pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.29675 · v1 · pith:BW4WOBSInew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI· cs.IR

From Prompts to Context: An Ontology-Driven Framework for Human-Generative AI Collaboration

Ngoc Luyen Le , Marie-H\'el\`ene Abel , Bertrand Laforge This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 05:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AIcs.IR
keywords ontologygenerative AIhuman-AI collaborationtraceabilitycontext modelingSPARQLaccountabilitycollaboration traces
0
0 comments X

The pith

The CCAI ontology turns prompt-response pairs with generative AI into structured, queryable records of tasks, roles, resources and constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an ontology-driven framework to capture the missing context around Human-Generative AI interactions that currently start with a short prompt and end with an opaque output. Its central component is the Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI), which supplies a shared vocabulary for tasks, agent roles, resources and constraints. Populating CCAI instances and retrieving them via SPARQL queries converts ephemeral exchanges into persistent, machine-readable collaboration traces. A case study of a software team building a competency-profile feature demonstrates that the approach makes task context explicit, improves traceability of AI contributions, and supports more transparent and accountable practices.

Core claim

By populating instances of the Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI) and applying SPARQL-based context retrieval, the framework converts otherwise ephemeral prompt-response interactions into structured and queryable collaboration traces that link prompts, outputs, and their surrounding context. The case study shows that explicit collaboration modelling makes task context more explicit, improves the traceability of AI-generated contributions, and supports more transparent and accountable Human-Generative AI practices.

What carries the argument

The Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI) together with SPARQL queries, which model and retrieve tasks, agent roles, resources and constraints to link prompts and outputs to their collaborative setting.

If this is right

  • Task context becomes more explicit across requirements analysis, design, implementation and testing phases.
  • AI-generated contributions gain traceable links to the roles, resources and constraints that shaped them.
  • Human-Generative AI practices become more transparent and accountable in information-intensive workflows.
  • Future systems can be designed around explicit representation of collaborative context rather than output quality alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same traces could be reused for post-hoc audits in regulated domains such as education or healthcare.
  • Automatic population of CCAI instances from prompt text might lower the entry barrier observed in the case study.
  • Integration with existing project-management tools could turn the framework into a lightweight add-on rather than a separate modelling step.

Load-bearing premise

Domain experts will reliably populate CCAI instances with accurate task, role, resource and constraint data during real workflows and that the resulting SPARQL queries will deliver useful context without excessive manual effort or ontology maintenance overhead.

What would settle it

A controlled deployment in which teams using the CCAI framework show no measurable gain in traceability of AI contributions or in perceived accountability compared with teams using ordinary prompts and logs.

read the original abstract

Collaborations with Generative AI often begin with a short prompt and end with an opaque output, leaving implicit who was involved, what task was being pursued, which resources were used, and which constraints should have shaped the process. This limited contextual explicitness hinders trust, traceability, and accountability, particularly when Generative AI is embedded in information-intensive workflows such as search, querying, and profile management. This paper introduces From Prompts to Context, an ontology-driven framework for representing Human-Generative AI collaboration. Its core component, the Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI), models key elements of collaboration - including tasks, agent roles, resources, and constraints - as a shared machine-interpretable vocabulary. By combining populated CCAI instances with SPARQL-based context retrieval in operational workflows, the framework turns otherwise ephemeral prompt-response interactions into structured and queryable collaboration traces linking prompts, outputs, and their surrounding context. The approach is illustrated through a case study involving a software development team building a competency-based education feature for viewing and updating learner competency profiles. The case study shows how the framework can support the representation and documentation of collaboration episodes across requirements analysis, design, implementation, and testing. Within this setting, the results indicate that explicit collaboration modelling helps make task context more explicit, improves the traceability of AI-generated contributions, and supports more transparent and accountable Human-Generative AI practices. We conclude by outlining design principles for future Human-Generative AI systems that emphasise not only output quality, but also the explicit representation of the collaborative context in which outputs are produced.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an ontology-driven framework ('From Prompts to Context') for Human-Generative AI collaboration. Its core is the Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI), which models tasks, agent roles, resources, and constraints as a shared machine-interpretable vocabulary. Populated CCAI instances combined with SPARQL-based retrieval are claimed to convert ephemeral prompt-response pairs into structured, queryable collaboration traces. The approach is demonstrated via a single case study of a software development team implementing a competency-based education feature for learner profiles, with the results indicating that explicit modeling increases task context explicitness, improves traceability of AI contributions, and supports more transparent and accountable practices. Design principles for future systems are outlined.

