applications in industrial and assistive robotics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an architecture integrating shared intelligence and embodied cognition for humanoid robots to enable safe physical collaboration with humans. Robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters are optimized w.r.t. human ergonomic metrics by modeling HRI as a function of hardware configurations and embedding human models into the robot's control. The ergoCub humanoid is presented as a concrete implementation with optimized morphology and control for collaborative tasks, providing a framework for human-aware robot design in industrial and assistive settings.

Significance. If the optimization approach is shown to work, the framework could advance the design of collaborative humanoids by systematically incorporating ergonomic metrics at both hardware and control levels. The concrete description of ergoCub morphology and parameterization supplies a useful case study for the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the architecture 'optimizes robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics' and that ergoCub 'has been optimized' is presented without any quantitative results, validation metrics, experimental outcomes, or error analysis. This is load-bearing because the manuscript's soundness for the stated goal of achieving shared embodied intelligence cannot be evaluated from a purely descriptive proposal.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and recommendation. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the architecture 'optimizes robot hardware and physical intelligence parameters with respect to human ergonomic metrics' and that ergoCub 'has been optimized' is presented without any quantitative results, validation metrics, experimental outcomes, or error analysis. This is load-bearing because the manuscript's soundness for the stated goal of achieving shared embodied intelligence cannot be evaluated from a purely descriptive proposal.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as drafted, asserts optimization outcomes without accompanying quantitative evidence, metrics, or validation. The manuscript frames a conceptual architecture with ergoCub as an illustrative implementation rather than a fully validated system. In revision we will rewrite the abstract to describe the proposed modeling approach and human-model embedding without claiming completed optimization results. If the body contains any specific ergonomic metrics or comparative outcomes we will add a concise summary; otherwise the language will be adjusted to 'proposes optimization of' and 'framework for'. This change will align the abstract with the manuscript's descriptive scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely descriptive proposal with no derivations or fitted quantities

full rationale

The manuscript is a high-level architectural proposal describing the ergoCub robot and an optimization framework for human-aware hardware and control. No equations, parameters, or derivation chains appear in the provided text. The central claim (optimizing hardware/control w.r.t. ergonomic metrics via human-model embedding) is stated narratively without any reduction to prior fitted values or self-citation load-bearing steps. The reader's assessment correctly identifies the absence of mathematical content that could be circular. This is the normal case for a design-overview paper; the argument is self-contained as description rather than deductive result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that human ergonomic metrics and body models can be directly used to optimize robot parameters, with no free parameters or invented entities specified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Human ergonomic metrics can be used to optimize robot hardware and control for effective collaboration.
    This premise underpins the entire optimization architecture described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5806 in / 1125 out tokens · 46815 ms · 2026-06-29T17:43:49.662221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Animals9(11), 991 (2019)

    Cordoni, G., Palagi, E.: Back to the future: A glance over wolf social behavior to understand dog–human relationship. Animals9(11), 991 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    Journal of Wilderness Medicine3(3), 292–300 (1992)

    Fenton, V .: The use of dogs in search, rescue and recovery. Journal of Wilderness Medicine3(3), 292–300 (1992)

    1992

  3. [3]

    Morris, S.C.: Life’s solution: inevitable humans in a lonely universe (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2011)

    Wilson, R.A., Foglia, L.: Embodied cognition. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Frontiers in psychology4, 58 (2013)

    Wilson, A.D., Golonka, S.: Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in psychology4, 58 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineer- ing18(3), 263–273 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047592

    Geyer, H., Herr, H.: A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineer- ing18(3), 263–273 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047592

    work page doi:10.1109/tnsre.2010.2047592 2010

  7. [7]

    Evolution65(5), 1297–1304 (2011)

    Nunn, C.L., Ezenwa, V .O., Arnold, C., Koenig, W.D.: Mutualism or parasitism? using a phylogenetic approach to characterize the oxpecker-ungulate relationship. Evolution65(5), 1297–1304 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    IEEEASME transactions on mechatronics (2025)

    Gu, Z., Li, J., Shen, W., Yu, W., Xie, Z., McCrory, S., Cheng, X., Shamsah, A., Griffin, R., Liu, C.K., et al.: Humanoid locomotion and manipulation: Current progress and challenges in control, planning, and learning. IEEEASME transactions on mechatronics (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    A Careful Examination of Large Behavior Models for Multitask Dexterous Manipulation

