pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01713 · v1 · pith:7CN4UGFLnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY· math.OC

FlipItRight: Stable Pose-Targeted Throw-Flip Across Diverse Objects

Axel Dawne , Shinkyu Park This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 14:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SYmath.OC
keywords throw flippose targetedmanipulatorrelease statemodel freerobotic manipulationdynamic throwing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Treating release states explicitly allows stable pose-targeted throw-flips on diverse objects without models or calibration.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

FlipItRight decomposes the throw-flip task into an object-level planner that generates release states for desired landing poses and a robot-level planner that builds executable swing motions. This explicit intermediate representation supports candidate filtering and motion designs with nearly constant end-effector speeds near release to tolerate timing errors. Real-robot tests on objects of different shapes, sizes, and masses reach 90 percent success over 120 trials, and the method deploys immediately to new objects and targets.

Core claim

The framework generates candidate release states satisfying the desired landing pose at the object level and evaluates executability while constructing feasible swing motions at the robot level. Treating the release state explicitly enables principled candidate filtering, adaptive selection of configurations, and near-release motion with approximately constant end-effector velocities for robustness to release-timing uncertainty.

What carries the argument

Release state as explicit intermediate representation for bridging object landing requirements and robot swing execution.

If this is right

  • Direct deployment on new objects and targets is possible without data collection or calibration.
  • Ablation studies show each design choice improves throwing performance.
  • 90 percent success rate holds across objects varying in shape, size, and mass in 120 real trials.
  • Approximately constant end-effector velocities during final swing enhance robustness to timing uncertainty.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar explicit intermediate states might simplify planning for other dynamic tasks like catching or batting.
  • The planar assumption could be relaxed by extending release states to include 3D orientations and velocities.
  • Integration with perception systems for online object property estimation would broaden applicability to unknown items.

Load-bearing premise

An explicit release state suffices to connect object-level landing predictions with robot-level motion constraints for stable execution.

What would settle it

Failure to achieve high success rates on a new set of objects with significantly different mass distributions or shapes, even after applying the planners, would indicate the need for environment-specific adjustments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01713 by Axel Dawne, Shinkyu Park.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FlipItRight across different throw-flip scenarios. For different objects and target landing poses, the framework generates scenario-specific throwing motions rather than relying on fixed initial or release robot configurations. Robotic throwing is one of the most demanding manipulation tasks: once an object leaves the gripper, the robot loses all direct control, and the subsequent trajectory is determined … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Proposed pose-targeted throw-flip framework. The object-level planner pro￾poses a release state ξrel; the robot-level planner validates it and computes swing variables; the swing-pose selector solves for the release configuration qf , initial config￾uration q0, and swing duration Tend; and the swing-trajectory generator produces the joint trajectory {qk} N k=0 for execution. with the end effector throughou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Experiment setup and (b) objects used in the experiments and their geo￾metric parameter definitions. The throwing motion is performed in the yz-plane. The optimized trajectory solves: min{qk}N k=1 PN k=1  wp∥ep(tk)∥ 2 + wv∥ev(tk)∥ 2 + wω∥eω(tk)∥ 2 + wθ∥eθ(tk)∥ 2  + PN−1 k=0 h wu∥uk∥ 2 + wub ∥ max(0,umin − uk)∥ 2 + ∥ max(0,uk − umax)∥ 2  i s.t. qmin ≤ qk ≤ qmax, k = 1, . . . , N. Here wp = 10, wv = 2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ablation of initial-pose selection. Grouped normalized pose- and velocity￾tracking RMSE over normalized swing time, aggregated across all 9 unique trajectories. RMSE over normalized swing time. The grouped errors are defined as epose(tk) = ∥[ ∆py sp , ∆pz sp , ∆θ sR ]∥2 and evel(tk) = ∥[ ∆vy sv , ∆vz sv , ∆ωx sω ]∥2, where ∆q = q − q ref de￾notes the tracking error of quantity q, and the normalization coef… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose FlipItRight, a framework for stable planar pose-targeted throw-flip with a high-DoF manipulator. The task is decomposed into an object-level planner, which generates candidate release states satisfying the desired landing pose, and a robot-level planner, which evaluates executability and constructs a feasible swing motion. Treating the release state as an explicit intermediate representation enables principled candidate filtering, adaptive selection of release and pre-swing configurations, and structured near-release motion design -- in particular, approximately constant end-effector velocities during the final swing phase to improve robustness to release-timing uncertainty. We validate on a real platform across objects of varying shape, size, and mass, achieving a 90% success rate across 120 trials. Ablation studies confirm that each design choice contributes to throwing performance, and the framework requires no prior data or learned model, enabling direct deployment on new objects and targets without environment-specific calibration or data collection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents FlipItRight, a model-based framework for stable planar pose-targeted throw-flip with a high-DoF manipulator. The task is split into an object-level planner generating candidate release states for a desired landing pose and a robot-level planner that checks executability and builds a swing trajectory, with emphasis on approximately constant end-effector velocity in the final phase to handle release-timing uncertainty. The framework uses no learned models or per-object calibration. Validation on a real robot across objects of varying shape, size, and mass reports a 90% success rate over 120 trials, with ablations supporting the design choices.

