pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20809 · v1 · pith:CW7PQP4Qnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

The Lifecycle and Emission Properties of PAHs in Cosmological Hydrodynamic Galaxy Formation Simulations

Desika Narayanan , Paul Torrey , Massimiliano Parente , Grant Donnelly , Dhruv Zimmerman , Alex Garcia , Helena Richie , J.-D. T. Smith
show 11 more authors
Brandon Hensley Federico Marinacci Jed McKinney Alexandra Pope Gergo Popping Laura Sales Karin Sandstrom Ethan Savitch Irene Shivaei Justin Spilker Corey Whitcomb
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords PAHsdust evolutiongrain shatteringcosmological simulationsgalaxy formationmid-infrared emissioninterstellar medium
0
0 comments X

The pith

Grain-grain shattering in diffuse interstellar gas drives the rise of PAH abundances from z=6 to today.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds the first cosmological zoom-in simulations that follow the lifecycle of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in galaxies across cosmic time. It demonstrates that PAHs form in place when large dust grains shatter in low-density gas, with the growing fraction of diffuse ISM causing qPAH to increase by more than an order of magnitude from high redshift to z=0. This single mechanism produces the observed PAH-metallicity relation, the anti-correlation between PAH fraction and molecular gas, and the relations between PAH luminosity and star-formation rate or molecular mass without additional tuning.

Core claim

If dust is injected as large grains, grain-grain shattering in the diffuse ISM naturally generates ultrasmall PAHs, raising their mass fraction qPAH from roughly 5 times 10 to the minus 4 at z approximately 4 to 10 to the minus 2 at z=0 as the diffuse-gas mass fraction grows. The same process produces an inverse qPAH-molecular gas fraction relation, a light-to-mass ratio that scales with radiation-field intensity yet anti-correlates with qPAH, and the PAH-metallicity relation that matches observations from z=0 to z=2. The LPAH-SFR and LPAH-M_mol relations follow from larger PAH reservoirs in massive galaxies combined with more efficient excitation per unit mass in high-SFR systems.

What carries the argument

on-the-fly dust grain evolution model in 40 zoom-in cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, in which grain-grain collisions in low-density diffuse gas convert large carbonaceous grains into PAHs smaller than 13 Angstrom

If this is right

  • qPAH increases steadily from z approximately 4 to z=0 as the diffuse ISM fraction grows.
  • qPAH and molecular gas fraction are inversely related at fixed redshift.
  • PAH light-to-mass ratio scales linearly with radiation field intensity but falls with rising qPAH because dense gas suppresses shattering.
  • The PAH-metallicity relation appears automatically once enrichment and diffuse-gas growth occur together.
  • LPAH-SFR and LPAH-M_mol relations arise because more massive galaxies hold larger PAH reservoirs while higher-SFR galaxies excite PAHs more efficiently per unit mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • PAH emission may trace star formation less directly at high redshift if diffuse-gas fractions are lower.
  • Changing the density distribution of the ISM in simulations would alter the predicted redshift evolution of qPAH.
  • If future models include direct stellar injection of small grains, the required shattering efficiency to match observations would decrease.

Load-bearing premise

Dust enters the ISM already as large grains so that PAHs can be created later by shattering collisions rather than being injected or formed by other channels.

