Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 70 references

A discrete symmetry among dark QCD copies, broken only by reheating into one copy, yields natural phantom dark energy from a trapped axion that rolls once dark-pion density dilutes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 21:35 UTC pith:Q2CXINDS

load-bearing objection Clean, technically natural construction that links Z_N-protected DE, dark-pion DM, and apparent phantom crossing to one soft reheating spurion; free V_0 is the main external assumption. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.06774 v1 pith:Q2CXINDS submitted 2026-07-07 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Natural Phantom Dark Energy from a mathbb{Z}_N--Axion

C\'edric Delaunay , Admir Greljo This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords phantom dark energyaxionZ_N symmetrydark pionsdark QCDreheatingDESIfinite-density potential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper constructs a microscopic model in which apparent phantom dark energy (an equation of state that dips below -1) arises without ghosts or null-energy-condition violations. An axion couples to N identical two-flavor dark-QCD sectors related by a discrete Z_N exchange symmetry; the symmetry exponentially suppresses the axion vacuum potential, so the dark-energy scale is technically natural. Reheating after inflation populates only one copy, softly breaking Z_N. That single source of breaking both restores the full axion field range and supplies a relic population of dark pions that act as dark matter. At early times the finite density of those pions holds the axion near a metastable point; as the Universe expands and the density redshifts, the axion is released and rolls, transferring energy so that an observer who assumes non-interacting dark matter and dark energy infers a phantom crossing. The same parameters that set the dark-matter abundance also fix the size of the vacuum potential, producing a finite, constrained region that matches the observed dark-matter density and dark-energy scale, satisfies warm-dark-matter, self-interaction and BBN bounds, and qualitatively tracks the DESI preference for evolving dark energy.

Core claim

A Z_N-symmetric multi-copy dark-QCD axion, with controlled Z_N breaking induced solely by reheating into one copy that supplies dark-pion dark matter, simultaneously generates a technically natural dark-energy scale, restores the physical axion periodicity, sets the dark-matter abundance, and drives late-time rolling that produces an effective phantom equation of state without tuned cancellations.

What carries the argument

The density-dependent axion potential V_DE(Θ) ≈ V_0 + Λ_b[1 - r(Θ)] + n_π m_π √r(Θ). Finite dark-pion density initially traps the axion near Θ = π; dilution of n_π lets the reheating-induced vacuum term dominate and release the field toward Θ = 0, raising the dark-pion mass and thereby exchanging energy between dark matter and dark energy.

Load-bearing premise

The constant vacuum-energy offset that sets today's cosmological constant is assumed to be fixed by some unspecified mechanism that solves the cosmological-constant problem, independent of the axion dynamics.

What would settle it

A dedicated joint likelihood analysis of the model's predicted expansion history, effective dark-energy equation of state, and growth of structure (fσ_8) against DESI BAO, supernovae, CMB and redshift-space-distortion data that shows statistically significant tension with the observed phantom-crossing pattern would falsify the claim that the mechanism accounts for the DESI preference.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the observed dark-energy scale, dark-matter relic density and reheating history are linked by a single set of parametric relations involving the dark-pion mass, decay constant and reheaton couplings.
  • The same dark-pion density that sets the dark-matter abundance also controls when and how the axion is released, producing a correlated pattern of deviations in expansion history, w_DE(z) and structure growth rather than an arbitrary parametrization of dark energy.
  • A finite, observationally allowed window exists in the (m_π, f_π) plane that simultaneously satisfies warm-dark-matter free-streaming, self-interaction, BBN and chiral-EFT constraints while reproducing the observed abundances.
  • Dark pions rather than dark baryons constitute the minimal dark-matter realization that keeps a sizable dark-matter–dark-energy coupling inside the dilute regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the release redshift and the depth of the transient phantom phase are set by the same spurion that fixes the dark-matter yield, future precision measurements of w_DE(z) and fσ_8 can jointly constrain the reheaton branching ratios without additional free functions.
  • The construction suggests a broader design principle: any discrete symmetry that protects an ultralight scalar can be broken in a controlled way by selective reheating, automatically correlating dark-matter production with late-time dark-energy dynamics.
  • If cannibalization of the dark pions is efficient near m_π ∼ f_π ∼ 10 keV, the required temperature ratio ξ_rh rises, tightening the lower edge of the allowed window and offering a sharp target for laboratory or astrophysical probes of light dark-sector self-interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a technically natural model of apparent phantom dark energy from an axion coupled to N copies of two-flavor dark QCD related by a Z_N exchange symmetry. The discrete symmetry exponentially suppresses the vacuum axion potential (Eq. 18), generating the meV-scale DE density with O(1) quark-mass ratios. Reheating into a single copy via a reheaton softly breaks Z_N, restoring 2πf periodicity, generating the leading vacuum potential V_b, and populating that copy with dark-pion DM. Finite dark-pion density initially traps the axion near φ=πf; as the density redshifts, the field is released and rolls, inducing energy exchange that produces an effective w_DE < −1 without ghosts or NEC violation. A benchmark solution qualitatively matches DESI-like evolution, and a non-empty (m_π, f_π) window simultaneously satisfies the DM relic density, DE scale, WDM, self-interaction, BBN, and chiral-EFT constraints.

Significance. If the construction holds, it supplies a concrete, microscopically consistent QFT realization of the finite-density phantom mechanism of Ref. [29], with the same soft spurion controlling both the DM abundance and the late-time DE potential. The Z_N protection, controlled reheating-induced breaking, and dark-pion DM choice remove the usual control and scale-separation problems of confining-sector axion DE. Strengths include fully derived chiral and finite-density potentials (Sec. III), consistent background and linear-perturbation equations (Secs. IV–V), an explicit non-empty viable region (Fig. 4), and correlated, falsifiable predictions for the expansion history, w_eff(z), and a few-percent growth suppression. The model therefore offers a predictive alternative to phenomenological CPL parametrizations and is of clear interest for both particle phenomenology and cosmology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, after Eq. (27)] After Eq. (27) the additive offset V_0 is left free and assumed fixed by an unspecified solution of the cosmological-constant problem, independent of the axion dynamics. This assumption is load-bearing: the late-time expansion history, the timing of phantom crossing, and the match to the observed DE density all depend on the relative size of V_0 and Λ_b. While the dynamical scale Λ_b is technically natural, the paper should quantify the residual tuning of V_0 relative to Λ_b (or discuss possible correlations) so that the claim of a natural DE scale is precise.
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (32)–(35)] The redshift of release and the subsequent delay of phantom crossing are controlled by the residual velocity at the moment the finite-density term becomes sub-dominant; this velocity is set by the free post-inflationary initial condition φ_i (Eqs. 32–34 and benchmark Eq. 35). For the quoted benchmark, φ_i = 0.57 π f is chosen by hand to obtain z_c ≃ 0.17. A short scan over the range of φ_i that still yields DESI-compatible w_eff(z) is needed to establish that the qualitative agreement is robust rather than the result of a single tuned initial condition.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sections V and VIII] Several typos appear in the text: “asusming” (Sec. V), “constrainted” (Sec. V), “adpoted” (Sec. VIII), and the accented “Poincar´ e”. A careful proof-read is needed.
  2. [Figures 1–2] Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions refer to “the benchmark solution” without restating the numerical values of Eq. (35); repeating the key parameters (or adding a table) would improve readability.
  3. [Appendix C] The discussion of cannibal depletion (Appendix C) is useful but the parametric estimate of ⟨σ_{4→2}v^{3}⟩ could be cross-checked against an explicit chiral-Lagrangian calculation for two flavors, or at least the uncertainty in c_6 should be stated.
  4. [Section IX] The paper correctly notes that a dedicated likelihood analysis is left for future work; a short paragraph listing the minimal set of model-specific fitting parameters (release redshift, depth of the phantom phase, β strength) would already help observers interface with the framework.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Z_N construction, reheating spurion, and finite-density release are derived from stated UV assumptions and then fitted to external data without tautological reduction.