Significance. If validated, the CCAI ontology and SPARQL mechanism would provide a concrete, reusable vocabulary and retrieval method for capturing collaboration context in GenAI workflows, addressing a gap in traceability for information-intensive tasks. The paper's strength lies in its explicit modeling proposal rather than ad-hoc prompting; however, the absence of any empirical testing limits immediate significance to that of a modeling framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Case study section] Case study section (and abstract): The central claim that the framework 'improves the traceability of AI-generated contributions' and 'supports more transparent and accountable Human-Generative AI practices' rests entirely on one illustrative case study with no quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons (e.g., vs. standard prompting), error analysis, population effort measurements, or failure modes. No data on CCAI instance accuracy, SPARQL query utility, or comparative outcomes are reported, leaving the practical effectiveness untested.
  2. [Framework description] Framework description (and weakest assumption noted in reader's report): The value proposition assumes domain experts will reliably populate CCAI instances with accurate task/role/resource/constraint data during real workflows and that SPARQL queries will surface useful context without excessive overhead. This assumption is stated but not tested; if population proves burdensome or error-prone, the traceability benefit does not materialize.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The manuscript presents a modeling framework with an illustrative case study rather than a controlled empirical evaluation; we address the two major comments below and will make targeted revisions to clarify scope and limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Case study section] Case study section (and abstract): The central claim that the framework 'improves the traceability of AI-generated contributions' and 'supports more transparent and accountable Human-Generative AI practices' rests entirely on one illustrative case study with no quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons (e.g., vs. standard prompting), error analysis, population effort measurements, or failure modes. No data on CCAI instance accuracy, SPARQL query utility, or comparative outcomes are reported, leaving the practical effectiveness untested.

    Authors: We agree the case study is illustrative and does not constitute empirical validation. The contribution is the CCAI ontology and SPARQL retrieval method as a reusable modeling approach; the case study demonstrates application in a realistic workflow but does not measure effectiveness quantitatively. We will revise the abstract, case study section, and conclusion to replace evaluative phrasing ('the results indicate that... improves...') with language that positions the example as a demonstration of feasibility and explicitness. A new 'Limitations and Future Work' subsection will be added that explicitly notes the absence of metrics, baselines, accuracy measurements, and error analysis, and outlines planned empirical studies. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Framework description] Framework description (and weakest assumption noted in reader's report): The value proposition assumes domain experts will reliably populate CCAI instances with accurate task/role/resource/constraint data during real workflows and that SPARQL queries will surface useful context without excessive overhead. This assumption is stated but not tested; if population proves burdensome or error-prone, the traceability benefit does not materialize.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the framework's value depends on accurate population of CCAI instances and acceptable query overhead. The manuscript presents the ontology and retrieval mechanism but does not empirically test population effort or error rates, as the focus is on the modeling vocabulary itself. We will expand the framework description to state this assumption more explicitly and add a paragraph in the new Limitations section discussing potential burdens, error-proneness, and mitigation approaches (e.g., tool support for semi-automated instantiation) as directions for future research. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework proposal with illustrative case study, no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper introduces the CCAI ontology as a modeling vocabulary and illustrates its application to collaboration traces via SPARQL in a single case study of a software team. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim—that explicit modeling improves traceability—is presented as a definitional outcome of adopting the ontology rather than derived from prior inputs or self-citations. This is a standard non-circular modeling paper whose value rests on the utility of the proposed structure, not on any reduction to its own definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that collaboration context can be usefully decomposed into tasks, agent roles, resources, and constraints and that this decomposition can be maintained as machine-interpretable data. No free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ontologies provide a shared machine-interpretable vocabulary sufficient to represent collaboration elements (tasks, roles, resources, constraints) in operational workflows.
    Invoked in the description of CCAI as the core component that models key elements of collaboration.
  • domain assumption SPARQL queries over populated ontology instances can retrieve useful context for traceability without prohibitive overhead.
    Stated as the mechanism that turns ephemeral interactions into structured traces.
invented entities (1)
  • Contextual Collaboration AI Ontology (CCAI) no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as the shared vocabulary for modeling collaboration context in Human-Generative AI interactions.
    New ontology introduced by the paper; no independent evidence outside the framework itself is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5828 in / 1528 out tokens · 27311 ms · 2026-06-29T05:47:24.662248+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

    Bommasani, R., Hudson, D.A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., Arx, S., Bern- stein, M.S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al.: On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020)

    Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J.D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A.,et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 1877–1901 (2020)

    1901

  3. [3]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

    Vaswani, A.: Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Nature medicine29(8), 1930– 1940 (2023)

