pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19054 · v1 · pith:5S2U56QHnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🧮 math.CT · math.AG· math.CO

Brave new categorical spectral positive Schubert geometry and the categorical Dual Amplituhedron

Julien Dalpayrat-Glutron This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 18:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CT math.AGmath.CO
keywords Dual AmplituhedronAmplituhedronpositive Grassmannianpositroid varietiesscattering amplitudescategorical geometryDe Rham volumehigher categories
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Amplituhedron categorified as a functor between higher categories has a concrete non-trivial dual and a De Rham volume.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a construction for the Dual Amplituhedron to address calculations of scattering amplitudes. It rewrites the positive real Grassmannian and performs singular gluing of its positroid varieties through categorical and spectral methods in geometry, combined with a synthetic differential-geometric perspective that handles infinitesimal structures and various cohomologies. This leads to the Amplituhedron being expressed in a functor between higher categories of spaces, where it gains a non-trivial dual along with a De Rham volume. The properties are presented as relevant to an expected duality between the Standard Model of particles and String Theory. The work supplies a compact formulation for the geometric objects involved.

Core claim

Instead of the Grassmannian stack which is autodual in the infinity-category of prestable infinity-categories of modules on ring spectra, the Amplituhedron categorified in a functor between infinity topoi possesses a concrete non-trivial dual and has a De Rham volume. This new construction yields the Dual Amplituhedron.

What carries the argument

The categorification of the Amplituhedron in a functor between infinity topoi, obtained from the rewriting of positive Schubert geometry and the singular gluing of positroid varieties.

If this is right

  • The positive real Grassmannian admits a compact formulation via perverse intersection complexes in a formal moduli problem.
  • The Amplituhedron acquires a De Rham volume within the categorical setting.
  • The dual object supplies a new route to the calculation of scattering amplitudes.
  • The construction bears on the expected duality between the Standard Model of particles and String Theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Explicit low-dimensional examples of the dual might be constructed and checked against known amplitude formulas.
  • The approach could extend to other positroid varieties in positive geometry.
  • Links to crystalline cohomology might produce new invariants for algebraic spaces arising in physics.
  • Verification could proceed by deriving established amplitude results from the dual construction.

Load-bearing premise

The rewriting of the positive real Grassmannian and singular gluing of its positroid varieties via categorical spectral geometry provides a valid foundation that captures the physical scattering amplitudes.

What would settle it

A computation of a known low-point scattering amplitude via the proposed Dual Amplituhedron that yields a result inconsistent with the original Amplituhedron or collider data would disprove the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.19054 by Julien Dalpayrat-Glutron.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: (a) One of the representant of the reduced planar bipartite graphs G of the 3-dimensional open positroid variety of the TNN Grassmannian Gr⩾0(2, 4); (b) strands of the strand permutation fG in G with edge weights w(e), where the unmarked edges have weight 1; (c) The quiver associated with this plabic graph G, whose all vertices are all frozen, and all variables (xij )i,j associated in the corresponding c… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This ArXiv preprint of my doctoral dissertation, which, at this stage, has not yet been accepted by the doctoral thesis committee, is intended both to lay the groundwork for a series of papers, and to confirm the existence of a first proposed solution to the "Dual Amplituhedron" problem posed in 2014 by Princeton physicists N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, a mathematical object which encapsulate the calculation of scattering amplitudes in high-energy particle colliders. The first part of this thesis deals with a rewriting of the positive real Grassmannian and performing the singular gluing of its positroid varieties in a new way via Spectral Algebraic Geometry of J. Lurie on "structured" spaces and a categorification of his "Tannaka Duality for Quasi-coherent Stacks", finding in this formal moduli problem, a compact yet holistic formulation via perverse intersection complexes of P. Deligne. This algebraico-geometric perspective paired with a synthetic differential-geometric perspective, namely the Differential Cohesion of B. Lawvere and U. Schreiber, subsumes infinitesimal thickenings, crystalline cohomology of De Rham stacks, the "Modalities of Structured Geometries" and the unification of their cohomologies of the underlying concrete topological etale algebraic space. The second part uses this rewriting of positive Schubert geometry and "The Cohomology of Brauer-Grothendieck Spaces" of B. To\"en and B. Antieau, to show that, instead of the Grassmannian spectral Deligne-Mumford stack which is autodual in the infinity-category of prestable infinity-categories of modules on E\infty-ring spectra, the Amplituhedron, categorified in a functor between infinity topo\"i, possesses a concrete non-trivial dual, and has a De Rham volume, facts of interest for the expected Duality between the Standard Model of particles and String Theory. This new construction yields the Dual Amplituhedron.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to construct the categorical Dual Amplituhedron by rewriting the positive real Grassmannian and singular gluing of positroid varieties via Lurie's spectral algebraic geometry and a categorification of Tannaka duality for quasi-coherent stacks; this is said to produce, in the second part, a functor between infinity topoi whose image is a non-autodual object in the infinity-category of prestable infinity-categories of modules over E∞-ring spectra, equipped with a De Rham volume, thereby solving the 2014 Dual Amplituhedron problem.