    Team, T.L., Barreiros, J., Beaulieu, A., Bhat, A., Cory, R., Cousineau, E., Dai, H., Fang, C.-H., Hashimoto, K., Irshad, M.Z., Itkina, M., Kuppuswamy, N., Lee, K.-H., Liu, K., McConachie, D., McMahon, I., Nishimura, H., Phillips-Grafflin, C., Richter, C., Shah, P., Srinivasan, K., Wulfe, B., Xu, C., Zhang, M., Alspach, A., Angeles, M., Arora, K., Guizilin...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

    Cardenas-Perez, C., Romualdi, G., Elobaid, M., Dafarra, S., L’Erario, G., Traversaro, S., Morerio, P., Del Bue, A., Pucci, D.: Xbg: End-to-end imitation learning for autonomous behaviour in human-robot interaction and collaboration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots

    NVIDIA, :, Bjorck, J., Casta ˜neda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L.J., Fang, Y ., Fox, D., Hu, F., Huang, S., Jang, J., Jiang, Z., Kautz, J., Kundalia, K., Lao, L., Li, Z., Lin, Z., Lin, K., Liu, G., Llontop, E., Magne, L., Mandlekar, A., Narayan, A., Nasiriany, S., Reed, S., Tan, Y .L., Wang, G., Wang, Z., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Xiang, J., Xie...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Journal of field robotics32(2), 293–312 (2015) 37

    Feng, S., Whitman, E., Xinjilefu, X., Atkeson, C.G.: Optimization-based full body control for the darpa robotics challenge. Journal of field robotics32(2), 293–312 (2015) 37

    2015

  13. [13]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 2779–2786 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3 141658

    Viceconte, P.M., Camoriano, R., Romualdi, G., Ferigo, D., Dafarra, S., Traversaro, S., Oriolo, G., Rosasco, L., Pucci, D.: Adherent: Learning human-like trajectory generators for whole-body control of humanoid robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2), 2779–2786 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3 141658

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3 2022

  14. [14]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(6), 3414–3433 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2022.3183785

    Dafarra, S., Romualdi, G., Pucci, D.: Dynamic complementarity conditions and whole-body trajectory optimization for humanoid robot locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Robotics38(6), 3414–3433 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2022.3183785

    work page doi:10.1109/tro.2022.3183785 2022

  15. [15]

    In: 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Herzog, A., Rotella, N., Schaal, S., Righetti, L.: Trajectory generation for multi-contact momentum control. In: 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 874–880 (2015). IEEE

    2015

  16. [16]

    In: 2022 In- ternational Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Romualdi, G., Dafarra, S., L’Erario, G., Sorrentino, I., Traversaro, S., Pucci, D.: Online non-linear centroidal mpc for humanoid robot locomotion with step adjustment. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 10412–10419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811670

    work page doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9811670 2022

  17. [17]

    In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Griffin, R.J., Leonessa, A.: Model predictive control for dynamic footstep adjustment using the divergent component of motion. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1763–1768 (2016). IEEE

    2016

  18. [18]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems105, 1–10 (2018)

    Joe, H.-M., Oh, J.-H.: Balance recovery through model predictive control based on capture point dynamics for biped walking robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems105, 1–10 (2018)

    2018

  19. [19]

    In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Ott, C., Roa, M.A., Hirzinger, G.: Posture and balance control for biped robots based on contact force optimization. In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 26–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/Humanoids.2011.6100882

    work page doi:10.1109/humanoids.2011.6100882 2011

  20. [20]

    In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Wensing, P.M., Orin, D.E.: Generation of dynamic humanoid behaviors through task-space control with conic optimization. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3103–3109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631008

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2013.6631008 2013

  21. [21]

    In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Nava, G., Romano, F., Nori, F., Pucci, D.: Stability analysis and design of momentum-based controllers for humanoid robots. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 680–687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2016.7759126

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759126 2016

  22. [22]

    International Journal of Humanoid Robotics05(01), 47–66 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843608001303

    Bauer, A., Wollherr, D., Buss, M.: Human-robot collaboration: a survey. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics05(01), 47–66 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843608001303

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219843608001303 2008

  23. [23]

    (eds.) Physical human-robot interaction, 2nd edn., pp

    Haddadin, S., Croft, E.: In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Physical human-robot interaction, 2nd edn., pp. 1835–1874. Springer, . (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1 69

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1 2016

  24. [24]

