pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03876 · v1 · pith:EZKB4C6Mnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI· cs.MA

From 'What' to 'How' and 'Why': Sharing LLM-Generated Retrospective Summaries of Older Adults' Passive Tracking Data with Remote Family Members

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AIcs.MA
keywords LLM-generated summariesremote family membersolder adultspassive tracking dataretrospective summariessensemakingmulti-agent systemscare coordination
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-layer, multi-agent LLM system produces retrospective summaries of older adults' tracking data that remote family members rate significantly higher in satisfaction, helpfulness, trust, and willingness to receive.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how large language models can turn heterogeneous passive tracking data into narrative retrospective summaries useful to remote family members who have emotional investment but little daily visibility into an older adult's life. Initial probe summaries stayed close to raw statistics and event lists; interviews with 11 remote family members showed these left users wanting explanations of context and meaning. The authors therefore rebuilt the generation pipeline as a multi-layer, multi-agent process that starts with objective measures, adds behavioral descriptions, and finally supplies insight-driven narratives. When the same participants compared the new versions against the old ones in a survey, they reported clear gains on every measured dimension. The work therefore argues that AI summaries for this audience succeed when they move from answering 'what' data were collected to answering 'how' the person is doing and 'why' that matters.

Core claim

Redesigning the summary generator into a multi-layer, multi-agent, insight-driven pipeline that progresses from objective statistics and descriptions to enriched, context-aware narratives produces summaries that the same 11 remote family members judge significantly better on satisfaction, perceived helpfulness, trust, and willingness to receive than the initial probe versions.

What carries the argument

The multi-layer, multi-agent, insight-driven summary approach, which constructs narratives by layering objective data, behavioral descriptions, and context-aware interpretations.

If this is right

  • Remote family members gain a clearer picture of daily patterns and can coordinate care with less uncertainty.
  • Designers should prioritize narrative layers that address 'how' and 'why' rather than stopping at raw data presentation.
  • The same staged generation method can be reused for other stakeholders who need both facts and interpretation.
  • Willingness to keep receiving AI summaries rises when the output supplies actionable context instead of lists of events.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may transfer to other family-care scenarios such as monitoring chronic illness or post-operative recovery.
  • Adding mechanisms for family members to inject their own background knowledge could further increase perceived relevance.
  • Longitudinal deployment would reveal whether repeated use sustains the reported gains in trust and helpfulness.

Load-bearing premise

The improvements observed with 11 remote family members are caused by the specific redesign rather than by repeated exposure to any summaries or by the small sample's particular preferences.

What would settle it

A new study with fresh remote family members that finds no statistically significant difference in satisfaction, trust, or willingness between the two summary styles would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03876 by Akshat Choube, Elizabeth Mynatt, Jiachen Li, Reina Szeyi Chan, Varun Mishra, Xiang Zhi Tan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System design of the initial LLM-based retrospective summaries adapted from Vital Insight. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Persona of the older adult and sensing infrastructure presented to RFMs during the interviews. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Conceptual framework and design of a multi-layer, multi-agent system for insight-driven summary generation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution, mean, and standard deviation of survey results comparing initial and redesigned summaries rated by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two paragraph formats of initial summaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two bullet-point formats of initial summaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Redesigned summaries examples on a full data day (July 8th). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