full rationale

The paper constructs an EFT (Eq. 3) with a Z_N-symmetric multi-copy dark QCD, derives the exponentially suppressed vacuum potential (Eq. 18) and the soft-breaking + finite-density potential (Eq. 27) from chiral Lagrangian + reheaton spurion (Secs. II–III, VI), then solves the coupled background and perturbation equations (Eqs. 30–31, 36–38) for a benchmark chosen to match Planck θ⋆, Ωm and the observed DE/DM scales. The same spurion ϵ_b that sets Λ_b also controls the dark-pion yield via reheating temperatures (Eqs. 48, 52, 55), producing a non-empty viable window (Fig. 4) after external constraints (WDM, self-interactions, BBN, chiral EFT). This is ordinary model-building plus parameter selection, not a self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The free additive offset V_0 (after Eq. 27) is an external assumption about the CC problem, not an internal circularity. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled from the authors’ prior work; the mechanism builds on the independent Ref. [29] while adding the Z_N + reheating ingredients. Score remains low because the central claims retain independent dynamical content once the UV assumptions are granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 5 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a multi-copy dark sector, a soft reheaton spurion, and an unspecified solution to the cosmological-constant problem. Free parameters are fixed by matching observed abundances and the qualitative DESI shape; the invented entities (N dark-QCD copies, reheaton, dark pions as DM) have no independent laboratory evidence yet but make falsifiable cosmological predictions.

free parameters (8)
  • N (number of dark-QCD copies)
    Chosen large enough (N ≳ 30–100) that the residual Z_N-symmetric potential is sub-dominant to the soft-breaking term; not fixed by first principles.
  • z_ud = m_u / m_d
    Quark-mass ratio controlling both the exponential suppression and the axion mass; benchmark value 0.05 chosen by hand.
  • f (axion decay constant)
    Sets the field range and the late-time mass; benchmark 0.065 M_P chosen so the field rolls today.
  • Λ_b = ε_b m_π² f_π²
    Overall scale of the soft-breaking vacuum potential; benchmark 19 H_0² M_P² fixed to place the release near the present epoch.
  • V_0 (additive vacuum-energy offset)
    Sets the present-day cosmological constant; free and assumed fixed by an external CC solution (after Eq. 27).
  • φ_i (initial axion displacement after inflation)
    Controls residual velocity at release and therefore the precise timing of phantom crossing; benchmark 0.57 π f chosen to match the acoustic scale.
  • m_π, f_π (dark-pion mass and decay constant)
    Scanned to satisfy relic density, WDM, self-interactions and reheating consistency; not predicted.
  • m_ϕ, κ_SM, κ_D (reheaton mass and couplings)
    Determine reheating temperatures and the size of ε_b; constrained only by BBN and the DE-scale requirement.
axioms (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The residual cosmological-constant problem is solved by an unspecified mechanism that sets V_0 to the observed value independently of the axion dynamics.
    Stated explicitly after Eq. (27); without it the late-time expansion history is uncontrolled.
  • domain assumption Leading-order two-flavor chiral perturbation theory plus the linear finite-density correction remain valid throughout the cosmological evolution of interest.
    Used to derive V_DE(Θ) in Sec. III; higher-order terms in n_π and in the chiral expansion are neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper Reheating populates only one dark copy (k=0) while the remaining N-1 copies stay cold, realized by a reheaton coupled solely to S_0 and the SM Higgs.
    Introduced in Sec. VI; the single-copy selection is essential for restoring 2π f periodicity and for generating the DM density that traps the axion.
  • domain assumption Dark pions are stable on cosmological timescales because all renormalizable interactions preserve pion parity.
    Sec. VII; required for them to constitute the entire DM relic.
  • domain assumption Standard ΛCDM initial conditions and adiabatic perturbations at z_i = 10^7, with three relativistic neutrinos.
    Secs. IV–V; used to initialize the numerical background and perturbation solutions.
invented entities (3)
  • N identical copies of two-flavor dark QCD related by a Z_N exchange symmetry no independent evidence
    purpose: Exponentially suppress the axion vacuum potential while keeping the confinement scale high enough for keV-scale dark pions.
    Postulated in Sec. II; no independent laboratory evidence; falsifiable only through the cosmological signatures of the model.
  • Reheaton scalar ϕ with trilinear couplings only to the SM Higgs and to the dark Higgs of copy k=0 no independent evidence
    purpose: Simultaneously reheat the visible sector and one dark copy, generate the soft Z_N-breaking spurion ε_b, and set the DM abundance.
    Introduced in Sec. VI; the selective coupling is an ad-hoc UV assumption.
  • Dark pions of the selected copy as the entirety of cold dark matter no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the finite-density term that traps the axion and later sources the energy exchange responsible for apparent phantom behavior.
    Chosen over dark baryons for minimality (Sec. VII and App. B); their mass and self-interactions are constrained but not independently measured.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 29032 in / 3943 out tokens · 49299 ms · 2026-07-10T21:35:47.079676+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a technically natural microscopic realization of apparent phantom dark energy based on an axion coupled to $N$ copies of two-flavor dark QCD related by a $\mathbb{Z}_N$ exchange symmetry. The symmetry exponentially suppresses the axion vacuum potential, naturally generating the dark-energy scale, while reheating into a single dark sector induces a controlled breaking of $\mathbb{Z}_N$ that simultaneously restores the physical axion periodicity, sets the dark-matter abundance, and drives the late-time dark-energy dynamics. The selected sector contains dark-pion dark matter, whose finite density initially traps the axion away from its vacuum minimum. As the Universe expands and the dark-pion density redshifts away, the axion is released and rolls on the reheating-induced vacuum potential, generating an effective phantom crossing without tuned cancellations. We identify a viable parameter region that simultaneously reproduces the observed dark-matter relic abundance and dark-energy scale, satisfies cosmological and astrophysical constraints, and qualitatively reproduces the DESI preference for an evolving dark-energy equation of state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06774 by Admir Greljo, C\'edric Delaunay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the axion field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Effective dark energy equation of state as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of the linear growth observable ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phenomenological constraints from cosmology and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Additional background diagnostics for the bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022), no. 2 110, [arXiv:2202.04077]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework

    D. Rubin et al.,Union Through UNITY: Cosmology with 2,000 SNe Using a Unified Bayesian Framework, Astrophys. J.986(2025), no. 2 231, [arXiv:2311.12098]. [6]DESCollaboration, T. M. C. Abbott et al.,The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024), no. 1 L14, [...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    A Detailed Description of the CamSpec Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps

    G. Efstathiou and S. Gratton,A Detailed Description of the CamSpec Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps,arXiv:1910.00483

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  4. [4]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    J. Carron, M. Mirmelstein, and A. Lewis,CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps,JCAP09(2022) 039, [arXiv:2206.07773]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec

    E. Rosenberg, S. Gratton, and G. Efstathiou,CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517 (2022), no. 3 4620–4636, [arXiv:2205.10869]. [12]ACTCollaboration, M. S. Madhavacheril et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,Astrophys. J.962(2024)...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    W. J. Wolf, C. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, and P. G. Ferreira, Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations,JCAP05(2025) 034, [arXiv:2502.04929]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    I. D. Gialamas, G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, J. Urrutia, M. Vasar, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Quintessence and phantoms in light of DESI 2025,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 6 063551, [arXiv:2506.21542]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    M. W. Toomey, G. Montefalcone, E. McDonough, and K. Freese,How theory-informed priors affect DESI evidence for evolving dark energy,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026), no. 12 123532, [arXiv:2509.13318]

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    D. H. Lee, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan, and C. van de Bruck,Shape of dark energy: Constraining its evolution with a general parametrization,Phys. Rev. D 113(2026), no. 6 063554, [arXiv:2507.11432]

    work page arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Ratra and P

    B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles,Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homogeneous Scalar Field, Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3406

    work page 1988

  11. [11]

    Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry

    C. Wetterich,Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B302(1988) 668–696, [arXiv:1711.03844]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  12. [12]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 1582–1585, [astro-ph/9708069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  13. [13]

    R. R. Caldwell,A Phantom menace?,Phys. Lett. B545 (2002) 23–29, [astro-ph/9908168]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  14. [14]

    Null Energy Condition and Dark Energy Models

    T. Qiu, Y.-F. Cai, and X.-M. Zhang,Null Energy Condition and Dark Energy Models,Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23(2008) 2787–2798, [arXiv:0710.0115]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  15. [15]

    K. J. Ludwick,The viability of phantom dark energy: A review,Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017), no. 28 1730025, [arXiv:1708.06981]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    How Much NEC Breaking Can the Universe Endure?