    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization24(2), 89–97 (2002)

    Rasmussen, J., Damsgaard, M., Christensen, S.T., Surma, E.: Design optimization with respect to ergonomic properties. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization24(2), 89–97 (2002)

    2002

  25. [25]

    Stubborn: A strong baseline for indoor object navigation

    Lagomarsino, M., Lorenzini, M., De Momi, E., Ajoudani, A.: Robot trajectory adaptation to optimise the trade-off between human cognitive ergonomics and workplace productivity in collaborative tasks. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 663–669 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981424

    work page doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981424 2022

  26. [26]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ 38 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Bravo-Palacios, G., Wensing, P.M.: Large-scale admm-based co-design of legged robots. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ 38 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 8842–8849 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  27. [27]

    Artificial life25(4), 352–365 (2019)

    Ha, D.: Reinforcement learning for improving agent design. Artificial life25(4), 352–365 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(3), 1611–1618 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2023.3234809

    Bjelonic, F., Lee, J., Arm, P., Sako, D., Tateo, D., Peters, J., Hutter, M.: Learning-based design and control for quadrupedal robots with parallel-elastic actuators. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters8(3), 1611–1618 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2023.3234809

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3234809 2023

  29. [29]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(4), 11306–11313 (2022)

    Fadini, G., Flayols, T., Del Prete, A., Sou `eres, P.: Simulation aided co-design for robust robot optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(4), 11306–11313 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    In: 2021 International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR), pp

    Gkikakis, A.E., Featherstone, R.: Realistic mechanism and behaviour co-design of a one legged hopping robot. In: 2021 International Conference on Computer, Control and Robotics (ICCCR), pp. 42–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCR49711.2021.9349280

    work page doi:10.1109/icccr49711.2021.9349280 2021

  31. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13948 (2023)

    Bergonti, F., Nava, G., W ¨uest, V ., Paolino, A., L’Erario, G., Pucci, D., Floreano, D.: Co-design optimisation of morphing topology and control of winged drones. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13948 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    In: 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Sartore, C., Rapetti, L., Pucci, D.: Optimization of humanoid robot designs for human-robot ergonomic payload lifting. In: 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 722–729 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/Humanoids53995.2022.10000222

    work page doi:10.1109/humanoids53995.2022.10000222 2022

  33. [33]

    In: 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Sartore, C., Rapetti, L., Bergonti, F., Dafarra, S., Traversaro, S., Pucci, D.: Codesign of humanoid robots for ergonomic collaboration with multiple humans via genetic algorithms and nonlinear optimization. In: 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 1–8 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  34. [34]

    Science Robotics9(86), 3834 (2024)

    Dafarra, S., Pattacini, U., Romualdi, G., Rapetti, L., Grieco, R., Darvish, K., Milani, G., Valli, E., Sorrentino, I., Viceconte, P.M.,et al.: icub3 avatar system: Enabling remote fully immersive embodiment of humanoid robots. Science Robotics9(86), 3834 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006

    Choi, Y ., Kim, D., You, B.-J.: On the walking control for humanoid robot based on the kinematic resolution of com jacobian with embedded motion. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006., pp. 2655–2660 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2006.1642102

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.2006.1642102 2006

  36. [36]

    Ergonomics36(7), 749–776 (1993)

    Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V ., Garg, A., Fine, L.J.: Revised niosh equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics36(7), 749–776 (1993)

    1993

  37. [37]

    In: 2013 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applica- tions (TePRA), pp

    Fitzgerald, C.: Developing baxter. In: 2013 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applica- tions (TePRA), pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TePRA.2013.6556344

    work page doi:10.1109/tepra.2013.6556344 2013

  38. [38]

    In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Parmiggiani, A., Fiorio, L., Scalzo, A., Sureshbabu, A.V ., Randazzo, M., Maggiali, M., Pattacini, U., Lehmann, H., Tikhanoff, V ., Domenichelli, D., Cardellino, A., Congiu, P., Pagnin, A., Cingolani, R., Natale, L., Metta, G.: The design and validation of the r1 personal humanoid. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Con- ference on Intelligent Robots and Sys...