With the growing prevalence of modern ubiquitous computing technologies, multi-modal tracking systems hold promise for providing timely awareness and reassurance to stakeholders such as remote family members (RFMs) of older adults, who play a central role in care coordination. However, combining heterogeneous data streams into high-level, meaningful content - such as retrospective summaries - remains challenging. While recent work has demonstrated the promise of large language models (LLMs) for interpreting multi-modal tracking data, less attention has been given to generating narrative accounts for stakeholders like RFMs, who possess rich personal knowledge of older adults and strong emotional responsibility, yet have limited visibility into their daily lives and limited capacity for caregiving. In this work, we explore how LLMs can be used to generate retrospective summaries from multi-modal tracking data for RFMs of older adults. We leveraged and customized an existing system, Vital Insight, to generate initial summaries on different dates and data availability scenarios as technology probes, and conducted interviews with 11 RFMs to gather feedback. Based on these insights, we redesigned the system into a multi-layer, multi-agent, insight-driven summary approach that builds from objective statistics and descriptions to enriched, context-aware narratives. We then compared the redesigned summaries with the initial versions through a survey with the same 11 RFMs and found significant improvements in satisfaction, perceived helpfulness, trust, and willingness to receive the summaries. We conclude by presenting design implications for AI-generated summaries for RFMs and broader contexts, emphasizing the need to support RFMs' sensemaking shift from simply presenting ''What'' data were collected, to explaining ''How'' is my loved one doing and ''Why''.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper explores using LLMs to generate retrospective summaries from multi-modal passive tracking data for remote family members (RFMs) of older adults. It customizes the Vital Insight system to produce initial summaries as technology probes, conducts interviews with 11 RFMs to collect feedback, redesigns the system into a multi-layer multi-agent insight-driven approach that progresses from objective statistics to context-aware narratives, and then surveys the same 11 RFMs to report significant improvements in satisfaction, perceived helpfulness, trust, and willingness to receive the summaries. The work ends with design implications for shifting AI summaries from 'What' data to 'How' and 'Why' explanations.

Significance. If the reported improvements prove robust, the work offers timely design guidance for LLM-generated narratives in ubiquitous computing and caregiving contexts, where RFMs have emotional stakes but limited visibility into daily data. It usefully distinguishes objective description from enriched sensemaking support.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Evaluation] Abstract and evaluation description: the headline claim of 'significant improvements' in satisfaction, helpfulness, trust, and willingness rests on a within-subjects survey using the identical 11 RFMs for both initial and redesigned summaries. No information is supplied on counterbalancing of order, blinding, statistical correction for sequence effects, or power analysis for N=11; the observed gains could therefore arise from repeated exposure or task familiarity rather than the shift to multi-layer, multi-agent narratives. This directly weakens the central empirical result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'significant improvements' is stated without accompanying details on the statistical tests, effect sizes, or confidence intervals used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The methodological concern raised is valid and we address it directly below, with planned revisions to better contextualize our evaluation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / Evaluation] Abstract and evaluation description: the headline claim of 'significant improvements' in satisfaction, helpfulness, trust, and willingness rests on a within-subjects survey using the identical 11 RFMs for both initial and redesigned summaries. No information is supplied on counterbalancing of order, blinding, statistical correction for sequence effects, or power analysis for N=11; the observed gains could therefore arise from repeated exposure or task familiarity rather than the shift to multi-layer, multi-agent narratives. This directly weakens the central empirical result.

    Authors: We acknowledge this limitation in the current manuscript. The study was conducted sequentially: initial summaries were generated as technology probes, interviews were held with the 11 RFMs to collect feedback, the system was then redesigned based on that input, and a follow-up survey compared both versions with the same participants. Consequently, presentation order was not counterbalanced, participants were not blinded (having previously seen the initial summaries), no power analysis was performed, and sequence-effect corrections were not applied. We agree these factors could contribute to the observed differences. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit limitations subsection to the Evaluation section discussing these issues and their implications, qualify the claims of 'significant improvements' in the abstract and conclusion to note the within-subjects design and potential confounds, and report additional details on the statistical tests used. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical HCI study with interviews and surveys; no derivations, equations, or fitted predictions present

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical process: customizing an existing system as probes, conducting interviews with 11 RFMs for feedback, redesigning into a multi-layer multi-agent approach, and running a follow-up survey with the same participants to compare versions. No mathematical models, parameter fitting, predictions derived from inputs, or self-citation chains appear in the provided abstract or described structure. The central claims rest on participant ratings rather than any self-referential reduction. This matches the default expectation of no circularity for non-theoretical empirical work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a human-centered design study relying on standard HCI assumptions about user studies rather than mathematical axioms or new entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Qualitative feedback from a small number of stakeholders can reliably inform system redesign and predict user satisfaction improvements.
    The paper uses interview insights to redesign and then validates with survey on same group.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5866 in / 1267 out tokens · 31504 ms · 2026-06-28T08:12:21.071469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    From information to reflection-design strategies for personal informatics

