Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Interactive Task Planning with Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.10645 v2 pith:5SXRN4UB submitted 2023-10-16 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CLcs.HC

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC
keywords taskplanninglanguagemodelsinteractivesystemtasksable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An interactive robot framework accomplishes long-horizon task planning and can easily generalize to new goals and distinct tasks, even during execution. However, most traditional methods require predefined module design, making it hard to generalize to different goals. Recent large language model based approaches can allow for more open-ended planning but often require heavy prompt engineering or domain specific pretrained models. To tackle this, we propose a simple framework that achieves interactive task planning with language models by incorporating both high-level planning and low-level skill execution through function calling, leveraging pretrained vision models to ground the scene in language. We verify the robustness of our system on the real world task of making milk tea drinks. Our system is able to generate novel high-level instructions for unseen objectives and successfully accomplishes user tasks. Furthermore, when the user sends a new request, our system is able to replan accordingly with precision based on the new request, task guidelines and previously executed steps. Our approach is easy to adapt to different tasks by simply substituting the task guidelines, without the need for additional complex prompt engineering. Please check more details on our https://wuphilipp.github.io/itp_site and https://youtu.be/TrKLuyv26_g.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. Exploratory Retrieval-Augmented Planning For Continual Embodied Instruction Following

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ExRAP couples LLM planning with a temporal knowledge-graph memory and information-based exploration, improving success and efficiency for continual embodied instruction following.

  3. mRAG: Elucidating the Design Space of Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic empirical study finds that for multimodal RAG, EVA-CLIP retrieval, listwise LVLM reranking, and feeding only the top-ranked document works best, with a self-reflection agent adding further gains.

  4. LoHoVLA: A Unified Vision-Language-Action Model for Long-Horizon Embodied Tasks

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A unified vision-language-action model that emits a sub-task description followed by a discrete action token outperforms modular and action-only baselines on simulated long-horizon tabletop tasks.

Pith tools