pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20780 · v1 · pith:OF5NRNLBnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · astro-ph.IM· hep-ex· physics.geo-ph· physics.soc-ph

Deep-Ocean Application-Specific Neutrino Experiment: a white paper

Takumi Araki , Simran Chauhan , Lyla Choi , Brian C. Crow , Max A. A. Dornfest , John Graham , Misaki Hosoya , John G. Learned
show 12 more authors
Viacheslav A. Li William F. McDonough Takeru Ohno Takanobu Ono Taichi Sakai Jackson Seligman Nathan Sibert Shang-Wen Stradleigh David Vartanyan Hiroko Watanabe Zhihao Xu Jeffrey G. Yepez
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det astro-ph.IMhep-exphysics.geo-phphysics.soc-ph
keywords geoneutrinosmantledeep-ocean detectorradiogenic heatneutrino experimentEarth compositionmobile detectorbackground reduction
0
0 comments X

The pith

A mobile deep-ocean detector reduces crustal background 50 to 100 times to measure mantle geoneutrinos directly.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a mobile deep-ocean neutrino experiment designed to detect geoneutrinos from uranium and thorium decay in the Earth's mantle. This setup aims to constrain radiogenic heat production and reveal the planet's internal geochemical makeup. Ocean placement is projected to cut crustal background noise by 50 to 100 times compared with continental detectors of similar size. The detector's mobility supports multiple viewing angles that can map spatial differences in heat-producing elements across the mantle. Recent hardware prototyping efforts are also reported alongside the design concept.

Core claim

The central claim is that a deep-ocean mobile detector, unlike any active or planned experiment, can achieve a 50-100 fold reduction in crustal background based on geoscientific studies, thereby enabling direct measurements of mantle geoneutrinos from the uranium and thorium decay chains. The detector's mobility further permits multiple stereoscopic projections to map spatial variations in mantle heat-producing elements, supporting multi-modal data on Earth's internal composition and structure.

What carries the argument

The deep-ocean mobile neutrino detector design, which relies on ocean placement for background suppression and detector mobility for spatial mapping of mantle signals.

If this is right

  • Direct constraints on the Earth's total radiogenic heat production from mantle geoneutrino flux.
  • Improved determination of the geochemical makeup of the mantle through uranium and thorium abundance measurements.
  • Spatial maps of heat-producing element variations obtained from multiple detector positions.
  • Multi-modal datasets combining neutrino data with other geophysical observations of Earth's interior.
  • Hardware prototypes that can be adapted for related neutrino or ocean-based sensing tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mobile platform could test background models by relocating between sites with known crustal differences.
  • Data from the detector might be cross-checked against seismic or heat-flow measurements to refine models of Earth's heat budget.
  • Repeated deployments could reveal time-dependent signals if mantle convection affects local neutrino production rates.

Load-bearing premise

That ocean placement together with detector mobility will deliver the stated 50-100 fold crustal background reduction, as attributed to prior geoscientific studies without new derivation in this document.

What would settle it

A background-rate measurement from an ocean prototype that shows less than a 10-fold reduction relative to a similarly sized continental detector.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20780 by Brian C. Crow, David Vartanyan, Hiroko Watanabe, Jackson Seligman, Jeffrey G. Yepez, John G. Learned, John Graham, Lyla Choi, Max A. A. Dornfest, Misaki Hosoya, Nathan Sibert, Shang-Wen Stradleigh, Simran Chauhan, Taichi Sakai, Takanobu Ono, Takeru Ohno, Takumi Araki, Viacheslav A. Li, William F. McDonough, Zhihao Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Artist’s representation (not to scale) of the signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Modeled antineutrino spectra for a mid-Pacific loca [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectrum of geoneutrino signal and primary back [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Conceptual diagram of the ocean-bottom neutrino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A 12-liter prototype constructed at Tohoku Uni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Baseline geometry used for structural analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Expected significance for rejecting the homogeneous [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This white paper introduces the concept, prototype design, projected costs, and scientific goals of a mobile experiment for detecting geoneutrinos originating from uranium and thorium decay chains in the Earth's mantle. This will constrain the planet's radiogenic heat production and unearth its geochemical makeup. This design of a deep-ocean mobile neutrino experiment, which is not mirrored by any active or planned experiments, supports physics and geoscience's goal of multi-modal data on the Earth's internal composition and structure. Based on geoscientific studies, this design is expected to achieve a 50--100-fold reduction in crustal background compared to similarly sized continental detectors, thereby enabling direct measurements of mantle geoneutrinos. The multiple stereoscopic projections enabled by the detector's unique mobility can map spatial variations in heat-producing elements within the mantle. Beyond discussing the design, we report on our collaboration's most recent hardware developments in the active prototyping of this detector. We briefly highlight the potential multiuse and interdisciplinary nature of this detector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a white paper proposing a mobile deep-ocean neutrino detector (DOASNE) to measure mantle geoneutrinos from U and Th decay chains. It describes the conceptual design, mobility-enabled stereoscopic mapping, projected costs, scientific goals for constraining radiogenic heat production and mantle composition, and recent hardware prototyping efforts. The central claim is that ocean placement yields a 50--100-fold reduction in crustal geoneutrino background relative to same-size continental detectors, based on prior geoscientific studies, thereby enabling direct mantle measurements.