What would settle it

Observations showing that PAH mass fraction does not rise with the fractional mass of diffuse gas, or that the PAH-metallicity relation requires direct injection of small grains from stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20809 by Alexandra Pope, Alex Garcia, Brandon Hensley, Corey Whitcomb, Desika Narayanan, Dhruv Zimmerman, Ethan Savitch, Federico Marinacci, Gergo Popping, Grant Donnelly, Helena Richie, Irene Shivaei, J.-D. T. Smith, Jed McKinney, Justin Spilker, Karin Sandstrom, Laura Sales, Massimiliano Parente, Paul Torrey.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Mid-infrared spectral decomposition of six representative simulated galaxies at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The evolution of the ISM physical conditions in the vicinity of dust over cosmic time. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distribution of dust grain collision velocities as a func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of normalized grain size distribution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: qPAH ≡ MPAH/Mdust distributions for our model galaxies, binned by redshift. The median of each distribution is shown by a thin dashed vertical line, and the number of galaxies that comprise each distribution is noted by the redshift markers. The median of the distribution follows the cosmic evolution of the gas density (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Morphological evolution of the stellar, gas, and PAH surface density distributions for an example galaxy (galaxy 10407) from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The molecular gas fraction and qPAH evolve inversely over cosmic time. We show the redshift evolution of the molecular gas fraction fmol (blue; left axis) and qPAH ≡ MPAH/Mdust (red; right axis) for an example galaxy (galaxy 10407) from our simu￾lation sample. The two quantities track nearly inversely such that when the fmol is low, qPAH is elevated owing to increased grain￾grain interaction velocities in … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The PAH Light to Mass Ratio correlates with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The co-evolution of ΣSFR, the PAH light to mass ratio, PAH mass, and the broadband SED for a single representative galaxy across cosmic time. Upper center: The evolution of ΣSFR (blue; left axis) and LPAH/MPAH (red; right axis) from z ∼ 6 to z = 0, with numbered circles marking 10 individual snapshots. Lower center: The evolution of MPAH (green), which grows largely monotonically over cosmic time. Top and… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Evolution of qPAH (circles) and LPAH/LFIR (di￾amonds) with redshift (left) and metallicity (right) for 3 in￾dividual galaxies spanning a range of final stellar masses (log(M∗/M⊙)final = 9.5, 9.9, and 10.8; top to bottom). Points are color-coded in grey scale by galaxy stellar mass, and the edge colors denote whether the symbol refers to the redshift evolution of qPAH (left) or LPAH/LFIR (right). While bot… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Modeled PAH-metallicity relationship (PZR) [squares] compared to observations (contours). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Model SFR vs LPAH (left) and SFR vs MPAH (right) relationships, color-coded by galaxy redshift. The individual symbols represent individual galaxy snapshots, while the lines represent literature observational constraints (with the specific PAH feature observed listed in the legend). The observations come from Shipley et al. (2016), Robinson et al. (2026), Shivaei et al. (2024), and Pope et al. (2008); for… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The physical PAH mass fraction qPAH (top left) and the observable LPAH/LFIR (top right) as a function of molecular gas mass Mmol, color-coded by dust-mass weighted deposited radiation field (⟨log U⟩.) While qPAH decreases with increasing Mmol (owing to the fact that grains more efficiently shatter in our model in diffuse gas), the observable ratio LPAH/LFIR increases with Mmol. This discrepancy is driven … view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A comparison of simulated galaxies to M∗ − Mhalo relationship (left) and M∗ − Zgas relationship (MZR; right) shows reasonable correspondence. Each point in both panels shows an individual galaxy snapshot. Left: The stellar mass-halo mass relationship for our model galaxies (circles) is compared to the Behroozi et al. (2013) inferences when operating under the abundance matching ansatz (dashed lines). Colo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first cosmological model for the lifecycle and luminous properties of PAHs in galaxies as they evolve from z=6-->0. We model 40 zoom-in galaxies, coupled with an on-the-fly model for the evolution of dust grains in the ISM. We assume that PAHs are ultrasmall (a < 13 Angstrom) carbonaceous dust grains, and couple this model with single-photon excitation calculations to compute the emergent mid-infrared spectra. (1) If we assume that dust is large upon formation, then PAHs are naturally able to form in situ in the ISM via grain-grain shattering. Interstellar collision velocities increase in low density, diffuse gas in our model; as galaxies evolve, the increase in fractional mass of diffuse gas drives an increase in grain-grain collision velocities and a corresponding rise in the PAH mass fraction (qPAH) from ~5 x 10^{-4} at z~4 to ~10^{-2} at z~0. (2) Increased PAH production in the diffuse ISM results in an inverse relationship between qPAH and the molecular gas fraction. (3) The PAH light-to-mass ratio scales linearly with the radiation field intensity (LPAH/MPAH ~ G_0) but anti-correlates with qPAH, because high-Sigma_SFR galaxies have a denser ISM that suppresses shattering. This means the physical qPAH and observed LPAH/LFIR do not evolve in lockstep. (4) The PAH-metallicity relationship (PZR) arises naturally in this framework: galaxies enrich and grow their diffuse ISM fraction simultaneously, linking rising metallicity to rising qPAH. Our models represent the first to reproduce the PZR observed across z=0-2. (5) The LPAH-SFR and LPAH-M_mol relations emerge from two effects: more massive galaxies have larger PAH reservoirs, and higher-SFR galaxies excite their PAHs more efficiently per unit mass. Taken together, these results suggest that grain-grain shattering in the diffuse ISM is the main driver behind the evolution of cosmic PAH abundances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first cosmological hydrodynamic model of PAH lifecycle and emission in 40 zoom-in galaxies from z=6 to z=0. It assumes dust forms large (a ≫ 13 Å) and couples an on-the-fly grain evolution model (with shattering in diffuse ISM) to single-photon excitation calculations for mid-IR spectra. The central claims are that this produces a rising qPAH from ~5e-4 at z~4 to ~1e-2 at z=0, an inverse qPAH–f_mol relation, the observed PZR across z=0–2, and LPAH–SFR/M_mol scalings, with grain-grain shattering in the diffuse ISM identified as the main driver of cosmic PAH evolution.

