pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.02117 · v1 · pith:7ZDWTQGYnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Unconventional Mixed-Parity Magnetism in Rare-Earth Tetraborides

Dong-Choon Ryu , Jae-Ho Han , Bongjae Kim , Chang-Jong Kang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 05:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords mixed-parity spin splittingaltermagnetismTbB4scalar spin chiralitynon-coplanar magnetismspin textureEdelstein responseBerry curvature dipole
0
0 comments X

The pith

TbB4's non-coplanar magnetic order creates mixed-parity spin textures in momentum space through scalar spin chirality rather than spin-orbit coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a compensated three-dimensional magnet can host component-resolved mixed-parity spin splitting, with in-plane components showing odd parity and the out-of-plane component showing even parity. In TbB4 the non-coplanar ground state produces p- and f-wave-like textures in the plane alongside a d-wave altermagnetic texture perpendicular to the plane. This mixing is generated by a staggered Berry phase that originates in the material's scalar spin chirality. A sympathetic reader would care because the resulting structure produces non-relativistic Edelstein and spin Hall responses plus a Berry curvature dipole, identifying a route to spin-charge conversion that does not rely on relativistic effects.

Core claim

The non-coplanar ground state of TbB4 enforces a unique momentum-space spin texture. The in-plane spin components exhibit odd-parity p- and f-wave-like textures, whereas the out-of-plane component retains an even-parity d-wave altermagnetic character. The coexistence of the in-plane odd-parity textures is driven by a staggered Berry phase arising from the inherent scalar spin chirality, not by relativistic spin-orbit coupling. This mixed-parity structure dictates distinct transport fingerprints, including bulk non-relativistic Edelstein and spin Hall responses, as well as a symmetry-allowed Berry curvature dipole.

What carries the argument

The staggered Berry phase generated by scalar spin chirality in the non-coplanar state, which produces the mixed-parity momentum-space spin textures.

If this is right

  • The mixed-parity spin splitting produces a bulk non-relativistic Edelstein response.
  • It also produces spin Hall responses.
  • A symmetry-allowed Berry curvature dipole appears in the material.
  • Rare-earth tetraborides become a platform for engineering complex spin-charge conversion phenomena.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same chirality-driven mechanism could be tested in other non-coplanar compensated magnets to look for similar mixed-parity textures.
  • Transport experiments on TbB4 that isolate the Edelstein and spin Hall signals would provide a direct check independent of the first-principles band-structure details.
  • Materials with tunable scalar spin chirality might allow external control over the relative strength of odd- and even-parity components.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles calculations and symmetry analysis correctly identify the non-coplanar ground state and show that scalar spin chirality, rather than spin-orbit coupling, is responsible for the odd-parity in-plane textures.

What would settle it

Measurement of the spin textures or transport responses in TbB4 that match the predictions of dominant spin-orbit coupling instead of scalar spin chirality would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.02117 by Bongjae Kim, Chang-Jong Kang, Dong-Choon Ryu, Jae-Ho Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color Online) Comparative summary of the symmetry-driven phenomena in GdB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color Online) Component-wise spin splitting in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color Online) (a) Non-relativistic Edelstein response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color Online) Momentum-space distribution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnetism has advanced the study of compensated magnets by revealing non-relativistic spin splitting, traditionally classified into strictly even- or odd-parity spin textures. Here, we unveil a fundamentally different regime: component-resolved mixed-parity spin splitting in a fully three-dimensional compensated magnet. Using first-principles calculations, tight-binding and $\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{p}$ models, along with spin-group symmetry analysis, we demonstrate that the non-coplanar ground state of $\mathrm{TbB}_4$ enforces a unique momentum-space spin texture. The in-plane spin components exhibit odd-parity $p$- and $f$-wave-like textures, whereas the out-of-plane component retains an even-parity $d$-wave altermagnetic character. Crucially, the coexistence of the in-plane odd-parity textures is driven not by relativistic spin-orbit coupling, but by a staggered Berry phase arising from the inherent scalar spin chirality. This mixed-parity structure dictates distinct transport fingerprints, including bulk non-relativistic Edelstein and spin Hall responses, as well as a symmetry-allowed Berry curvature dipole. These results establish the rare-earth tetraborides as a robust platform for engineering complex spin-charge conversion phenomena.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses first-principles DFT calculations, tight-binding and k·p models, and spin-group symmetry analysis to argue that the non-coplanar magnetic ground state of TbB4 produces a mixed-parity momentum-space spin texture in this compensated magnet: odd-parity p- and f-wave-like textures for the in-plane spin components and even-parity d-wave altermagnetic character for the out-of-plane component. The key claim is that the in-plane odd-parity components arise from a staggered Berry phase generated by the scalar spin chirality of the non-coplanar order, rather than from relativistic spin-orbit coupling, and that this texture enables distinct bulk transport responses including non-relativistic Edelstein and spin Hall effects plus a Berry curvature dipole.