    Naseem Ahmadpour and Karen Anne Cochrane. From information to reflection-design strategies for personal informatics. In2017 IEEE Life Sciences Conference (LSC), pages 103–106, 2017

  2. [2]

    Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.Maturitas, 124:100–110, 2019

    Muaddi Alharbi, Nicola Straiton, Sidney Smith, Lis Neubeck, and Robyn Gallagher. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.Maturitas, 124:100–110, 2019

  3. [3]

    who wants to know all this stuff?!

    Sami Alkhatib, Ryan Kelly, Jenny Waycott, George Buchanan, Marthie Grobler, and Shuo Wang. “who wants to know all this stuff?!”: Understanding older adults’ privacy concerns in aged care monitoring devices.Interacting with Computers, 2021

  4. [4]

    you get reminded you’re a sick person

    Jessica S Ancker, Holly O Witteman, Baria Hafeez, Thierry Provencher, Mary Van de Graaf, and Esther Wei. “you get reminded you’re a sick person”: personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions.Journal of medical Internet research, 17(8):e202, 2015

  5. [5]

    Older people are more likely to live alone in the u.s

    Jacob Ausubel. Older people are more likely to live alone in the u.s. than elsewhere in the world, 2020

  6. [6]

    i could wear it all of the time, just like my wedding ring:

    Laura-Bianca Bilius and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. “i could wear it all of the time, just like my wedding ring:” insights into older people’s perceptions of smart rings. InExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’23, page 1–8, New York, NY, USA, April 2023. Association for Computing Machinery

  7. [7]

    Bias beneath the tone: Empirical characterisation of tone bias in llm-driven ux systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19950, 2025

    Heet Bodara, Md Masum Mushfiq, and Isma Farah Siddiqui. Bias beneath the tone: Empirical characterisation of tone bias in llm-driven ux systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19950, 2025

  8. [8]

    The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review.The Gerontologist, 59(5):e629–e642, 2019

    Judith Bom, Pieter Bakx, Frederik Schut, and Eddy Van Doorslaer. The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review.The Gerontologist, 59(5):e629–e642, 2019

  9. [9]

    Co-designing customizable clinical dashboards with multidisciplinary teams: Bridging the gap in chronic disease care

    Diogo Branco, Margarida Móteiro, Raquel Bouça-Machado, Rita Miranda, Tiago Reis, Élia Decoroso, Rita Cardoso, Joana Ramalho, Filipa Rato, Joana Malheiro, Diana Miranda, Verónica Caniça, Filipa Pona-Ferreira, Daniela Guerreiro, Mariana Leitão, Alexandra Saúde Braz, Joaquim J Ferreira, and Tiago Guerreiro. Co-designing customizable clinical dashboards with ...

  10. [10]

    Association for Computing Machinery. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026. From ‘What’ to ‘How’ and ‘Why’: Sharing LLM-Generated Retrospective Summaries of Older Adults’ Passive Tracking Data with Remote Family Members•23

  11. [11]

    Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2):77, 2006

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2):77, 2006

  12. [12]

    Senior care for aging in place: balancing assistance and independence

    Clara Caldeira, Matthew Bietz, Marisol Vidauri, and Yunan Chen. Senior care for aging in place: balancing assistance and independence. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pages 1605–1617, 2017

  13. [13]

    Understanding socio-technical opportunities for enhancing communication between older adults and their remote family

    Baihui Chen and Xueliang Li. Understanding socio-technical opportunities for enhancing communication between older adults and their remote family. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–16, 2024

  14. [14]

    Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury.The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 14(2):176–188, 1999

    Randall M Chesnut, Nancy Carney, Hugo Maynard, N Clay Mann, Patricia Patterson, and Mark Helfand. Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury.The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 14(2):176–188, 1999

  15. [15]