Significance. If the experimental results are reproducible with full protocol details, the explicit release-state representation and constant-velocity swing design offer a parameter-free, directly deployable method for non-prehensile throwing that generalizes without data collection. This could meaningfully advance model-based manipulation for diverse objects where learning-based alternatives require extensive training.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental Validation] Experimental section (or equivalent validation subsection): The central claim of 90% success across 120 trials on varied objects is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the manuscript supplies no information on trial protocol, exact success criteria, failure-mode categorization, object parameter ranges, or statistical measures such as confidence intervals or per-object breakdowns. This prevents assessment of whether results reflect post-hoc selection or genuine robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the 90% figure but omits any reference to the number of objects, their physical properties, or how trials were distributed; adding a brief quantitative summary would improve clarity without altering the technical content.
  2. [Method] Notation for release state and pre-swing configuration is introduced without an explicit diagram or table summarizing the variables; a small notation table would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the experimental validation. We agree that the reported 90% success rate requires fuller protocol details to allow proper assessment of robustness, and we will revise the manuscript to address this.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental Validation] Experimental section (or equivalent validation subsection): The central claim of 90% success across 120 trials on varied objects is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet the manuscript supplies no information on trial protocol, exact success criteria, failure-mode categorization, object parameter ranges, or statistical measures such as confidence intervals or per-object breakdowns. This prevents assessment of whether results reflect post-hoc selection or genuine robustness.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not provide these details. In the revised version we will expand the experimental section (and any supplementary material) to include: (1) a complete trial protocol describing setup, number of repetitions per object/target, randomization procedures, and environmental conditions; (2) precise success criteria (e.g., final pose error thresholds for position and orientation together with stability requirements); (3) a categorized breakdown of failure modes observed across trials; (4) explicit ranges and distributions of object parameters (mass, dimensions, shape categories); and (5) statistical measures including per-object success rates, overall confidence intervals, and any relevant hypothesis testing. These additions will be placed in the main text or a dedicated validation subsection so that readers can evaluate the strength of the empirical claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper describes a model-based planner that generates release states from object dynamics and constructs swing motions with constant-velocity phases, validated directly via 120 real-robot trials at 90% success across varied objects with zero learned parameters or calibration. No equations, parameters, or claims reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the reported performance is tied to external physical execution rather than internal redefinition or renaming of results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5696 in / 1144 out tokens · 34105 ms · 2026-06-28T14:39:53.678305+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Mori, W., Ueda, J., Ogasawara, T.: 1-DOF dynamic pitching robot that indepen- dently controls velocity, Angular velocity, and direction of a ball: Contact models and motion planning. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1655–1661. IEEE, Kobe (2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Miyashita, H., Yamawaki, T., Yashima, M.: Control for throwing manipulation by one joint robot. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1273–1278. IEEE, Kobe (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Journal of System Design and Dynamics 5(1), 139–154 (2011)

    Miyashita, H., Yamawaki, T., Yashima, M.: Parts Assembly and Sorting by Throw- ing Manipulation: Planning and Control. Journal of System Design and Dynamics 5(1), 139–154 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA), pp

    Sintov, A., Shapiro, A.: A stochastic dynamic motion planning algorithm for object-throwing. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA), pp. 2475–2480. IEEE, Seattle, WA, USA (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine29(3), 127–138 (2022)

