Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Multimodal Language Models as Visual Assistants for Visually Impaired Users

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.22610 v1 pith:7OYKVYCA submitted 2025-03-28 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG

Evaluating Multimodal Language Models as Visual Assistants for Visually Impaired Users

classification cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords modelsmultimodaltechnologiesvisualadoptionassistivebraillecultural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores the effectiveness of Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) as assistive technologies for visually impaired individuals. We conduct a user survey to identify adoption patterns and key challenges users face with such technologies. Despite a high adoption rate of these models, our findings highlight concerns related to contextual understanding, cultural sensitivity, and complex scene understanding, particularly for individuals who may rely solely on them for visual interpretation. Informed by these results, we collate five user-centred tasks with image and video inputs, including a novel task on Optical Braille Recognition. Our systematic evaluation of twelve MLLMs reveals that further advancements are necessary to overcome limitations related to cultural context, multilingual support, Braille reading comprehension, assistive object recognition, and hallucinations. This work provides critical insights into the future direction of multimodal AI for accessibility, underscoring the need for more inclusive, robust, and trustworthy visual assistance technologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are We There Yet? Exploring the Capabilities of MLLMs in Assistive AI Applications

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Evaluation of MLLMs on assistive scenarios with a new egocentric benchmark called NetraLink provides a diagnostic of model strengths and limitations in object recognition, scene text, and multilingual understanding.