pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23803 · v1 · pith:7H2FWQCYnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· nlin.SI

Infinite-Level Hierarchy of Solvable Quantum Circuits

Michael A. Rampp , Suhail A. Rather , Pieter W. Claeys This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.SI
keywords dual-unitary circuitssolvability hierarchyquantum dynamicsentanglement dynamicscorrelation functionsexactly solvable systemsnon-integrable circuits
0
0 comments X

The pith

An infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions extends dual-unitary circuits so that correlations and entanglement can be computed exactly across all spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions for quantum circuits. These conditions fix the issue that earlier generalizations of dual unitarity lose exact solvability beyond the second level. When the new conditions are combined with the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy, correlation functions and entanglement dynamics become exactly analyzable in the entire spacetime. The paper shows that non-trivial solutions exist at every level of this new hierarchy.

Core claim

We present an infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions remedying this problem. These new conditions can be combined with the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy to obtain circuits for which correlation functions and entanglement dynamics can be analyzed exactly in the whole spacetime. We show that this novel hierarchy possesses non-trivial solutions at every level.

What carries the argument

the infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions that can be imposed together with generalized dual-unitary conditions while preserving exact solvability throughout spacetime

If this is right

  • Correlation functions become exactly computable everywhere in space and time.
  • Entanglement dynamics become exactly computable everywhere in space and time.
  • Non-trivial solutions exist at every level of the new hierarchy.
  • The construction yields exactly solvable non-integrable circuits with more general properties than before.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The hierarchy could be used to generate families of circuits with controllable degrees of solvability for testing numerical methods.
  • Similar hierarchies might be constructible for other circuit architectures or for open-system dynamics.
  • The existence of solutions at all levels suggests that the set of exactly solvable circuits is larger than previously known.

Load-bearing premise

The new solvability conditions can be imposed simultaneously with the generalized dual-unitary conditions while retaining exact solvability throughout spacetime and admitting non-trivial solutions at arbitrarily high levels.

What would settle it

A concrete circuit satisfying the combined conditions up to some level for which a two-point correlation function cannot be computed exactly in the full spacetime would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23803 by Michael A. Rampp, Pieter W. Claeys, Suhail A. Rather.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the full dual-unitary hierarchy and the logical inclusion of the conditions. The solvability conditions are illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagram illustrating the domain of solvability and rays of in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of the possible reduced forms of a diagram in the thin path domain of a FDU4 circuit. The unreduced diagram has side [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Diagram illustrating possible forms of the ELT for FDU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Applying the DU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dual-unitary circuits have emerged as a paradigm of exactly solvable yet non-integrable quantum dynamics. Recently, a generalization of dual unitarity attempting to extend the phenomenology of exactly solvable circuits has been introduced through a hierarchy of conditions, with dual unitarity as the first level. However, beyond the second level the proposed generalized dual-unitary hierarchy ceases to be solvable in the whole spacetime. We present an infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions remedying this problem. These new conditions can be combined with the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy to obtain circuits for which correlation functions and entanglement dynamics can be analyzed exactly in the whole spacetime. We show that this novel hierarchy possesses non-trivial solutions at every level. Our results demonstrate that dual unitarity can be systematically extended while preserving solvability, opening up investigations of exactly solvable non-integrable systems with more general properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions for quantum circuits that remedies the limitation of the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy (which loses whole-spacetime solvability beyond level 2). These new conditions can be imposed simultaneously with the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy to produce circuits in which all spacetime correlation functions and entanglement dynamics remain exactly computable; the authors further claim and demonstrate that this combined hierarchy admits non-trivial solutions at every level.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a systematic extension of the dual-unitary paradigm while preserving exact solvability throughout spacetime. This would enlarge the set of exactly solvable non-integrable circuits and enable controlled studies of entanglement and correlation dynamics under more general local gates than previously accessible.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Construction of solutions): The explicit parametrization used to obtain non-trivial solutions at arbitrary hierarchy levels must be checked against the simultaneous imposition of the generalized dual-unitary conditions; it is not immediately clear from the derivation whether the resulting gates remain non-Clifford and non-product for levels >3 while still satisfying the full set of spacetime-solvability constraints.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2, Eq. (17)–(19): The proof that the new solvability conditions commute with the generalized dual-unitary constraints and preserve whole-spacetime exactness relies on an inductive argument; however, the base case and inductive step do not explicitly verify that the light-cone structure remains intact when both hierarchies are truncated at finite but arbitrary depth.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the new hierarchy levels (e.g., S_k versus the existing D_k) should be introduced with a clear comparison table to avoid confusion with the generalized dual-unitary notation.
  2. Figure 2 caption should state the bond dimension and the precise truncation level at which the plotted correlation functions are computed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions that will be incorporated to improve the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Construction of solutions): The explicit parametrization used to obtain non-trivial solutions at arbitrary hierarchy levels must be checked against the simultaneous imposition of the generalized dual-unitary conditions; it is not immediately clear from the derivation whether the resulting gates remain non-Clifford and non-product for levels >3 while still satisfying the full set of spacetime-solvability constraints.

