Nonlinear SPDEs and Maximal Regularity: An Extended Survey

Antonio Agresti; Mark Veraar

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Nonlinear SPDEs and Maximal Regularity: An Extended Survey

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read If the linear part of a nonlinear SPDE has stochastic maximal Lp-regularity with a time weight, and the nonlinearities obey a criticality condition, then the equation has a unique maximal local solution, sharp blow-up criteria, and…

desk verdict A solid, honest survey of the authors' maximal-regularity framework for semilinear SPDEs, with a few real new results; the intro's regularization claim is broader than the precise theorems support, but that's a scope issue, not an error. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18561 v5 pith:CAAWD4OW submitted 2025-01-30 math.PR math.APmath.CAmath.FA

Antonio Agresti , Mark Veraar This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.APmath.CAmath.FA MSC 60H1535A0135B6535K5735K9035R6076M35

keywords stochasticmaximalLp-regularitycriticalspacesblow-upcriteriainstantaneousregularizationNavier-StokesequationsAllen-Cahnequationquasi-geostrophicreaction-diffusionsystems

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey exposes a framework for nonlinear Itô SPDEs of the form du + Au dt = F(u) dt + (Bu + G(u)) dW. The central claim is that if the linear pair (A,B) enjoys stochastic maximal L^p-regularity with time weight t^κ dt, and the nonlinearities (F,G) are locally Lipschitz with growth obeying the criticality inequality (1.4), then the equation has a unique maximal local solution, sharp blow-up criteria, and -- under mild extra conditions -- instantaneous regularization. The abstract critical spaces of the framework coincide, in concrete problems, with classical scaling-invariant spaces, which makes the results sharp for models such as Navier–Stokes and quasi-geostrophic equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the class SMR_{p,κ} -- stochastic maximal L^p-regularity with weight t^κ dt -- for the linear pair (A,B): the linear equation du + Au dt = f dt + (Bu + g) dW must be uniquely solvable with an a priori estimate in L^p(w^a_κ; X1) controlled by f and g (Definitions 3.7--3.8). The second ingredient is the criticality inequality (1.4), 1+κ over p ≤ (1+ρ)(1-β) over ρ, which ties the growth ρ of the Lipschitz constants of (F,G) to the interpolation exponent β of the space where they act; Lemma 4.3 converts this inequality into a critical interpolation estimate that makes the fixed-point argument work exactly at the scaling-invariant endpoint.

What would settle it

If one could exhibit a single triple (A,B,F,G) satisfying Assumption 4.1 and (4.3) with (A,B) ∈ SMR_{p,κ} but without a unique maximal local solution, Theorem 1.1 would be false; the first concrete test is the open case of Remark 3.15 -- deciding whether SMR_{p,κ} holds for X0 = $L^{2}$(R; L^q(R)) with q > 2, since failure there would block the framework for that whole class of spaces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is Theorem 1.1: assuming (A,B) ∈ SMR_{p,κ} on a UMD Banach space X0 of type 2, with X1 = D(A), and assuming (F,G) satisfy the local Lipschitz estimate (1.2) with the criticality condition (1.4), every initial value u0 in the trace space X_{1-(1+κ)/p,p} yields a unique maximal solution with lifetime σ > 0 a.s. The blow-up criteria state that on {σ < ∞} the limit lim_{t↑σ} u(t) fails to exist in the trace space, and certain norms diverge; the regularization part gives u ∈ $C^{{θ-ε}}$_{loc}((0,σ); X_{1-θ}) for θ ∈ (0,1/2). The key phenomenon is that equality in (1.4) is allowed: the critical setting, which for concrete equations coincides with scaling-invariant spaces, is exactly where the fixed-point argument is delicate.