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2017 2017

  39. [39]

    Sensors19(12), 2794 (2019)

    Latella, C., Traversaro, S., Ferigo, D., Tirupachuri, Y ., Rapetti, L., Andrade Chavez, F.J., Nori, F., Pucci, D.: Simultaneous floating-base estimation of human kinematics and joint torques. Sensors19(12), 2794 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Algorithms13(10), 266 (2020) 39

    Rapetti, L., Tirupachuri, Y ., Darvish, K., Dafarra, S., Nava, G., Latella, C., Pucci, D.: Model-based real-time motion tracking using dynamical inverse kinematics. Algorithms13(10), 266 (2020) 39

    2020

  41. [41]

    IEEE Access 9, 123260–123279 (2021)

    Tirupachuri, Y ., Ramadoss, P., Rapetti, L., Latella, C., Darvish, K., Traversaro, S., Pucci, D.: Online non- collocated estimation of payload and articular stress for real-time human ergonomy assessment. IEEE Access 9, 123260–123279 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Autonomous robots35, 161–176 (2013)

    Orin, D.E., Goswami, A., Lee, S.-H.: Centroidal dynamics of a humanoid robot. Autonomous robots35, 161–176 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    In: 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Romualdi, G., Dafarra, S., Hu, Y ., Pucci, D.: A benchmarking of dcm based architectures for position and velocity controlled walking of humanoid robots. In: 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 1–9 (2018). IEEE

    2018

  44. [44]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10(3), 2806–2813 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2025 .3536296

    Elobaid, M., Turrisi, G., Rapetti, L., Romualdi, G., Dafarra, S., Kawakami, T., Chaki, T., Yoshiike, T., Semini, C., Pucci, D.: Adaptive non-linear centroidal mpc with stability guarantees for robust locomotion of legged robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10(3), 2806–2813 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2025 .3536296

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2025 2025

  45. [45]

    In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Ivaldi, S., Fumagalli, M., Randazzo, M., Nori, F., Metta, G., Sandini, G.: Computing robot internal/external wrenches by means of inertial, tactile and f/t sensors: Theory and implementation on the icub. In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 521–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/Hu manoids.2011.6100813

    work page doi:10.1109/hu 2011

  46. [46]

    Mech- anism and Machine Theory43(3), 253–270 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.0 03

    De Santis, A., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., Bicchi, A.: An atlas of physical human–robot interaction. Mech- anism and Machine Theory43(3), 253–270 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.0 03

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.0 2008

  47. [47]

    IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine SystemsPP(2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3128892

    Latella, C., Tirupachuri, Y ., Tagliapietra, L., Rapetti, L., Schirrmeister, B., Bornmann, J., Gorjan, D., ˇCamernik, J., Maurice, P., Fritzsche, L., Gonzalez-Vargas, J., Ivaldi, S., Babiˇc, J., Nori, F., Pucci, D.: Analy- sis of human whole-body joint torques during overhead work with a passive exoskeleton. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine SystemsPP(20...

    work page doi:10.1109/thms.2021.3128892 2021

  48. [48]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Rapetti, L., Sartore, C., Elobaid, M., Tirupachuri, Y ., Draicchio, F., Kawakami, T., Yoshiike, T., Pucci, D.: A control approach for human-robot ergonomic payload lifting. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7504–7510 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  49. [49]

    In: 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (humanoids), pp

    Guo, C., Rapetti, L., Darvish, K., Grieco, R., Draicchio, F., Pucci, D.: Online action recognition for human risk prediction with anticipated haptic alert via wearables. In: 2023 IEEE-RAS 22nd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (humanoids), pp. 1–8 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  50. [50]

    https://doi.or g/10.5281/zenodo.17011716

    Sartore, C.: Ami-iit/paper sartore 2025 ergocub nature machine intelligence: NatureRelease. https://doi.or g/10.5281/zenodo.17011716 . Version V1.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17011716

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17011716 2025

  51. [51]

    PhD thesis, Uni- versity of Genoa (April 2017)

    Traversaro, S.: Modelling, Estimation and Identification of Humanoid Robots Dynamics. PhD thesis, Uni- versity of Genoa (April 2017). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3564797 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3 564797

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3564797 2017

  52. [52]

    Featherstone, R.: Rigid body dynamics algorithms (2014)

    2014

  53. [53]

    Marsden, J.E., Ratiu, T.S.: Introduction to mechanics and symmetry: A basic exposition of classical mechanical systems (2010)

    2010

  54. [54]

    Ingram, J.N., Wolpert, D.M.: Chapter 1 - naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control191, 3–29 (2011) 40 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00016-3

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53752-2.00016-3 2011

  55. [55]