Significance. If the shattering channel is shown to be robust, the work would provide a physically motivated, parameter-light framework linking galaxy ISM evolution to PAH abundances and luminosities, representing a notable advance over ad-hoc injection prescriptions. The on-the-fly dust model and radiative coupling are technical strengths. However, the significance is reduced by the lack of differential tests against direct-injection alternatives, leaving open whether the reported relations are emergent predictions or consequences of the initial-size assumption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (points 1 and 5): The attribution of PAH evolution and the PZR to grain-grain shattering as the 'main driver' rests on the assumption that dust forms exclusively large, with no direct stellar injection of ultrasmall grains. No control simulation injecting a realistic fraction of carbon dust as a < 13 Å grains from AGB stars or SNe is shown; without this, the trends could arise from standard growth plus direct injection, rendering the uniqueness claim untested.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that the model 'reproduces the PZR observed across z=0-2' and other relations provides no quantitative metrics (e.g., slope, scatter, reduced chi-squared, or direct overlay with observational data points), nor error analysis on the qPAH(z) evolution, making it impossible to assess the fidelity of the match.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces qPAH, LPAH, and G_0 without explicit definitions or units on first use; these should be defined at the outset for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our results. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (points 1 and 5): The attribution of PAH evolution and the PZR to grain-grain shattering as the 'main driver' rests on the assumption that dust forms exclusively large, with no direct stellar injection of ultrasmall grains. No control simulation injecting a realistic fraction of carbon dust as a < 13 Å grains from AGB stars or SNe is shown; without this, the trends could arise from standard growth plus direct injection, rendering the uniqueness claim untested.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the model explicitly assumes dust forms exclusively as large grains (a ≫ 13 Å), as stated in the abstract and methods, and that this assumption is central to identifying shattering in the diffuse ISM as the driver of rising qPAH. This choice follows from standard dust formation models in which stellar sources (AGB stars and SNe) primarily inject larger grains, with ultrasmall grains arising via ISM processing. We agree that, without a control run including direct injection of a realistic fraction of small grains, the claim that shattering is the unique main driver remains untested against alternatives that combine growth with direct injection. In revision we will (i) explicitly qualify the 'main driver' language in the abstract and conclusions to refer to results under the large-grain formation assumption, (ii) add a short discussion paragraph noting that direct small-grain injection would introduce additional free parameters not required in the current framework, and (iii) flag a direct-injection control simulation as a natural extension for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that the model 'reproduces the PZR observed across z=0-2' and other relations provides no quantitative metrics (e.g., slope, scatter, reduced chi-squared, or direct overlay with observational data points), nor error analysis on the qPAH(z) evolution, making it impossible to assess the fidelity of the match.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and main text currently lack quantitative metrics (slopes, scatters, reduced χ²) and direct data overlays for the PZR and related relations, as well as uncertainty estimates on the qPAH(z) trend. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements: fitted slopes and 1σ scatters for the PZR at z = 0 and z ≈ 2, a direct overlay of model points with observational compilations in the relevant figure, and error bars derived from the 40-galaxy sample on the qPAH evolution. Corresponding quantitative statements will be inserted into the abstract and results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Shattering as main driver of PAH evolution follows by construction from assumption of large initial dust

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "If we assume that dust is large upon formation, then PAHs are naturally able to form in situ in the ISM via grain-grain shattering. ... as galaxies evolve, the increase in fractional mass of diffuse gas drives an increase in grain-grain collision velocities and a corresponding rise in the PAH mass fraction (qPAH) from ~5 x 10^{-4} at z~4 to ~10^{-2} at z~0. ... Taken together, these results suggest that grain-grain shattering in the diffuse ISM is the main driver behind the evolution of cosmic PAH abundances."

