pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26262 · v1 · pith:RSUWOPHWnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.HE

A Stellar Role Reversal: Multiple Features in the Mass and Mass Ratio Distributions of Merging Binary Black Holes from Stable Mass Transfer

Gina Chen , Katelyn Breivik , Lieke A. C. van Son This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords binary black holesstable mass transfermass ratio reversalgravitational wave populationsmass distributionbinary population synthesismass transfer stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stable mass transfer produces two distinct subpopulations in binary black hole masses and mass ratios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that under conservative mass transfer the stable mass transfer channel for binary black hole formation yields two observationally distinct groups. A high-primary-mass population with near-equal mass ratios forms through mass ratio reversal, while a low-primary-mass population forms without reversal. Stability criteria that depend on the donor star's evolutionary stage divide the primary-mass versus mass-ratio plane into complementary regions, placing the two groups into separate peaks. This imprint means the observed mass function of merging black holes carries direct information about the physics of mass transfer and accretion efficiency.

Core claim

Under the assumption of conservative mass transfer, the SMT channel produces two observationally distinct subpopulations: a high primary mass, near equal mass ratio population formed through mass ratio reversal (MRR), and a low primary mass non-MRR subpopulation. The mass range where MRR occurs is determined by assumptions about binary SMT. In particular, the stability criteria for mass transfer at different stellar evolutionary stages carve out complementary regions in the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane, separating the MRR and non-MRR populations into distinct peaks at high and low primary mass respectively.

What carries the argument

Stability criteria for mass transfer at different stellar evolutionary stages, which divide the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane into complementary MRR and non-MRR regions.

If this is right

  • The binary black hole mass function develops distinct peaks at high and low primary mass.
  • Near-equal mass ratios become associated with the higher-mass peak.
  • The locations of the peaks shift when assumptions about mass-transfer stability or accretion efficiency change.
  • Current and near-future gravitational-wave detectors can resolve these separate subpopulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Observed distributions lacking the predicted peaks would point toward non-conservative mass transfer or different stability rules.
  • The separation supplies a potential way to isolate the stable mass transfer contribution from other formation channels in future catalogs.
  • Varying the accretion efficiency in population models would move the boundary between the two subpopulations in a predictable way.

Load-bearing premise

Mass transfer is fully conservative so that all transferred mass is accreted, combined with the specific stability criteria applied at each evolutionary stage.