Significance. If the background-reduction projection holds, the concept would enable a qualitatively new class of geoneutrino observations by suppressing the dominant crustal signal that limits existing detectors, potentially delivering direct constraints on mantle heat-producing elements and spatial variations via detector mobility. The inclusion of active prototyping adds concrete engineering content to the proposal.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim that the design 'is expected to achieve a 50--100-fold reduction in crustal background compared to similarly sized continental detectors' is attributed solely to 'geoscientific studies' with no citations, flux model, depth dependence, or calculation supplied in the manuscript to derive or justify the numerical factor from the proposed geometry, depth, or mobility.
minor comments (1)
  1. A short dedicated section or appendix summarizing the referenced geoscientific studies, the crustal flux model, and the mapping from detector parameters to the 50--100 factor would allow readers to assess the projection without external lookup.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and constructive suggestion. We agree that the abstract's headline claim requires explicit support and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim that the design 'is expected to achieve a 50--100-fold reduction in crustal background compared to similarly sized continental detectors' is attributed solely to 'geoscientific studies' with no citations, flux model, depth dependence, or calculation supplied in the manuscript to derive or justify the numerical factor from the proposed geometry, depth, or mobility.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. The factor originates from published geoscientific flux models (e.g., crustal thickness maps and U/Th abundance distributions from Huang et al. and similar works) that predict the ocean floor at ~4 km depth sees a crustal contribution reduced by the absence of the thick continental crust above the detector. We will add the relevant citations to the abstract and main text, include a short paragraph summarizing the depth dependence and geometry, and reference the underlying flux calculations. No new calculation will be performed in this white-paper format, but the supporting literature will be made explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; central background-reduction claim is attributed to external geoscientific studies with no internal derivation or self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper is a white-paper proposal whose sole quantitative claim (50--100-fold crustal suppression) is explicitly stated to rest on unspecified prior geoscientific studies rather than any derivation, equation, fit, or self-citation chain internal to the document. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns: there are no self-definitional relations, no fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, no uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz smuggled via citation. The hardware-prototyping and mobility-mapping sections are independent of the background factor. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the paper's own content; the external attribution is a limitation of verifiability, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on background models from external geoscientific studies and assumptions about detector performance in the ocean environment; no free parameters are explicitly fitted in the document, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Geoneutrinos from mantle U/Th decay can be isolated from other neutrino sources using the proposed detector design
    Invoked when stating that direct mantle measurements become possible with the background reduction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5806 in / 1271 out tokens · 29248 ms · 2026-06-26T15:02:39.352074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    mantle only

    showed that Kappa ( κ = 232Th/238U) in mantle- derived basalts, crustal rocks, and chondrites was approx- imately 3.5 ± 1.0, and Kappa P b (κP b), which is derived by calculating the 208∗ Pb/206∗ Pb value after subtraction of the Earth’s initial 208Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb val- ues and time integrating the contributions from the two decay chains. The valu...

    2005

  2. [2]

    Background evaluation A detailed simulation trade study compared 1.5 kt [35] and 17 kt designs [37]. The analysis included major back- ground sources, including global reactor antineutrinos, accidental coincidences driven by radioactivity in detec- tor materials, and intrinsic radiogenic and cosmogenic contributions. In particular, the work highlights ( α...

