pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.00282 · v1 · pith:Q42TF7TQnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.AI

Synthetic Data from Cross-Domain Events for Large-Scale Recommendation Systems

Xiangyu Wang , Yawen He , Shivendra Pratap Singh , Han Huang , Mengtong Hu , Sharath Ciddu , Yi-Hsuan Hsieh , Erik Groving
show 7 more authors
Yi Ding Jieming Di Tony Wang Min Yun Xiaoyu Chen Ling Leng Rob Malkin
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 20:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.AI
keywords cross-domain recommendationsynthetic data generationrecommendation systemsdata augmentationimplicit feedbackevent likelihood estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A framework generates synthetic user-item events from source domains to augment target recommendation data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a method to create synthetic interaction events for a target recommendation domain by estimating the likelihood of user actions based on observed events from a source domain. This synthetic data then serves as additional training material for any downstream model. The approach addresses data sparsity and noisy implicit feedback without relying on model-specific distillation techniques. If effective, it allows cross-domain knowledge to transfer through data augmentation rather than internal model representations. The authors report that this leads to measurable gains when deployed in production systems.

Core claim

SCALR decomposes cross-domain learning into two stages: first translating source-domain events into synthetic target-domain events by framing generation as conditional likelihood estimation of user-item interactions, then using those synthetic events as augmentation to train target-domain models in a model-agnostic way. The resulting system produces statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests on an industrial recommendation platform.

What carries the argument

The SCALR two-stage process that first estimates likelihoods to synthesize target events from source observations and then augments training data for any downstream recommender.

If this is right

  • Synthetic events augment the target domain's training set directly, allowing any existing recommendation model to benefit without architectural changes.
  • Cross-domain transfer is achieved through explicit data synthesis rather than internal knowledge distillation between models.
  • The method operates in a modular fashion, separating event generation from downstream model training.
  • Observed events from one domain can be reused to create training signals for multiple target domains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same likelihood-based synthesis step could be applied to generate training data for entirely new item categories not seen in the source domain.
  • If the synthetic events prove low-noise, they might reduce reliance on collecting fresh implicit feedback in the target domain.
  • The framing opens the possibility of chaining multiple source domains to produce richer synthetic sets for a single target.

Load-bearing premise

The estimated likelihood of a user interacting with a target-domain item given source-domain behavior accurately reflects real preferences without adding substantial bias or noise.

What would settle it

An online A/B test on the industrial platform that finds no statistically significant lift in key metrics when models are trained with the synthetic events versus without them.

read the original abstract

Large-scale recommendation systems operate across diverse domains, yet they face the challenges of data sparsity and noisy implicit feedback. Traditional approaches mitigate this via model-specific knowledge distillation from source domains to a target domain. Inspired by the transformative success of synthetic data generation in large language models (LLMs), we introduce Synthetic Cross-domain Augmentation and Learning for Recommendation (SCALR), a framework that generates synthetic user-item interaction events for a target recommendation domain by leveraging observed events from a source domain. SCALR decomposes cross-domain learning into two modular stages. First, it translates observed user events in source domains by framing event generation as estimating the likelihood that a user would interact with a target-domain item, conditioned on their observed interactions in a source domain. Second, downstream models train on these synthetic events as cross-domain learning objectives, where the synthetic events augment the target domain's training data in a model-agnostic manner. Our approach yields statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests on an industrial recommendation platform. To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first works to explicitly frame cross-domain event transfer as synthetic data generation for recommendation systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces SCALR, a two-stage framework for cross-domain recommendation. Stage 1 frames synthetic event generation as estimating the likelihood that a user interacts with a target-domain item conditioned on observed source-domain events. Stage 2 augments the target-domain training set with these synthetic events and trains downstream models in a model-agnostic manner. The central empirical claim is that the approach produces statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests on an industrial recommendation platform.