    E. Moghtaderi, B. R. Hull, J. Quintin, and G. Geshnizjani,How much null-energy-condition 16 breaking can the Universe endure?,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025), no. 12 123552, [arXiv:2503.19955]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder,Null impact of the null energy condition in current cosmology,JCAP05(2026) 008, [arXiv:2511.07526]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti, and J. Khoury, Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 083509, [astro-ph/0510628]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    A Minimal Axio-dilaton Dark Sector

    A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis,A Minimal Axio-dilaton Dark Sector,arXiv:2410.11099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Khoury, M.-X

    J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden,Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025), no. 18 181001, [arXiv:2503.16415]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario

    A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu,Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario, arXiv:2507.03090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang, Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence,Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 8 083534, [arXiv:2508.01759]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    S. L. Guedezounme, B. R. Dinda, and R. Maartens, Phantom crossing or dark interaction?,JCAP01 (2026) 062, [arXiv:2507.18274]

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    R. Chen, J. M. Cline, V. Muralidharan, and B. Salewicz, Quintessential dark energy crossing the phantom divide, JCAP03(2026) 044, [arXiv:2508.19101]

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    La Penna, A

    L. La Penna, A. Notari, and M. Redi,Mimicking Phantom Dark Energy with Evolving Dark Matter Mass, arXiv:2601.05235

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide

    S. Antusch, S. F. King, and X. Wang,Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide,arXiv:2604.08449

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Quintessence: A Review

    S. Tsujikawa,Quintessence: A Review,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 214003, [arXiv:1304.1961]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins, and I. Waga, Cosmology with ultralight pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.75(1995) 2077–2080, [astro-ph/9505060]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  29. [29]

    J. E. Kim,Axion and almost massless quark as ingredients of quintessence,JHEP05(1999) 022, [hep-ph/9811509]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  30. [30]

    J. E. Kim,Model dependent axion as quintessence with almost massless hidden sector quarks,JHEP06(2000) 016, [hep-ph/9907528]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  31. [31]

    R. Liu, Y. Zhu, W. Hu, and V. Miranda,Phantom mirage from axion dark energy,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026), no. 8 083506, [arXiv:2510.14957]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    T. D. Cohen, R. J. Furnstahl, and D. K. Griegel,Quark and gluon condensates in nuclear matter,Phys. Rev. C 45(1992) 1881–1893

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes

    A. Hook and J. Huang,Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes,JHEP06 (2018) 036, [arXiv:1708.08464]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely

    A. Hook,Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely, Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 26 261802, [arXiv:1802.10093]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    An even lighter QCD axion

    L. Di Luzio, B. Gavela, P. Quilez, and A. Ringwald,An even lighter QCD axion,JHEP05(2021) 184, [arXiv:2102.00012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    work page 1979

  37. [37]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

    work page 1980

  38. [38]

    The KSVZ Atlas: A Unified SMEFT-ALP Framework

    A. Palavri´ c, X. Ponce D´ ıaz, and H. Tiblom,The KSVZ Atlas: A Unified SMEFT-ALP Framework, arXiv:2606.12298

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys

    E. Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys. Lett. B117 (1982) 324–328

    work page 1982

  40. [40]

    Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1–23

    work page 1989

  41. [41]

    D. J. Fixsen,The temperature of the cosmic microwave background, . [51]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Archidiacono, E

    M. Archidiacono, E. Castorina, D. Redigolo, and E. Salvioni,Unveiling dark fifth forces with linear cosmology,JCAP10(2022) 074, [arXiv:2204.08484]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    From 100 kpc to 10 Gpc: Dark Matter self-interactions before and after DESI

    S. Bottaro, E. Castorina, M. Costa, D. Redigolo, and E. Salvioni,From 100 kpc to 10 Gpc: Dark matter self-interactions before and after DESI observations, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 2 023525, [arXiv:2407.18252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z \approx 0 measurement of the growth rate and sigma_8

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, G. B. Poole, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders, and F. Watson,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z≈0measurement of the growth rate andσ 8,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423(2012) 3430–3444, [arXiv:1204.4725]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    The Clustering of the SDSS Main Galaxy Sample II: Mock galaxy catalogues and a measurement of the growth of structure from Redshift Space Distortions at $z=0.15$

    C. Howlett, A. Ross, L. Samushia, W. Percival, and M. Manera,The clustering of the SDSS main galaxy sample – II. Mock galaxy catalogues and a measurement of the growth of structure from redshift space distortions atz= 0.15,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.449(2015), no. 1 848–866, [arXiv:1409.3238]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): improved cosmic growth measurements using multiple tracers of large-scale structure