    Thirunavukarasu, A.J., Ting, D.S.J., Elangovan, K., Gutierrez, L., Tan, T.F., Ting, D.S.W.: Large language models in medicine. Nature medicine29(8), 1930– 1940 (2023)

    1930

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03624 (2024)

    Hu, S., Fang, Z., Fang, Z., Deng, Y., Chen, X., Fang, Y., Kwong, S.: Agentscom- erge: Large language model empowered collaborative decision making for ramp 42 merging. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03624 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T., Cao, Y., Narasimhan, K.: Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction39(3), 391–437 (2023)

    Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S.M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K.,et al.: Six human- centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction39(3), 391–437 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges

    Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K.I., Karkee, M.: Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. Information Fusion, 103599 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Business Horizons (2024)

    Holmstr¨ om, J., Carroll, N.: How organizations can innovate with generative ai. Business Horizons (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Journal of computer assisted learning40(3), 931–945 (2024)

    ElSayary, A.: An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using chatgpt as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of computer assisted learning40(3), 931–945 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology33(7), 1–38 (2024)

    Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Jin, Z., Li, G.: Self-collaboration code generation via chat- gpt. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology33(7), 1–38 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Knowledge acquisition5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    1993

  13. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Wu, T., Terry, M., Cai, C.J.: Ai chains: Transparent and controllable human-ai interaction by chaining large language model prompts. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–22 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7(CSCW1), 1–21 (2023)

    Cabrera, ´A.A., Perer, A., Hong, J.I.: Improving human-ai collaboration with descriptions of ai behavior. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction7(CSCW1), 1–21 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Nature Human Behaviour, 1–11 (2024)

    Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., Malone, T.: When combinations of humans and ai are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–11 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    Mozannar, H., Lee, J., Wei, D., Sattigeri, P., Das, S., Sontag, D.: Effective human-ai teams via learned natural language rules and onboarding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00358 (2021)

    Buschek, D., Mecke, L., Lehmann, F., Dang, H.: Nine potential pitfalls when designing human-ai co-creative systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00358 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12647 (2023)

    Kulkarni, C., Druga, S., Chang, M., Fiannaca, A., Cai, C., Terry, M.: A word 43 is worth a thousand pictures: Prompts as ai design material. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12647 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    IEEE Intelligent Systems17(1), 54–60 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.988453

    Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O.: Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems17(1), 54–60 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.988453

    work page doi:10.1109/5254.988453 2002

  20. [20]

    Management Science70(12), 9101–9117 (2024)

    Chen, Z., Chan, J.: Large language model in creative work: The role of collab- oration modality and user expertise. Management Science70(12), 9101–9117 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    and Garrido-Merch \'a n, E

    Gozalo-Brizuela, R., Garrido-Merchan, E.C.: Chatgpt is not all you need. a state of the art review of large generative ai models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04655 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Advances in neural information processing systems33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems33, 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Foundations and Trends®in Machine Learning12(4), 307–392 (2019)

    Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.,et al.: An introduction to variational autoencoders. Foundations and Trends®in Machine Learning12(4), 307–392 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    Communications of the ACM63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM63(11), 139–144 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., Sutskever, I.: Improving language understanding with unsupervised learning (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

    Devlin, J.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models

    Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., Duvenaud, D., Askell, A., Bowman, S.R., Cheng, N., Durmus, E., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., Johnston, S.R., et al.: Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13548 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    29971–30004 (2023)

    Santurkar, S., Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Lee, C., Liang, P., Hashimoto, T.: Whose opinions do language models reflect? In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 29971–30004 (2023). PMLR

    2023

  29. [29]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., Anadkat, S., et al.: Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.-B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A.M., Hauth, A., Millican, K., et al.: Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Mistral 7B

    Jiang, A.Q., Sablayrolles, A., Mensch, A., Bamford, C., Chaplot, D.S., Casas, 44 D.d.l., Bressand, F., Lengyel, G., Lample, G., Saulnier, L., et al.: Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Computer Science

    Betker, J., Goh, G., Jing, L., Brooks, T., Wang, J., Li, L., Ouyang, L., Zhuang, J., Lee, J., Guo, Y.,et al.: Improving image generation with better captions. Computer Science. https://cdn. openai. com/papers/dall-e-3. pdf2(3), 8 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Brooks, T., Peebles, B., Holmes, C., DePue, W., Guo, Y., Jing, L., Schnurr, D., Taylor, J., Luhman, T., Luhman, E., et al.: Video generation models as world simulators (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Tacotron: Towards End-to-End Speech Synthesis