Significance. If the central attribution to scalar spin chirality holds, the work identifies a new regime of component-resolved mixed-parity spin splitting in altermagnets that is independent of SOC. This would position rare-earth tetraborides as a platform for engineering complex spin-charge conversion phenomena and would extend the classification of compensated magnets beyond strictly even- or odd-parity textures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section on first-principles and model calculations] Abstract and results section on first-principles and model calculations: The load-bearing claim that the odd-parity in-plane textures are driven by staggered Berry phase from scalar spin chirality and not by SOC requires a controlled demonstration. Because the DFT calculations necessarily include SOC for the heavy Tb f-electrons, the manuscript must show either (i) that the same odd-parity textures survive when SOC is switched off while the non-coplanar order is preserved, or (ii) an explicit non-relativistic symmetry analysis of the spin texture. Without this isolation, SOC-induced parity mixing cannot be ruled out.
  2. [k·p model and Berry-phase discussion] k·p model and Berry-phase discussion: The explicit mapping from the scalar spin chirality of the non-coplanar order to the staggered Berry phase that produces the odd-parity components is not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that the parity mixing is SOC-independent. A step-by-step derivation linking the real-space chirality to the momentum-space spin texture in the non-relativistic limit would be required.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions for the spin-texture plots should explicitly state whether the plotted components are obtained with SOC included or excluded.
  2. A short table summarizing the spin-group symmetries and the allowed spin-texture parities under each would improve readability of the symmetry analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful comments. We agree that the SOC-independent origin of the odd-parity textures requires a more explicit demonstration and will revise the manuscript to address both points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The load-bearing claim that the odd-parity in-plane textures are driven by staggered Berry phase from scalar spin chirality and not by SOC requires a controlled demonstration. Because the DFT calculations necessarily include SOC for the heavy Tb f-electrons, the manuscript must show either (i) that the same odd-parity textures survive when SOC is switched off while the non-coplanar order is preserved, or (ii) an explicit non-relativistic symmetry analysis of the spin texture. Without this isolation, SOC-induced parity mixing cannot be ruled out.

    Authors: We agree that a direct isolation is needed. In the revised manuscript we will add DFT calculations performed with SOC switched off while preserving the non-coplanar magnetic order; these will show that the odd-parity in-plane textures remain. We will also expand the spin-group symmetry analysis to explicitly demonstrate the non-relativistic character of the spin texture. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The explicit mapping from the scalar spin chirality of the non-coplanar order to the staggered Berry phase that produces the odd-parity components is not shown in sufficient detail to confirm that the parity mixing is SOC-independent. A step-by-step derivation linking the real-space chirality to the momentum-space spin texture in the non-relativistic limit would be required.

    Authors: We will add a detailed step-by-step derivation, based on the tight-binding model in the non-relativistic limit, that explicitly connects the real-space scalar spin chirality to the staggered Berry phase and the resulting odd-parity momentum-space spin texture. This derivation will be placed in the main text or supplementary material of the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation grounded in independent calculations and symmetry analysis

full rationale

The paper derives mixed-parity spin textures from the non-coplanar magnetic order of TbB4 via first-principles DFT, tight-binding/k·p models, and spin-group symmetry analysis. The central attribution to scalar spin chirality (rather than SOC) is presented as a result of these external methods applied to the identified ground state, with no reduction of predictions to fitted inputs, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Insufficient detail in abstract to identify specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; no explicit fitting or new postulated particles mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5758 in / 1194 out tokens · 22051 ms · 2026-07-03T05:54:09.182991+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci- ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Na- ture Reviews Materials7, 482 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. MacDon- ald, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermagnetism: An un- conventional spin-ordered phase of matter, Newton1, 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newton.2025.100162 2025

  6. [6]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the al- termagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, J. Dai, L. Han, C. Chen, S. Liang, Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, W. Zhu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Electrical manipulation of spin splitting torque in altermagnetic RuO 2, Nature Communications16, 5646 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Noh, G.-H

    S. Noh, G.-H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Jung, U. Seo, G. So, J. Lee, S. Lee, M. Park, S. Yang, Y. S. Oh, H. Jin, C. Sohn, and J.-W. Yoo, Tunneling magnetoresistance in alter- magnetic RuO 2-based magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 246703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Liao, Y.-C

    C.-T. Liao, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Tien, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Separation of inverse altermagnetic spin-splitting effect from inverse spin hall effect in RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 056701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Elec- tronics5, 735 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal s...