    Akshat Choube, Ha Le, Jiachen Li, Kaixin Ji, Vedant Das Swain, and Varun Mishra. Gloss: Group of llms for open-ended sensemaking of passive sensing data for health and wellbeing.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 9(3):1–32, 2025

  16. [16]

    The carenet display: lessons learned from an in home evaluation of an ambient display

    Sunny Consolvo, Peter Roessler, and Brett E Shelton. The carenet display: lessons learned from an in home evaluation of an ambient display. InInternational conference on ubiquitous computing, pages 1–17. Springer, 2004

  17. [17]

    Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative sociology, 13(1):3–21, 1990

    Juliet M Corbin and Anselm Strauss. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative sociology, 13(1):3–21, 1990

  18. [18]

    Towards a personal health large language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06474, 2024

    Justin Cosentino, Anastasiya Belyaeva, Xin Liu, Nicholas A Furlotte, Zhun Yang, Chace Lee, Erik Schenck, Yojan Patel, Jian Cui, Logan Douglas Schneider, et al. Towards a personal health large language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06474, 2024

  19. [19]

    Comparative study between formal and informal caregivers of older adults.Ciencia & saude coletiva, 23:3789–3798, 2018

    Maria Angélica Andreotti Diniz, Beatriz Rodrigues de Souza Melo, Karolina Helena Neri, Francine Golghetto Casemiro, Leandro Correa Figueiredo, Cheila Cristina Leonardo de Oliveira Gaioli, and Aline Cristina Martins Gratão. Comparative study between formal and informal caregivers of older adults.Ciencia & saude coletiva, 23:3789–3798, 2018

  20. [20]

    The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities.Journal of aging research, 2012, 2012

    Charles A Emlet and Joane T Moceri. The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities.Journal of aging research, 2012, 2012

  21. [21]

    Zachary Englhardt, Chengqian Ma, Margaret E Morris, Chun-Cheng Chang, Xuhai" Orson" Xu, Lianhui Qin, Daniel McDuff, Xin Liu, Shwetak Patel, and Vikram Iyer. From classification to clinical insights: Towards analyzing and reasoning about mobile and behavioral health data with large language models.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and...

  22. [22]

    Benefits and challenges of conversational agents in older adults: a scoping review.Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 55(5):381–387, 2022

    Christiane Even, Torsten Hammann, Vera Heyl, Christian Rietz, Hans-Werner Wahl, Peter Zentel, and Anna Schlomann. Benefits and challenges of conversational agents in older adults: a scoping review.Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 55(5):381–387, 2022

  23. [23]

    Physiollm: Supporting personalized health insights with wearables and large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19283, 2024

    Cathy Mengying Fang, Valdemar Danry, Nathan Whitmore, Andria Bao, Andrew Hutchison, Cayden Pierce, and Pattie Maes. Physiollm: Supporting personalized health insights with wearables and large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.19283, 2024

  24. [24]

    Aging in place: A state survey of livability policies and practices

    Nicholas Farber, Douglas Shinkle, Jana Lynott, Wendy Fox-Grage, and Rodney Harrell. Aging in place: A state survey of livability policies and practices. 2011

  25. [25]

    A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model

    Pedro Felzenszwalb, David McAllester, and Deva Ramanan. A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model. In2008 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1–8. Ieee, 2008

  26. [26]

    Public health terms for planners and planning terms for public health professionals, 2013

    Centers for Disease Control, Prevention, et al. Public health terms for planners and planning terms for public health professionals, 2013

  27. [27]

    The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research.Nursing research, 17(4):364, 1968

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss, and Elizabeth Strutzel. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research.Nursing research, 17(4):364, 1968

  28. [28]

    Effect of selection format on llm performance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06926, 2025

    Yuchen Han, Yucheng Wu, and Jeffrey Willard. Effect of selection format on llm performance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06926, 2025

  29. [29]

    What’s happening at home: a claims-based approach to better understand home clinical care received by older adults.Medical care, 58(4):360–367, 2020