    The model is defined to exclude direct PAH injection by assuming a ≫ 13 Å dust at formation, then the simulation produces rising qPAH via shattering and the paper concludes shattering is the main driver. The attribution is the direct logical consequence of the input assumption rather than demonstrated by comparison to alternative formation channels.

full rationale

The paper's central claim that grain-grain shattering is the main driver of cosmic PAH evolution reduces directly to its modeling choice of large dust upon formation (no direct small-grain injection). The abstract states the assumption, derives the qPAH rise and PZR from it, and concludes the driver attribution without a control simulation using direct injection. This matches the self-definitional pattern where the reported outcome is the expected consequence of the input assumption rather than an independent test.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that PAHs form exclusively via shattering of large initial grains in diffuse gas; no independent evidence for this channel versus other formation routes is provided in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PAHs are ultrasmall (a < 13 Angstrom) carbonaceous dust grains
    Stated directly in the abstract as the modeling choice for PAH identity.
  • ad hoc to paper dust is large upon formation
    Explicit conditional assumption required for in-situ shattering to be the formation channel.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5990 in / 1322 out tokens · 27979 ms · 2026-06-26T16:18:45.204845+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

181 extracted references · 169 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J., Tielens A

    Allamandola L. J., Tielens A. G. G. M., Barker J. R., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...290L..25A 290, L25

    work page doi:10.1086/184435 1985

  2. [2]

    H., Martini P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765..140A 765, 140

    Andrews B. H., Martini P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765..140A 765, 140

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/140 2013

  3. [3]

    Aniano G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fdb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...889..150A 889, 150

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fdb 2020

  4. [4]

    Aoyama S., Hou K.-C., Shimizu I., Hirashita H., Todoroki K., Choi J.-H., Nagamine K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..105A 466, 105

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3061 2017

  5. [5]

    Aoyama S., Hou K.-C., Hirashita H., Nagamine K., Shimizu I., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1431 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.4905A 478, 4905

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1431 2018

  6. [6]

    Aoyama S., Hirashita H., Nagamine K., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3253 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.3844A 491, 3844

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3253 2020

  7. [7]

    Aravena M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab30df , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882..136A 882, 136

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab30df 2019

  8. [8]

    S., Takeuchi T

    Asano R. S., Takeuchi T. T., Hirashita H., Nozawa T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432..637A 432, 637

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt506 2013

  9. [9]

    Bakes E. L. O., Tielens A. G. G. M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...427..822B 427, 822

    work page doi:10.1086/174188 1994

  10. [10]

    The Average Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Dark Matter Halos from z=0-8

    Behroozi P. S., Wechsler R. H., Conroy C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770...57B 770, 57

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 2013

  11. [11]

    Bekki K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.2298B 432, 2298

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt589 2013

  12. [12]

    The stochastic gravitational-wave background from massive black hole binary systems: implications for observations with Pulsar Timing Arrays

    Bendo G. J., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13567.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.389..629B 389, 629

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13567.x 2008

  13. [13]

    Bianchi S., Schneider R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11829.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378..973B 378, 973

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11829.x 2007

  14. [14]

    Catinella B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty089 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476..875C 476, 875

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty089 2018

  15. [15]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376392 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..763C 115, 763

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  16. [16]

    Chastenet J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876...62C 876, 62

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab16cf 2019

  17. [17]

    Chastenet J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acadd7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..11C 944, L11

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acadd7 2023

  18. [18]

    Chastenet J., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ad8a5c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJS..276....2C 276, 2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad8a5c 2025

  19. [19]

    R., Tielens A

    Cherchneff I., Barker J. R., Tielens A. G. G. M., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172059 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...401..269C 401, 269

    work page doi:10.1086/172059 1992

  20. [20]

    R., Salim S., Kere s D., Hayward C

    Choban C. R., Salim S., Kere s D., Hayward C. C., Sandstrom K. M., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537.1518C 537, 1518

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf118 2025

  21. [21]

    Ashes of FIRE: Modeling Dust Grain Size Evolution in the Local Group with FIRE

    Choban C. R., Salim S., Kere s D., Roman-Duval J., Sandstrom K. M., 2026, @doi [arXiv/2603.08504] 10.48550/arXiv.2603.08504 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260308504C p. arXiv:2603.08504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.08504 2026

  22. [22]

    , title="

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  23. [23]

    D., Li N., Gao Y., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1261C 500, 1261

    Chown R., Li C., Parker L., Wilson C. D., Li N., Gao Y., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1261C 500, 1261

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3288 2021

  24. [24]

    The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling III: model calibration, comparison, and evaluation

    Conroy C., Gunn J. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..833C 712, 833

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/833 2010

  25. [25]

