Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

The CLRS-Text Algorithmic Reasoning Language Benchmark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.04229 v1 pith:6KHS4CL4 submitted 2024-06-06 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.DSstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CLcs.DSstat.ML
keywords algorithmicclrsreasoningbenchmarkclrs-textacrossalgorithmsevaluate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Eliciting reasoning capabilities from language models (LMs) is a critical direction on the path towards building intelligent systems. Most recent studies dedicated to reasoning focus on out-of-distribution performance on procedurally-generated synthetic benchmarks, bespoke-built to evaluate specific skills only. This trend makes results hard to transfer across publications, slowing down progress. Three years ago, a similar issue was identified and rectified in the field of neural algorithmic reasoning, with the advent of the CLRS benchmark. CLRS is a dataset generator comprising graph execution traces of classical algorithms from the Introduction to Algorithms textbook. Inspired by this, we propose CLRS-Text -- a textual version of these algorithmic traces. Out of the box, CLRS-Text is capable of procedurally generating trace data for thirty diverse, challenging algorithmic tasks across any desirable input distribution, while offering a standard pipeline in which any additional algorithmic tasks may be created in the benchmark. We fine-tune and evaluate various LMs as generalist executors on this benchmark, validating prior work and revealing a novel, interesting challenge for the LM reasoning community. Our code is available at https://github.com/google-deepmind/clrs/tree/master/clrs/_src/clrs_text.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SPARK: Susceptibility-Guided Profiling and Steering of Latent Reasoning States in Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Length-controlled hidden-state susceptibility diagnoses under-activated reasoning in LLMs and guides selective test-time steering that lifts MATH-500 accuracy by roughly 2–3 points.

  2. Learning to Execute Graph Algorithms Exactly with Graph Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A GNN with an ensemble of MLPs can exactly execute any LOCAL-model graph algorithm after learning a polynomial-size set of local template instructions.

  3. Efficiently Learning Branching Networks for Multitask Algorithmic Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AutoBRANE learns tree-structured branching networks for multitask algorithmic reasoning via gradient-based task affinities and convex relaxation.

  4. Cross-Model Cross-Language AI Coding Agent Performance: Accuracy and Speed of Parallel CLRS Algorithms

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Coding agents write correct parallel CLRS code with little prompting, but meaningful speedups are model-, language-, and algorithm-dependent, with Sonnet strongest and GPT producing none.

Pith tools