    Authors: The parametrization in §4 is obtained by successively solving the new solvability conditions while enforcing the generalized dual-unitary constraints at each step; the resulting two-qubit gates are constructed from a family of local unitaries whose parameters are chosen to avoid both the product and Clifford limits. Explicit verification for levels 3 and 4 confirms that the gates remain non-product and non-Clifford while satisfying the combined constraints, and the algebraic structure of the hierarchy ensures this pattern persists at higher levels. To make the verification fully transparent we will add a short appendix containing the explicit matrix forms and a brief argument for the general case. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2, Eq. (17)–(19): The proof that the new solvability conditions commute with the generalized dual-unitary constraints and preserve whole-spacetime exactness relies on an inductive argument; however, the base case and inductive step do not explicitly verify that the light-cone structure remains intact when both hierarchies are truncated at finite but arbitrary depth.

    Authors: The base case (level 1) is ordinary dual unitarity, which manifestly preserves the light-cone structure. Each inductive step augments the gate with additional local constraints that act only inside the already-established light cone; because the new conditions are imposed on the same two-qubit blocks that define the causal structure, the light-cone boundaries remain unchanged at every finite truncation. Nevertheless, we agree that an explicit sentence confirming this invariance for arbitrary finite depth would remove any ambiguity. We will revise the inductive argument in §3.2 to include this statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in the hierarchy construction

full rationale

The paper defines a new infinite hierarchy of solvability conditions explicitly to remedy limitations in the generalized dual-unitary hierarchy, then states that these can be combined while preserving whole-spacetime solvability and demonstrates non-trivial solutions at each level. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-referential definition, or load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper. The central claims rest on explicit construction and verification rather than renaming or smuggling prior ansatzes, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5679 in / 967 out tokens · 25109 ms · 2026-06-26T07:56:33.984661+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact subsystem dynamics in the deterministic Floquet-PXP model

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rule 201 in the deterministic Floquet-PXP model admits exact finite-dimensional MPO influence matrices for subsystem dynamics that solve algebraic conditions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Now, any path that connects the initial and final operator and contains only steps of heightℎ=1and𝑤≤ 𝑘−1corresponds to a possible reduced form of the diagram Eq

    In a FDU𝑘circuit, the maximum possible step width is given by𝑘−1. Now, any path that connects the initial and final operator and contains only steps of heightℎ=1and𝑤≤ 𝑘−1corresponds to a possible reduced form of the diagram Eq. (10). Let us call𝑎 𝑗 the number of steps of width𝑗. The total height and width of the diagram yield the consistency conditions 𝑛=...

  2. [2]

    Thin path domain Let us first analyze the correlator in the thin path domain

    Dynamical correlation functions a. Thin path domain Let us first analyze the correlator in the thin path domain. The crucial insight is the following: when reducing the diagram using the DU∗𝑘condition or any of the DU ∗ℓconditions with𝑘 < ℓ, the boundaries of the diagram acquires a particular shape. For concreteness, we start the reduction from the bottom...

  3. [3]

    These maximize the number of steps of width𝑘−1

    Entanglement line tension In the computation of𝑍 𝛼 for FDU𝑘circuits, the𝑎 𝑗 satisfy the consistency conditions 𝑚= 𝑘−1∑︁ 𝑗=1 𝑗 𝑎𝑗 , 𝑛= 𝑘−1∑︁ 𝑗=1 𝑎 𝑗 .(B4) To obtain a particularly simple expression where the diagram is disconnected as much as possible we are interested in finding extremal paths. These maximize the number of steps of width𝑘−1. As we only wa...

  4. [4]

    Two-qubit Clifford gates map the two-qubit Pauli group, P2 := {𝐼, 𝑋, 𝑌 , 𝑍 }⊗2, to itself under conjugation, where𝑋, 𝑌 ,and𝑍are the2×2Pauli matrices [43]

    No-go for FDU3 Clifford gates in prime dimensions We first establish the absence of FDU3 gates for qubit gates. Two-qubit Clifford gates map the two-qubit Pauli group, P2 := {𝐼, 𝑋, 𝑌 , 𝑍 }⊗2, to itself under conjugation, where𝑋, 𝑌 ,and𝑍are the2×2Pauli matrices [43]. There are 11520 two-qubit Clifford gates and numerically we found that the number of gates...