    Wang, Y., Skerry-Ryan, R., et al.: Tacotron: Towards end-to-end speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.10135 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15352 (2022)

    Kreuk, F., Synnaeve, G., Polyak, A., et al.: Audiogen: Textually guided audio generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15352 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Xu, T., Brockman, G., McLeavey, C., Sutskever, I.: Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 28492–28518 (2023). PMLR

    2023

  37. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04673 (2023)

    Du, Z., Wang, J., Chen, Q., Chu, Y., Gao, Z., Li, Z., Hu, K., Zhou, X., Xu, J., Ma, Z., et al.: Lauragpt: Listen, attend, understand, and regenerate audio with gpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04673 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio

    Van Den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., Kavukcuoglu, K., et al.: Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.0349912(2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    Copet, J., Kreuk, F., Gat, I., et al.: Simple and controllable music generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36(2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10684–10695 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks

    Karras, T.: A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04948 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Imagen Video: High Definition Video Generation with Diffusion Models

    Ho, J., Chan, W., Saharia, C., Whang, J., Gao, R., Gritsenko, A., Kingma, D.P., Poole, B., Norouzi, M., Fleet, D.J., et al.: Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Data

    Singer, U., Polyak, A., Hayes, T., Yin, X., An, J., Zhang, S., Hu, Q., Yang, H., Ashual, O., Gafni, O., et al.: Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792 (2022) 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusion

    Poole, B., Jain, A., Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B.: Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Point-E: A System for Generating 3D Point Clouds from Complex Prompts

    Nichol, A., Jun, H., Dhariwal, P., Mishkin, P., Chen, M.: Point-e: A sys- tem for generating 3d point clouds from complex prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08751 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation

    Wang, Y., Le, H., Gotmare, A.D., Bui, N.D., Li, J., Hoi, S.C.: Codet5+: Open code large language models for code understanding and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07922 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Advances in neural information processing systems35, 23716–23736 (2022)

    Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M.,et al.: Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems35, 23716–23736 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Future Internet15(8), 260 (2023)

    Bandi, A., Adapa, P.V.S.R., Kuchi, Y.E.V.P.K.: The power of generative ai: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges. Future Internet15(8), 260 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    In: Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and Beyond, pp

    G´ orska, A.M., Jemielniak, D.: Ai racial bias: How text-to-image artificial intel- ligence generators construct prestigious professions. In: Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence and Beyond, pp. 211–226 (2025). Routledge

    2025

  50. [50]

    610–623 (2021)

    Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, S.: On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Models

    Xu, Z., Jain, S., Kankanhalli, M.: Hallucination is inevitable: An innate limitation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.11817 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Scientific reports12(1), 14952 (2022)

    Reverberi, C., Rigon, T., Solari, A., Hassan, C., Cherubini, P., Cherubini, A.: Experimental evidence of effective human–ai collaboration in medical decision- making. Scientific reports12(1), 14952 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Proceedings of the Design Society4, 2247–2256 (2024)

    Song, B., Zhu, Q., Luo, J.: Human-ai collaboration by design. Proceedings of the Design Society4, 2247–2256 (2024)

    2024

  54. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Cila, N.: Designing human-agent collaborations: Commitment, responsiveness, and support. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–18 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies, pp

    Chang, T.-S., Li, Y., Huang, H.-W., Whitfield, B.: Exploring efl students’ writing performance and their acceptance of ai-based automated writing feed- back. In: Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Education Development and Studies, pp. 31–35 (2021) 46

    2021

  56. [56]

    In: Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI Workshops, vol

    Yang, D., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, T.J.-J., LC, R.: Ai as an active writer: Inter- action strategies with generated text in human-ai collaborative fiction writing. In: Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI Workshops, vol. 10, pp. 1–11 (2022). CEUR-WS Team

    2022

  57. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Li, Z., Liang, C., Peng, J., Yin, M.: The value, benefits, and concerns of genera- tive ai-powered assistance in writing. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–25 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Suh, M., Youngblom, E., Terry, M., Cai, C.J.: Ai as social glue: uncovering the roles of deep generative ai during social music composition. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11 (2021)

    2021

  59. [59]

    Min Chul Cha, Lee, S.C.: Not merely useful but also amusing: Impact of perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment on the adop- tion of ai-powered coding assistant

    Young Woo Kim, S.H.Y. Min Chul Cha, Lee, S.C.: Not merely useful but also amusing: Impact of perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment on the adop- tion of ai-powered coding assistant. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction0(0), 1–13 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2375701

    work page doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2375701 2024

  60. [60]

    Business Horizons67(5), 649–661 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor

    France, S.L.: Navigating software development in the chatgpt and github copilot era. Business Horizons67(5), 649–661 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor. 2024.05.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bushor 2024

  61. [61]

    Xu, Y., Liu, X., Liu, X., Hou, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Zeng, A., Du, Z., Zhao, W., Tang, J., Dong, Y.: ChatGLM-Math: Improving Math Problem- Solving in Large Language Models with a Self-Critique Pipeline (2024)

    2024

  62. [62]

    Science advances10(28), 5290 (2024)

    Doshi, A.R., Hauser, O.P.: Generative ai enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science advances10(28), 5290 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    Nature human behaviour9(6), 1107–1109 (2025)

    Meincke, L., Nave, G., Terwiesch, C.: Chatgpt decreases idea diversity in brainstorming. Nature human behaviour9(6), 1107–1109 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P.N., Inkpen, K., Teevan, J., Kikin-Gil, R., Horvitz, E.: Guidelines for human-ai interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’19, pp. 1–

    2019

  65. [65]

    https: //doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233 .https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233

    Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233 .https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233

    work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300233 2019

  66. [66]

    In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp

    Kamar, E.: Directions in hybrid intelligence: complementing ai systems with human intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 4070–4073 (2016). AAAI Press

    2016

  67. [67]

    International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction36(6), 495–504 47 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118

    Shneiderman, B.: Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trust- worthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction36(6), 495–504 47 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118

    work page doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118 2020

  68. [68]

    an ideal human

    Zhang, R., McNeese, N.J., Freeman, G., Musick, G.: “an ideal human”: Expecta- tions of ai teammates in human-ai teaming. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(CSCW3) (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    SIMULATION100(4), 379–399 (2024)

    Zhong, J., Ngoc, L.L., Negre, E., Abel, M.-H.: Ontology-based crisis simulation system for population sheltering management. SIMULATION100(4), 379–399 (2024)

    2024

  70. [70]

    Data & Knowledge Engineering25(1), 161–197 (1998) https://doi

    Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering25(1), 161–197 (1998) https://doi. org/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0169-023x(97)00056-6 1998

  71. [71]

    In: International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation, pp

    Konat´ e, J., Zarat´ e, P., Gueye, A., Camilleri, G.: An ontology for collabo- rative decision making. In: International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation, pp. 179–191 (2020). Springer

    2020

  72. [72]

    Cognition, Technology & Work 24(1), 75–91 (2022)

    Li, S., Abel, M.-H., Negre, E.: A collaboration context ontology to enhance human-related collaboration into industry 4.0. Cognition, Technology & Work 24(1), 75–91 (2022)

    2022

  73. [73]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05055 (2020)

    Gu, T., Wang, X.H., Pung, H.K., Zhang, D.Q.: An ontology-based context model in intelligent environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.05055 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2003

  74. [74]

    In: Proc

    Oliveira, F.F., Antunes, J.C., Guizzardi, R.S.: Towards a collaboration ontology. In: Proc. of the Snd Brazilian Workshop on Ontologies and Metamodels for Software and Data Engineering (2007). Jo˜ ao Pessoa

    2007

  75. [75]

    IEEE Access6, 1362–1371 (2017)

    Gasmi, H., Bouras, A.: Ontology-based education/industry collaboration sys- tem. IEEE Access6, 1362–1371 (2017)

    2017

  76. [76]

    Computers in Industry138, 103627 (2022)

    Olivares-Alarcos, A., Foix, S., Borgo, S., Aleny` a, G.: Ocra–an ontology for collaborative robotics and adaptation. Computers in Industry138, 103627 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    In: GDN 2010, pp

    Knoll, S., Plumbaum, T., Hoffman, J., De Luca, E.W.: Collaboration ontology: Applying collaboration knowledge to a generic group support system. In: GDN 2010, pp. 1–37 (2010). Omaha: Center for Collaboration Science

    2010

  78. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07472 (2023)

    Lin, Z., Riedl, M.: An ontology of co-creative ai systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07472 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Wang, D., Churchill, E., Maes, P., Fan, X., Shneiderman, B., Shi, Y., Wang, Q.: From human-human collaboration to human-ai collaboration: Designing ai systems that can work together with people. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–6 (2020) 48

    2020

  80. [80]

    In: 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), pp

    Pangavhane, S., Raktate, G., Pariane, P., Shelar, K., Wakchaure, R., Kale, J.: Ai-augmented software development: Boosting efficiency and quality. In: 2024 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA), pp. 1–5 (2024). IEEE

    2024

Showing first 80 references.