What would settle it

A catalog of merging binary black holes whose primary-mass and mass-ratio distribution shows a single continuous population without separated high-mass equal-ratio and low-mass peaks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26262 by Gina Chen, Katelyn Breivik, Lieke A. C. van Son.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic showing the major evolutionary stages in the stable mass transfer (SMT) only channel. transfer are subject to stability criteria and both in￾stances of core collapse can produce natal kicks. 80% of the merging BBHs in our cosmerge simulation fol￾low these stages of evolution. An additional 15% of the merging population experiences three phases of RLOF, where the first instance of RLOF occurs wh… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Merger rates as a function of the chirp mass (top left), BBH mass ratio (bottom left), and individual component masses (right) for the merging BBH population evaluated at z = 0.1. Black solid lines denote the entire SMT-only population, while pink and blue lines denote the non-MRR and MRR subpopulations respectively. The gray histogram on the right panel is the GTWC-5 component mass distribution, using the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The primary masses and initial mass ratios of the merging SMT-only BBHs. We normalize each population separately, and use the opacity to indicate the relative size of each subpopulation. The gray dotted contours and shading show the full SMT-only population. Left panel: BBHs are classified by the donor star’s evolutionary state during MT1. Vertical lines denote qcrit,1 for each type of donor star, which is… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The minimum mass of each component of a BBH formed through the SMT-only channel according to our an￾alytic model for the five β1 values we simulated. Increasing β1 results in a higher minimum limit for both MBH,a and MBH,b In order to determine the effect of β1 on the merger rate and mass and qBBH distributions, we simulate BBHs at an additional four fixed β1 values (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75) and compare to … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The merger rate as a function of primary mass for different β1 values. In the top row, the population is split into MRR (blue) and non-MRR (pink) subpopulations, and in the bottom row, the population is split by donor star type during MT1. The full SMT-only merger rate Rtot evaluated at z = 0.1 is given in units of Gpc−3 yr−1 . Black lines denote the full SMT-only population in both rows. We do not include… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The merger rate as a function of BBH mass ratio for different β1 values. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Observations of gravitational wave events have enabled the measurement of the merging binary black hole (BBH) mass function. This mass function encodes the physical interactions which shape the formation and evolution of BBHs. In this work we investigate how the stable mass transfer (SMT) channel of BBH formation imprints onto the BBH primary mass and mass ratio distributions. We use both an analytic framework and binary population synthesis to show how assumptions about mass transfer accretion efficiency and mass transfer stability affect the BBH mass distribution. Under the assumption of conservative mass transfer, we find that the SMT channel produces two observationally distinct subpopulations: a high primary mass, near equal mass ratio population formed through mass ratio reversal (MRR), and a low primary mass non-MRR subpopulation. The mass range where MRR occurs is determined by assumptions about binary SMT. In particular, we find that the stability criteria for mass transfer at different stellar evolutionary stages carve out complementary regions in the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane, separating the MRR and non-MRR populations into distinct peaks at high and low primary mass respectively. Our results imply that the physics of SMT creates distinct features in gravitational wave populations which current and near future gravitational wave detectors may be able to resolve.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that under the assumption of conservative mass transfer, the stable mass transfer (SMT) channel for binary black hole formation produces two observationally distinct subpopulations in the primary-mass and mass-ratio distributions: a high-primary-mass, near-equal-q population formed via mass ratio reversal (MRR) and a low-primary-mass non-MRR subpopulation. These subpopulations arise because stability criteria for mass transfer at different stellar evolutionary stages carve complementary regions in the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane. The result is demonstrated with both an analytic framework and binary population synthesis.

Significance. If the result holds, it supplies a direct physical mechanism linking SMT assumptions to distinct, potentially resolvable features in the BBH mass function measured by gravitational-wave detectors. Explicit credit is due for the dual use of analytic modeling and population synthesis, which maps the input physics (accretion efficiency and stability criteria) onto observable distributions in a falsifiable way.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should more explicitly flag that all reported subpopulations are conditional on the conservative-mass-transfer assumption and the adopted stability criteria; this is already stated but could be highlighted earlier to avoid misreading as a general prediction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and accurate summary of our manuscript, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. The report correctly identifies the central result that conservative stable mass transfer produces two distinct subpopulations in the primary-mass and mass-ratio distributions via mass ratio reversal, with the separation arising from evolutionary-stage-dependent stability criteria. No specific major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from stated assumptions

full rationale

The paper derives the claimed subpopulations (high-mass MRR and low-mass non-MRR) directly from explicit inputs: conservative mass transfer plus adopted stability criteria at different evolutionary stages. These inputs are used in both analytic modeling and population synthesis to produce complementary regions in the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane. No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation chain supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The result is conditional on the stated physics assumptions and does not reduce to those assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to explicitly stated assumptions. Full paper likely contains additional free parameters inside the population-synthesis code and further domain assumptions about binary evolution.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mass transfer is conservative (all mass lost by donor is accreted by companion)
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the assumption under which the two subpopulations appear.
  • domain assumption Stability criteria for mass transfer depend on stellar evolutionary stage and carve complementary regions in the primary-mass--mass-ratio plane
    Stated in the abstract as the mechanism that separates MRR and non-MRR populations into distinct peaks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5771 in / 1450 out tokens · 29697 ms · 2026-06-26T01:18:20.579921+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al

    Abac, A. G., Abouelfettouh, I., Acernese, F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 995, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c06

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0c06 2025

  2. [2]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, PhRvL, 116, 061102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 14 Figure B1.Same as Figure 3, for allβ 1 variations explored in Section 4.3. Only the full SMT-only population has been shaded for clarity

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  3. [3]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2019, Physical Review X, 9, 031040, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  4. [4]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2021, Physical Review X, 11, 021053, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  5. [5]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2023a, Physical Review X, 13, 041039, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039

  6. [6]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Acernese, F., et al. 2023b, Physical Review X, 13, 011048, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048

  7. [7]

    D., & Thrane, E

    Adamcewicz, C., Galaudage, S., Lasky, P. D., & Thrane, E. 2024, ApJL, 964, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df2

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad2df2 2024

  8. [8]

    2025, The Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 8817, doi: 10.21105/joss.08817

    Agrawal, P., Breivik, K., Hurley, J., et al. 2025, The Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 8817, doi: 10.21105/joss.08817

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.08817 2025

  9. [9]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 933, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2334

    Agrawal, P., Hurley, J., Stevenson, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 933, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2334

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2334 2023

  10. [10]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 4549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2264 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Agrawal, P., Hurley, J., Stevenson, S., Sz´ ecsi, D., & Flynn, C. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2264 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f A...

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2264 2020

  11. [11]

    Banagiri, S., Thrane, E., & Lasky, P. D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.15646, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.15646

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15646 2025

  12. [12]

    2025, ApJ, 987, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addfd8

    Bao, Y., Li, Z., Ge, H., Chen, X., & Han, Z. 2025, ApJ, 987, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addfd8

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addfd8 2025

  13. [13]

    S., Fragos, T., Qin, Y., et al

    Bavera, S. S., Fragos, T., Qin, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A97, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936204

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936204 2020

  14. [14]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

    Bavera, S. S., Fragos, T., Zevin, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039804

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039804 2021

  15. [15]

    S., Fragos, T., Zapartas, E., et al

    Bavera, S. S., Fragos, T., Zapartas, E., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1090, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02018-5

    doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02018-5 2023

  16. [16]

    Begelman, M. C. 2002, ApJL, 568, L97, doi: 10.1086/340457

    work page doi:10.1086/340457 2002

  17. [17]

    2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 3, Vol

    Breivik, K. 2026, in Encyclopedia of Astrophysics, Volume 3, Vol. 3, 570–591, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00115-2

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00115-2 2026

  18. [18]

    2023, TeamLEGWORK/LEGWORK: LEGWORK v0.4.7, v0.4.7 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8436065

    Breivik, K., & Wagg, T. 2023, TeamLEGWORK/LEGWORK: LEGWORK v0.4.7, v0.4.7 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8436065

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8436065 2023

  19. [20]

    2020b, ApJ, 898, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9d85

    Breivik, K., Coughlin, S., Zevin, M., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 898, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9d85

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9d85

  20. [21]

    A case for Case A: detailed look at binary black hole formation through stable mass transfer

    Briel, M. M., Fragos, T., Gallegos-Garcia, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.03629, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.03629 15

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.03629 2026

  21. [22]

    S., Stevenson, S., & Thrane, E

    Broekgaarden, F. S., Stevenson, S., & Thrane, E. 2022, ApJ, 938, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8879

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8879 2022

  22. [23]

    Q., Zevin, M., & Vitale, S

    Cheng, A. Q., Zevin, M., & Vitale, S. 2023, ApJ, 955, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced98

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced98 2023

  23. [24]

    2024, Astropy, v6.1.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11121433

    Collaboration, A. 2024, Astropy, v6.1.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11121433

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11121433 2024

  24. [25]

    2026, COSMIC-PopSynth/COSMIC: v4.1.0, v4.1.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20721229 da Costa-Luis, C., Larroque, S

    Coughlin, S., Breivik, K., Zevin, M., et al. 2026, COSMIC-PopSynth/COSMIC: v4.1.0, v4.1.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20721229 da Costa-Luis, C., Larroque, S. K., Altendorf, K., et al. 2024, tqdm: A fast, Extensible Progress Bar for Python and CLI, v4.66.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3551211 de Mink, S. E., & Mandel, I. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3545, doi: 10.109...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20721229 2026

  25. [26]

    2025, ApJL, 989, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf286

    Disberg, P., & Mandel, I. 2025, ApJL, 989, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf286

