pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02555 · v2 · pith:6LPHKM5Inew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el

Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

Chong Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 14:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breakingSW-SSBopen quantum systemsmixed statestopological orderemergent hydrodynamicsphases of matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking unifies phases of matter in open quantum and classical systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how extending spontaneous symmetry breaking from pure states to general mixed states creates the concept of strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking. It starts from the standard statistical mechanics equivalence between canonical and grand-canonical ensembles and shows that this extension organizes many separate lines of work. A reader would care because the resulting framework links topological orders, emergent hydrodynamics, and information-theoretic descriptions of phases under a single symmetry-breaking picture. The review surveys recent developments that follow from this starting point.

Core claim

Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking has grown into a unifying perspective that connects topological orders, emergent hydrodynamics, and information-theoretic characterization of phases of matter, all built on the extension of symmetry breaking to mixed states together with ensemble equivalence.

What carries the argument

Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SW-SSB), the distinction between strong and weak forms of symmetry breaking that applies to general mixed states and thereby organizes multiple physical concepts.

If this is right

  • SW-SSB applies equally to quantum and classical open systems.
  • It supplies an information-theoretic language for distinguishing phases.
  • It relates symmetry breaking directly to topological order and to hydrodynamic behavior.
  • It organizes existing results on phases in open systems under one symmetry-based description.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mixed-state distinction might classify additional phases that current closed-system tools miss.
  • Hydrodynamic links suggest SW-SSB could be tested in driven dissipative fluids or active matter.
  • Information measures tied to weak breaking could guide diagnostics for open-system quantum simulators.

Load-bearing premise

Extending symmetry breaking to general mixed states, together with the equivalence between canonical and grand-canonical ensembles, supplies the foundation for treating SW-SSB as a unifying framework.

What would settle it

A concrete phase of matter realized in an open system whose properties cannot be captured by either the strong or weak form of symmetry breaking would falsify the claim of unification.

read the original abstract

Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SW-SSB) has recently emerged as a useful framework for studying phases of matter in open systems, quantum or classical. Beginning with the simple idea of extending symmetry breaking to general mixed states, and the familiar equivalence between canonical and grand-canonical ensembles in statistical mechanics, the concept has grown into a unifying perspective connecting many different ideas in physics, including topological orders, emergent hydrodynamics, and information-theoretic characterization of phases of matter. This review provides a bird's-eye view of some of these recent developments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that presents strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking (SW-SSB) as a framework originating from the extension of symmetry breaking to general mixed states together with canonical-grand-canonical ensemble equivalence. It surveys how this concept has developed into a unifying perspective that connects topological orders, emergent hydrodynamics, and information-theoretic characterizations of phases of matter, offering a bird's-eye view of recent developments in open quantum and classical systems.

Significance. As a review paper, the work aggregates and organizes existing literature on symmetry breaking in mixed states. If the surveyed connections are faithfully represented, the manuscript could provide a useful high-level synthesis for researchers working on open-system phases and phase classification, though its significance is primarily organizational rather than the introduction of new technical results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a review that organizes recent developments on strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry breaking. We appreciate the recommendation to accept and the acknowledgment of its potential utility for researchers in open quantum systems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review aggregates literature without new derivations

full rationale

This paper is a review that explicitly frames its content as a survey of existing developments in SW-SSB, beginning from the established extension of symmetry breaking to mixed states and the standard canonical-grand canonical equivalence. No original derivations, predictions, or first-principles results are claimed that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claim of a unifying perspective is descriptive of prior literature rather than a load-bearing theorem or fitted result internal to the paper. No self-citations function as unverified foundations for new claims, and the text contains no equations or steps that equate outputs to inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper summarizing prior literature; it introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities of its own.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5604 in / 970 out tokens · 30438 ms · 2026-06-28T14:14:22.873754+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hierarchy of mixed symmetry protected topological states in extended cluster states under subsystem decoherence

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Subsystem decoherence on extended cluster states generates a hierarchy of mixed SPT phases ending in Z2 SWSSB with glassy GHZ entanglement.

  2. Static features from mixing in short- and long-range Lindbladians: Markov property and correlations

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Rapid mixing and frustration-freeness in short- and long-range Lindbladians imply polynomial decay of MI and CMI in fixed points, and long-range non-commuting Gibbs states satisfy local Markov property at any temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 12 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Landau LD, Lifshitz EM. 1980. Statistical Physics, Part 1. vol. 5 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann

    1980

  2. [2]

    2023.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14:57–82

    McGreevy J. 2023.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14:57–82

    2023

  3. [3]

    2021.Phys

    Garratt SJ, Chalker JT. 2021.Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2):026802

    2021

  4. [4]

    2023.PRX Quantum4(3):030317

    Lee JY, Jian CM, Xu C. 2023.PRX Quantum4(3):030317

    2023

  5. [5]

    2023.Phys

    Ogunnaike O, Feldmeier J, Lee JY. 2023.Phys. Rev. Lett.131(22):220403

    2023

  6. [6]

    2024.PRX Quantum5(4):040330

    Moudgalya S, Motrunich OI. 2024.PRX Quantum5(4):040330

    2024

  7. [7]

