pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01357 · v1 · pith:U4UOF2IDnew · submitted 2026-05-31 · 🧬 q-bio.QM · physics.data-an· q-bio.NC

Hypergraphs from multivariate connectivity: caCoh-based EEG/MEG representation

Daniil Vlasenko , Irina Saranskaia , Denis Zakharov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 15:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM physics.data-anq-bio.NC
keywords hypergraphscanonical coherenceEEGMEGmultivariate connectivityfrequency-resolved analysisbrain networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Canonical coherence constructs hypergraphs that recover simulated EEG/MEG coupling frequencies with higher contrast than magnitude-squared coherence graphs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to build hypergraphs directly from canonical coherence, a multivariate measure that estimates coupling across entire signal spaces rather than pairs of sensors. This produces two compact representations—one-to-space and space-to-space—that replace hundreds of pairwise edges with a handful of hyperedges while preserving frequency-specific information. In controlled simulations, the resulting hypergraphs yield statistically stronger recovery of known coupling frequencies and associated spatial patterns across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios. The reduction in representational size and the improved contrast together suggest that multivariate spectral connectivity supplies a natural foundation for hypergraph models of distributed brain activity.

Core claim

Hyperedges obtained from canonical coherence produce EEG/MEG hypergraphs that achieve statistically higher target-baseline contrasts at almost all tested SNR levels, recover the spatial patterns of simulated sources, and compress 610 magnitude-squared coherence edges per frequency into 10 or 1 hyperedges depending on the representation chosen.

What carries the argument

caCoh-based hypergraphs, formed by treating canonical coherence estimates between multidimensional signal spaces as hyperedges over the EEG/MEG sensor array.

If this is right

  • caCoh hypergraphs maintain higher target-baseline contrast than MSC graphs across nearly the full range of simulated SNR values.
  • Both one-to-space and space-to-space versions recover the sensor-level spatial patterns tied to the injected sources.
  • The two representations reduce the number of connections per frequency from 610 MSC edges to 10 or 1 hyperedges.
  • Multivariate spectral connectivity therefore supplies a direct methodological basis for constructing EEG/MEG hypergraphs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction could be applied to other multivariate connectivity estimators to test whether the performance advantage is specific to canonical coherence.
  • Fewer hyperedges may make real-time or large-scale network analyses computationally lighter while retaining frequency resolution.
  • If the simulation-to-real translation holds, the approach could be used to detect higher-order interactions in clinical datasets without first computing an exhaustive pairwise graph.

Load-bearing premise

Simulations that inject known coupling frequencies at controlled SNR levels capture the statistical structure and noise properties of actual EEG/MEG recordings.

What would settle it

Repeating the same target-baseline contrast and spatial-recovery tests on real recordings that contain independently verified coupling events at known frequencies and locations.

read the original abstract

Hypergraphs provide a natural framework for representing neurophysiological interactions distributed across sets of sensors. A key methodological question is how hyperedges should be defined from frequency-resolved electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG) data. We demonstrate a construction strategy in which hyperedges are obtained from canonical coherence (caCoh), an extension of coherence that estimates coupling between multidimensional signal spaces. To our knowledge, this is the first work to construct hypergraphs directly from a multivariate connectivity measure specifically designed for frequency-resolved neurophysiological analysis. We propose two caCoh-based representations: a one-to-space hypergraph, where each external signal defines a hyperedge over the EEG/MEG sensor space, and a space-to-space hypergraph, where two multidimensional signal spaces are represented by a single hyperedge. We evaluate the approach in controlled simulations with known coupling frequencies and varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Compared with graphs based on magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), caCoh-based hypergraphs showed statistically higher target-baseline contrasts at almost all SNR levels, indicating stronger recovery of coupling frequencies. They also recovered sensor-level spatial patterns associated with the simulated sources. In addition, one-to-space and space-to-space representations reduced 610 MSC edges per frequency to 10 and 1 hyperedges, respectively. These results establish multivariate spectral connectivity as a natural methodological basis for EEG/MEG hypergraphs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes constructing hypergraphs for EEG/MEG data using canonical coherence (caCoh), an extension of coherence for multidimensional signals. It defines one-to-space (external signal to sensor space) and space-to-space hypergraph representations, then evaluates them in controlled simulations with injected coupling frequencies across SNR levels. The central results are that caCoh hypergraphs yield statistically higher target-baseline contrasts than magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) graphs at nearly all SNR levels, recover associated spatial patterns, and reduce the connection count from 610 MSC edges per frequency to 10 or 1 hyperedges.