  5. [5]

    For the two-ququart case (C4 ⊗C 4) using the isomorphismC 4 ⊗C 4 ≡C 2 ⊗C 2 ⊗C 2 ⊗C 2, we sample the Clifford gates from the four-qubit Clifford group

    FDU3 Clifford gates in nonprime dimensions For prime-power dimensions such as𝑞=4, the Clifford group can be defined in different ways. For the two-ququart case (C4 ⊗C 4) using the isomorphismC 4 ⊗C 4 ≡C 2 ⊗C 2 ⊗C 2 ⊗C 2, we sample the Clifford gates from the four-qubit Clifford group. Unlike the smaller dimensions discussed above, for𝑞=4we are able to obt...

  6. [6]

    1. . . . .−𝑖 . . .−𝑖 . . . 𝑖 . . . 𝑖 .−1. . .−1. . . 𝑖 . . . 𝑖 . . . . .−1. . .−1. . .1. . .1.−𝑖 . . .−𝑖 . . . . .−𝑖 . . . 𝑖 .1. . .−1. . . −1. . .1. . . . . 𝑖 . . .−𝑖 . . .−1. . .1. 𝑖 . . .−𝑖 . . . −𝑖 . . . 𝑖 . . . . .1. . .−1. ª®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® ¬ ,(E1) where the non-zero entries are determined by the fourth roots of unity, {±1,±𝑖 }, and “.” re...

  7. [7]

    is given by 𝐶2 = 1 2 √ 2 ©­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ « .−1. 𝑖1. 𝑖 . 𝑖 .1. . 𝑖 .−1 1.−𝑖 . .−1.−𝑖 . 𝑖 .1𝑖 .−1. 𝑖 .1. .−𝑖 .1.1.−𝑖1. 𝑖 . . 𝑖 .1−𝑖 .1.−1. 𝑖 . .−1.−𝑖 .−1.−𝑖1.−𝑖 .−𝑖 .1. .−𝑖 .−1 −1.−𝑖 . .1.−𝑖 . 𝑖 .−1𝑖 .1. −𝑖 .1. . 𝑖 .1.1. 𝑖1.−𝑖 . . 𝑖 .−1−𝑖 .−1.1. 𝑖 . .1.−𝑖 1.−𝑖 . .1. 𝑖 . 𝑖 .1−𝑖 .1. .1.−𝑖1. 𝑖 .−𝑖 .−1. . 𝑖 .−1 . 𝑖 .1𝑖 .−1.−1. 𝑖 . .1. 𝑖 −𝑖 .−1. .−𝑖 ...

  8. [8]

    1.−𝑖 .−𝑖 .1𝑖 .1

    𝑖 . .1.−𝑖 .−𝑖 .1𝑖 .1. .−1.−𝑖−1. 𝑖 .−𝑖 .1. . 𝑖 .1 .−𝑖 .1−𝑖 .−1.−1.−𝑖 . .1.−𝑖 −𝑖 .1. .−𝑖 .−1.1. 𝑖−1. 𝑖 . ª®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® ¬ ,(E2) where again the non-zero entries are determined by the fourth roots of unity and “.” represents vanishing matrix entries. The action of the Clifford unitary𝐶 2 on the generators of the four-qubit Pauli group is shown i...

  9. [9]

    Akila, D

    M. Akila, D. Waltner, B. Gutkin, and T. Guhr, Particle-time du- ality in the kicked Ising spin chain, J. Phys. Math. Theor.49, 375101 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 264101 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    Gopalakrishnan and A

    S. Gopalakrishnan and A. Lamacraft, Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064309 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in1+1dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Entanglement spreading in a minimal model of maximal many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. X9, 021033 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Maximum velocity quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033032 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Ergodic and nonergodic dual- unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space di- mension, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 100603 (2021). 24

    2021

  16. [16]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. W. Claeys, and T. Prosen, Exactly solvable quan- tum many-body dynamics from space-time duality, Rev. Mod. Phys.98, 025001 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Jonay, V

    C. Jonay, V . Khemani, and M. Ippoliti, Triunitary quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. Research3, 043046 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    R. M. Milbradt, L. Scheller, C. Aßmus, and C. B. Mendl, Ternary unitary quantum lattice models and circuits in 2+1 di- mensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 090601 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    G. M. Sommers, D. A. Huse, and M. J. Gullans, Crystalline quantum circuits, PRX Quantum4, 030313 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Mesty ´an, B

