Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MUSTARD: Mastering Uniform Synthesis of Theorem and Proof Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.08957 v3 pith:EXHOAWT5 submitted 2024-02-14 cs.AI cs.CLcs.FLcs.LGcs.PL

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.FLcs.LGcs.PL
keywords datamustardprooftheoremformallanguageframeworkinformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent large language models (LLMs) have witnessed significant advancement in various tasks, including mathematical reasoning and theorem proving. As these two tasks require strict and formal multi-step inference, they are appealing domains for exploring the reasoning ability of LLMs but still face important challenges. Previous studies such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) have revealed the effectiveness of intermediate steps guidance. However, such step-wise annotation requires heavy labor, leading to insufficient training steps for current benchmarks. To fill this gap, this work introduces MUSTARD, a data generation framework that masters uniform synthesis of theorem and proof data of high quality and diversity. MUSTARD synthesizes data in three stages: (1) It samples a few mathematical concept seeds as the problem category. (2) Then, it prompts a generative language model with the sampled concepts to obtain both the problems and their step-wise formal solutions. (3) Lastly, the framework utilizes a proof assistant (e.g., Lean Prover) to filter the valid proofs. With the proposed MUSTARD, we present a theorem-and-proof benchmark MUSTARDSAUCE with 5,866 valid data points. Each data point contains an informal statement, an informal proof, and a translated formal proof that passes the prover validation. We perform extensive analysis and demonstrate that MUSTARD generates validated high-quality step-by-step data. We further apply the MUSTARDSAUCE for fine-tuning smaller language models. The fine-tuned Llama 2-7B achieves a 15.41% average relative performance gain in automated theorem proving, and 8.18% in math word problems. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/Eleanor-H/MUSTARD.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CDS: Knowledge Component-Driven Data Synthesis Guided by Cognitive Diagnosis Theory

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A knowledge-component diagnostic pipeline, inspired by cognitive diagnosis theory, generates weakness-targeted synthetic data that improves small LLMs on math, code, and exam benchmarks by up to 13.1 percentage points.

  2. A Survey of LLM $\times$ DATA

    cs.DB 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey of the bidirectional links between LLMs and data management, organized as DATA4LLM and LLM4DATA with a new 'IaaS' data-quality framework.

  3. Scaling Natural-Language Graph-Based Test Time Compute for Automated Theorem Proving

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    KG-Prover shows that traversing a ProofWiki-derived knowledge graph at inference time improves LLM theorem-proving accuracy on miniF2F, ProofNet, and MUSTARDSAUCE without extra fine-tuning.

Pith tools