pith. sign in

arxiv: 2003.10769 · v2 · pith:EXJRFPTZnew · submitted 2020-03-22 · 📡 eess.IV · cs.CV· cs.LG· stat.ML

Estimating Uncertainty and Interpretability in Deep Learning for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Detection

classification 📡 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
keywords uncertaintydeeplearningcovid-19accuracycoronavirusdetectiondiagnosis
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Deep Learning has achieved state of the art performance in medical imaging. However, these methods for disease detection focus exclusively on improving the accuracy of classification or predictions without quantifying uncertainty in a decision. Knowing how much confidence there is in a computer-based medical diagnosis is essential for gaining clinicians trust in the technology and therefore improve treatment. Today, the 2019 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infections are a major healthcare challenge around the world. Detecting COVID-19 in X-ray images is crucial for diagnosis, assessment and treatment. However, diagnostic uncertainty in the report is a challenging and yet inevitable task for radiologist. In this paper, we investigate how drop-weights based Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks (BCNN) can estimate uncertainty in Deep Learning solution to improve the diagnostic performance of the human-machine team using publicly available COVID-19 chest X-ray dataset and show that the uncertainty in prediction is highly correlates with accuracy of prediction. We believe that the availability of uncertainty-aware deep learning solution will enable a wider adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a clinical setting.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Principled Uncertainty in Clinical AI: End-to-End Bayesian Modelling and Algorithmic Equity Auditing Across Multimodal Patient Data

    cs.CY 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    An end-to-end Bayesian multimodal model for clinical predictions uses calibrated uncertainty to report equity gaps on 1,000 simulated patients, with larger gaps for rural, low-SES, and elderly subgroups.