    H., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/620 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..620C 696, 620

    Conroy C., Wechsler R. H., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/620 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..620C 696, 620

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/620 2009

  26. [26]

    E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/58 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708...58C 708, 58

    Conroy C., White M., Gunn J. E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/58 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708...58C 708, 58

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/708/1/58 2010

  27. [27]

    Cortzen I., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1618C 482, 1618

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2777 2019

  28. [28]

    Curti M., Mannucci F., Cresci G., Maiolino R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..944C 491, 944

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2910 2020

  29. [29]

    A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/517 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703..517D 703, 517

    Dale D. A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/517 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...703..517D 703, 517

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/517 2009

  30. [30]

    A., Stevens A

    Dav \'e R., Crain R. A., Stevens A. R. H., Narayanan D., Saintonge A., Catinella B., Cortese L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1894 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497..146D 497, 146

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1894 2020

  31. [31]

    L., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...237..215D 237, 215

    Desert F.-X., Boulanger F., Puget J. L., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...237..215D 237, 215

    1990

  32. [32]

    T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    Draine B. T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium . Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ

    2011

  33. [33]

    T., Lee H

    Draine B. T., Lee H. M., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...285...89D 285, 89

    work page doi:10.1086/162480 1984

  34. [34]

    T., Li A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...551..807D 551, 807

    Draine B. T., Li A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...551..807D 551, 807

    work page doi:10.1086/320227 2001

  35. [35]

    T., & Li, A

    Draine B. T., Li A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/511055 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...657..810D 657, 810

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/511055 2007

  36. [36]

    T., Salpeter E

    Draine B. T., Salpeter E. E., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...231...77D 231, 77

    work page doi:10.1086/157165 1979

  37. [37]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine B. T., Li A., Hensley B. S., Hunt L. K., Sandstrom K., Smith J. D. T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917....3D 917, 3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abff51 2021

  38. [38]

    arXiv:2402.18515

    Dubois Y., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv/2402.18515] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18515 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240218515D p. arXiv:2402.18515

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18515 2024

  39. [39]

    Dwek E., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305829 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...501..643D 501, 643

    work page doi:10.1086/305829 1998

  40. [40]

    V., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acac92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..16E 944, L16

    Egorov O. V., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acac92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..16E 944, L16

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acac92 2023

  41. [41]

    W., Gordon K

    Engelbracht C. W., Gordon K. D., Rieke G. H., Werner M. W., Dale D. A., Latter W. B., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432613 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...628L..29E 628, L29

    work page doi:10.1086/432613 2005

  42. [42]

    W., Rieke, G

    Engelbracht C. W., Rieke G. H., Gordon K. D., Smith J. D. T., Werner M. W., Moustakas J., Willmer C. N. A., Vanzi L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/529513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678..804E 678, 804

    work page doi:10.1086/529513 2008

  43. [43]

    Silicate cosmic dust grain collisions in the interstellar medium: A molecular dynamics study

    Esmerian C. J., et al., 2026, @doi [arXiv/2605.22225] 10.48550/arXiv.2605.22225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026arXiv260522225E p. arXiv:2605.22225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.22225 2026

  44. [44]

    S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L...8E 940, L8

    Evans A. S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L...8E 940, L8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9971 2022

  45. [45]

    J., et al., 2013, RMXAA, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013RMxAA..49..137F 49, 137

    Ferland G. J., et al., 2013, RMXAA, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013RMxAA..49..137F 49, 137

    2013

  46. [46]

    S., Gail H

    Ferrarotti A. S., Gail H. P., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...447..553F 447, 553

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041198 2006

  47. [47]

    Foley N., Cazaux S., Egorov D., Boschman L. M. P. V., Hoekstra R., Schlath \"o lter T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479..649F 479, 649

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1528 2018

  48. [48]

    D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...341..372F 341, 372

    Frenklach M., Feigelson E. D., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167501 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...341..372F 341, 372

    work page doi:10.1086/167501 1989

  49. [49]

    Galliano F., Dwek E., Chanial P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672..214G 672, 214

    work page doi:10.1086/523621 2008

  50. [50]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.1398G 531, 1398

    Garcia A. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.1398G 531, 1398

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1252 2024

  51. [51]

    Genzel R., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498..579G 498, 579

    work page doi:10.1086/305576 1998

  52. [52]

    C., Forrest W

    Gillett F. C., Forrest W. J., Merrill K. M., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...183...87G 183, 87

    work page doi:10.1086/152211 1973

  53. [53]