    Hanavan, E.P., et al.: A mathematical model of the human body32(3) (1964)

    1964

  56. [56]

    Springer, Cham (2016)

    Herman, I.P.: Mechanical Properties of the Body. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319 -23932-3 4 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23932-3 4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319 2016

  57. [57]

    In: Garza-Ulloa, J

    Garza-Ulloa, J.: Chapter 2 - introduction to human neuromusculoskeletal systems. In: Garza-Ulloa, J. (ed.) Applied Biomechatronics Using Mathematical Models, pp. 53–118. Academic Press, . (2018). https://doi.or g/10.1016/B978-0-12-812594-6.00002-0

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812594-6.00002-0 2018

  58. [58]

    (eds.): Motor Control Hierarchy, pp

    Binder, M.D., Hirokawa, N., Windhorst, U. (eds.): Motor Control Hierarchy, pp. 2428–2428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2 3583

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2 2009

  59. [59]

    Science Robotics2(13), 1026 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1026 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1026

    Natale, L., Bartolozzi, C., Pucci, D., Wykowska, A., Metta, G.: icub: The not-yet-finished story of build- ing a robot child. Science Robotics2(13), 1026 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1026 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1026

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1026 2017

  60. [60]

    In: Bi, Y ., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S

    Tirupachuri, Y ., Nava, G., Latella, C., Ferigo, D., Rapetti, L., Tagliapietra, L., Nori, F., Pucci, D.: Towards partner-aware humanoid robot control under physical interactions. In: Bi, Y ., Bhatia, R., Kapoor, S. (eds.) Intelligent Systems and Applications, pp. 1073–1092. Springer, Cham (2020)

    2020

  61. [61]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Rapetti, L., Tirupachuri, Y ., Ranavolo, A., Kawakami, T., Yoshiike, T., Pucci, D.: Shared control of robot- robot collaborative lifting with agent postural and force ergonomic optimization. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 9840–9847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48 506.2021.9561623

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48 2021

  62. [62]

    In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Dafarra, S., Nava, G., Charbonneau, M., Guedelha, N., Andrade, F., Traversaro, S., Fiorio, L., Romano, F., Nori, F., Metta, G., Pucci, D.: A control architecture with online predictive planning for position and torque controlled walking of humanoid robots. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1–9 (2018)....

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8594277 2018

  63. [63]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2023, London, UK, May 29 - June 2, 2023

    Elobaid, M., Romualdi, G., Nava, G., Rapetti, L., Omer Mohamed, H.A., Pucci, D.: Online non-linear centroidal mpc for humanoid robots payload carrying with contact-stable force parametrization. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12233–12239 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161086

    work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161086 2023

  64. [64]

    IEEE transactions on robotics23(5), 884–898 (2007)

    Hyon, S.-H., Hale, J.G., Cheng, G.: Full-body compliant human–humanoid interaction: balancing in the presence of unknown external forces. IEEE transactions on robotics23(5), 884–898 (2007)

    2007

  65. [65]

    task space inverse dynamics

    Del Prete, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Natale, L.: Prioritized motion–force control of constrained fully-actuated robots: “task space inverse dynamics”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems63, 150–157 (2015) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.016 2015

  66. [66]

    In: 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp

    Tirupachuri, Y ., Nava, G., Rapetti, L., Latella, C., Pucci, D.: Trajectory advancement during human-robot collaboration. In: 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956339

    work page doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956339 2019

  67. [67]

    Gr ¨une, L., Pannek, J.: Nonlinear model predictive control (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics37(1), 1–15 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TRO.2020.3005547

    Gazar, A., Nava, G., Chavez, F.J.A., Pucci, D.: Jerk control of floating base systems with contact-stable 41 parameterized force feedback. IEEE Transactions on Robotics37(1), 1–15 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/ TRO.2020.3005547

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering, pp

    Shamsuddin, S., Ismail, L.I., Yussof, H., Zahari, N.I., Bahari, S., Hashim, H., Jaffar, A.: Humanoid robot nao: Review of control and motion exploration. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering, pp. 511–516 (2011). IEEE

    2011

  70. [70]

    In: 2023 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN) (2023) 42

    Sortino, D.M., Rapetti, L., Valli, E., Pucci, D.: Towards a real-world application of wearable sensors for musculoskeletal disorders prevention: the ifeel wired suit. In: 2023 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN) (2023) 42

    2023