Load-bearing premise

All of the results require that the linear pair (A,B) already have stochastic maximal L^p-regularity with weight t^κ dt; this property is known for many concrete operators but is open in some natural settings (for instance X0 = $L^{2}$(R; L^q(R)) with q > 2), and the paper cites rather than proves it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Local well-posedness, blow-up criteria, and instantaneous regularization hold simultaneously whenever the two ingredients -- SMR_{p,κ} for (A,B) and the local Lipschitz/criticality condition (1.4) for (F,G) -- are verified.
In concrete equations the abstract critical spaces coincide with scaling-invariant spaces (e.g., Besov B^{d/q-1}_{q,p} or L^d for Navier–Stokes), so the criteria are sharp rather than merely sufficient.
The new blow-up criterion in Theorem 5.1(1) -- non-existence of the limit lim_{t↑σ} u(t) in the trace space -- transfers between different (p,κ)-settings, so global well-posedness for rough data follows from its validity for smooth data.
Applications to stochastic Navier–Stokes with transport noise yield new Serrin-type blow-up criteria; applications to Allen–Cahn, Cahn–Hilliard, quasi-geostrophic, and reaction-diffusion systems (including Lotka–Volterra) give global existence under coercivity or energy bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the criticality condition is genuinely sharp as the paper suggests, then any stochastic parabolic equation with a scaling symmetry has its well-posedness threshold determined by equality in (1.4), giving a systematic way to predict the optimal data space for new SPDEs before performing the estimates.
The transference results (Corollaries 5.10 and 5.11) point toward a general programme for SPDEs: prove global well-posedness in the most convenient (p,κ)-setting for smooth data, then transfer to rough initial data, mirroring the strategy used in deterministic critical PDE theory.
A testable next step is to drop the UMD/type-2 restriction on X0: the Hilbert-space theorem (Theorem 3.13) plus extrapolation suggests SMR may hold for wider classes such as L^2(R; L^q(R)) with q > 2, the case left open in Remark 3.15.
For applications like 3D Navier–Stokes with transport noise, the new Serrin-type criteria could be checked numerically or analytically against known blow-up candidates, providing a concrete test of the sharpness of the abstract critical spaces.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version. This is a serious survey of the authors' own maximal-regularity framework for semilinear parabolic SPDEs, and it does what a good survey should: it consolidates a large body of work, explains the criticality condition clearly, and adds a few genuine new results. The most valuable new items are Theorem 3.13—which extends Da Prato's Hilbert-space result to all p≥2 with weights—and the new blow-up criterion in Theorem 5.1(1). The exposition of the local well-posedness and blow-up machinery in Sections 4 and 5 is careful and mostly self-contained. The applications sections (7 and 8), especially the quasi-geostrophic and Navier-Stokes parts, are useful blueprints for applying the framework.

The main soft spot is a scope mismatch between the informal theorem in the introduction and the precise results. Theorem 1.1(3) advertises instantaneous regularization 'under relatively weak assumptions,' but the actual theorems in §5.3 require SMR_{r,α} for all r∈(2,∞) and α∈[0,r/2−1), plus in the κ=0 case the extra growth condition (5.21), and Proposition 5.9 adds further regularity on u0. That's a real gap between the advertisement and the product. It's not a load-bearing error—the precise statements are honest—but a reader who applies Theorem 1.1 with SMR for a single (p,κ) will overclaim the regularization. The stress-test note gets this exactly right.

Two smaller reservations. First, Theorem 5.1(2) defers its proof to [AV22b], and the quasi-geostrophic results in §8.3 are flagged 'may be new' without full detail. That's acceptable in a survey, but it means the genuinely new parts are not all self-contained. Second, the survey is heavily self-referential. That's a natural consequence of consolidating one's own framework, and the prior results are externally supported, so I don't hold it against the paper.

Who should read this: anyone working on SPDEs who wants a map of the maximal-regularity approach, and anyone applying the framework to a new concrete equation. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to peer review, but require the authors to fix the mismatch between Theorem 1.1(3) and the hypotheses in §5.3, and to make the status of deferred proofs explicit at each point.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper is an extended survey of the authors' framework for semilinear stochastic evolution equations of the form du + Au dt = F(u) dt + (Bu + G(u)) dW, built on stochastic maximal L^p-regularity with power weights and a criticality condition (1.4). The abstract theory is developed in Sections 3–5: weighted stochastic maximal regularity, local well-posedness, blow-up criteria, and instantaneous regularization. Section 6 presents a critical variational setting, and Sections 7–8 apply the results to Allen–Cahn, Cahn–Hilliard, reaction-diffusion, quasi-geostrophic, and Navier–Stokes equations. The survey refines and unifies earlier work of the authors and also contains some new results, notably the blow-up criterion in Theorem 5.1(1) and a tentative treatment of quasi-geostrophic equations in Section 8.3.