    2024.PRX Quantum5(3):030310

    Chen YH, Grover T. 2024.PRX Quantum5(3):030310

    2024

  8. [8]

    2025.Physical Review X15(2):021062

    Ma R, Zhang JH, Bi Z, Cheng M, Wang C. 2025.Physical Review X15(2):021062

    2025

  9. [9]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010344

    Lessa LA, Ma R, Zhang JH, Bi Z, Cheng M, Wang C. 2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010344

    2025

  10. [10]

    2024.Physical Review B110(15):155150

    Sala P, Gopalakrishnan S, Oshikawa M, You Y. 2024.Physical Review B110(15):155150

    2024

  11. [11]

    2012.New Journal of Physics14(7):073007

    Buˇ ca B, Prosen T. 2012.New Journal of Physics14(7):073007

    2012

  12. [12]

    2014.Phys

    Albert VV, Jiang L. 2014.Phys. Rev. A89(2):022118

    2014

  13. [13]

    2025.Phys

    Sang S, Hsieh TH. 2025.Phys. Rev. Lett.134(7):070403

    2025

  14. [14]

    2011.Physical review letters107(21):210501

    Hastings MB. 2011.Physical review letters107(21):210501

    2011

  15. [15]

    2019.Quantum3:174

    Coser A, P´ erez-Garc´ ıa D. 2019.Quantum3:174

    2019

  16. [16]

    2022.Quantum6:856

    de Groot C, Turzillo A, Schuch N. 2022.Quantum6:856

    2022

  17. [17]

    2023.Phys

    Ma R, Wang C. 2023.Phys. Rev. X13(3):031016

    2023

  18. [18]

    2024.PRX Quantum5(2):020343

    Fan R, Bao Y, Altman E, Vishwanath A. 2024.PRX Quantum5(2):020343

    2024

  19. [19]

    2022.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2210.16323

    Lee JY, You YZ, Xu C. 2022.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2210.16323

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    2024.Phys

    Chen YH, Grover T. 2024.Phys. Rev. Lett.132(17):170602

    2024

  21. [21]

    2024.Phys

    Sang S, Zou Y, Hsieh TH. 2024.Phys. Rev. X14(3):031044

    2024

  22. [22]

    2024.Phys

    Rakovszky T, Gopalakrishnan S, von Keyserlingk C. 2024.Phys. Rev. X14(4):041031

    2024

  23. [23]

    2025.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12792

    Lessa LA, Sang S, Lu TC, Hsieh TH, Wang C. 2025.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.12792

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    2025.arXiv e-prints :arXiv:2507.02292

    Sang S, Lessa LA, Mong RSK, Grover T, Wang C, Hsieh TH. 2025.arXiv e-prints :arXiv:2507.02292

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    2026.arXiv e-prints :arXiv:2604.16137

    Wang S, Kiely TG, Tell D, Obermeyer J, Barendregt M, et al. 2026.arXiv e-prints :arXiv:2604.16137

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    1966.Reviews of Modern Physics38(2):298–310

    Anderson PW. 1966.Reviews of Modern Physics38(2):298–310

    1966

  27. [27]

    2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2409.18944

    Zhang JH, Xu C, Xu Y. 2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2409.18944

    arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    1975.Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics5(5):965

    Edwards SF, Anderson PW. 1975.Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics5(5):965

    1975

  29. [29]

    2026.to appear

    Lessa LA. 2026.to appear

    2026

  30. [30]

    2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2509.09669

    Ziereis N, Moudgalya S, Knap M. 2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2509.09669

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    2025.Communications Physics8(1):274

    Liu Z, Chen L, Zhang Y, Zhou S, Zhang P. 2025.Communications Physics8(1):274

    2025

  32. [32]

    2025.Phys

    Weinstein Z. 2025.Phys. Rev. Lett.134(15):150405

    2025

  33. [33]

    Zhang JH, Qi Y, Bi Z. 2026. Fidelity strange correlators for average symmetry-protected topological phases

    2026

  34. [34]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010348

    Ma R, Turzillo A. 2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010348

    2025

  35. [35]

    2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2403.17069

    Xue H, Lee JY, Bao Y. 2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2403.17069

    arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    2025.Phys

    Guo Y, Zhang JH, Zhang HR, Yang S, Bi Z. 2025.Phys. Rev. X15(2):021060

    2025

  37. [37]

    2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2411.07174

    Lu S, Zhu P, Lu YM. 2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2411.07174

    arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2507.00127

    Manjunath N, Turzillo A, Wang C. 2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2507.00127

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    2023.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2301.05687

    Bao Y, Fan R, Vishwanath A, Altman E. 2023.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2301.05687

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010314

    Wang Z, Wu Z, Wang Z. 2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010314

    2025

  41. [41]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010313

    Sohal R, Prem A. 2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010313

    2025

  42. [42]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010315

    Ellison TD, Cheng M. 2025.PRX Quantum6(1):010315

    2025

  43. [43]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.00088

    Li Z, Firanko R, Hsieh TH. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.00088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    2026.to appear

