pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27544 · v1 · pith:JHHAFDRDnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ✦ hep-th

Gravitational wave scattering at mathcal{O}(G⁴): Murua construction and elliptics

Yilber Fabian Bautista , Mathias Driesse , Kays Haddad , Gustav Uhre Jakobsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 00:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords gravitational wave scatteringworldline quantum field theoryMurua coefficientsMagnusianSchwarzschild black holesblack hole perturbation theoryelliptic integralsO(G^4)
0
0 comments X

The pith

Point-particle worldline quantum field theory accurately describes Schwarzschild black holes for gravitational wave scattering up to order G^4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the amplitude for a gravitational wave scattering off a spinless point particle at fourth order in Newton's constant within the worldline quantum field theory framework. A decomposition of the master integrals that incorporates Murua coefficients produces the Magnusian directly and avoids the standard cut subtraction step. The resulting Magnusian is matched to the corresponding prediction obtained from black hole perturbation theory. Agreement between the two establishes that the point-particle worldline description reproduces the physics of Schwarzschild black holes for this process through O(G^4). Elliptic functions enter the momentum-space amplitude for the first time at this order.

Core claim

We compute the amplitude for the scattering of a gravitational wave off of a spinless point particle at fourth order in Newton's constant, using the worldline quantum field theory formalism. A decomposition of our master integrals incorporating Murua coefficients allows us to entirely bypass the cut subtraction needed to convert the scattering amplitude into the Magnusian, the latter being desirable as it maps directly onto the scattering phase shift in partial wave space. This is then matched to the prediction from black hole perturbation theory, proving that point-particle worldline quantum field theory accurately describes Schwarzschild black holes up to O(G^4). Elliptic functions appear

What carries the argument

Murua coefficient decomposition of master integrals that converts the amplitude directly into the Magnusian without cut subtraction.

If this is right

  • The point-particle worldline quantum field theory supplies an accurate effective description of non-spinning Schwarzschild black holes in gravitational wave scattering through fourth order in G.
  • Elliptic functions appear explicitly in the momentum-space amplitude at O(G^4).
  • The Magnusian can be extracted from the amplitude by the Murua decomposition without performing cut subtraction.
  • The matching procedure validates the worldline formalism for this class of processes at the stated order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same decomposition technique may simplify amplitude calculations at fifth order in G or for spinning black holes.
  • Direct access to the Magnusian could ease conversion of scattering amplitudes into waveform templates for gravitational-wave detectors.
  • The first appearance of elliptic integrals at this order indicates that higher-order gravitational scattering will involve increasingly transcendental structures.

Load-bearing premise

The Murua coefficient decomposition correctly bypasses cut subtraction to produce the Magnusian without introducing errors, and the subsequent matching to black hole perturbation theory is valid and complete.

What would settle it

A numerical mismatch between the worldline QFT amplitude (or its Magnusian) and the black hole perturbation theory result at O(G^4), especially in any elliptic contribution, would show the claimed agreement does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27544 by Gustav Uhre Jakobsen, Kays Haddad, Mathias Driesse, Yilber Fabian Bautista.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The (a) helicity-reversing and (b) preserving Magnusian ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the amplitude for the scattering of a gravitational wave off of a spinless point particle at fourth order in Newton's constant, using the worldline quantum field theory formalism. A decomposition of our master integrals incorporating Murua coefficients allows us to entirely bypass the cut subtraction needed to convert the scattering amplitude into the Magnusian, the latter being desirable as it maps directly onto the scattering phase shift in partial wave space. This is then matched to the prediction from black hole perturbation theory, proving that point-particle worldline quantum field theory accurately describes Schwarzschild black holes up to $\mathcal{O}(G^4)$. Elliptic functions appear in momentum space for the first time for this process at this order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper computes the gravitational wave scattering amplitude off a spinless point particle at O(G^4) in the worldline quantum field theory formalism. A Murua coefficient decomposition of the master integrals is used to bypass cut subtraction and directly obtain the Magnusian, which is then matched to an independent black hole perturbation theory prediction. This matching is presented as proving that point-particle WLQFT accurately describes Schwarzschild black holes up to O(G^4). Elliptic functions are reported to appear in momentum space for the first time at this order.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result supplies a non-trivial higher-order check of the equivalence between WLQFT and Schwarzschild dynamics, extending prior lower-order verifications. The Murua-based bypass, if validated, offers a technical simplification for future amplitude computations, while the appearance of elliptic functions marks a new structural feature in the O(G^4) momentum-space integrals.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the Murua decomposition 'entirely bypasses' cut subtraction is load-bearing for the subsequent matching proof, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit verification that the Murua coefficients remain free of O(G^4) mixing between cut and uncut sectors; any such mixing would alter the extracted Magnusian relative to the true phase-shift input.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on decomposition and matching): the matching to black hole perturbation theory is asserted to constitute a proof of equivalence, but without reported integral tables, explicit error analysis, or completeness checks on the matching procedure, the central steps cannot be independently verified from the provided information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the Murua decomposition 'entirely bypasses' cut subtraction is load-bearing for the subsequent matching proof, yet the manuscript supplies no explicit verification that the Murua coefficients remain free of O(G^4) mixing between cut and uncut sectors; any such mixing would alter the extracted Magnusian relative to the true phase-shift input.