Significance. If the likelihood model and bias controls are sound, the work offers a modular, model-agnostic route to cross-domain augmentation that parallels synthetic-data successes in LLMs. The absence of any equations, fitted parameters, or validation protocol for the likelihood step, however, prevents assessment of whether the claimed A/B gains are reproducible or merely artifacts of unstated assumptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that SCALR 'yields statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract (and the supplied manuscript text) supplies no description of the likelihood estimation procedure, the statistical test used, sample sizes, or any control for selection bias introduced by the synthetic events. Without these elements the empirical result cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract / §2 (method description): the core mechanism is described only as 'estimating the likelihood that a user would interact with a target-domain item, conditioned on their observed interactions in a source domain,' with no equation, parameterization, or training objective provided. This omission makes it impossible to determine whether the synthetic events are generated in a manner that preserves user preference structure or merely injects noise.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'to the best of our knowledge, this is among the first works…'; a brief related-work paragraph citing the most relevant prior cross-domain and synthetic-data papers would strengthen the novelty claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback. The comments correctly identify gaps in the description of the likelihood model and empirical protocol. We have revised the manuscript to supply the missing technical details while preserving the original claims and experimental results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that SCALR 'yields statistically significant improvements in online A/B tests' is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the abstract (and the supplied manuscript text) supplies no description of the likelihood estimation procedure, the statistical test used, sample sizes, or any control for selection bias introduced by the synthetic events. Without these elements the empirical result cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We agree that the original abstract omitted key evaluation details. The revised abstract now briefly states that the likelihood model is a neural network trained via binary cross-entropy on historical cross-domain pairs, that significance is assessed via paired t-tests (p < 0.05) on CTR and conversion metrics, that the A/B tests involved several million users over multiple weeks, and that selection bias is controlled through randomized user assignment plus propensity-score weighting. A new paragraph in §3.4 and an appendix provide the full protocol. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract / §2 (method description): the core mechanism is described only as 'estimating the likelihood that a user would interact with a target-domain item, conditioned on their observed interactions in a source domain,' with no equation, parameterization, or training objective provided. This omission makes it impossible to determine whether the synthetic events are generated in a manner that preserves user preference structure or merely injects noise.

    Authors: We accept that the initial submission lacked the formal specification. Section 2 has been expanded with the explicit likelihood equation P(y_{u,i}^T=1 | {e^S}) = σ(f_θ(e^S)), where f_θ is a two-tower network, θ trained by minimizing binary cross-entropy on observed source-target pairs, and synthetic events sampled only when the predicted probability exceeds a calibrated threshold. We also added a validation subsection showing that the generated events preserve ranking correlations with held-out target-domain data, confirming they do not inject unstructured noise. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The abstract and available text describe SCALR as a two-stage framework using likelihood estimation to generate synthetic events, followed by model-agnostic training, with an empirical A/B test claim. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the provided content. The central claim rests on external validation rather than any internal reduction to inputs by definition or construction, making the derivation self-contained against the given information.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5779 in / 1023 out tokens · 27040 ms · 2026-06-28T20:33:11.053705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

    Irgan: A minimax game for unifying generative and discriminative information retrieval models , author=. Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    Comparing recommender systems using synthetic data , author=. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  3. [3]

    Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=

    An empirical evaluation of easily implemented, nonparametric methods for generating synthetic datasets , author=. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  4. [4]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages=

    On LLMs-driven synthetic data generation, curation, and evaluation: A survey , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024 , pages=

    2024

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07503 , year=

    Best practices and lessons learned on synthetic data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07503 , year=

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?

    Tinystories: How small can language models be and still speak coherent english? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07759 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Textbooks Are All You Need

    Textbooks are all you need , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11644 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical report

    Textbooks are all you need ii: phi-1.5 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05463 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

    Magpie: Alignment data synthesis from scratch by prompting aligned llms with nothing , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    Exploiting asymmetry for synthetic training data generation: SynthIE and the case of information extraction , author=. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages=

    2023

  11. [11]

    Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models

    Alpaca: A strong, replicable instruction-following model , author=. Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models. https://crfm. stanford. edu/2023/03/13/alpaca. html , volume=

    2023

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01696 , year=

    Cross-domain recommendation: challenges, progress, and prospects , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01696 , year=

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    , author=

    Cross-domain recommendation: An embedding and mapping approach. , author=. Ijcai , volume=

  14. [14]

    Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management , pages=

    Conet: Collaborative cross networks for cross-domain recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management , pages=

  15. [15]

    Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management , pages=

    Dtcdr: A framework for dual-target cross-domain recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management , pages=

  16. [16]

    Proceedings of the 13th international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

    Ddtcdr: Deep dual transfer cross domain recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

  17. [17]

    Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management , pages=

    Cross-market product recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management , pages=

  18. [18]

    Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

    Disencdr: Learning disentangled representations for cross-domain recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

  19. [19]

    Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

    Relational learning via collective matrix factorization , author=. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

  20. [20]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

    Transfer learning in collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

    Personalized transfer of user preferences for cross-domain recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

  22. [22]

    Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

    Counterfactual data-augmented sequential recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

  23. [23]

    Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

    Self-supervised learning for large-scale item recommendations , author=. Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval , pages=

    Augmenting sequential recommendation with pseudo-prior items via reversely pre-training transformer , author=. Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval , pages=

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

    Contrastvae: Contrastive variational autoencoder for sequential recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on information & knowledge management , pages=

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the 46th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

    Improving implicit feedback-based recommendation through multi-behavior alignment , author=. Proceedings of the 46th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13286 , year=

    The unfairness of popularity bias in recommendation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13286 , year=

    work page arXiv 1907

  28. [28]

    ACM Transactions on Information Systems , volume=

    Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions , author=. ACM Transactions on Information Systems , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  29. [29]

    Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

    Popularity bias in dynamic recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages=

  30. [30]

    Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    The long tail of recommender systems and how to leverage it , author=. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    2008

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

    Item popularity and recommendation accuracy , author=. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems , pages=

  32. [32]

    The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

    Should I follow the crowd? A probabilistic analysis of the effectiveness of popularity in recommender systems , author=. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

  33. [33]

    Klimashevskaia et al

    A survey on popularity bias in recommender systems: A. Klimashevskaia et al. , author=. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  34. [34]

    Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Tallrec: An effective and efficient tuning framework to align large language model with recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  35. [35]

    Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

    Llmrec: Large language models with graph augmentation for recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on web search and data mining , pages=

  36. [36]

    Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

    Towards open-world recommendation with knowledge augmentation from large language models , author=. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems , pages=

  37. [37]

    Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations , author=. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  38. [38]

    Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems , pages=

    Wide & deep learning for recommender systems , author=. Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems , pages=

  39. [39]

    DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Prediction

    DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04247 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Deep Learning Recommendation Model for Personalization and Recommendation Systems

    Deep learning recommendation model for personalization and recommendation systems , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00091 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  41. [41]

    Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

    Recommending what video to watch next: a multitask ranking system , author=. Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on recommender systems , pages=

  42. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering , volume=

    A survey on transfer learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  43. [43]

    Journal of machine learning research , volume=

    Domain-adversarial training of neural networks , author=. Journal of machine learning research , volume=

  44. [44]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Generative adversarial nets , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  45. [45]

    The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

    Entire space multi-task model: An effective approach for estimating post-click conversion rate , author=. The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , pages=

  46. [46]

    Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval , pages=

    Entire space multi-task modeling via post-click behavior decomposition for conversion rate prediction , author=. Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval , pages=

  47. [47]

    Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , pages=

    Modeling the sequential dependence among audience multi-step conversions with multi-task learning in targeted display advertising , author=. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , pages=

  48. [48]

    2021 , publisher=

    Synthetic data for deep learning , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  49. [49]

    Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , pages=

    Training deep networks with synthetic data: Bridging the reality gap by domain randomization , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops , pages=

  50. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03257 , year=

    Synthetic Data--what, why and how? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03257 , year=

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

    Self-supervised graph learning for recommendation , author=. Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pages=

  52. [52]

    2022 IEEE 38th international conference on data engineering (ICDE) , pages=

    Contrastive learning for sequential recommendation , author=. 2022 IEEE 38th international conference on data engineering (ICDE) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  53. [53]

    The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration

    The curious case of neural text degeneration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09751 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  54. [54]

    Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    Hierarchical neural story generation , author=. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

  55. [55]

    The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMs

    The false promise of imitating proprietary llms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15717 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv