On the Linear Ordering Problem and the Rankability of Data
read the original abstract
In 2019, Anderson et al. proposed the concept of rankability, which refers to a dataset's inherent ability to be meaningfully ranked. In this article, we give an expository review of the linear ordering problem (LOP) and then use it to analyze the rankability of data. Specifically, the degree of linearity is used to quantify what percentage of the data aligns with an optimal ranking. In a sports context, this is analogous to the number of games that a ranking can correctly predict in hindsight. In fact, under the appropriate objective function, we show that the optimal rankings computed via the LOP maximize the hindsight accuracy of a ranking. Moreover, we develop a binary program to compute the maximal Kendall tau ranking distance between two optimal rankings, which can be used to measure the diversity among optimal rankings without having to enumerate all optima. Finally, we provide several examples from the world of sports and college rankings to illustrate these concepts and demonstrate our results.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SUMMIR: A Hallucination-Aware Framework for Ranking Sports Insights from LLMs
SUMMIR is a multimetric ranking model that orders LLM-generated sports insights by importance while incorporating hallucination detection to improve factual reliability across cricket, soccer, basketball, and baseball...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.