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications12, 7061 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- 7 magnetism in MnTe, Nature6...

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Min´ ar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Alterm...

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Hariki, A

    A. Hariki, A. Dal Din, O. J. Amin, T. Yamaguchi, A. Badura, D. Kriegner, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Cam- pion, P. Wadley, D. Backes, L. S. I. Veiga, S. S. Dhesi, G. Springholz, L. ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, T. Jungwirth, and J. Kuneˇ s, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism in alter- magneticα-MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176701 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Takegami, T

    D. Takegami, T. Aoyama, T. Okauchi, T. Yamaguchi, S. Tippireddy, S. Agrestini, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, T. Mi- zokawa, K. Ohgushi, K.-J. Zhou, J. Chaloupka, J. Kuneˇ s, A. Hariki, and H. Suzuki, Circular dichroism in reso- nant inelastic x-ray scattering: Probing altermagnetic domains in MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three- dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nature Communications16, 1442 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Biniskos, M

    N. Biniskos, M. dos Santos Dias, S. Agrestini, D. Svit´ ak, K.-J. Zhou, J. Posp´ ıˇ sil, and P.ˇCerm´ ak, Systematic map- ping of altermagnetic magnons by resonant inelastic x- ray circular dichroism, Nature Communications16, 9311 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagara- jan, M. Leandersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu, C. Fulga, M. G. Vergniory, O. Janson, O. Tjernberg, and J. van den Brink, Topological weyl altermagnetism in CrSb, Com- munications Physics8, 311 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Y.-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X.-R. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, X.-M. Ma, Y.-J. Hao, M.-Y. Zhu, W. Liu, M. Zeng, S. Jayaram, M. Lenger, J. Ding, S. Mo, K. Tanaka, M. Arita, Z. Liu, M. Ye, D. Shen, J. Wrachtrup, Y. Huang, R.-H. He, S. Qiao, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Observation of plaid-like spin split- ting in a noncoplanar antiferromagn...

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal,p-wave mag- nets (2024), arXiv:2309.01607 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Brekke, P

    B. Brekke, P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Minimal models and transport properties of unconventionalp-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 236703 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. An- tonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of ap-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Odd-Parity Altermagnetism Originated from Orbital Orders

    Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Odd-parity altermagnetism originated from orbital or- ders (2025), arXiv:2508.18361 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Yamada, M

    R. Yamada, M. T. Birch, P. R. Baral, S. Okumura, R. Nakano, S. Gao, M. Ezawa, T. Nomoto, J. Masell, Y. Ishihara, K. K. Kolincio, I. Belopolski, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, K. Ohishi, T. Ohhara, R. Kiyanagi, T. Naka- jima, Y. Tokura, T.-h. Arima, Y. Motome, M. M. Hirschmann, and M. Hirschberger, A metallicp-wave magnet with commensurate spin helix, Nature646, 8...

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    McNally,p-wave magnetism in a metal, Nature Mate- rials25, 16 (2026)

    D. McNally,p-wave magnetism in a metal, Nature Mate- rials25, 16 (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Q. N. Meier, A. Carta, C. Ederer, and A. Cano, Net and compensated altermagnetism from staggered orbital order: Layer-dependent spin splitting in sr n+1crno3n+1, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 116705 (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Y. Yu, M. B. Lyngby, T. Shishidou, M. Roig, A. Kreisel, M. Weinert, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Odd- parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 046701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    N. A. A. Pari, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Nonrelativistic linear edel- stein effect in helical EuIn2As2, Phys. Rev. B112, 024404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, P. Ritzinger, K. V´ yborn´ y, J. ˇZelezn´ y, and A. Manchon, Non-relativistic torque and edelstein effect in non-collinear magnets, Nature Com- munications15, 7663 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    M. Hu, O. Janson, C. Felser, P. McClarty, J. van den Brink, and M. G. Vergniory, Spin hall and edelstein ef- fects in chiral non-collinear altermagnets, Nature Com- munications16, 8529 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly efficient non-relativistic edelstein effect in nodalp-wave magnets, Nature Communications16, 7270 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    R. R. Neumann, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, R. Zarzuela, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and A. Mook, Odd-parity-wave magonons and nonrelativistic thermal edelstein effect 8 (2026), arXiv:2603.05415

