Efficient Transferable Optimal Transport via Min-Sliced Transport Plans

Elaheh Akbari; Navid Naderializadeh; Rocio Diaz Martin; Soheil Kolouri; Xinran Liu

arxiv: 2511.19741 · v4 · pith:3Y6PW6BUnew · submitted 2025-11-24 · 💻 cs.CV

Efficient Transferable Optimal Transport via Min-Sliced Transport Plans

Xinran Liu , Elaheh Akbari , Rocio Diaz Martin , Navid NaderiAlizadeh , Soheil Kolouri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV

keywords optimal transportsliced transporttransferabilitypoint cloud alignmentminibatch optimal transportdistribution shiftgenerative modeling

0 comments

The pith

A slicer optimized for one distribution pair stays effective for nearby pairs under small perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the best projection direction found by min-sliced transport can be reused when the two input distributions shift a little. It proves that the optimal slicer changes only modestly when the distributions are perturbed slightly, so the same projection still gives a good transport plan without fresh optimization. This matters because full optimal transport is costly to run repeatedly, and many vision tasks involve related or evolving data such as successive point clouds or similar image sets. The authors add a minibatch version with statistical accuracy bounds and show that the transferred slicer supports one-shot matching and amortized training for alignment and generative models.

Core claim

The central claim is that optimized slicers in the min-STP framework remain close under slight perturbations of the data distributions. This closeness lets a slicer trained on one pair produce effective conditional transport plans for new but related pairs. The paper further introduces a minibatch formulation of min-STP together with statistical guarantees on its accuracy and demonstrates strong empirical performance on point-cloud alignment and flow-based generative modeling.

What carries the argument

The min-Sliced Transport Plan (min-STP), which selects a single one-dimensional projection that minimizes the full-dimensional transport cost via closed-form 1D solutions.

If this is right

Optimized slicers transfer across related tasks without retraining.
Minibatch min-STP retains statistical accuracy guarantees.
One-shot matching becomes practical for point-cloud and multimodal alignment.
Amortized training is enabled for flow-based generative models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

In streaming or sequential settings, infrequent slicer updates could replace per-step full optimization.
The same transfer argument may apply to other projection-based methods outside optimal transport.
For larger shifts a hybrid schedule of occasional full retraining plus transfer could be tested directly.

Load-bearing premise

New distribution pairs are only slightly perturbed versions of the original training pair.

What would settle it

Compare the transport cost or matching accuracy of a transferred slicer versus a freshly optimized slicer on pairs whose Wasserstein distance from the training pair is gradually increased; a rapid deterioration would falsify the transfer guarantee.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19741 by Elaheh Akbari, Navid Naderializadeh, Rocio Diaz Martin, Soheil Kolouri, Xinran Liu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Overview of the Sliced Transport Plan (STP) framework and our transferability results. (a–c) The STP framework computes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Transport costs with respect to slicing directions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Training with two-branch symmetric gradients through [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (Top row) The generated tasks {(µt, νt)} 7 t=1 along with OT plans and costs. (Middle row) min-STP plans and costs optimized using the slicer with set transformer [27] architecture and pretrained weights. Pretraining refers to using the optimal slicer f ⋆ t−1 from the previous task µt−1, νt−1 for t ≥ 2. (Bottom row) Initial costs (averaging over 5 runs) of the slicer network against the OT lower bound, for… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Average OT compute time per epoch vs. the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Single step sample generation on ShapeNet Chairs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Correlations for desk and sofa pairs in Model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Sketch illustrating that S(µ2, ν2) ⊂ Uε(S(µ1, ν1)) if τ is chosen appropriately depending on the gap m (1) ε . Note: Notice that using these quantitative bounds, there exists a trade-off between δ and η: Indeed, the condition ηtδ,B > L (equivalently, δ > B 2 (1 − e −L/η)) ensures that the slicers gξη are uniformly inverse-Lipschitz on a high-probability event. Larger values of η make this condition easi… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: We plot the transport costs (over 5 runs) evaluated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Additional experiments on amortized min-STP. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Optimal Transport (OT) offers a powerful framework for finding correspondences between distributions and addressing matching and alignment problems in various areas of computer vision, including shape analysis, image generation, and multimodal tasks. The computation cost of OT, however, hinders its scalability. Slice-based transport plans have recently shown promise for reducing the computational cost by leveraging the closed-form solutions of 1D OT problems. These methods optimize a one-dimensional projection (slice) to obtain a conditional transport plan that minimizes the transport cost in the ambient space. While efficient, these methods leave open the question of whether learned optimal slicers can transfer to new distribution pairs under distributional shift. Understanding this transferability is crucial in settings with evolving data or repeated OT computations across closely related distributions. In this paper, we study the min-Sliced Transport Plan (min-STP) framework and investigate the transferability of optimized slicers: can a slicer trained on one distribution pair yield effective transport plans for new, unseen pairs? Theoretically, we show that optimized slicers remain close under slight perturbations of the data distributions, enabling efficient transfer across related tasks. To further improve scalability, we introduce a minibatch formulation of min-STP and provide statistical guarantees on its accuracy. Empirically, we demonstrate that the transferable min-STP achieves strong one-shot matching performance and facilitates amortized training for point cloud alignment and flow-based generative modeling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper advances transferable min-sliced OT but the optimality preservation under shift needs a stronger link.

read the letter

Hi, on this paper about efficient transferable optimal transport via min-sliced transport plans, the main thing to know is that it explores reusing optimized slicers across slightly shifted distributions and adds a minibatch version with guarantees, which could help with repeated OT calculations in vision applications. What is actually new here is the investigation into whether slicers trained on one distribution pair transfer well to new ones under distributional shift. They provide a theoretical result showing that optimized slicers remain close for small perturbations, and they introduce a minibatch formulation of the min-STP with statistical accuracy guarantees. This builds on existing sliced OT methods by addressing the transfer question directly. The work does well in connecting the theory to practical CV tasks like point cloud alignment and flow-based generative modeling. The empirical demonstrations of strong one-shot matching performance and amortized training suggest real utility for settings where you compute OT multiple times on related data. The perturbation analysis seems a reasonable way to ground the transferability claim. Where it is softer is in linking the slicer closeness to the quality of the resulting transport plans. The stress-test concern is valid: closeness of the slicers alone does not guarantee that the min-STP stays competitive with the true optimum on the new pair, and there is no clear sign of a bound on excess transport cost. If the full paper derives such a quantitative relation, that would strengthen it considerably; otherwise, the transferability result is more limited to very small shifts. The minibatch part looks more standard but still useful. This paper is for researchers in computer vision working on scalable optimal transport for matching and alignment problems. Someone dealing with large or evolving datasets would get practical value from the transfer and minibatch ideas. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The ideas are grounded enough and address a real scalability issue to merit referee feedback, even with some tightening needed on the theoretical links.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the min-Sliced Transport Plan (min-STP) framework for scalable optimal transport. It claims that slicers optimized on one distribution pair remain close under small perturbations of the input distributions, thereby enabling transfer of the resulting conditional transport plans to new, related pairs without re-optimization. A minibatch formulation is introduced together with statistical accuracy guarantees, and experiments demonstrate competitive one-shot matching performance on point-cloud alignment and amortized flow-based generative modeling tasks.

Significance. If the transferability result holds with a quantitative link to excess transport cost, the work would provide a practical route to amortized OT computation in computer vision pipelines that repeatedly solve related matching problems. The combination of a perturbation-based continuity argument with a minibatch implementation directly targets the scalability bottleneck of classical OT.

major comments (1)

[Theoretical analysis] Theoretical section on slicer transferability: the manuscript establishes closeness of optimized slicers under distributional perturbations but does not supply a quantitative bound relating slicer perturbation size to the excess cost of the induced min-STP relative to the true OT optimum on the perturbed pair. Without this link, the claim that transferred slicers yield effective (near-optimal) transport plans remains incomplete even for small shifts.

minor comments (2)

[Preliminaries] Notation for the conditional transport plan and its cost should be introduced once and used consistently; the current presentation occasionally redefines symbols across sections.
[Minibatch formulation] The minibatch statistical guarantee would benefit from an explicit statement of the dependence on batch size and number of slices in the main theorem statement rather than only in the appendix.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our work. We address the single major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theoretical analysis] Theoretical section on slicer transferability: the manuscript establishes closeness of optimized slicers under distributional perturbations but does not supply a quantitative bound relating slicer perturbation size to the excess cost of the induced min-STP relative to the true OT optimum on the perturbed pair. Without this link, the claim that transferred slicers yield effective (near-optimal) transport plans remains incomplete even for small shifts.

Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out this gap in the theoretical development. The manuscript proves that the slicers minimizing the min-STP objective remain close (in a suitable metric on the space of projections) when the underlying distribution pair is perturbed by a small amount in Wasserstein distance; this is stated as a continuity result for the argmin of the sliced objective. While this closeness is used to argue that the induced conditional transport plans can be transferred, we indeed stop short of supplying an explicit quantitative inequality that bounds the excess transport cost of the transferred min-STP relative to the true OT optimum on the perturbed pair. Such a bound would make the effectiveness claim fully rigorous even for small shifts. We agree that the current argument is therefore incomplete on this point. In the revised version we will add a new corollary that relates the slicer perturbation size to the excess cost via the Lipschitz continuity of the 1D transport cost and the definition of the min-STP objective, thereby closing the link the referee requests. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Theoretical perturbation analysis is self-contained and independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper derives a theoretical result showing that optimized slicers remain close under slight perturbations of the data distributions, which is presented as a perturbation analysis enabling transfer. No equations or claims in the provided abstract reduce this result to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose validity depends on the current work. The minibatch formulation is accompanied by separate statistical guarantees, and empirical results on point cloud alignment and generative modeling provide external checks. The derivation chain therefore stands on independent mathematical content rather than collapsing to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is based only on the abstract, so specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities cannot be audited in detail; the work appears to rest on standard optimal transport assumptions plus new perturbation analysis for transferability.

axioms (1)

standard math Standard assumptions of optimal transport theory including existence of transport plans and finite costs
The min-STP framework builds directly on classical OT without stating new axioms in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5792 in / 1189 out tokens · 39944 ms · 2026-05-21T17:55:56.728491+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

min-STP p(μ, ν) = min f∈F STP p(μ, ν; f)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

ASAP: Amortized Doubly-Stochastic Attention via Sliced Dual Projection
cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

ASAP amortizes Sinkhorn-based doubly-stochastic attention by learning a parametric map from 1D potentials to the Sinkhorn dual and reconstructing the plan via two-sided entropic c-transform, delivering 5.3x faster inf...
Generative Transfer for Entropic Optimal Transport with Unknown Costs
math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A generative transfer framework using iterative path-wise tilting integrated with conditional flow matching recovers target entropic optimal transport couplings from reference samples, achieving O(δ) convergence in Wa...
Sliced Inner Product Gromov-Wasserstein Distances
stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A sliced IGW distance is introduced with closed-form 1D expressions, rotational invariance, and studied structural and computational properties for efficient data alignment.