Significance. If the asserted constructions were supplied with explicit functors, derivations, and verifications that the resulting object is non-isomorphic to the original Amplituhedron and reproduces known positroid or scattering data, the work could provide a new categorical framework connecting positive Schubert geometry to physical dualities. No such derivations, machine-checked proofs, or reproducible computations are present.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the Amplituhedron, categorified in a functor between infinity topoi, possesses a concrete non-trivial dual, and has a De Rham volume' is stated without any functor definition, explicit gluing construction, or calculation demonstrating non-isomorphism to the autodual Grassmannian spectral Deligne-Mumford stack or reproduction of scattering amplitudes.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (second part): the assertion that the new spectral rewriting yields a non-autodual object relies on the categorification of Tannaka duality and perverse intersection complexes, yet no specific moduli problem, E∞-ring spectrum, or volume form computation is exhibited to establish that the dual is non-trivial rather than a redefinition within the chosen framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title is excessively long and mixes multiple technical adjectives without clarifying the precise contribution.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript is explicitly described as an unaccepted dissertation draft; this status should be addressed if resubmission is contemplated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and for highlighting the need for greater explicitness in the constructions. The manuscript is a doctoral dissertation that outlines a categorical framework for the Dual Amplituhedron using spectral algebraic geometry and differential cohesion; it is intended as foundational groundwork rather than a fully computational treatment. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'the Amplituhedron, categorified in a functor between infinity topoi, possesses a concrete non-trivial dual, and has a De Rham volume' is stated without any functor definition, explicit gluing construction, or calculation demonstrating non-isomorphism to the autodual Grassmannian spectral Deligne-Mumford stack or reproduction of scattering amplitudes.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the principal result of the dissertation. The functor between infinity topoi is obtained by applying the categorification of Tannaka duality for quasi-coherent stacks to the positive real Grassmannian after its rewriting in Lurie's spectral algebraic geometry, with singular gluing of positroid varieties effected via perverse intersection complexes. Differential cohesion supplies the De Rham volume. We agree, however, that the manuscript does not furnish fully explicit functor definitions, step-by-step gluing constructions, or concrete calculations establishing non-isomorphism to the autodual Grassmannian spectral Deligne-Mumford stack or reproducing specific scattering amplitudes. These details are reserved for subsequent papers. We will revise the abstract to state explicitly that the constructions are presented at the level of a unifying framework rather than with complete derivations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (second part): the assertion that the new spectral rewriting yields a non-autodual object relies on the categorification of Tannaka duality and perverse intersection complexes, yet no specific moduli problem, E∞-ring spectrum, or volume form computation is exhibited to establish that the dual is non-trivial rather than a redefinition within the chosen framework.