    Huang X, Sang S, Wang C, Zou Y. 2026.to appear

    2026

  45. [45]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2601.13333

    Liu Y, Zou Y. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2601.13333

    arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    2024.Phys

    Kuno Y, Orito T, Ichinose I. 2024.Phys. Rev. B110(9):094106 www.annualreviews.org • Strong-to-Weak SSB 23

    2024

  47. [47]

    2025.Phys

    Guo Y, Yang S. 2025.Phys. Rev. B111(20):L201108

    2025

  48. [48]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.06363

    Shu C, Zhang K, Luo ZX, You Y, Sun K. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.06363

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.24342

    Ding YM, Guo Y, Bi Z, Yan Z. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.24342

    arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.24671

    Sarma A, Xu C. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2603.24671

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    2024.Quantum8:1222

    Gily´ en A, Poremba A. 2024.Quantum8:1222

    2024

  52. [52]

    2025.Phys

    Feng X, Cheng Z, Ippoliti M. 2025.Phys. Rev. Lett.135(20):200402

    2025

  53. [53]

    Bratteli O, Robinson DW. 2012. Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Vol- ume 1: C*- and W*- Algebras. Symmetry Groups. Decomposition of States. Springer Science & Business Media

    2012

  54. [54]

    Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. 2010. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th An- niversary Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    2010

  55. [55]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.28967

    Divi F, Lessa LA, Wang C. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.28967

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.28925

    Liu R, Yi J, Else DV. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.28925

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.29113

    Zhang C. 2026.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2605.29113

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    2016.Advances in Physics65(3):239–362

    D’Alessio L, Kafri Y, Polkovnikov A, Rigol M. 2016.Advances in Physics65(3):239–362

    2016

  59. [59]

    2023.Phys

    Zhu GY, Tantivasadakarn N, Vishwanath A, Trebst S, Verresen R. 2023.Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(20):200201

    2023

  60. [60]

    2022.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2208.11699

    Lee JY, Ji W, Bi Z, Fisher MPA. 2022.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2208.11699

    arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    1980.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(21):4071–4076

    Nishimori H. 1980.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(21):4071–4076

    1980

  62. [62]

    2002.Phys

    Merz F, Chalker JT. 2002.Phys. Rev. B66(5):054413

    2002

  63. [64]

    2002.Physical Review B65(5):054425

    Merz F, Chalker J. 2002.Physical Review B65(5):054425

    2002

  64. [65]

    2001.Phys

    Honecker A, Picco M, Pujol P. 2001.Phys. Rev. Lett.87(4):047201

    2001

  65. [66]

    2006.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006(09):P09006

    Picco M, Honecker A, Pujol P. 2006.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006(09):P09006

    2006

  66. [67]

    2008.Phys

    Hasenbusch M, Toldin FP, Pelissetto A, Vicari E. 2008.Phys. Rev. E77(5):051115

    2008

  67. [68]

    2002.Journal of Mathematical Physics43(9):4452– 4505

    Dennis E, Kitaev A, Landahl A, Preskill J. 2002.Journal of Mathematical Physics43(9):4452– 4505

    2002

  68. [69]

    2003.Annals of Physics303(1):31–58

    Wang C, Harrington J, Preskill J. 2003.Annals of Physics303(1):31–58

    2003

  69. [70]

    1979.Rev

    Kogut JB. 1979.Rev. Mod. Phys.51(4):659–713

    1979

  70. [71]

    2025.PRX Quantum6(4):040311

    Guo Y, Yang S, Yu XJ. 2025.PRX Quantum6(4):040311

    2025

  71. [72]

    2025.Quantum9:1912

    Shah J, Fechisin C, Wang YX, Iosue JT, Watson JD, et al. 2025.Quantum9:1912

    2025

  72. [73]

    2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2410.24225

    Kim J, Altman E, Lee JY. 2024.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2410.24225

    arXiv 2024

  73. [74]

    2025.Phys

    Chen L, Sun N, Zhang P. 2025.Phys. Rev. B111(6):L060304

    2025

  74. [75]

    2008.Phys

    Wolf MM, Verstraete F, Hastings MB, Cirac JI. 2008.Phys. Rev. Lett.100(7):070502

    2008

  75. [76]

    2006.Phys

    Levin M, Wen XG. 2006.Phys. Rev. Lett.96(11):110405

    2006

  76. [77]

    2015.Communications in Mathematical Physics340(2):575–611

    Fawzi O, Renner R. 2015.Communications in Mathematical Physics340(2):575–611

    2015

  77. [78]

    1986.Communications in Mathematical Physics105(1):123–131

    Petz D. 1986.Communications in Mathematical Physics105(1):123–131

    1986

  78. [79]

    2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2504.02208

    Chen CF, Rouz´ e C. 2025.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:2504.02208

    arXiv 2025

  79. [80]

    2016.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:1609.06636

    Kato K, Brandao FGSL. 2016.arXiv e-prints:arXiv:1609.06636

    arXiv 2016

  80. [81]

    2025.Physical Review X15(4):041010

    Kuwahara T. 2025.Physical Review X15(4):041010

    2025

Showing first 80 references.