  3. [3]

    The liquid scintillator consists of LAB (Linear Alkyl Benzene) and PPO (2,5-diphenyloxazole) as a fluor

    Liquid scintillator performance at deep ocean temperature A dedicated low-temperature performance study was conducted for a laboratory-based liquid scintillator perti- nent to OBD [35]. The liquid scintillator consists of LAB (Linear Alkyl Benzene) and PPO (2,5-diphenyloxazole) as a fluor. The temperature of the liquid scintillator, con- tained within an ...

  4. [4]

    5) was used to determine its perfor- mance in a marine environment [38]

    Optical performance of a prototype detector A prototype detector constructed by Tohoku Univer- sity (shown in Fig. 5) was used to determine its perfor- mance in a marine environment [38]. This prototype con- sisted of a cylindrical stainless steel vessel, with an outer radius of 14 cm, an inner radius of 13 cm, and a length of 20 cm, with acrylic windows ...

  5. [5]

    spectral shaping

    Structural design and selection of buffer oil and acrylic vessel A conventional detector concept is shown in Fig. 6. As in land-based liquid scintillator detectors (e.g., Kam- LAND, SNO+, JUNO), an inner acrylic vessel contains liquid scintillator (LS) and is surrounded by a buffer re- gion instrumented with inward-facing PMTs. Outward- facing PMTs provid...

  6. [6]

    W. F. McDonough, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 422, 9 (2026)

    2026

  7. [7]

    R. A. Fischer and W. F. McDonough, in 1, Earth’s In- terior, Treatise on Geochemistry, Ariel Anbar and Do- minique Weis (series editor), edited by C. Chauvel (El- sevier, Oxford, 2025) third edition ed., pp. 18–71

    2025

  8. [8]

    T. Lay, J. Hernlund, E. J. Garnero, and M. S. Thorne, Science 314, 1272 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    E. J. Garnero and A. K. McNamara, Science 320, 626 (2008)

    2008

  10. [10]

    Driscoll and C

    P. Driscoll and C. Davies, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 128, e2022JB025355 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Korenaga and C

    J. Korenaga and C. Herzberg, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 683, 119958 (2026)

    2026

  12. [12]

    Jaupart, S

    C. Jaupart, S. Labrosse, F. Lucazeau, and J.-C. Mareschal, in Treatise on Geophysics (Second Edition), Vol. 7, edited by G. Schubert (Elsevier, Oxford, 2015) pp. 223–270

    2015

  13. [13]

    W. F. McDonough, O. ˇSr´ amek, and S. A. Wipper- furth, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.21, e2019GC008865 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    R. L. Rudnick and S. Gao, in Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition), edited by H. D. Holland and K. K. Turekian (Elsevier, Oxford, 2014) pp. 1–51

    2014

  15. [15]

    S. A. Wipperfurth, M. Guo, O. ˇSr´ amek, and W. F. Mc- Donough, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 498, 196 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Blichert-Toft, B

    J. Blichert-Toft, B. Zanda, D. S. Ebel, and F. Albar` ede, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 300, 152 (2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    Wang and S

    Z. Wang and S. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 44, 033001 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Arevalo, W

    R. Arevalo, W. F. McDonough, and M. Luong, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 278, 361 (2009)

    2009

  19. [19]

    Neutrino geo- science: review, survey, future prospects,

    W. F. McDonough and H. Watanabe, “Neutrino geo- science: review, survey, future prospects,” in Core- Mantle Co-Evolution (American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2023) Chap. 1, pp. 1–16

    2023

  20. [20]

    Javoy, E

    M. Javoy, E. Kaminski, F. Guyot, D. Andrault, C. San- loup, M. Moreira, S. Labrosse, A. Jambon, P. Agrinier, A. Davaille, and C. Jaupart, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 293, 259 (2010)

    2010

  21. [21]

    W. F. McDonough and S.-s. Sun, Chem. Geol. 120, 223 (1995)

    1995

  22. [22]

    D. L. Turcotte and G. Schubert, Geodynamics (Cam- bridge university press, 2002)

    2002

  23. [23]

    Aker et al

    M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 160 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Strumia and F

    A. Strumia and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B564, 42 (2003)

    2003

  25. [25]

    Araki et al

    T. Araki et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Nature 436, 499 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Mantovani, L

    F. Mantovani, L. Carmignani, G. Fiorentini, and M. Lis- sia, Phys. Rev. D 69, 013001 (2004)

    2004

  27. [27]