    Authors: The non-autoduality is obtained by showing that the categorified Amplituhedron, realized as the image of a functor between infinity topoi, lies outside the autodual objects in the infinity-category of prestable infinity-categories of modules over E∞-ring spectra, in contrast to the Grassmannian spectral Deligne-Mumford stack. The De Rham volume is induced by the crystalline cohomology of the De Rham stack within the differential cohesive setting. We concur that no concrete moduli problem, specific E∞-ring spectrum, or numerical volume-form computation is supplied. The dissertation focuses on the existence of the categorical rewriting rather than on the selection of particular instances. We will add a clarifying sentence in the abstract and introduction to distinguish the proposed framework from a mere redefinition. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Explicit functor definitions, gluing constructions, non-isomorphism calculations, reproduction of scattering amplitudes, specific moduli problems, named E∞-ring spectra, and concrete volume-form computations establishing the non-trivial dual.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and description frame the Dual Amplituhedron as obtained via a rewriting of the positive Grassmannian and positroid varieties inside Lurie's spectral algebraic geometry together with a categorification of Tannaka duality for quasi-coherent stacks, followed by an application of differential cohesion and results of Toën–Antieau. These steps are presented as building on named external references (Lurie, Lawvere–Schreiber, Deligne, Toën–Antieau) rather than on any self-citation chain or internal redefinition. No equations, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems internal to the paper are quoted that would reduce the claimed dual or De Rham volume to the input data by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the cited external categorical frameworks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on several advanced frameworks treated as background and introduces a new mathematical object without independent physical evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The positive real Grassmannian and positroid varieties can be rewritten and glued using Spectral Algebraic Geometry of J. Lurie on structured spaces
    Invoked in the first part to obtain a compact formulation via perverse intersection complexes.
  • domain assumption Categorification of Tannaka Duality for Quasi-coherent Stacks and Differential Cohesion unify the relevant cohomologies
    Used to subsume infinitesimal thickenings and crystalline cohomology.
invented entities (1)
  • Categorical Dual Amplituhedron no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as the concrete non-trivial dual to the categorified Amplituhedron with De Rham volume
    Introduced as the main output of the second part of the thesis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5896 in / 1766 out tokens · 42963 ms · 2026-06-26T18:06:07.583608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 22 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    P.N. Achar. Perverse Sheaves and Applications to Representation Theory . Math- ematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories: Bibliography

    Jirí Adámek and Jiří Rosický. “Locally Presentable and Accessible Categories: Bibliography” . In: 1994

    1994

  3. [3]

    A reconstruction theorem for abelian categories of twisted sheaves

    Benjamin Antieau. A reconstruction theorem for abelian categories of twisted sheaves. 2013. arXiv: 1305.2541 [math.AG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Twisted derived equivalences for affine schemes

    Benjamin Antieau. Twisted derived equivalences for affine schemes . 2013. arXiv: 1311.2332 [math.AG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    On the uniqueness of infinity-categorical enhancements of triangulated categories

    Benjamin Antieau. On the uniqueness of infinity-categorical enhancements of triangulated categories. 2021. arXiv: 1812.01526 [math.AG]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Brauer groups and étale cohomology in derived algebraic geometry

    Benjamin Antieau and David Gepner. “Brauer groups and étale cohomology in derived algebraic geometry” . In: Geometry & Topology 18.2 (Apr. 2014), pp. 1149–1244

    2014

  7. [7]

    Picard sheaves, lo- cal Brauer groups, and topological modular forms

    Benjamin Antieau, Lennart Meier, and Vesna Stojanoska. Picard sheaves, lo- cal Brauer groups, and topological modular forms . 2022. arXiv: 2210 . 15743 [math.AG]

    2022

  8. [8]

    Faisceaux pervers sur les variétés algébriques complexes

    Alberto Arabia. “Faisceaux pervers sur les variétés algébriques complexes” . In: Correspondance de Springer (d’apres Borho-MacPherson)”, lecture notes http://people. math. jussieu. fr/~ arabia/math/Pervers. pdf (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Yuntao Bai, and Thomas Lam. “Positive Geometries and Canonical Forms” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2017 (Mar. 2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Positive amplitudes in the amplituhedron

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Andrew Hodges, and Jaroslav Trnka. “Positive amplitudes in the amplituhedron” . In:Journal of High Energy Physics 2015.8 (Aug. 7, 2015), p. 30

    2015

  11. [11]

    Unwinding the am- plituhedron in binary

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Hugh Thomas, and Jaroslav Trnka. “Unwinding the am- plituhedron in binary” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2018.1 (Jan. 3, 2018), p. 16. 237 Julien Dalpayrat-Glutron

    2018

  12. [12]

    Into the Amplituhedron

    Nima Arkani-Hamed and Jaroslav Trnka. “Into the Amplituhedron” . In: JHEP 12 (2014), p. 182. arXiv: 1312.7878 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    The Amplituhedron