    L., Murante G., Ragone-Figueroa C., Tornatore L., Borgani S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2588G 479, 2588

    Gjergo E., Granato G. L., Murante G., Ragone-Figueroa C., Tornatore L., Borgani S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2588G 479, 2588

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1564 2018

  54. [54]

    D., Engelbracht C

    Gordon K. D., Engelbracht C. W., Rieke G. H., Misselt K. A., Smith J. D. T., Kennicutt Robert C. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589567 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...682..336G 682, 336

    work page doi:10.1086/589567 2008

  55. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Granato G. L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab362 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503..511G 503, 511

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab362 2021

  56. [56]

    A., Riley, J

    Guo F., Oh S. P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12692.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..251G 384, 251

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12692.x 2008

  57. [57]

    J., 1968, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968BAN....19..421H 19, 421

    Habing H. J., 1968, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968BAN....19..421H 19, 421

    1968

  58. [58]

    Hahn O., Abel T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415.2101H 415, 2101

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x 2011

  59. [59]

    Y., Werner M

    Helou G., Lu N. Y., Werner M. W., Malhotra S., Silbermann N., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...532L..21H 532, L21

    work page doi:10.1086/312549 2000

  60. [60]

    Helou G., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..253H 154, 253

    work page doi:10.1086/422640 2004

  61. [61]

    S., Draine B

    Hensley B. S., Draine B. T., 2022, arXiv/2208.12365, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220812365H p. arXiv:2208.12365

    arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    S., Draine B

    Hensley B. S., Draine B. T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948...55H 948, 55

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc4c2 2023

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Hensley B. S., Murray C. E., Dodici M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cbd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...23H 929, 23

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cbd 2022

  64. [64]

    Hirashita H., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/52.4.585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASJ...52..585H 52, 585

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/52.4.585 2000

  65. [65]

    Hirashita H., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2617 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.2937H 447, 2937

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2617 2015

  66. [66]

    Hirashita H., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3394 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.tmp.3171H

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3394 2022

  67. [67]

    S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3779H 492, 3779

    Hirashita H., Murga M. S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.3779H 492, 3779

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3640 2020

  68. [68]

    Hirashita H., Yan H., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.394.1061H 394, 1061

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14405.x 2009

  69. [69]

    S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.3046H 499, 3046

    Hirashita H., Deng W., Murga M. S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.3046H 499, 3046

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3101 2020

  70. [70]

    F., Richards, G

    Hopkins P. F., Richards G. T., Hernquist L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509629 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...654..731H 654, 731

    work page doi:10.1086/509629 2007

  71. [71]

    FIRE-2 Simulations: Physics versus Numerics in Galaxy Formation

    Hopkins P. F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.480..800H 480, 800

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1690 2018

  72. [72]

    Hou K.-C., Aoyama S., Hirashita H., Nagamine K., Shimizu I., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.1727H 485, 1727

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz121 2019

  73. [73]

    K., Thuan, T

    Hunt L. K., Thuan T. X., Izotov Y. I., Sauvage M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...712..164H 712, 164

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/164 2010

  74. [74]

    K., Izotov Y

    Hunt L. K., Izotov Y. I., Sauvage M., Thuan T. X., 2011, in Joblin C., Tielens A. G. G. M., eds, EAS Publications Series Vol. 46, EAS Publications Series. pp 143--148, @doi 10.1051/eas/1146015

    work page doi:10.1051/eas/1146015 2011

  75. [75]

    C., Cannon J

    Jackson D. C., Cannon J. M., Skillman E. D., Lee H., Gehrz R. D., Woodward C. E., Polomski E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504707 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..192J 646, 192

    work page doi:10.1086/504707 2006

  76. [76]

    P., Tielens, A

    Jones A. P., Tielens A. G. G. M., Hollenbach D. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...469..740J 469, 740

    work page doi:10.1086/177823 1996

  77. [77]

    Kennicutt Jr. R. C., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 1998

  78. [78]

    R., Tan J

    Krumholz M. R., Tan J. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...654..304K 654, 304

    work page doi:10.1086/509101 2007

  79. [79]

    R., McKee C

    Krumholz M. R., McKee C. F., Tumlinson J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592490 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...689..865K 689, 865

    work page doi:10.1086/592490 2008

  80. [80]

    R., McKee C

    Krumholz M. R., McKee C. F., Tumlinson J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/216 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...693..216K 693, 216

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/216 2009

Showing first 80 references.