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf286 2025

  26. [27]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 3706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae152

    Dorozsmai, A., & Toonen, S. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 3706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae152

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae152 2024

  27. [28]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.14472, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.14472

    Flanagan, E., Antonini, F., Callister, T., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.14472, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.14472

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.14472 2026

  28. [29]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/749/1/91 2012

  29. [30]

    2019, ApJL, 881, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

    Fuller, J., & Ma, L. 2019, ApJL, 881, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab339b 2019

  30. [31]

    2021, ApJ, 922, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610

    Kalogera, V. 2021, ApJ, 922, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610 2021

  31. [32]

    F., Chen, X., & Han, Z

    Ge, H., Webbink, R. F., Chen, X., & Han, Z. 2015, ApJ, 812, 40, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/40

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/40 2015

  32. [33]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01288, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.01288

    Godfrey, J., Edelman, B., & Farr, B. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.01288, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.01288

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.01288 2023

  33. [34]

    A Strongly Parametrized Mass Ratio Model for the Stable Mass Transfer Channel: a Case Study of the $10 \, \rm{M}_{\odot}$ Peak

    Godfrey, J., van Son, L., & Farr, B. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.23083, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.23083

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.23083 2026

  34. [35]

    2023, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.11.4, v1.11.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10155614

    Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Haberland, M., et al. 2023, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.11.4, v1.11.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10155614

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10155614 2023

  35. [36]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  36. [37]

    S., & Webbink, R

    Hjellming, M. S., & Webbink, R. F. 1987, ApJ, 318, 794, doi: 10.1086/165412

    work page doi:10.1086/165412 1987

  37. [38]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  38. [39]

    Abundance and colour gradients in discs

    Hurley, J. R., Pols, O. R., & Tout, C. A. 2000, MNRAS, 315, 543, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03426.x 2000

  39. [40]

    , keywords =

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x 2002

  40. [41]

    2017, MNRAS, 468, 5020, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx757

    Inayoshi, K., Hirai, R., Kinugawa, T., & Hotokezaka, K. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 5020, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx757

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx757 2017

  41. [42]

    G., & Chruslinska, M

    Klencki, J., Nelemans, G., Istrate, A. G., & Chruslinska, M. 2021, A&A, 645, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038707

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038707 2021

  42. [43]

    2026, A&A, 706, A296, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555500

    Klencki, J., Podsiadlowski, P., Langer, N., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A296, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555500

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555500 2026

  43. [44]

    2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed

    Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P´ erez, F., et al. 2016, in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, ed. F. Loizides & B. Schmidt, IOS Press, 87–90

    2016

  44. [45]

    , keywords =

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x 2001

  45. [46]

    M., & Yahil, A

    Lattimer, J. M., & Yahil, A. 1989, ApJ, 340, 426, doi: 10.1086/167404

    work page doi:10.1086/167404 1989

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    Lechien, T., de Mink, S. E., Valli, R., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L51, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfdd4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfdd4 2025

  47. [48]

    B., Agrawal, P., Breivik, K., et al

    Maclean, D. B., Agrawal, P., Breivik, K., et al. 2026, in prep

    2026

  48. [49]

    Cosmic Star Formation History

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 2014

  49. [50]

    Maltsev, K., Schneider, F. R. N., Mandel, I., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554931

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554931 2025

  50. [51]

    Mandel, I., & Broekgaarden, F. S. 2022, Living Reviews in Relativity, 25, 1, doi: 10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3

    doi:10.1007/s41114-021-00034-3 2022

  51. [52]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 3214, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3043

    Mandel, I., & M¨ uller, B. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 3214, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3043

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3043 2020

  52. [53]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =

    Marchant, P., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Tauris, T. M., & Moriya, T. J. 2016, A&A, 588, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628133

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628133 2016

  53. [54]

    Marchant, P., Pappas, K. M. W., Gallegos-Garcia, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039992

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039992 2021

  54. [55]

    , keywords =

    Marchant, P., Renzo, M., Farmer, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3426