Significance. If the simulation results are robust, the work supplies a principled route from multivariate spectral connectivity to hypergraph models of distributed neurophysiological interactions. The use of simulations with known ground-truth coupling frequencies supplies a non-circular evaluation of frequency recovery and spatial reconstruction; the reported dimensionality reduction is a concrete practical benefit. These elements strengthen the case for caCoh-based hypergraphs as a methodological foundation within the simulation setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation results] Simulation evaluation section: the claim that caCoh hypergraphs produce 'statistically higher target-baseline contrasts at almost all SNR levels' is not accompanied by the identity of the statistical test, the number of simulation repetitions, degrees of freedom, or any multiple-comparison correction across SNR values and frequencies. This information is required to substantiate the central superiority claim over MSC graphs.
  2. [Methods] Methods section on data generation: the forward model (source placement, lead-field mapping, and additive noise structure) is described only at a high level. Because the spatial-pattern recovery result depends on the realism of the sensor-level mixing, the absence of an explicit equation or reference for the generative process limits assessment of whether the reported spatial advantage is tied to the specific simulation assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. The number '610 MSC edges per frequency' is stated in the abstract but not derived or justified with an equation or table in the main text; adding this clarification would aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure legends for the spatial recovery plots would benefit from explicit indication of ground-truth source locations to allow direct visual comparison with the recovered patterns.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details for improved clarity and reproducibility.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Simulation evaluation section: the claim that caCoh hypergraphs produce 'statistically higher target-baseline contrasts at almost all SNR levels' is not accompanied by the identity of the statistical test, the number of simulation repetitions, degrees of freedom, or any multiple-comparison correction across SNR values and frequencies. This information is required to substantiate the central superiority claim over MSC graphs.

    Authors: We agree that these statistical details must be provided to support the superiority claim. The revised manuscript will explicitly report the statistical test (a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test), the number of simulation repetitions (100 independent runs per SNR level), the associated degrees of freedom, and the multiple-comparison correction (Bonferroni adjustment across the 5 SNR levels and 3 frequencies tested). These additions will allow full evaluation of the reported target-baseline contrast differences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Methods section on data generation: the forward model (source placement, lead-field mapping, and additive noise structure) is described only at a high level. Because the spatial-pattern recovery result depends on the realism of the sensor-level mixing, the absence of an explicit equation or reference for the generative process limits assessment of whether the reported spatial advantage is tied to the specific simulation assumptions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the forward model is high-level. In the revision we will add an explicit equation for the generative process, specifying source locations, the lead-field matrix computation, and the additive noise model (including its covariance structure). We will also cite the simulation toolbox or reference used for the forward modeling to enable readers to assess the dependence of the spatial recovery results on these assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: hypergraph construction and simulation evaluation remain independent.

full rationale

The paper defines caCoh-based hyperedges directly from the multivariate connectivity measure and evaluates recovery of injected coupling frequencies in forward simulations whose ground-truth sources and noise are specified independently of the caCoh construction itself. No equation reduces a reported contrast or spatial pattern to a quantity fitted from the same data used to define the hyperedges; the dimensionality reduction from MSC edges to hyperedges is a representational choice, not a self-definitional loop. Self-citation is absent from the load-bearing claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that caCoh provides a suitable multivariate measure for defining hyperedges and that simulation results generalize; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Canonical coherence (caCoh) is an appropriate and valid extension of coherence for estimating coupling between multidimensional signal spaces in frequency-resolved EEG/MEG data.
    The hyperedge construction strategy is defined directly in terms of caCoh without additional derivation or validation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5793 in / 1346 out tokens · 23417 ms · 2026-06-28T15:56:06.088091+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    NeuroImage61(2), 371–385 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage

    Michel, C.M., Murray, M.M.: Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool. NeuroImage61(2), 371–385 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2011.12.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage 2012

  2. [2]

    Cohen, M.X.: Where Does EEG Come From and What Does It Mean? Trends in Neurosciences40(4), 208–218 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.02.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.02.004 2017

  3. [3]

    Reviews of Modern Physics65(2), 413–497 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413

    H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Knuutila, J., Lounasmaa, O.V.: Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to nonin- vasive studies of the working human brain. Reviews of Modern Physics65(2), 413–497 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.413 1993

  4. [4]

    Nature Neuroscience20(3), 327–339 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4504

    Baillet, S.: Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience20(3), 327–339 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4504

    work page doi:10.1038/nn.4504 2017

  5. [5]

    Journal of Applied Biomechanics13(2), 135–163 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.13

    Luca, C.J.D.: The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics13(2), 135–163 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.13. 2.135

    work page doi:10.1123/jab.13 1997

  6. [6]

    The Journal of Physiology489 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3), 917–924 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol

    Conway, B.A., Halliday, D.M., Farmer, S.F., Shahani, U., Maas, P., Weir, A.I., Rosenberg, J.R.: Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. The Journal of Physiology489 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3), 917–924 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol. 1995.sp021104

    work page doi:10.1113/jphysiol 1995

  7. [7]

    Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation7(5), 397–429 (1975) https://doi.org/10

    Young, L.R., Sheena, D.: Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation7(5), 397–429 (1975) https://doi.org/10. 3758/BF03201553

    1975

  8. [8]

    International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology155, 49–62 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020

    Carter, B.T., Luke, S.G.: Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology155, 49–62 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020. 05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020 2020

  9. [9]

    Nature Reviews

    Bullmore, E., Sporns, O.: Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience10(3), 186–198 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575

    work page doi:10.1038/nrn2575 2009

  10. [10]

    NeuroImage52(3), 1059–1069 (2010) https://doi.org/10

    Rubinov, M., Sporns, O.: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage52(3), 1059–1069 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 20

    2010

  11. [11]

    Nature Neuroscience20(3), 353– 364 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502

    Bassett, D.S., Sporns, O.: Network neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience20(3), 353– 364 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502

    work page doi:10.1038/nn.4502 2017

  12. [12]

    North-Holland Publishing Company, Ams- terdam (1973)

    Berge, C.: Graphs and Hypergraphs. North-Holland Publishing Company, Ams- terdam (1973)

    1973

  13. [13]

    URL https://doi.org/ 10.1137/S003614450342480

    Newman, M.E.J.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2), 167–256 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480 arXiv:cond- mat/0303516

    work page doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 2003

  14. [14]

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods166(1), 41–52 (2007) https://doi.org/10

    Srinivasan, R., Winter, W.R., Ding, J., Nunez, P.L.: EEG and MEG coherence: Measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynam- ics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods166(1), 41–52 (2007) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.026

    2007

  15. [15]

    Neuropsychiatric Electrophysiology2(1), 1 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40810-015-0015-7

    Bowyer, S.M.: Coherence a measure of the brain networks: Past and present. Neuropsychiatric Electrophysiology2(1), 1 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40810-015-0015-7

    2016

  16. [16]

    Nature Physics17(10), 1093–1098 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4

    Battiston, F., Amico, E., Barrat, A., Bianconi, G., Ferraz de Arruda, G., Franceschiello, B., Iacopini, I., K´ efi, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Murray, M.M., Peixoto, T.P., Vaccarino, F., Petri, G.: The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems. Nature Physics17(10), 1093–1098 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01371-4 2021