Significance. If the central conditional claim is accepted, the framework provides a unified route to local well-posedness in critical spaces, sharp blow-up criteria, and instantaneous regularization for a broad class of nonlinear SPDEs. The paper is transparent about its main input: stochastic maximal L^p-regularity is an assumption verified by reference rather than proved here, and Remark 3.15 records natural spaces where the property is open. Strengths include the explicit criticality condition (1.4), the weighted maximal-regularity setting, the new blow-up criterion Theorem 5.1(1) with a detailed proof, and extensive applications to concrete models. The main reservations are the gap between the advertised regularization in Theorem 1.1(3) and the stronger hypotheses of Theorems 5.6–5.7 and Proposition 5.9, and the incomplete proof of the second blow-up criterion in Theorem 5.1.

major comments (2)

[Section 1.1, Theorem 1.1(3)] The advertised instantaneous-regularization statement is not a consequence of the hypotheses stated in Theorem 1.1. The precise results in Section 5.3 require (A,B) ∈ SMR_{r,α} for all r ∈ (2,∞) and α ∈ [0,r/2−1) (Theorems 5.6 and 5.7), the additional growth condition (5.21) in Theorem 5.7, and, for p = 2, the subcritical growth condition (5.23) together with u0 ∈ X_{1/2+ε} (Proposition 5.9). Please either include these extra hypotheses in Theorem 1.1(3) or replace that part by a precise statement pointing to Section 5.3 with a clear disclaimer that a single SMR_{p,κ} assumption does not suffice.
[Section 5.1, Theorem 5.1(2)] The proof of the second blow-up criterion is not completed in the survey. After Lemma 5.5, the text says that 'one can, in principle, follow the argument in [AV22b]', but the required verification that the solution satisfies the inequalities of the referenced lemma is not supplied. Since Theorem 5.1(2) is a central tool for global well-posedness and is presented as an improvement over [AV22b, Theorem 4.10(3)], please either give a complete proof or explicitly label the statement as quoted from [AV22b] with only an adapted interpolation step.

minor comments (7)

[Title] The title contains a typo: 'SUR VEY' should read 'SURVEY'.
[Section 4.3] In the sentence 'we note tay conservative terms', 'tay' should be 'that'.
[Theorem 5.1(2)] The notation X_{1−κ/p} is used without a second interpolation parameter; please clarify whether this is the real interpolation space X_{1−κ/p,p} and similarly in the embedding display following the theorem.
[Section 6.3.3] The derivation of exponential moments by 'letting p→∞ in (6.2)' needs the constants C and C_T to be independent of p; this is claimed but should be stated explicitly before the passage to the limit.
[Sections 1.5 and 8.3] The quasi-geostrophic results are announced as 'may be new' with the primary aim of demonstrating techniques. If these are intended as new contributions, please give precise theorem statements with full hypotheses and either proofs or explicit references; otherwise soften the novelty claim in the abstract and in Section 1.5.
[Definition 3.7] The notation L^p(Ω; L^p(a, τ, w^a_κ; X0)) for random intervals is not formally defined; a short remark that this means the subspace of progressively measurable processes with finite weighted norm would improve readability.
[Figure 1 and Contents] The word 'Instanteneous' appears misspelled; it should be 'Instantaneous'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the theorems are conditional on stochastic maximal regularity, and the scaling-critical identifications are computed, not assumed.