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3426 2019

  55. [56]

    First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields

    Marinacci, F., Vogelsberger, M., Pakmor, R., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 5113, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2206

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2206 2018

  56. [57]

    Michaely, E., & Perets, H. B. 2019, ApJL, 887, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5b9b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab5b9b 2019

  57. [58]

    S., & Steinle, N

    Mould, M., Gerosa, D., Broekgaarden, F. S., & Steinle, N. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2738, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2859

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2859 2022

  58. [59]

    First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: A tale of two elements -- chemical evolution of magnesium and europium

    Naiman, J. P., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1206, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty618

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/sty618 2018

  59. [60]

    First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy color bimodality

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3040

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3040 2018

  60. [61]

    2025, A&A, 695, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451564

    Nuijten, M., & Nelemans, G. 2025, A&A, 695, A117, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451564

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451564 2025

  61. [62]

    2021, A&A, 651, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140520

    Olejak, A., Belczynski, K., & Ivanova, N. 2021, A&A, 651, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140520

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140520 2021

  62. [63]

    1981, A&A, 102, 17 pandas development team, T

    Packet, W. 1981, A&A, 102, 17 pandas development team, T. 2023, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, v2.1.4 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10304236 16

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10304236 1981

  63. [64]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 2015

  64. [65]

    Perez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.53 2007

  65. [66]

    Petrovic, J., Langer, N., & van der Hucht, K. A. 2005, A&A, 435, 1013, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042368

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042368 2005

  66. [67]

    2024, A&A, 681, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347090

    Picco, A., Marchant, P., Sana, H., & Nelemans, G. 2024, A&A, 681, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347090

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347090 2024

  67. [68]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al

    Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3112

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3112 2018

  68. [69]

    2018, A&A, 616, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

    Qin, Y., Fragos, T., Meynet, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A28, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832839

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832839 2018

  69. [70]

    2019, ApJL, 870, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b

    Qin, Y., Marchant, P., Fragos, T., Meynet, G., & Kalogera, V. 2019, ApJL, 870, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf97b 2019

  70. [71]

    Raveh, Y., Michaely, E., & Perets, H. B. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4246, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1605

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1605 2022

  71. [72]

    M., Breivik, K., & Creighton, J

    Ray, A., Hernandez, I. M., Breivik, K., & Creighton, J. 2025, ApJ, 991, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf22a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf22a 2025

  72. [73]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17987, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17987

    Ray, A., Mukherjee, S., Zevin, M., & Kalogera, V. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17987, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17987

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17987 2026

  73. [74]

    Science , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Sana, H., de Mink, S. E., de Koter, A., et al. 2012, Science, 337, 444, doi: 10.1126/science.1223344

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1223344 2012

  74. [75]

    Massquerade: Impacts of Mass Ratio Reversals on Binary Black Hole Merger Rates and Mass Distributions

    Smith, T. B., Broekgaarden, F., Levina, S., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.21580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21580

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21580 2026

  75. [76]

    E., Phinney, E

    Soberman, G. E., Phinney, E. S., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1997, A&A, 327, 620, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9703016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9703016 1997

  76. [77]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Pillepich, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 676, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3304

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3304 2018

  77. [78]

    2024, ApJL, 972, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad70bb

    Stegmann, J., Vigna-G´ omez, A., Rantala, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 972, L19, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad70bb

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad70bb 2024

  78. [79]

    Stevenson, S., & Clarke, T. A. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 4034, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2936

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2936 2022

  79. [80]

    GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    Temmink, K. D., Pols, O. R., Justham, S., & Blagorodnova, N. 2025, A&A, 703, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556333 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, & the KAGRA Collaboration. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.27226, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.27226 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collaboratio...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556333 2025

  80. [81]

    Mink, S. E. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4256, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1430 Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace) van Son, L. A. C., de Mink, S. E., Chru´ sli´ nska, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbf51 van Son, L. A. C., De Mink, S. E., Broekgaarden, F. S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 100, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1430 2017

Showing first 80 references.