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    J. Lai, T. Yu, P. Liu, L. Liu, G. Xing, X.-Q. Chen, and Y. Sun,d-wave flat fermi surface in altermagnets enables maximum charge-to-spin conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 256702 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    J. A. Blanco, P. J. Brown, A. Stunault, K. Katsumata, F. Iga, and S. Michimura, Magnetic structure of Gdb 4 from spherical neutron polarimetry, Phys. Rev. B73, 212411 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    L. Ye, T. Suzuki, and J. G. Checkelsky, Electronic trans- port on the shastry-sutherland lattice in ising-type rare- earth tetraborides, Phys. Rev. B95, 174405 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    R. D. Johnson and S. W. Lovesey, Magnetic symmetries of terbium tetraboride (Tbb4) revealed by resonant x-ray bragg diffraction, Phys. Rev. B110, 104405 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    H. Sim, S. Lee, K.-P. Hong, J. Jeong, J. R. Zhang, T. Kamiyama, D. T. Adroja, C. A. Murray, S. P. Thomp- son, F. Iga, S. Ji, D. Khomskii, and J.-G. Park, Spon- taneous structural distortion of the metallic shastry- sutherland system Dyb 4 by quadrupole-spin-lattice cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B94, 195128 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Etourneau, J

    J. Etourneau, J. Mercurio, A. Berrada, P. Hagenmuller, R. Georges, R. Bourezg, and J. Gianduzzo, The magnetic and electrical properties of some rare earth tetraborides, Journal of the Less Common Metals67, 531 (1979)

    work page 1979

  51. [51]

    K. H. J. Buschow and J. H. N. Creyghton, Magnetic prop- erties of rare earth tetraborides, The Journal of Chemical Physics57, 3910 (1972)

    work page 1972

  52. [52]

    H. C. Choi, A. Laref, J. H. Shim, S. K. Kwon, and B. I. Min, Electronic structures and magnetic properties of rb4 (r=yb,pr,gd,tb,dy), Journal of Applied Physics105, 07E107 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    G. A. Wigger, E. Felder, R. Monnier, H. R. Ott, L. Pham, and Z. Fisk, Low-temperature phase transitions in the induced-moment system Prb 4, Phys. Rev. B72, 014419 (2005)

    work page 2005

  54. [54]

    Misawa, K

    R. Misawa, K. Arakawa, T. Yoshioka, H. Ueda, F. Iga, K. Tamasaku, Y. Tanaka, and T. Kimura, Resonant x-ray diffraction study using circularly polarized x rays on an- tiferromagnetic tbb4, Phys. Rev. B108, 134433 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  56. [57]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  57. [58]

    The Supplemental Material includes Refs

    See Supplemental Material for further computational de- tails, the electronic structures ofRB 4, spin textures on the Fermi surfaces, tight-binding andk·pmodels, the ef- fect of spin-orbit coupling on the spin textures and Edel- stein response, as well as the Berry curvature and Berry curvature dipole in the absence of spin-orbit coupling. The Supplementa...

    work page

  58. [59]

    H. Li, H. Gao, L. P. Zˆ arbo, K. V´ yborn´ y, X. Wang, I. Garate, F. Doˇ gan, A. ˇCejchan, J. Sinova, T. Jung- wirth, and A. Manchon, Intraband and interband spin- orbit torques in noncentrosymmetric ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B91, 134402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [60]

    Hence, the symmetry operation{I sC −1 4z ||C4z}be- comes{I sC −1 4z ||KC4z} ≡T{C −1 4z ||C4z}, whereTis the time-reversal operation

    The spin-only inversionI s is forced to become anti- unitary (incorporating the complex conjugation operator K) in order to preserve the spin commutation relations when evaluated as a quantum operator in the Kubo for- mula. Hence, the symmetry operation{I sC −1 4z ||C4z}be- comes{I sC −1 4z ||KC4z} ≡T{C −1 4z ||C4z}, whereTis the time-reversal operation

    work page

  60. [61]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [62]

    Mixed-Parity Altermagnetism in Collinear Spin-Orbital Magnets

    Z.-Y. Zhuang, J.-X. Hu, S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and Z. Yan, Mixed-parity altermagnetism in collinear spin- orbital magnets (2026), arXiv:2605.05205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  62. [63]

    Tunable Odd-Parity Spin Splittings in Altermagnets

    Y. Yu, Tunable odd-parity spin splittings in altermagnets (2026), arXiv:2605.03026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  63. [64]