    Krista L Harrison, Bruce Leff, Aylin Altan, Stephan Dunning, Casey R Patterson, and Christine S Ritchie. What’s happening at home: a claims-based approach to better understand home clinical care received by older adults.Medical care, 58(4):360–367, 2020

  30. [30]

    Dancing with the roles: Towards designing technology that supports the multifaceted roles of caregivers for older adults

    Long-Jing Hsu and Chia-Fang Chung. Dancing with the roles: Towards designing technology that supports the multifaceted roles of caregivers for older adults. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2024

  31. [31]

    Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families

    Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, et al. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 17–24, 2003

  32. [32]

    Hargpt: Are llms zero-shot human activity recognizers?arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02727, 2024

    Sijie Ji, Xinzhe Zheng, and Chenshu Wu. Hargpt: Are llms zero-shot human activity recognizers?arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02727, 2024

  33. [33]

    Older adults and mobile phones for health: a review.Journal of biomedical informatics, 46(5):947–954, 2013

    Jonathan Joe and George Demiris. Older adults and mobile phones for health: a review.Journal of biomedical informatics, 46(5):947–954, 2013

  34. [34]

    Jeffrey A Kaye, Shoshana A Maxwell, Nora Mattek, Tamara L Hayes, Hiroko Dodge, Misha Pavel, Holly B Jimison, Katherine Wild, Linda Boise, and Tracy A Zitzelberger. Intelligent systems for assessing aging changes: home-based, unobtrusive, and continuous assessment of aging.Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(sup...

  35. [35]

    Health-llm: Large language models for health prediction via wearable sensor data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06866, 2024

    Yubin Kim, Xuhai Xu, Daniel McDuff, Cynthia Breazeal, and Hae Won Park. Health-llm: Large language models for health prediction via wearable sensor data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06866, 2024

  36. [36]

    The use of wearable activity trackers among older adults: focus group study of tracker perceptions, motivators, and barriers in the maintenance stage of behavior change

    Anastasia Kononova, Lin Li, Kendra Kamp, Marie Bowen, RV Rikard, Shelia Cotten, Wei Peng, et al. The use of wearable activity trackers among older adults: focus group study of tracker perceptions, motivators, and barriers in the maintenance stage of behavior change. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(4):e9832, 2019. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: J...

  37. [37]

    A multi-agent llm network for suggesting and correcting human activity and posture annotations

    Ha Le, Akshat Choube, Vedant Das Swain, Varun Mishra, and Stephen Intille. A multi-agent llm network for suggesting and correcting human activity and posture annotations. InCompanion of the 2025 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 877–884, 2025

  38. [38]

    Jiachen Li, Xiwen Li, Justin Steinberg, Akshat Choube, Bingsheng Yao, Xuhai Xu, Dakuo Wang, Elizabeth Mynatt, and Varun Mishra. Vital insight: Assisting experts’ context-driven sensemaking of multi-modal personal tracking data using visualization and human-in-the-loop llm.Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies,...

  39. [39]

    Privacy vs

    Jiachen Li, Bingrui Zong, Tingyu Cheng, Yunzhi Li, Elizabeth D Mynatt, and Ashutosh Dhekne. Privacy vs. awareness: Relieving the tension between older adults and adult children when sharing in-home activity data.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2):1–30, 2023

  40. [40]

    Burden, satisfaction caregiving, and family relations in informal caregivers of older adults.Frontiers in Medicine, 9:1059467, 2022

    Jéssica da Silva Marinho, Ilaise Brilhante Batista, Rute Alessandra da Silva Nobre, Maria Sortênia Alves Guimarães, Ariene Angelini dos Santos-Orlandi, Tábatta Renata Pereira Brito, Valéria Pagotto, Maria Giovana Borges Saidel, Suzimar de Fátima Benato Fusco, Flavia de Oliveira Motta Maia, et al. Burden, satisfaction caregiving, and family relations in in...