full rationale

The paper's main results (Theorem 1.1; Theorems 4.7, 5.1, 5.2) are explicitly conditional on the hypothesis (A,B) ∈ SMR_{p,κ}; SMR is not derived from the target conclusions. The criticality condition (1.4) is an algebraic interpolation inequality, and the claim that the abstract critical spaces coincide with scaling-invariant spaces is verified in Section 4.3 by concrete Sobolev-embedding and Hölder computations (e.g., the Allen–Cahn example yields the Besov trace space B^{d/q−1}_{q,p} from equality in (4.17)), rather than by substituting the desired conclusion. The regularization results in Section 5.3 are proved from the stronger hypothesis SMR_{r,α} for all r∈(2,∞), α∈[0,r/2−1) plus the growth condition (5.21) in the κ=0 case, using maximality and the blow-up criteria; they do not assume the asserted regularity of u. The survey's reliance on [AV22a, AV22b, AV24c] for detailed proofs is normal scholarly citation to prior peer-reviewed work and does not reduce a prediction to an input. The only caveat is presentation: Theorem 1.1(3) says 'under relatively weak assumptions', whereas Theorems 5.6 and 5.7 need the whole SMR_{r,α} family and (5.21); this is a scope limitation, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a theory survey and introduces no empirical free parameters or invented physical entities. Its assumptions are structural (SMR, UMD, criticality), which are the price of admission for the framework.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption X0 is a UMD Banach space with type 2, and A is sectorial with D(A)=X1.
Used throughout; required for stochastic integration (Prop 2.4) and maximal regularity theorems; see Assumption 4.1 and Section 2.
domain assumption The pair (A,B) has stochastic maximal Lp-regularity, (A,B) in SMR_{p,kappa}.
Central hypothesis of Theorem 4.7 and all derived results; not proven here, cited from prior work (Definitions 3.7-3.8 and Section 3.6).
domain assumption The criticality condition (1.4)/(4.3): (1+kappa)/p <= ((1+rho)(1-beta))/rho.
Assumed in the abstract theorems to make fixed point arguments work; equality gives the critical setting. See Theorem 1.1 and Assumption 4.1.
standard math Standard results on H-infinity calculus, interpolation, and stochastic integration.
Used as black boxes throughout Sections 2-3, with references to HNVW23, PS16, and NVW15c.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear SPDEs and Maximal Regularity: An Extended Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CAAWD4OW

@misc{pith2026250118561,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear SPDEs and Maximal Regularity: An Extended Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CAAWD4OW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18561}
}

abstract

In this survey, we provide an in-depth exposition of our recent results on the well-posedness theory for stochastic evolution equations, employing maximal regularity techniques. The core of our approach is an abstract notion of critical spaces, which, when applied to nonlinear SPDEs, coincides with the concept of scaling-invariant spaces. This framework leads to several sharp blow-up criteria and enables one to obtain instantaneous regularization results. Additionally, we refine and unify our previous results, while also presenting several new contributions. In the second part of the survey, we apply the abstract results to several concrete SPDEs. In particular, we give applications to stochastic perturbations of quasi-geostrophic equations, Navier-Stokes equations, and reaction-diffusion systems (including Allen--Cahn, Cahn--Hilliard and Lotka--Volterra models). Moreover, for the Navier--Stokes equations, we establish new Serrin-type blow-up criteria. While some applications are addressed using $L^2$-theory, many require a more general $L^p(L^q)$-framework. In the final section, we outline several open problems, covering both abstract aspects of stochastic evolution equations, and concrete questions in the study of linear and nonlinear SPDEs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18561 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Diagram describing our results. The grey boxes represent the assumptions, while the other boxes indicate the outputs of our framework. The arrows show the flow of implications in which one proves the corresponding result. The three central boxes correspond to Theorem 1.1, while the two on the right correspond to Corollaries 5.10 and 5.11 presented later in the manuscript. Applications of our framework to SPDEs. As… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Note on a threshold for temporal regularity of stochastic PDEs
math.PR 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

For linear parabolic SPDEs with constant additive noise, u belongs to W^{α,2}(D(A^{1/2})) if and only if the noise term x belongs to D(A^α), refuting the Breit and Hofmanová conjecture.
The stochastic Keller--Segel system in critical spaces
math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A stochastically forced Keller–Segel system in dimensions d≥3 admits maximal local solutions in scaling-critical Besov spaces, and small data guarantees arbitrarily long existence with high probability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

[Agr23] A. Agresti. The primitive equations with rough transport noise: Global well-posedness and regularity. arXiv preprint:2310.01193,

arXiv
[4]

[Agr24c] A. Agresti. On anomalous dissipation induced by transport noise. arXiv preprint:2405.03525,

work page arXiv
[5]

Agresti and M

[AS24] A. Agresti and M. Sauerbrey. Well-posedness of the stochastic thin-film equation with an interface potential. arXiv preprint:2403.12652,

arXiv
[7]

Bechtel and M.C

[BV23] S. Bechtel and M.C. Veraar. An extrapolation result in the variational setting: improved regularity, compactness, and applications to quasilinear systems. arXiv preprint:2311.01271,

arXiv
[11]