  17. [17]

    Physics Reports874, 1–92 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004

    Battiston, F., Cencetti, G., Iacopini, I., Latora, V., Lucas, M., Patania, A., Young, J.-G., Petri, G.: Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports874, 1–92 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.004 2020

  18. [18]

    Nature Physics15(4), 313–320 (2019) https://doi

    Lambiotte, R., Rosvall, M., Scholtes, I.: From networks to optimal higher-order models of complex systems. Nature Physics15(4), 313–320 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-019-0459-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0459-y 2019

  19. [19]

    Medical Image Analysis32, 84–100 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.03.003

    Jie, B., Wee, C.-Y., Shen, D., Zhang, D.: Hyper-connectivity of functional net- works for brain disease diagnosis. Medical Image Analysis32, 84–100 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.03.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.03.003 2016

  20. [20]

    NeuroImage173, 610–622 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.056

    Wang, S.H., Lobier, M., Siebenh¨ uhner, F., Puoliv¨ ali, T., Palva, S., Palva, J.M.: Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses. NeuroImage173, 610–622 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.056 2018

  21. [21]

    Nature Communications15(1), 10244 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54472-y 21

    Santoro, A., Battiston, F., Lucas, M., Petri, G., Amico, E.: Higher-order con- nectomics of human brain function reveals local topological signatures of task decoding, individual identification, and behavior. Nature Communications15(1), 10244 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54472-y 21

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54472-y 2024

  22. [22]

    NeuroImage21(2), 659–673 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006

    David, O., Cosmelli, D., Friston, K.J.: Evaluation of different measures of func- tional connectivity using a neural mass model. NeuroImage21(2), 659–673 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.006 2004

  23. [23]

    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience9(2016) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175

    Bastos, A.M., Schoffelen, J.-M.: A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectiv- ity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience9(2016) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175

    work page doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 2016

  24. [24]

    Bioengineering10(3), 372 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ bioengineering10030372

    Chiarion, G., Sparacino, L., Antonacci, Y., Faes, L., Mesin, L.: Connectiv- ity Analysis in EEG Data: A Tutorial Review of the State of the Art and Emerging Trends. Bioengineering10(3), 372 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ bioengineering10030372

    2023

  25. [25]

    Nature Methods22(7), 1593–1602 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Liu, Z.-Q., Luppi, A.I., Hansen, J.Y., Tian, Y.E., Zalesky, A., Yeo, B.T.T., Fulcher, B.D., Misic, B.: Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connec- tivity in the brain. Nature Methods22(7), 1593–1602 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41592-025-02704-4

    2025

  26. [26]

    Entropy23(1), 5 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010005

    Fraschini, M., La Cava, S.M., Didaci, L., Barberini, L.: On the Variability of Functional Connectivity and Network Measures in Source-Reconstructed EEG Time-Series. Entropy23(1), 5 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010005

    work page doi:10.3390/e23010005 2021

  27. [27]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intel- ligence44(5), 2548–2566 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3039374

    Gao, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, H., Zhao, X., Du, S., Zou, C.: Hypergraph Learning: Methods and Practices. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intel- ligence44(5), 2548–2566 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3039374

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3039374 2022

  28. [28]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2106

    Jo, J., Baek, J., Lee, S., Kim, D., Kang, M., Hwang, S.J.: Edge Representation Learning with Hypergraphs. arXiv (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106. 15845

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106 2021

  29. [29]

    arXiv (2024)

    Wang, Y., Kleinberg, J.: From Graphs to Hypergraphs: Hypergraph Projection and Its Remediation. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.08519

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.08519 2024

  30. [30]

    Cognitive Neuro- dynamics17(5), 1271–1281 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-022-09890-3

    Li, M., Qiu, M., Zhu, L., Kong, W.: Feature hypergraph representation learning on spatial-temporal correlations for EEG emotion recognition. Cognitive Neuro- dynamics17(5), 1271–1281 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-022-09890-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11571-022-09890-3 2023