    Authors: The Murua decomposition is constructed recursively from the Magnus expansion and isolates the relevant contributions algebraically, independent of the cut structure at each order. This property follows from the definition of the coefficients and holds at O(G^4) without introducing mixing. The manuscript relies on this general feature rather than an order-by-order numerical check. To strengthen the presentation, we will add an explicit verification of the absence of mixing in a revised appendix, including the relevant coefficient combinations at this order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on decomposition and matching): the matching to black hole perturbation theory is asserted to constitute a proof of equivalence, but without reported integral tables, explicit error analysis, or completeness checks on the matching procedure, the central steps cannot be independently verified from the provided information.

    Authors: We agree that additional documentation of the matching procedure would improve independent verifiability. The matching equates coefficients of independent Lorentz structures between the WLQFT amplitude and the black-hole perturbation theory result, with agreement obtained within the numerical accuracy of the integrals. In the revised manuscript we will supply the explicit master-integral expressions, a step-by-step description of the matching, a quantitative error analysis, and completeness checks confirming that all independent structures have been compared. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation matches independent external prediction

full rationale

The paper computes the O(G^4) gravitational wave scattering amplitude in worldline QFT, applies a Murua-coefficient decomposition of master integrals to obtain the Magnusian (bypassing cut subtraction), and matches the result to a separate black-hole perturbation theory prediction. No quoted step defines an output in terms of itself, renames a fitted quantity as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content reduces to the present claim. The matching is presented as external corroboration, satisfying the criteria for an independent, self-contained derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is populated at the minimal level extractable from it. The work relies on the established worldline QFT framework and black hole perturbation theory as external inputs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5656 in / 1070 out tokens · 37446 ms · 2026-06-29T00:51:57.839257+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo, VIRGO), Living Rev. Rel.21, 3 (2018), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. D73, 104031 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0511061

    work page arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff, JHEP09, 219, arXiv:1501.04956 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Levi, Rept

    M. Levi, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 075901 (2020), arXiv:1807.01699 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    P. H. Damgaard, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP11, 070, arXiv:1908.10308 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 1908

  8. [8]

    K¨ alin, Z

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP01, 027, arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D104, 065014 (2021), arXiv:2005.03071 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    M. Levi, A. J. Mcleod, and M. Von Hippel, JHEP07, 116, arXiv:2003.07890 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    W. D. Goldberger, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2206.14249 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Ben-Shahar,Scattering of spinning compact objects from a worldline EFT,JHEP03 (2024) 108 [2311.01430]

    M. Ben-Shahar, JHEP03, 108, arXiv:2311.01430 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Haddad, G.U

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, JHEP02, 019, arXiv:2411.08176 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Scattering of two spinning black holes in post-Minkowskian gravity, to all orders in spin, and effective-one-body mappings

    J. Vines, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 084002 (2018), arXiv:1709.06016 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Guevara, A

    A. Guevara, A. Ochirov, and J. Vines, JHEP09, 056, arXiv:1812.06895 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Chung, Y.-T

    M.-Z. Chung, Y.-T. Huang, J.-W. Kim, and S. Lee, JHEP 04, 156, arXiv:1812.08752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, JHEP03, 136, arXiv:2107.10179 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 201402 (2023), arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Aoude, K

    R. Aoude, K. Haddad, and A. Helset, JHEP07, 072, arXiv:2203.06197 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    Y. F. Bautista, A. Guevara, C. Kavanagh, and J. Vines, JHEP05, 211, arXiv:2212.07965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Y. F. Bautista, Phys. Rev. D108, 084036 (2023), arXiv:2304.04287 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D109, 084071 (2024), arXiv:2312.05965 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Emergence of Calabi-Yau manifolds in high-precision black hole scattering