Lecture notes on stationary critical and super-critical SPDEs

[CT24] G. Cannizzaro and F. Toninelli. Lecture notes on stationary critical and super-critical SPDEs. arXiv preprint:2403.15006,

work page Pith review arXiv
[12]

Choi, B.-S

[CHP24] J.-H. Choi, B.-S. Han, and D. Park. Sobolev regularity theory for stochastic reaction-diffusion- advection equations with spatially homogeneous colored noises and variable-order nonlocal operators. arXiv preprint:2405.11969,

arXiv
[13]

[CLSW23] J.-H. Choi, J. B. Lee, J. Seo, and K. Woo. On the trace theorem to Volterra-type equations with local or non-local derivatives. arXiv preprint:2309.00370,

work page Pith review arXiv
[15]

Cl´ ement and S

[CL94] Ph. Cl´ ement and S. Li. Abstract parabolic quasilinear equations and application to a groundwater flow problem. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. , 3(Special Issue):17–32, 1993/94. [CIN25] P. Constantin, M. Ignatova, and Q.-H. Nguyen. Global regularity for critical SQG in bounded domains. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 78(1):3–59,

work page 1993

Show all 34 references

[20]

[Fuj66] H. Fujita. On the blowing up of solutions of the Cauchy problem for ut “ ∆u` u1`α. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. I , 13:109–124 (1966),

1966
[23]

[Goo24a] D. Goodair. Improved Blow-Up Criterion in a Variational Framework for Nonlinear SPDEs. arXiv preprint:2408.11678,

arXiv
[26]

Kim, K.-H

[KKL19] I. Kim, K.-H. Kim, and S. Lim. A Sobolev space theory for stochastic partial differential equations with time-fractional derivatives. Ann. Probab., 47(4):2087–2139,
[27]

[Kry09b] N.V. Krylov. On divergence form SPDEs with VMO coefficients in a half space. Stochastic Processes Appl., 119(6):2095–2117,
[28]

[KN23] C

©2020. [KN23] C. Kuehn and A. Neamt ¸u. Center manifolds for rough partial differential equations. Electron. J. Probab., 28:31,

2020
[29]

Matioc, L

[MR W24] B.-V. Matioc, L. Roberti, and C. Walker. Quasilinear parabolic equations with superlinear nonlinear- ities in critical spaces. arXiv preprint:2408.05067,

arXiv
[33]

Walker and K

[WY24] E. Walker and K. Yamazaki. Surface quasi-geostrophic equations forced by random noise: prescribed energy and non-unique Markov selections. arXiv preprint:2407.00920,

arXiv
[34]

[Wal86] J. B. Walsh. An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations. ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIV - 1984, Lect. Notes Math. 1180, 265-437 (1986).,

1986
[1964]

Debussche, M

[DHV16] A. Debussche, M. Hofmanov´ a, and J. Vovelle. Degenerate parabolic stochastic partial differential equations: quasilinear case. Ann. Probab., 44(3):1916–1955,

1916
[1966]

Galeati and D

[GL23] L. Galeati and D. Luo. Weak well-posedness by transport noise for a class of 2d fluid dynamics equations. arXiv preprint:2305.08761,

arXiv
[1979]

[The25] E. Theewis. The Yamada-Watanabe-Engelbert theorem for SPDEs in Banach spaces. arXiv preprint:2502.00189,

arXiv
[1981]

[CV10] L. A. Caffarelli and A. Vasseur. Drift diffusion equations with fractional diffusion and the quasi- geostrophic equation. Ann. of Math. (2) , 171(3):1903–1930,

1903
[1982]

Da Prato

[DP86] G. Da Prato. Abstract differential equations, maximal regularity, and linearization. Nonlinear func- tional analysis and its applications, Proc. Summer Res. Inst., Berkeley/Calif. 1983, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 45/1, 359-370 (1986).,

1986
[1994]

Gy¨ ongy and N.V

[GK24] I. Gy¨ ongy and N.V. Krylov. Once again on evolution equations with monotone operators in Hilbert spaces and applications. arXiv preprint:2409.18242,

arXiv
[1996]

Cox and J

[CvW24] S. Cox and J. van Winden. Sharp supremum and H¨ older bounds for stochastic integrals indexed by a parameter. arXiv preprint:2409.13615,

arXiv
[2009]

Gnann, J

[GHV24] M.V. Gnann, J. Hoogendijk, and M.C. Veraar. Higher order moments for SPDE with monotone nonlinearities. Stochastics, 96(7):1948–1983,