  31. [31]

    Frontiers in Neuroscience17, 1257982 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnins.2023.1257982

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Li, Z., Yang, Z., Dong, X., Han, Q.: Constructing high- order functional networks based on hypergraph for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Neuroscience17, 1257982 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnins.2023.1257982

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Applied Sciences15(7), 3833 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Pisarchik, A.N., Pe˜ na Serrano, N., Escalante Puente de la Vega, W., Jaimes- Re´ ategui, R.: Hypergraph Analysis of Functional Brain Connectivity During Figurative Attention. Applied Sciences15(7), 3833 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 3390/app15073833 22

    2025

  33. [33]

    Applied Sciences14(6), 2343 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/ app14062343

    Pe˜ na Serrano, N., Jaimes-Re´ ategui, R., Pisarchik, A.N.: Hypergraph of Func- tional Connectivity Based on Event-Related Coherence: Magnetoencephalogra- phy Data Analysis. Applied Sciences14(6), 2343 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/ app14062343

    2024

  34. [34]

    Zhu, L., Liu, Y., Liu, R., Peng, Y., Cao, J., Li, J., Kong, W.: Decoding Multi-Brain Motor Imagery From EEG Using Coupling Feature Extraction and Few-Shot Learning. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society31, 4683– 4692 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.202...

    work page doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3336356 2023

  35. [35]

    NeuroImage 201, 116009 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116009

    Vidaurre, C., Nolte, G., de Vries, I.E.J., G´ omez, M., Boonstra, T.W., M¨ uller, K.- R., Villringer, A., Nikulin, V.V.: Canonical maximization of coherence: A novel tool for investigation of neuronal interactions between two datasets. NeuroImage 201, 116009 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116009 2019

  36. [36]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10278399

    Binns, T.S., Li, A., Larson, E., McCloy, D., Rockhill, A., Li, Q., Ruuskanen, S., Kroner, A., Gramfort, A., Marraffini, G.F.G., Shor, J., Marshall, K., Orabe, M., Gerster, M., K¨ ohler, R.M., Steingold, S., Mert, S.: MNE-Connectivity (2026). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10278399

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10278399 2026

  37. [37]

    Frontiers in Neuroscience7(2013) https: //doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267

    Gramfort, A., Luessi, M., Larson, E., Engemann, D.A., Strohmeier, D., Brodbeck, C., Goj, R., Jas, M., Brooks, T., Parkkonen, L., H¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, M.: MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience7(2013) https: //doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00267

    work page doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 2013

  38. [38]

    Zenodo (2026)

    MNE-Python Developers: MNE-Python. Zenodo (2026). https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.19666955

    2026

  39. [39]

    Human Brain Mapping8(4), 272–284 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8: 4⟨272::AID-HBM10⟩3.0.CO;2-4

    Fischl, B., Sereno, M.I., Tootell, R.B.H., Dale, A.M.: High-resolution intersub- ject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Human Brain Mapping8(4), 272–284 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8: 4⟨272::AID-HBM10⟩3.0.CO;2-4

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8: 1999

  40. [40]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology50(16), 3807 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/010

    Nolte, G., Dassios, G.: Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors. Physics in Medicine & Biology50(16), 3807 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/010

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/010 2005

  41. [41]

    Brain: A Journal of Neurology 122 ( Pt 3), 461–472 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.3.461

    Brown, P., Farmer, S.F., Halliday, D.M., Marsden, J., Rosenberg, J.R.: Coherent cortical and muscle discharge in cortical myoclonus. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 122 ( Pt 3), 461–472 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.3.461

    work page doi:10.1093/brain/122.3.461 1999

  42. [42]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series1740(1), 012050 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1740/1/012050 23

    Kostenetskiy, P.S., Chulkevich, R.A., Kozyrev, V.I.: HPC Resources of the Higher School of Economics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1740(1), 012050 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1740/1/012050 23

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1740/1/012050 2021