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Nature 641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith, and M. Zeng, (2025), arXiv:2512.23654 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Ple- fka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, (2026), arXiv:2601.16256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    R. A. Matzner and M. P. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D16, 1636 (1977)

    1977

  29. [29]

    R. A. Matzner and M. P. Ryan, Jr., ApJS36, 451 (1978)

    1978

  30. [30]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    K¨ alin, J

    G. K¨ alin, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 140, arXiv:2207.00580 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2201.07778 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 151401 (2023), arXiv:2306.01714 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, JHEP08, 109, arXiv:2304.01275 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

    L. Bohnenblust, C. Jordan Eriksen, J. Hoogeveen, G. U. Jakobsen, and J. Plefka, (2026), arXiv:2604.22009 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Y. F. Bautista, M. Driesse, K. Haddad, and G. U. Jakob- sen, JHEP05, 252, arXiv:2602.06125 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP02, 048, arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, (2026), arXiv:2602.06951 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. Jordan Eriksen, and N. Shah, (2026), arXiv:2602.06947 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Kim, J.-W

    J.-H. Kim, J.-W. Kim, S. Kim, and S. Lee, JHEP01, 111, arXiv:2410.22988 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini, and P. Vives Matasan, (2025), arXiv:2512.05017 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Canonical Quantisation of Bound and Unbound WQFT

    R. Gonzo and G. Mogull, (2026), arXiv:2603.05237 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, JHEP11, 213, arXiv:2107.12891 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    J.-W. Kim, R. Patil, T. Scheopner, and J. Steinhoff, (2025), arXiv:2511.05649 [hep-th]. 9

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 131401 (2024), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 159901 (2025)], arXiv:2401.08752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Correia and G

    M. Correia and G. Isabella, JHEP03, 144, arXiv:2406.13737 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 191601 (2025), arXiv:2503.13593 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Dynamical Love Numbers for Black Holes and Beyond from Shell Effective Field Theory

    D. Kosmopoulos, D. Perrone, and M. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 211401 (2026), arXiv:2512.04002 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, and L. Santoni, JHEP06, 032, arXiv:2511.02372 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    M. P. Solon, (2026), arXiv:2606.19281 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141401 (2025), arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    From the confluent Heun equation to a new factorized and resummed gravitational waveform for circularized, nonspinning, compact binaries

    A. Cipriani, A. Nagar, F. Fucito, and J. F. Morales, (2026), arXiv:2602.08833 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Gravitational Sommerfeld Effects: Formalism, Renormalization, and Perturbation to $O(G^{10})$

    C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Shen, and Z. Zhou, (2026), arXiv:2604.14112 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Bonocore, A

    D. Bonocore, A. Kulesza, and J. Pirsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 211404 (2025), arXiv:2505.11488 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Ben-Shahar, L

    M. Ben-Shahar, L. Cangemi, and H. Johansson, (2025), arXiv:2512.24549 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    J. A. Futterman, F. A. Handler, and R. A. Matzner,Scat- tering from Black Holes(Cambridge University Press, 1988)

    1988

  59. [59]

    Haddad, G

    K. Haddad, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, and J. Plefka, JHEP02, 008, arXiv:2510.00988 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Magnus, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics7, 649 (1954)

    W. Magnus, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics7, 649 (1954)

    1954

  61. [61]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch, and Z. Wu, Comput. Phys. Com- mun.322, 109999 (2026), arXiv:2505.20197 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma, Comput. Phys. Commun.283, 108565 (2023), arXiv:2201.11669 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 96, 549 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9605057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  64. [64]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev.140, B516 (1965)

    1965

  65. [65]

    S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D77, 044004 (2008), arXiv:0710.4252 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  66. [66]

    Lippstreu, (2025), arXiv:2505.04702 [hep-th]

    L. Lippstreu, (2025), arXiv:2505.04702 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Klemm, C

    A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer, and J. Plefka, Phys. Rev. D109, 124046 (2024), arXiv:2401.07899 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, (bhptoolkit.org)

  69. [69]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun.64, 345 (1991)

    1991

  70. [70]

    New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.207, 432 (2016), arXiv:1601.01167 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  71. [71]

    FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.256, 107478 (2020), arXiv:2001.04407 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun.306, 109357 (2025), arXiv:2312.14089 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    FORM version 4.2

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda, and J. Vermaseren, FORM version 4.2 (2017), arXiv:1707.06453 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA

    C. Meyer, Comput. Phys. Commun.222, 295 (2018), arXiv:1705.06252 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Dlapa, J

    C. Dlapa, J. M. Henn, and F. J. Wagner, JHEP08, 120, arXiv:2211.16357 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv