REVIEW 3 cited by
Generalization in Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper provides theoretical insights into why and how deep learning can generalize well, despite its large capacity, complexity, possible algorithmic instability, nonrobustness, and sharp minima, responding to an open question in the literature. We also discuss approaches to provide non-vacuous generalization guarantees for deep learning. Based on theoretical observations, we propose new open problems and discuss the limitations of our results.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Learning Algorithm Hyperparameters for Fast Parametric Convex Optimization
A machine-learning framework that learns a shared hyperparameter sequence for first-order optimization solvers, achieving order-of-magnitude speedups with only 10 training instances.
-
L2GNet: Optimal Local-to-Global Representation of Anatomical Structures for Generalized Medical Image Segmentation
A segmentation model that pools vector-quantized features via optimal transport to learnable references reports state-of-the-art Dice scores on Synapse (82.23) and ACDC (91.44) benchmarks.
-
Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact
A broad survey arguing that AGI requires modular, memory-augmented, embodied architectures rather than scaled-up token prediction, with a brief proposal to decompose intelligence into five components.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.