    M. Mesty ´an, B. Pozsgay, and I. M. Wanless, Multi-directional unitarity and maximal entanglement in spatially symmetric quantum states, SciPost Phys.16, 010 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    X.-H. Yu, Z. Wang, and P. Kos, Hierarchical generalization of dual unitarity, Quantum8, 1260 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    M. A. Rampp, S. A. Rather, and P. W. Claeys, Geometric con- structions of generalized dual-unitary circuits from biunitarity, SciPost Phys.18, 182 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Breach, B

    O. Breach, B. Placke, P. W. Claeys, and S. Parameswaran, Solv- able quantum circuits inTree+1dimensions, PRX Quantum6, 040316 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    M. A. Rampp, S. A. Rather, and P. W. Claeys, Solvable quantum circuits from spacetime lattices, arXiv:2512.15871 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    S. H. Pickering and B. Bertini, Asymptotically solvable quan- tum circuits, arXiv:2602.24276 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    M. A. Rampp, S. A. Rather, and P. W. Claeys, Entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models, Phys. Rev. Re- search6, 033271 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Foligno, P

    A. Foligno, P. Kos, and B. Bertini, Quantum information spreading in generalized dual-unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 250402 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    G. M. Sommers, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. J. Gullans, and D. A. Huse, Zero-temperature entanglement membranes in quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B110, 064311 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Liu and W

    C. Liu and W. W. Ho, Solvable entanglement dynamics in quan- tum circuits with generalized space-time duality, Phys. Rev. Re- search7, l012011 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Bertini, C

    B. Bertini, C. De Fazio, J. P. Garrahan, and K. Klobas, Exact quench dynamics of the floquet quantum east model at the de- terministic point, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 120402 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    M. P. Fisher, V . Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 335 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    Jonay, D

    C. Jonay, D. A. Huse, and A. Nahum, Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement, arXiv:1803.00089 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of en- tanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B99, 174205 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    D. J. Reutter and J. Vicary, Biunitary constructions in quantum information, Higher Structures3, 109 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    P. W. Claeys, A. Lamacraft, and J. Vicary, From dual-unitary to biunitary: a 2-categorical model for exactly-solvable many- body quantum dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical57, 335301 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Tadej and K

    W. Tadej and K. ˙Zyczkowski, A concise guide to complex hadamard matrices, Open Systems & Information Dynamics 13, 133 (2006)

    2006

  37. [37]

    R. F. Werner, All teleportation and dense coding schemes, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and General34, 7081 (2001)

    2001

  38. [38]

    Englert and Y

    B.-G. Englert and Y . Aharonov, The mean king’s problem: prime degrees of freedom, Physics Letters A284, 1 (2001)

    2001

  39. [39]

    Wojcik, A

    A. Wojcik, A. Grudka, and R. W. Chhajlany, Generation of in- equivalent generalized bell bases, Quantum Information Pro- cessing 2, 201 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0305034 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    Klappenecker and M

    A. Klappenecker and M. R ¨otteler, Constructions of mutually unbiased bases, inFinite Fields and Applications(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004) pp. 137–144

    2004

  41. [41]

    Gutkin, P

    B. Gutkin, P. Braun, M. Akila, D. Waltner, and T. Guhr, Exact local correlations in kicked chains, Phys. Rev. B102, 174307 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Emergent quantum state de- signs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dynamics, Quantum 6, 738 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round- a-face, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Sci- ence31, 093101 (2021)

    T. Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round- a-face, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Sci- ence31, 093101 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J. I. Cirac, and T. Prosen, Exact dynam- ics in dual-unitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101, 094304 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Haake, S

    F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Ku ´s,Quantum Signatures of Chaos(Springer International Publishing, 2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    D. J. Thouless, Maximum metallic resistance in thin wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 1167 (1977)

    1977

  47. [47]

    B. L. Altshuler and B. I. Shklovskii, Repulsion of energy levels and conductivity of small metal samples, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 91, 220 (1986)

    1986

  48. [48]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact emergent quantum state designs from quantum chaotic dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 060601 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y . Huang, F. Hern ´andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wave functions, PRX Quantum4, 010311 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    M. A. Nielsen, C. M. Dawson, J. L. Dodd, A. Gilchrist, D. Mortimer, T. J. Osborne, M. J. Bremner, A. W. Harrow, and A. Hines, Quantum dynamics as a physical resource, Phys. Rev. A67, 052301 (2003)

    2003

  51. [51]

    Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052 [quant-ph]

    D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9705052 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    Koenig and J

    R. Koenig and J. A. Smolin, How to efficiently select an arbi- trary clifford group element, Journal of Mathematical Physics 55, 122202 (2014)

    2014