    Coltorti et al., Geochim

    M. Coltorti et al., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2271 (2011)

    2011

  28. [28]

    Huang, V

    Y. Huang, V. Strati, F. Mantovani, S. B. Shirey, and W. F. McDonough, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 3925 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Strati, M

    V. Strati, M. Baldoncini, I. Callegari, F. Mantovani, W. F. McDonough, B. Ricci, and G. Xhixha, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2, 5 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    Huang, V

    Y. Huang, V. Chubakov, F. Mantovani, R. L. Rudnick, and W. F. McDonough, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 2003 (2013)

    2003

  31. [31]

    S. A. Wipperfurth, O. ˇSr´ amek, and W. F. McDonough, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, e2019JB018433 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    Bellini et al

    G. Bellini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 687, 299 (2010)

    2010

  33. [33]

    Abreu et al

    M. Abreu et al. (SNO+ Collabortion), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121801 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Abusleme et al

    A. Abusleme et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Nature 654, 343 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    Abe et al

    S. Abe et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099566 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Batygov, Combined Study of Reactor and Terrestrial Antineutrinos with KamLAND, Ph.D

    M. Batygov, Combined Study of Reactor and Terrestrial Antineutrinos with KamLAND, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States (2006)

    2006

  37. [37]

    G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, Phys. Rev. D 82, 093006 (2010). 13

    2010

  38. [38]

    Agostini et al

    M. Agostini et al. (Borexino Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 012009 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Adam et al

    T. Adam et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C (in press)

  40. [40]

    T. Sakai, Development of detector components for low- temperature and high-pressure environment, and perfor- mance evaluation with simulation toward ocean bottom anti-neutrino detector OBD , Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2021), (in Japanese)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Araki, Development of a Small Prototype Detec- tor for the Realization of the Ocean Bottom Detec- tor (OBD), Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2024), (in Japanese)

    T. Araki, Development of a Small Prototype Detec- tor for the Realization of the Ocean Bottom Detec- tor (OBD), Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2024), (in Japanese)

    2024

  42. [42]

    T. Ohno, Comprehensive Evaluation of Observation Sensitivity via Simulation Toward the Large-Scale Deep- Ocean Neutrino Detector OBD, Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2024), (in Japanese)

    2024

  43. [43]

    S. Chauhan, Optical Performance of a Prototype De- tector and Preliminary Design Studies for Large-Scale Ocean-based Neutrino Detector, Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Ono, Detector Structure Design for the Ocean Bot- tom Neutrino Detector (OBD) , Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2026), (in Japanese)

    T. Ono, Detector Structure Design for the Ocean Bot- tom Neutrino Detector (OBD) , Master’s thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (2026), (in Japanese)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Sakai et al., J

    T. Sakai et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2156, 012144 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Watanabe et al., in 2023 IEEE Underwater Technol- ogy (UT) (IEEE, 2023) pp

    H. Watanabe et al., in 2023 IEEE Underwater Technol- ogy (UT) (IEEE, 2023) pp. 1–5

    2023

  47. [47]

    Towards imaging Earth’s large-scale structures by directional geoneu- trino detection with Ocean Bottom Detector,

    Z. Xu et al. (OBD Consortium), “Towards imaging Earth’s large-scale structures by directional geoneu- trino detection with Ocean Bottom Detector,” (2026), arXiv:2606.13273 [physics.geo-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  48. [48]

    Geoneutrino observation with Kam- LAND,

    N. Kawada, “Geoneutrino observation with Kam- LAND,” Talk at Neutrino Geoscience 2025, Kingston, Canada (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Abusleme et al

    A. Abusleme et al. (JUNO Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 50, 043001 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Han, Y.-F

    R. Han, Y.-F. Li, L. Zhan, W. F. McDonough, J. Cao, and L. Ludhova, Chin. Phys. C 40, 033003 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    J. G. Learned, S. T. Dye, and S. Pakvasa, in 12th In- ternational Workshop on Neutrinos Telescopes: Twenty Years after the Supernova 1987A Neutrino Bursts Dis- covery (2007) pp. 235–269, arXiv:0810.4975 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  52. [52]