    C. Blake et al.,Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): improved cosmic growth measurements using multiple tracers of large-scale structure,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.436(2013) 3089, [arXiv:1309.5556]. [57]WiggleZCollaboration, C. Blake et al.,The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z<1,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    A. Pezzotta et al.,The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): The growth of structure at 0.5< z <1.2from redshift-space distortions in the clustering of the PDR-2 final sample,Astron. Astrophys.604(2017) A33, [arXiv:1612.05645]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions at $z\sim 1.4$

    T. Okumura et al.,The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions atz∼1.4,Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.68(2016), no. 3 38, [arXiv:1511.08083]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    K. Said, M. Colless, C. Magoulas, J. R. Lucey, and M. J. Hudson,Joint analysis of 6dFGS and SDSS peculiar velocities for the growth rate of cosmic structure and tests of gravity,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497(2020), no. 1 1275–1293, [arXiv:2007.04993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    S. S. Boruah, M. J. Hudson, and G. Lavaux,Cosmic flows in the nearby Universe: new peculiar velocities from SNe and cosmological constraints,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498(2020), no. 2 2703–2718, [arXiv:1912.09383]. 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field

    J. Carrick, S. J. Turnbull, G. Lavaux, and M. J. Hudson,Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450(2015), no. 1 317–332, [arXiv:1504.04627]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Testing $\Lambda$CDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities

    D. Huterer, D. Shafer, D. Scolnic, and F. Schmidt, TestingΛCDM at the lowest redshifts with SN Ia and galaxy velocities,JCAP05(2017) 015, [arXiv:1611.09862]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    R. J. Turner, C. Blake, and R. Ruggeri,A local measurement of the growth rate from peculiar velocities and galaxy clustering correlations in the 6dF Galaxy Survey,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2022), no. 2 2436–2452, [arXiv:2207.03707]. [65]EuclidCollaboration, I. Ocampo et al.,Euclid: Forecasts onΛCDM consistency tests with growth rate data,arXiv:2507.22780

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Softening the UV without New Particles

    A. Hook and R. Rattazzi,Softening the UV without new particles,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 11 115019, [arXiv:2306.12489]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. A. Buen-Abad, and A. Hook, Constructing a light QCD axion without1/Ntuning, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 7 075027, [arXiv:2507.02049]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    The anthropic principle and the mass scale of the Standard Model

    V. Agrawal, S. M. Barr, J. F. Donoghue, and D. Seckel, Viable range of the mass scale of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 5480–5492, [hep-ph/9707380]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  57. [57]

    Anthropic considerations in multiple domain theories and the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking

    V. Agrawal, S. M. Barr, J. F. Donoghue, and D. Seckel, Anthropic considerations in multiple domain theories and the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 1822–1825, [hep-ph/9801253]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  58. [58]

    Dark QCD Matters

    R. Garani, M. Redi, and A. Tesi,Dark QCD matters, JHEP12(2021) 139, [arXiv:2105.03429]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Consequences of anomalous Ward identities,Phys. Lett. B37(1971) 95–97

    work page 1971

  60. [60]

    E. D. Carlson, M. E. Machacek, and L. J. Hall, Self-interacting dark matter,Astrophys. J.398(1992) 43–52

    work page 1992

  61. [61]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360 (1991) 145–179

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP03(2010) 080, [arXiv:0911.1120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter

    M. Garny, M. Sandora, and M. S. Sloth,Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016), no. 10 101302, [arXiv:1511.03278]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    M. Redi, A. Tesi, and H. Tillim,Gravitational Production of a Conformal Dark Sector,JHEP05 (2021) 010, [arXiv:2011.10565]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    P. Bode, J. P. Ostriker, and N. Turok,Halo formation in warm dark matter models,Astrophys. J.556(2001) 93–107, [astro-ph/0010389]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton, and M. G. Haehnelt,Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman-αforest data,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 043502, [arXiv:1306.2314]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56

    M. Markevitch, A. H. Gonzalez, D. Clowe, A. Vikhlinin, L. David, W. Forman, C. Jones, S. Murray, and W. Tucker,Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56,Astrophys. J.606(2004) 819–824, [astro-ph/0309303]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  68. [68]

    Weinberg,Pion scattering lengths,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Pion scattering lengths,Phys. Rev. Lett. 17(1966) 616–621

    work page 1966

  69. [69]

    Affleck and M

    I. Affleck and M. Dine,A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B249(1985) 361–380

    work page 1985

  70. [70]

    The SIMP Miracle

    Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky, and J. G. Wacker, Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 171301, [arXiv:1402.5143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014