    Bombile, M., Billard, A.: Dual-Arm Control for Coordinated Fast Grabbing and Tossing of an Object: Proposing a New Approach. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine29(3), 127–138 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    In: 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Senoo, T., Namiki, A., Ishikawa, M.: High-speed throwing motion based on kinetic chain approach. In: 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3206–3211. IEEE, Nice (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering7(7), 937 – 945 (2013) 16 Axel Dawne et al

    Gai, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Hoshino, Y., Emaru, T.: Motion control of a ball throw- ing robot with a flexible robotic arm. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering7(7), 937 – 945 (2013) 16 Axel Dawne et al

    2013

  8. [8]

    In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Pekarovskiy, A., Buss, M.: Optimal control goal manifolds for planar nonprehensile throwing. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4518–4524. IEEE, Tokyo (2013)

    2013

  9. [9]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(3), 2184–2191 (2024)

    Zermane, A., Dehio, N., Kheddar, A.: Planning Impact-Driven Logistic Tasks. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters9(3), 2184–2191 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Hauser, K.: Sampling-based motion planning with dynamic intermediate state objectives: Application to throwing. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2551–2556. IEEE (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, pp

    Lombai, F., Szederkenyi, G.: Throwing motion generation using nonlinear opti- mization on a 6-degree-of-freedom robot manipulator. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Malaga, Spain (2009)

    2009

  12. [12]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems167, 104,481 (2023)

    Bombile, M., Billard, A.: Bimanual dynamic grabbing and tossing of objects onto a moving target. Robotics and Autonomous Systems167, 104,481 (2023)

    2023

  13. [13]

    , Chien, M.-C., Chang, Y.-J., Su, S.-H., Kai, C.-Y.: A ball-throwing robot with visual feedback

    Hu, J.-S. , Chien, M.-C., Chang, Y.-J., Su, S.-H., Kai, C.-Y.: A ball-throwing robot with visual feedback. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2511–2512. IEEE, Taipei (2010)

    2010

  14. [14]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems (IROS), pp

    Liu, Y., Nayak, A., Billard, A.: A Solution to Adaptive Mobile Manipulator Throw- ing. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems (IROS), pp. 1625–1632. IEEE, Kyoto, Japan (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering pp

    Aslam, S., Kumar, K., Zhou, P., Yu, H., Wang, M.Y., She, Y.: DartBot: Overhand Throwing of Deformable Objects with Tactile Sensing and Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering pp. 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Deep Predictive Policy Training using Reinforcement Learning

    Ghadirzadeh, A., Maki, A., Kragic, D., Bj¨ orkman, M.: Deep Predictive Policy Training using Reinforcement Learning (2017). ArXiv:1703.00727 [cs]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    ArXiv:2405.19001 [cs]

    Werner, L., Nan, F., Eyschen, P., Spinelli, F.A., Yang, H., Hutter, M.: Dynamic Throwing with Robotic Material Handling Machines (2024). ArXiv:2405.19001 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Kober, J., Muelling, K., Peters, J.: Learning throwing and catching skills. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5167–5168 (2012)

    2012

  19. [19]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(2), 576–583 (2023)

    Monastirsky, M., Azulay, O., Sintov, A.: Learning to Throw With a Handful of Samples Using Decision Transformers. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 8(2), 576–583 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    In: 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Liu, Y., Costa, B.D., Billard, A.: Learning to throw-flip. In: 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    In: Pro- ceedings

    Aboaf, E., Atkeson, C., Reinkensmeyer, D.: Task-level robot learning. In: Pro- ceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1309–1310. IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Philadelphia, PA, USA (1988)

    1988

  22. [22]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Kasaei, H., Kasaei, M.: Throwing Objects into A Moving Basket While Avoiding Obstacles. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3051–3057. IEEE, London, United Kingdom (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics 36(4), 1307–1319 (2020)

    Zeng, A., Song, S., Lee, J., Rodriguez, A., Funkhouser, T.: TossingBot: Learning to Throw Arbitrary Objects With Residual Physics. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 36(4), 1307–1319 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 3232–3251 (2024)

    Chen, L., Lu, W., Zhang, K., Zhang, Y., Zhao, L., Zheng, Y.: TossNet: Learning to Accurately Measure and Predict Robot Throwing of Arbitrary Objects in Real Time With Proprioceptive Sensing. IEEE Transactions on Robotics40, 3232–3251 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006)

    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006)

    2006