  41. [41]

    Categorizing sources of information for explanations in conversational ai systems for older adults aging in place.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05111, 2024

    Niharika Mathur, Tamara Zubatiy, and Elizabeth Mynatt. Categorizing sources of information for explanations in conversational ai systems for older adults aging in place.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05111, 2024

  42. [42]

    Older adults’ experiences using a commercially available monitor to self-track their physical activity.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2):e5120, 2016

    Siobhan K McMahon, Beth Lewis, Michael Oakes, Weihua Guan, Jean F Wyman, and Alexander J Rothman. Older adults’ experiences using a commercially available monitor to self-track their physical activity.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2):e5120, 2016

  43. [43]

    Functional privacy concerns of older adults about pervasive health- monitoring systems

    Andrew McNeill, Pam Briggs, Jake Pywell, and Lynne Coventry. Functional privacy concerns of older adults about pervasive health- monitoring systems. InProceedings of the 10th international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments, pages 96–102, 2017

  44. [44]

    Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review.BMC health services research, 7(1):47, 2007

    Patriek Mistiaen, Anneke L Francke, and Else Poot. Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review.BMC health services research, 7(1):47, 2007

  45. [45]

    Aware technologies for aging in place: understanding user needs and attitudes.IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2):36–41, 2004

    Elizabeth D Mynatt, A-S Melenhorst, A-D Fisk, and Wendy A Rogers. Aware technologies for aging in place: understanding user needs and attitudes.IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2):36–41, 2004

  46. [46]

    Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members

    Elizabeth D Mynatt, Jim Rowan, Sarah Craighill, and Annie Jacobs. Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 333–340, 2001

  47. [47]

    Activity summarisation and fall detection in a supportive home environment

    Hammadi Nait-Charif and Stephen J McKenna. Activity summarisation and fall detection in a supportive home environment. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004., volume 4, pages 323–326. IEEE, 2004

  48. [48]

    Contextual ai journaling: Integrating llm and time series behavioral sensing technology to promote self- reflection and well-being using the mindscape app

    Subigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi, Eunsol Soul Choi, Xuhai Xu, Joanna Kuc, Jeremy F Huckins, Jason Holden, Colin Depp, et al. Contextual ai journaling: Integrating llm and time series behavioral sensing technology to promote self- reflection and well-being using the mindscape app. InExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on ...

  49. [49]

    Mindscape study: integrating llm and behavioral sensing for personalized ai-driven journaling experiences

    Subigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi, Michael V Heinz, Ashmita Kunwar, Eunsol Soul Choi, Xuhai Xu, Joanna Kuc, Jeremy F Huckins, et al. Mindscape study: integrating llm and behavioral sensing for personalized ai-driven journaling experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 8(4...

  50. [50]

    i left my legacy, told my story

    Novia Nurain and Chia-Fang Chung. “i left my legacy, told my story”: Understanding older adults’ tracking practices to promote active aging. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pages 459–475, 2023

  51. [51]

    Size and Demographics of Aging Populations

    Institute of Medicine (US) Food Forum.Providing Healthy and Safe Foods As We Age: Workshop Summary. Size and Demographics of Aging Populations. National Academies Press (US), 2010

  52. [52]

    Older americans 2020: Key indicators of well-being

    Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics (US). Older americans 2020: Key indicators of well-being. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics, 2020

  53. [53]

    Llmsense: Harnessing llms for high-level reasoning over spatiotemporal sensor traces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19857, 2024

    Xiaomin Ouyang and Mani Srivastava. Llmsense: Harnessing llms for high-level reasoning over spatiotemporal sensor traces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19857, 2024

  54. [54]

    Technology adoption and learning preferences for older adults: evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities

    Carolyn Pang, Zhiqin Collin Wang, Joanna McGrenere, Rock Leung, Jiamin Dai, and Karyn Moffatt. Technology adoption and learning preferences for older adults: evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–13, 2021

  55. [55]

    Emotionally aware or tone-deaf? evaluating emotional alignment in LLM-based conversational recommendation systems

    Darshna Parmar and Pramit Mazumdar. Emotionally aware or tone-deaf? evaluating emotional alignment in LLM-based conversational recommendation systems. In Chen Zhang, Emily Allaway, Hua Shen, Lesly Miculicich, Yinqiao Li, Meryem M’hamdi, Peerat Limkon- chotiwat, Richard He Bai, Santosh T.y.s.s., Sophia Simeng Han, Surendrabikram Thapa, and Wiem Ben Rim, ed...