    Nima Arkani-Hamed and Jaroslav Trnka. “The Amplituhedron” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2014.10 (Oct. 6, 2014), p. 30

    2014

  14. [14]

    Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes

    Nima Arkani-Hamed et al. Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes . Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  15. [15]

    Solving Scattering in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills The- ory

    Nima Arkani-Hamed et al. “Solving Scattering in N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills The- ory” . In: (July 2022). arXiv: 2207.10636 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Théorie des Topos et Cohomologie Étale des Schémas I, II, III

    Michael Artin, Alexander Grothendieck, and Jean-Louis Verdier. Théorie des Topos et Cohomologie Étale des Schémas I, II, III . Vol. 269, 270, 305. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, 1971

    1971

  17. [17]

    Structure in Mathematics and Logic: A Categorical Perspective

    Steve Awodey. “Structure in Mathematics and Logic: A Categorical Perspective” . In: Philosophia Mathematica 4 (1996), pp. 209–237

    1996

  18. [18]

    Type theory and homotopy

    Steve Awodey. Type theory and homotopy . 2010. arXiv: 1010.1810 [math.CT]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    Presheaves of triangulated categories and reconstruction of schemes

    Paul Balmer. “Presheaves of triangulated categories and reconstruction of schemes” . In: Mathematische Annalen 324 (2001), pp. 557–580

    2001

  20. [20]

    Presheaves of triangulated categories and reconstruction of schemes

    Paul Balmer. “Presheaves of triangulated categories and reconstruction of schemes” . In: Mathematische Annalen 324.3 (2002), pp. 557–580

    2002

  21. [21]

    Triples, Algebras and Cohomology, Thesis

    Jonathan Beck. “Triples, Algebras and Cohomology, Thesis” . In: 1967

    1967

  22. [22]

    Loop spaces and connections

    David Ben-Zvi and David Nadler. “Loop spaces and connections” . In: Journal of Topology 5.2 (Mar. 2012), pp. 377–430

    2012

  23. [23]

    Completions and derived de Rham cohomology

    Bhargav Bhatt. Completions and derived de Rham cohomology . 2012. arXiv: 1207.6193 [math.AG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Reflex- ivity and dualizability in categorified linear algebra

    Martin Brandenburg, Alexandru Chirvasitu, and Theo Johnson-Freyd. Reflex- ivity and dualizability in categorified linear algebra . 2014. arXiv: 1409 . 5934 [math.CT]

    2014

  25. [25]

    Higher Orbifolds and Deligne-Mumford Stacks as Structured Infinity Topoi

    David Carchedi. Higher Orbifolds and Deligne-Mumford Stacks as Structured Infinity Topoi. 2016. arXiv: 1312.2204 [math.CT]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Sheaves of E-infinity algebras and applications to algebraic varieties and singular spaces

    David Chataur and Joana Cirici. Sheaves of E-infinity algebras and applications to algebraic varieties and singular spaces . 2022. arXiv: 1811.08642 [math.AT]

    arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Brauer Spaces of Spectral Algebraic Stacks

    Chang-Yeon Chough. Brauer Spaces of Spectral Algebraic Stacks . 2020. arXiv: 2002.07946 [math.AG]

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Twisted Equivalences in Spectral Algebraic Geometry

    Chang-Yeon Chough. Twisted Equivalences in Spectral Algebraic Geometry. 2021. arXiv: 2109.02854 [math.AG] . 238 Categorical spectral Schubert Geometry and the Dual Amplituhedron

    arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    When are there enough projective perse sheaves? 2022

    Alessio Cipriani and Jon Wool. When are there enough projective perse sheaves? 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra

    Denis-Charles Cisinski. Higher Categories and Homotopical Algebra. 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Colliot-Thélène and A.N

    J.L. Colliot-Thélène and A.N. Skorobogatov. The Brauer–Grothendieck Group . Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge / A Series of Mod- ern Surveys in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, 2021

    2021

  32. [32]

    Noncommutative Geometry

    Alain Connes. Noncommutative Geometry. 2005

    2005

  33. [33]

    Le topos étale réel d’un anneau

    Marie-Françoise Coste Michel; Coste-Roy. Le topos étale réel d’un anneau. 1981

    1981

  34. [34]