1948
[2010]

An Lp-theory for the stochastic heat equation on angular domains in R2 with mixed weights

NONLINEAR SPDEs AND MAXIMAL REGULARITY 97 [CL20] PA Cioica-Licht. An Lp-theory for the stochastic heat equation on angular domains in R2 with mixed weights. arXiv preprint:2003.03782,

2003 arXiv
[2013]

[Hai14a] M. Hairer. Singular stochastic PDEs. arXiv preprint:1403.6353,

arXiv
[2014]

Bechtel, F

[BGV24] S. Bechtel, F. Germ, and M.C. Veraar. An extended variational setting for critical SPDEs with L´ evy noise. arXiv preprint:2412.17420,
[2016]

Pr¨ uss, G

[PSW18] J. Pr¨ uss, G. Simonett, and M. Wilke. Critical spaces for quasilinear parabolic evolution equations and applications. J. Differential Equations , 264(3):2028–2074,
[2018]

Breit, Thamsanqa C

[BMPW23] D. Breit, Thamsanqa C. Moyo, A. Prohl, and J. Wichmann. Mean Square Temporal error estimates for the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations with transport noise. arXiv preprint:2305.10999,

arXiv
[2020]

Duan and A

98 ANTONIO AGRESTI AND MARK VERAAR [DM09] J. Duan and A. Millet. Large deviations for the Boussinesq equations under random influences. Sto- chastic Process. Appl., 119(6):2052–2081,
[2022]

van den Bosch and H.J

[BH24] M. van den Bosch and H.J. Hupkes. Multidimensional stability of planar travelling waves for stochas- tically perturbed reaction-diffusion systems. arXiv preprint:2406.04232,

arXiv
[2023]

[Agr24a] A. Agresti. Delayed blow-up and enhanced diffusion by transport noise for systems of reaction-diffusion equations. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. , 12(3):1907–1981,

1907
[2024]

[Agr24b] A. Agresti. Global smooth solutions by transport noise of 3D Navier-Stokes equations with small hyperviscosity. arXiv preprint:2406.09267,

arXiv
[2025]

Theewis and M

[TV24] E. Theewis and M. Veraar. Large Deviations for Stochastic Evolution Equations in the Critical Vari- ational Setting. arXiv preprint:2402.16622,

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

[Agr23] A. Agresti. The primitive equations with rough transport noise: Global well-posedness and regularity. arXiv preprint:2310.01193,

arXiv

[2] [4]

[Agr24c] A. Agresti. On anomalous dissipation induced by transport noise. arXiv preprint:2405.03525,

work page arXiv

[3] [5]

Agresti and M

[AS24] A. Agresti and M. Sauerbrey. Well-posedness of the stochastic thin-film equation with an interface potential. arXiv preprint:2403.12652,

arXiv

[4] [7]

Bechtel and M.C

[BV23] S. Bechtel and M.C. Veraar. An extrapolation result in the variational setting: improved regularity, compactness, and applications to quasilinear systems. arXiv preprint:2311.01271,

arXiv

[5] [11]

Lecture notes on stationary critical and super-critical SPDEs

[CT24] G. Cannizzaro and F. Toninelli. Lecture notes on stationary critical and super-critical SPDEs. arXiv preprint:2403.15006,

work page Pith review arXiv

[6] [12]

Choi, B.-S

[CHP24] J.-H. Choi, B.-S. Han, and D. Park. Sobolev regularity theory for stochastic reaction-diffusion- advection equations with spatially homogeneous colored noises and variable-order nonlocal operators. arXiv preprint:2405.11969,

arXiv

[7] [13]

[CLSW23] J.-H. Choi, J. B. Lee, J. Seo, and K. Woo. On the trace theorem to Volterra-type equations with local or non-local derivatives. arXiv preprint:2309.00370,

work page Pith review arXiv

[8] [15]

Cl´ ement and S

[CL94] Ph. Cl´ ement and S. Li. Abstract parabolic quasilinear equations and application to a groundwater flow problem. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. , 3(Special Issue):17–32, 1993/94. [CIN25] P. Constantin, M. Ignatova, and Q.-H. Nguyen. Global regularity for critical SQG in bounded domains. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 78(1):3–59,

work page 1993