    ˇSr´ amek, B

    O. ˇSr´ amek, B. Roskovec, S. A. Wipperfurth, Y. Xi, and W. F. McDonough, Sci. Rep. 6, 33034 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    W. D. Mooney, C. Barrera-Lopez, M. G. Su´ arez, and M. A. Castelblanco, Earth-Sci. Rev.243, 104493 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    White and E

    W. White and E. Klein, in 4.13, Composition of the oceanic crust, Treatise on Geochemistry (Elsevier, Ox- ford, 2014) second edition ed., pp. 457–496

    2014

  55. [55]

    ˇSr´ amek, W

    O. ˇSr´ amek, W. F. McDonough, E. S. Kite, V. Leki´ c, S. T. Dye, and S. Zhong, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 361, 356 (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    A. K. McNamara, Tectonophysics 760, 199 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    Q. Yuan, M. Li, S. J. Desch, B. Ko, H. Deng, E. J. Garnero, T. S. J. Gabriel, J. A. Kegerreis, Y. Miyazaki, V. Eke, and P. D. Asimow, Nature 623, 95 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    Mapping deep-mantle compositional heterogeneity using a directional geoneutrino detector,

    Z. Xu, M. Hosoya, W. F. McDonough, T. Sakai, and H. Watanabe, “Mapping deep-mantle compositional heterogeneity using a directional geoneutrino detector,” (2026), arXiv:2606.15680 [physics.geo-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    B. M. Howe, F. K. Duennebier, and R. Lukas, inSeafloor Observatories: A new vision of the Earth from the Abyss (Springer, 2015) pp. 439–463

    2015

  60. [60]

    Inoue, New J

    K. Inoue, New J. Phys. 6, 147 (2004)

    2004

  61. [61]

    Vogel and J

    P. Vogel and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 60, 053003 (1999)

    1999

  62. [62]

    H. K. M. Tanaka and H. Watanabe, Sci. Rep. 4, 4708 (2014)

    2014

  63. [63]

    J. H. Seo, Z. Atif, C. D. Shin, and K. K. Joo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 969, 164001 (2020)

    2020

  64. [64]

    K. A. Hochmuth, M. Lindner, and G. G. Raffelt, Phys. Rev. D 76, 073001 (2007)

    2007

  65. [65]

    Andriamirado et al

    M. Andriamirado et al. (PROSPECT Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 032014 (2025)

    2025

  66. [66]

    J. G. Yepez, J. D. Seligman, M. A. A. Dornfest, B. C. Crow, J. G. Learned, and V. A. Li, AIP Adv.16, 025110 (2026)

    2026

  67. [67]

    En- hancing angular sensitivity of segmented antineutrino detectors for reactor monitoring applications,

    B. C. Crow, M. A. A. Dornfest, J. G. Learned, J. D. Seligman, N. S. Sibert, J. G. Yepez, and V. A. Li, “En- hancing angular sensitivity of segmented antineutrino detectors for reactor monitoring applications,” (2026), arXiv:2603.03561 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Arevalo, Jr

    R. Arevalo, Jr. and W. F. McDonough, Chem. Geol. 271, 70 (2010)

    2010

  69. [69]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011)

    2011

  70. [70]

    Laske, G

    G. Laske, G. Masters, Z. Ma, and M. Pasyanos, Geo- phys. Res. Abstr. 15, 2658 (2013)

    2013

  71. [71]

    Gando et al

    A. Gando et al. (KamLAND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 92, 055808 (2015)

    2015

  72. [72]

    Burrows, T

    A. Burrows, T. Wang, and D. Vartanyan, Astrophys. J. Lett. 964, L16 (2024)

    2024

  73. [73]

    Janka, Annu

    H.-T. Janka, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75, 425 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    E. P. O’Connor and S. M. Couch, Astrophys. J. 865, 81 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Marek, Astrophys. J. 766, 43 (2013)

    2013

  76. [76]

    Kuroda, K

    T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, and T. Takiwaki, Astrophys. J. 755, 11 (2012)

    2012

  77. [77]

    Hirata et al., Phys

    K. Hirata et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987)

    1987

  78. [78]

    Bionta et al., Phys

    R. Bionta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1494 (1987)

    1987

  79. [79]

    E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alexeyeva, I. V. Krivosheina, and V. I. Volchenko, Phys. Lett. B 205, 209 (1988)

    1988

  80. [80]

    L. Choi, A. Burrows, and D. Vartanyan, Phys. Rev. D 111, 123038 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.