    Shulman D.-C

    M. Shulman D.-C. Cisinski. Characterizations of locally presentable (∞,1)-categories. A vailable at/nlab/show/locally+cartesian+closed+(infinity,1)-category

  35. [35]

    On Lurie’s theorem and applications

    Jack Morgan Davies. “On Lurie’s theorem and applications” . In: Mathematische Zeitschrift 309.2 (Dec. 2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Scheiderer motives and equivariant higher topos theory

    Elden Elmanto and Jay Shah. Scheiderer motives and equivariant higher topos theory. 2021. arXiv: 1912.11557 [math.AG]

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Chaim Even-Zohar, Tsviqa Lakrec, and Ran J. Tessler. The Amplituhedron BCFW Triangulation. 2021

    2021

  38. [38]

    A cluster of results on amplituhedron tiles

    Chaim Even-Zohar et al. A cluster of results on amplituhedron tiles . 2024. arXiv: 2402.15568 [math.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Cluster algebras and tilings for the m=4 amplituhedron

    Chaim Even-Zohar et al. Cluster algebras and tilings for the m=4 amplituhedron

  40. [40]

    arXiv: 2310.17727 [math.CO]

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Tree-level scattering ampli- tudes from the amplituhedron

    L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, and Parisi M. Orta A. and. “Tree-level scattering ampli- tudes from the amplituhedron” . In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 841.1 (2017), p. 012037

    2017

  42. [42]

    Towards the amplituhedron volume

    Livia Ferro et al. “Towards the amplituhedron volume” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.3 (Mar. 3, 2016), p. 14

    2016

  43. [43]

    Introduction to Cluster Algebras

    Sergey Fomin, Lauren Williams, and Andrei Zelevinsky. Introduction to Cluster Algebras. Chapter 7 . 2021

    2021

  44. [44]

    Positroid cluster structures from relabeled plabic graphs

    Chris Fraser and Melissa Sherman-Bennett. Positroid cluster structures from relabeled plabic graphs . 2020

    2020

  45. [45]

    Positroid cluster structures from relabeled plabic graphs

    Chris Fraser and Melissa Sherman-Bennett. “Positroid cluster structures from relabeled plabic graphs” . en. In: Algebraic Combinatorics 5.3 (2022), pp. 469– 513

    2022

  46. [46]

    Des catégories abéliennes

    Pierre Gabriel. “Des catégories abéliennes” . In: Bulletin de la Société Mathéma- tique de France 90 (1962), pp. 323–448. 239 Julien Dalpayrat-Glutron

    1962

  47. [47]

    Sheaves of categories and the notion of 1-affineness

    Dennis Gaitsgory. Sheaves of categories and the notion of 1-affineness . 2014. arXiv: 1306.4304 [math.AG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    A study in derived algebraic geome- try: Volume I: correspondences and duality

    Dennis Gaitsgory and Nick Rozenblyum. A study in derived algebraic geome- try: Volume I: correspondences and duality . Vol. 221. American Mathematical Society, 2019

    2019

  49. [49]

    Applet : Plabic Graphs, Strand Permutations and Tiling

    Pavel Galashin. Applet : Plabic Graphs, Strand Permutations and Tiling

  50. [50]

    Critical varieties in the Grassmannian

    Pavel Galashin. Critical varieties in the Grassmannian . 2021

    2021

  51. [51]

    Positroid varieties and cluster algebras

    Pavel Galashin and Thomas Lam. Positroid varieties and cluster algebras . 2019

    2019

  52. [52]

    Sur quelques points d’algèbre homologique, I

    Alexander Grothendieck. “Sur quelques points d’algèbre homologique, I” . In: Tohoku Mathematical Journal 9 (1957), pp. 119–221

    1957

  53. [53]

    Éléments de géométrie algébrique: I. Le langage des schémas

    Alexander Grothendieck. “Éléments de géométrie algébrique: I. Le langage des schémas” . In:Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 4 (1960), pp. 5–228

    1960

  54. [54]

    M. Hakim. Topos annelés et schémas relatifs . Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer-Verlag, 1972

    1972

  55. [55]

    Positive Geometries for One-Loop Chiral Octagons

    Enrico Herrmann et al. “Positive Geometries for One-Loop Chiral Octagons” . In: (July 2020). arXiv: 2007.12191 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron

    Enrico Herrmann et al. “Positive geometry, local triangulations, and the dual of the Amplituhedron” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2021.1 (Jan. 8, 2021), p. 35

    2021

  57. [57]

    M. Hovey. Model Categories. Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society, 2007

    2007

  58. [58]

    Symmetric spectra

    Mark Hovey, Brooke Shipley, and Jeff Smith. Symmetric spectra. 1998. arXiv: math/9801077 [math.AT]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    Johnstone

    P.T. Johnstone. Sketches of an Elephant: A Topos Theory Compendium . Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 2002

    2002

  60. [60]

    Johnstone

    P.T. Johnstone. Topos Theory. Dover Books on Mathematics. Dover Publica- tions, 2014

    2014

  61. [61]

    Theory of quasi-categories and its applications, lectures at Simpli- cial Methods in Higher Categories, Barcelona, 2008

    André Joyal. Theory of quasi-categories and its applications, lectures at Simpli- cial Methods in Higher Categories, Barcelona, 2008

    2008

  62. [62]

    Notes on quasicategories

    André Joyal. Notes on quasicategories. 2007

    2007

  63. [63]

    An introduction to tannaka duality and quantum groups

    André Joyal and Ross Street. “An introduction to tannaka duality and quantum groups. ” In:In A. Carboni, M. C. Pedicchio, and G. Rosolini, editors, Category Theory (1991). Springer Berlin Heidelberg., pages 413–492

    1991

  64. [64]

    Applet : Quivers and Mutations in Cluster Algebras

    Bernhard Keller. Applet : Quivers and Mutations in Cluster Algebras

  65. [65]

    Adeel A. Khan. A modern introduction to algebraic stacks . 2023. 240 Categorical spectral Schubert Geometry and the Dual Amplituhedron

    2023

  66. [66]

    Adeel A. Khan. Lectures on algebraic stacks. 2023. arXiv: 2310.12456 [math.AG]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Kirwan and J

    F. Kirwan and J. Woolf. An Introduction to Intersection Homology Theory, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis, 2006

    2006

  68. [68]

    Semialgebraic topology in the last ten years

    Manfred Knebusch. Semialgebraic topology in the last ten years. 2010

    2010

  69. [69]

    Positroid varieties: juggling and geometry

    Allen Knutson, Thomas Lam, and David E Speyer. “Positroid varieties: juggling and geometry” . In: Compositio Mathematica 149.10 (2013), pp. 1710–1752

    2013

  70. [70]

    Sign flip triangulations of the amplituhe- dron

    Ryota Kojima and Cameron Langer. “Sign flip triangulations of the amplituhe- dron” . In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2020.5 (May 25, 2020), p. 121

    2020

  71. [71]

    Totally nonnegative Grassmannian and Grassmann polytopes

    Thomas Lam. “Totally nonnegative Grassmannian and Grassmann polytopes” . In: arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1506.00603 (June 2015)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    An invitation to positive geometries

    Thomas Lam. An invitation to positive geometries . 2022. arXiv: 2208 . 05407 [math.CO]

    2022

  73. [73]

    Functorial Semantics of Algebraic Theories (Thesis 1963)

    Bill Lawvere. Functorial Semantics of Algebraic Theories (Thesis 1963) . 1963

    1963

  74. [74]

    The Category of Categories as a Foundation for Mathematics

    Bill Lawvere. The Category of Categories as a Foundation for Mathematics . 1966

    1966

  75. [75]

    Adjointness in Foundations

    Bill Lawvere. Adjointness in Foundations . 1969

    1969

  76. [76]

    Quantifiers and Sheaves

    Bill Lawvere. Quantifiers and Sheaves . 1971

    1971

  77. [77]

    Introduction to Toposes, Algebraic Geometry and Logic

    Bill Lawvere. Introduction to Toposes, Algebraic Geometry and Logic . 1972

    1972

  78. [78]

    Taking Categories Seriously

    Bill Lawvere. Taking Categories Seriously . 1986

    1986

  79. [79]

    Some Thoughts on the Future of Category Theory

    Bill Lawvere. Some Thoughts on the Future of Category Theory . 1991

    1991

  80. [80]

    Categories of Space and of Quantity

    Bill Lawvere. Categories of Space and of Quantity . 1992

    1992

Showing first 80 references.