  56. [56]

    Marzieh Pashmdarfard and Akram Azad. Assessment tools to evaluate activities of daily living (adl) and instrumental activities of daily living (iadl) in older adults: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34:33, 2020

  57. [57]

    The communication of information about older people between health and social care practitioners.Age and ageing, 31(2):107–117, 2002

    Sheila Payne, Chris Kerr, Sheila Hawker, Michael Hardey, and Jackie Powell. The communication of information about older people between health and social care practitioners.Age and ageing, 31(2):107–117, 2002. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026. From ‘What’ to ‘How’ and ‘Why’: Sharing LLM-Generated Retrospective Summaries of Older Adul...

  58. [58]

    Habit formation in wearable activity tracker use among older adults: qualitative study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(1):e22488, 2021

    Wei Peng, Lin Li, Anastasia Kononova, Shelia Cotten, Kendra Kamp, Marie Bowen, et al. Habit formation in wearable activity tracker use among older adults: qualitative study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(1):e22488, 2021

  59. [59]

    Weld, Joseph Chee Chang, Pao Siangliulue, and Jonathan Bragg

    Marissa Radensky, Daniel S. Weld, Joseph Chee Chang, Pao Siangliulue, and Jonathan Bragg. Papers-to-posts: Supporting detailed long-document summarization with an interactive llm-powered source outline, 2025

  60. [60]

    Ai-enabled conversational journaling for advancing parkinson’s disease symptom tracking

    Mashrur Rashik, Shilpa Sweth, Nishtha Agrawal, Saiyyam Kochar, Kara M Smith, Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Vidya Setlur, Narges Mahyar, and Ali Sarvghad. Ai-enabled conversational journaling for advancing parkinson’s disease symptom tracking. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’25, New York, NY, USA, 2025. Associatio...

  61. [61]

    Digital family portrait field trial: Support for aging in place

    Jim Rowan and Elizabeth D Mynatt. Digital family portrait field trial: Support for aging in place. InProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 521–530, 2005

  62. [62]

    A case study on older adults’ long-term use of an activity tracker.Gerontechnology, 16(2), 2017

    Anna Schlomann. A case study on older adults’ long-term use of an activity tracker.Gerontechnology, 16(2), 2017

  63. [63]

    Clinician roles and responsibilities during care transitions of older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(2):231–236, 2013

    Nancy L Schoenborn, Alicia I Arbaje, Kathryn J Eubank, Kenric Maynor, and Joseph A Carrese. Clinician roles and responsibilities during care transitions of older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(2):231–236, 2013

  64. [64]

    Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, Natalia Murinova, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. Examining opportunities for goal-directed self- tracking to support chronic condition management.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 3(4):1–26, 2019

  65. [65]

    Family caregiving for older adults.Annual review of psychology, 71(1):635–659, 2020

    Richard Schulz, Scott R Beach, Sara J Czaja, Lynn M Martire, and Joan K Monin. Family caregiving for older adults.Annual review of psychology, 71(1):635–659, 2020

  66. [66]

    The use of mobile devices for physical activity tracking in older adults’ everyday life.Digital health, 3:2055207617740088, 2017

    Alexander Seifert, Anna Schlomann, Christian Rietz, and Hans Rudolf Schelling. The use of mobile devices for physical activity tracking in older adults’ everyday life.Digital health, 3:2055207617740088, 2017

  67. [67]

    Overview of post-discharge predictors for psychiatric re-hospitalisations: a systematic review of the literature.BMC psychiatry, 17(1):227, 2017

    R Sfetcu, S Musat, P Haaramo, M Ciutan, G Scintee, C Vladescu, K Wahlbeck, and H Katschnig. Overview of post-discharge predictors for psychiatric re-hospitalisations: a systematic review of the literature.BMC psychiatry, 17(1):227, 2017

  68. [68]