    Unconventional Mixed-Parity Magnetism in Rare-Earth Tetraborides

    G. Y. Guo, S. Murakami, T.-W. Chen, and N. Nagaosa, Intrinsic spin hall effect in platinum: First-principles cal- culations, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096401 (2008). END MA TTER Appendix A: Spin-Space Group Symmetry Elements in TbB4— Based on the spin-space group (SSG) analysis, the non-coplanar magnetic ground state of TbB 4 com- prises 16 symmetry operations...

    work page 2008

  64. [65]

    Standard Kinetic Hamiltonian Hkin(k) The 8×8 standard kinetic Hamiltonian is given by: Hkin(k) =hkin(k)⊗σ0 where hkin(k) is the 4×4 spin-independent kinetic matrix and σ0 is the 2×2 identity matrix. To accurately capture the energy band dispersion and the topological crossing features near the Fermi level—particularly around the M-point— hkin(k) incorpora...

    work page

  65. [66]

    For itinerant electrons, this chiral spin texture acts as an emergent fictitious gauge field (Berry phase)

    Complex Kinetic Hamiltonian HB(k) Even in the absence of spin-orbit coupling (SOC), the non-coplanar magnetic ordering of the Tb ions yields a non-zero scalar spin chirality, Si·(Sj×Sk)̸= 0. For itinerant electrons, this chiral spin texture acts as an emergent fictitious gauge field (Berry phase). Due to the specific non-coplanar magnetic structure of TbB...

    work page

  66. [67]

    Exchange Interaction Hex The conduction electrons interact with the localized, non-coplanar magnetic moments of the Tb ions via the s−f exchange coupling. The interaction Hamiltonian at site i is−Jsf si·Si, where si is the conduction electron spin operator (represented by Pauli matrices) and Si is the normalized local spin moment of the Tb ion. The exchan...

    work page

  67. [68]

    7 and SFIG

    Model Parameters The tight-binding parameters used to reproduce the key features of the DFT calculations (e.g., the crossing at the M-point and the spin texture on the Fermi surface) are: ˆ E0 =−0.4 eV (On-site energy) ˆ t =−0.5 eV (Nearest-neighbor hopping) ˆ t′=−0.3 eV (Dimer hopping) ˆ t3 = 0.05 eV (Next-nearest-neighbor hopping) ˆ Jsf =−0.15 eV (s−f e...

    work page

  68. [69]

    We expand the elements of the total kinetic Hamiltonian in Eq

    T A YLOR EXP ANSION OF THE KINETIC MA TRIX A T THE M-POINT We define the momentum near the M-point as k = M + q = (π/a+qx,π/a+qy), where|q|≪1. We expand the elements of the total kinetic Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) up to the cubic order,O(q3), to capture the dominant symmetries. 1.1 Nearest-Neighbor Hopping ( t) and Staggered Berry Phase ( λ) Substituting kx =...

    work page

  69. [70]

    L ¨OWDIN DOWNFOLDING AND THE EFFECTIVE SPIN HAMIL TONIAN To extract the effective physics at the Fermi level, we project the 8×8 HamiltonianH(M + q) onto the low-energy degenerate subspace utilizing L¨ owdin partitioning. The resulting 2×2 effective Hamiltonian for the conduction electrons in the pseudo-spin subspace takes the generic form: Heff (q) =ε0(q...

    work page

  70. [71]

    However, the staggered Berry phase ( λ̸= 0) breaks this cancellation

    COEXISTENCE OF p-W A VE,d-W A VE, ANDf -W A VE SPIN SYMMETRIES 3.1 The Inner Pocket (In-Plane): p-wave Symmetry During downfolding, the pure real-hopping linear terms (±itqxa and±itqya) destructively interfere and cancel out due to the staggered s−f exchange potential. However, the staggered Berry phase ( λ̸= 0) breaks this cancellation. The symmetric rea...

    work page

  71. [72]

    Heiba, W

    Z. Heiba, W. Sch¨ afer, E. Jansen, and G. Will, Low-temperature structural phase transitions of tbb4 and erb4 studied by high resolution x-ray diffraction and profile analysis, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 47, 651 (1986)

    work page 1986

  72. [73]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  73. [74]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    work page 1996

  74. [75]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  75. [76]

    R. D. Johnson and S. W. Lovesey, Magnetic symmetries of terbium tetraboride (Tbb 4) revealed by resonant x-ray bragg diffraction, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104405 (2024)

    work page 2024