    Exploring the needs and requirements of informal caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment from sensor-based care solutions: multimethod study.JMIR aging, 6:e49319, 2023

    Nikita Sharma, Louise MA Braakman-Jansen, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, Jan Hendrik Croockewit, and JEWC van Gemert-Pijnen. Exploring the needs and requirements of informal caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment from sensor-based care solutions: multimethod study.JMIR aging, 6:e49319, 2023

  69. [69]

    Tracking and its potential for older adults with memory concerns

    Amelia Short, Norman Makoto Su, Ruipu Hu, Eun Kyoung Choe, Hernisa Kacorri, Margaret Danilovich, David E Conroy, Shannon Jette, Beth Barnett, and Amanda Lazar. Tracking and its potential for older adults with memory concerns. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–15, 2025

  70. [70]

    they make us old before we’re old

    Jianna So, Samantha Estrada, Matthew Jörke, Eva Bianchi, Maria Wang, Nava Haghighi, Kristen L Fessele, James A Landay, and Andrea Cuadra. " they make us old before we’re old": Designing ethical health technology with and for older adults.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2):1–30, 2024

  71. [71]

    Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences.Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2):411–419, 2018

    Anika Steinert, Marten Haesner, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen. Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences.Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(2):411–419, 2018

  72. [72]

    Narrating fitness: Leveraging large language models for reflective fitness tracker data interpretation

    Konstantin R Strömel, Stanislas Henry, Tim Johansson, Jasmin Niess, and Paweł W Woźniak. Narrating fitness: Leveraging large language models for reflective fitness tracker data interpretation. InProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–16, 2024

  73. [73]

    Dailyllm: Context-aware activity log generation using multi-modal sensors and llms

    Ye Tian, Xiaoyuan Ren, Zihao Wang, Onat Gungor, Xiaofan Yu, and Tajana Rosing. Dailyllm: Context-aware activity log generation using multi-modal sensors and llms. In2025 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Smart Systems (MASS), pages 372–380, 2025

  74. [74]

    Wearable physical activity tracking systems for older adults—a systematic review.ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, 1(4):1–37, 2020

    Dimitri Vargemidis, Kathrin Gerling, Katta Spiel, Vero Vanden Abeele, and Luc Geurts. Wearable physical activity tracking systems for older adults—a systematic review.ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, 1(4):1–37, 2020

  75. [75]

    Aging in place: Evolution of a research topic whose time has come.Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 2012

    Sarinnapha Vasunilashorn, Bernard A Steinman, Phoebe S Liebig, and Jon Pynoos. Aging in place: Evolution of a research topic whose time has come.Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 2012

  76. [76]

    Ellen Verbakel, Silke F Metzelthin, and Gertrudis IJM Kempen. Caregiving to older adults: Determinants of informal caregivers’ subjective well-being and formal and informal support as alleviating conditions.The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(6):1099–1111, 2018

  77. [77]

    Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems

    John Vines, Stephen Lindsay, Gary W Pritchard, Mabel Lie, David Greathead, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems. InProceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing, pages 607–616, 2013

  78. [78]

    A review of monitoring technology for use with older adults.Journal of geriatric physical therapy, 35(1):28–34, 2012

    Flo Wagner, Jenny Basran, and Vanina Dal Bello-Haas. A review of monitoring technology for use with older adults.Journal of geriatric physical therapy, 35(1):28–34, 2012

  79. [79]

    Ai-driven privacy in elderly care: Developing a comprehensive solution for camera-based monitoring of older adults.Applied Sciences, 14(10):4150, 2024

    Chang-Yueh Wang and Fang-Suey Lin. Ai-driven privacy in elderly care: Developing a comprehensive solution for camera-based monitoring of older adults.Applied Sciences, 14(10):4150, 2024

  80. [80]

    Social workers’ attitudes toward older adults: A review of the literature.Journal of Social Work Education, 49(1):150–172, 2013

    Donna Wang and Jill Chonody. Social workers’ attitudes toward older adults: A review of the literature.Journal of Social Work Education, 49(1):150–172, 2013

Showing first 80 references.