pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02593 · v1 · pith:HBNLBXQ5new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph· nucl-th

Hybrid stars among mass gap objects are excluded by twin stars at 1.4\,M_odot

Alexander Ayriyan , David Blaschke , Marcin Dubaj , Oleksandr Vitiuk , Adrian Wojcik This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-phnucl-th
keywords hybrid starsmass gaptwin starsdeconfinement transitionequation of stateBayesian analysisneutron starsquark matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hybrid stars cannot explain mass-gap compact objects because they conflict with twin stars at 1.4 solar masses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether compact objects between 2.5 and 5 solar masses can be hybrid stars made of nuclear matter plus deconfined quark matter. A generic equation of state with a sharp first-order phase transition is mapped across parameter space and compared to current mass and radius measurements. Only models with an unusually early onset of deconfinement and extremely stiff quark matter can place hybrid stars in the mass gap. Bayesian analysis of the same data instead selects equations of state that produce the transition near 1.4 solar masses and generate mass-twin pairs. If those twins are observed, the parameter region needed for mass-gap hybrids is ruled out.

Core claim

Mass-gap hybrid stars require an extremely early onset of deconfinement and very stiff quark matter. The Bayesian analysis, however, favors equations of state with deconfinement at typical neutron-star masses around 1.4 M_⊙ with mass-twin stars that, if confirmed, would rule out hybrid stars as candidates for observed mass-gap compact objects.

What carries the argument

A generic hybrid equation of state with a first-order deconfinement transition, mapped in a Seidov-type diagram and constrained by Bayesian inference on mass-radius data.

If this is right

  • Confirmation of mass twins near 1.4 solar masses eliminates hybrid-star models for any compact object above 2.5 solar masses.
  • The allowed region for mass-gap hybrids lies outside the posterior probability distribution obtained from current observations.
  • Equations of state with very early deconfinement and stiff quark matter receive low posterior weight.
  • Mass-gap objects, if they exist, cannot be explained by the same first-order transition physics that produces twins at lower masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future radius measurements of stars near 1.4 solar masses could directly test whether the transition occurs early enough to allow or forbid mass-gap hybrids.
  • The result implies that any confirmed mass-gap object is more likely a black hole or a different form of exotic matter without a strong first-order quark transition.
  • The tension highlights how a single well-measured mass-radius pair at ordinary neutron-star masses can constrain the entire high-density phase diagram.
  • Similar Bayesian mapping could be applied to other phase-transition models to check whether they also force mass-gap hybrids into disfavored corners.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen generic hybrid model with a sharp first-order transition represents all possible hybrid-star physics and that existing mass-radius data already exclude the required parameter region.

What would settle it

Precise confirmation of two stars with masses near 1.4 solar masses but measurably different radii, or the detection of a 3-solar-mass object whose radius and tidal deformability match a hybrid equation of state that lacks twins at 1.4 solar masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02593 by Adrian Wojcik, Alexander Ayriyan, David Blaschke, Marcin Dubaj, Oleksandr Vitiuk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Mass–radius diagram for representative parametrizations of the hybrid EoS (2). The solid red curve shows the purely hadronic EoS; the other curves cor￾respond to hybrid EoS solutions with different values of c 2 s in brackets. MAP denotes the EoS with the maximum￾a-posteriori probability, while HMM denote the heaviest maximum-mass models within the parameter region of 95% credibility. Colored contours show… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Seidov diagrams, density jump in units of the onset density versus onset density for the hybrid EoS (2) and three cases of squared sound speed: c 2 s = 0.50 (upper panel), 0.75 (middle panel), 1.00 (lowest panel). The black line denotes the modified Seidov instability criterion (3) and white lines indicate maximum masses of 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 M⊙, where that for 2.5 M⊙ is the border to the mass gap region. Re… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We test whether compact objects in the so called mass gap ($2.5 < M_{\rm max}/M_\odot < 5.0$) can be hybrid stars. Using a generic hybrid equation of state with a first-order deconfinement transition, we map the allowed parameter space in a Seidov-type diagram and confront it with modern mass--radius constraints. We find that mass-gap hybrid stars require an extremely early onset of deconfinement and very stiff quark matter. The Bayesian analysis, however, favors equations of state with deconfinement at typical neutron-star masses around $1.4\,M_\odot$ with mass-twin stars that, if confirmed, would rule out hybrid stars as candidates for observed mass-gap compact objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper maps the parameter space of a generic hybrid equation of state with a sharp first-order deconfinement transition in a Seidov-type diagram (onset density vs. energy-density jump) and confronts it with modern mass-radius constraints. It concludes that hybrid stars in the mass gap (2.5–5 M_⊙) require an extremely early onset of deconfinement together with stiff quark matter; a Bayesian analysis of the same model family instead favors deconfinement near 1.4 M_⊙, producing mass-twin stars whose confirmation would exclude hybrid stars as explanations for observed mass-gap compact objects.

Significance. If the central mapping and Bayesian preference hold within the adopted model class, the work supplies a falsifiable link between the existence of ~1.4 M_⊙ twins and the exclusion of hybrid stars from the mass-gap window, offering a concrete observational test with existing and forthcoming NICER and gravitational-wave data. The explicit Seidov-diagram exploration and use of current M-R constraints constitute a clear, reproducible step beyond purely qualitative arguments.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Bayesian analysis): the reported preference for deconfinement near 1.4 M_⊙ and the consequent twin-star branch are obtained from the posterior of the identical fit to the same mass-radius data used to exclude the mass-gap region; this renders the exclusion conditional on the model family rather than an independent test, weakening the claim that twins “rule out” mass-gap hybrids.
  2. [§2.1] §2.1 (model setup and Seidov diagram): the parameter-space mapping is performed exclusively for a constant-speed-of-sound quark-matter EoS with a sharp first-order transition; the title and abstract present the exclusion as applying to hybrid stars in general, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that other constructions (density-dependent vector couplings, crossover transitions, or different high-density extrapolations) are unable to populate the mass-gap window while remaining consistent with the same M-R constraints.
  3. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: the statement that mass-gap hybrids “require an extremely early onset … and very stiff quark matter” is derived from the boundaries of the allowed Seidov region, but the quantitative thresholds (onset density < 2 n_sat and c_s^2 > 0.8, for example) are not shown to be robust against reasonable variations in the nuclear-matter EoS or the precise mass-radius data selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (posterior contours): the 68 % and 95 % credible regions are plotted but the prior boundaries on the onset pressure and quark stiffness are not overlaid, making it difficult to judge how strongly the data pull away from the mass-gap corner.
  2. [§2] Notation: the symbol Δε/ε is used both for the Seidov jump and for the energy-density discontinuity at the transition; a brief clarifying sentence in §2 would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and clarify the scope of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Bayesian analysis): the reported preference for deconfinement near 1.4 M_⊙ and the consequent twin-star branch are obtained from the posterior of the identical fit to the same mass-radius data used to exclude the mass-gap region; this renders the exclusion conditional on the model family rather than an independent test, weakening the claim that twins “rule out” mass-gap hybrids.

    Authors: We agree that the Bayesian posterior and the Seidov-diagram exclusion are obtained from the same mass-radius data within the same model family. The mapping identifies the narrow parameter region needed for mass-gap hybrids, while the posterior assigns low probability to that region, favoring instead the twin-star solutions near 1.4 M_⊙. The result is therefore conditional on the adopted class of hybrid EOS. We will revise the abstract, §3, and §4 to state explicitly that the exclusion of mass-gap hybrids by the twin-star branch holds within this model family, thereby removing any implication of an independent test. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2.1] §2.1 (model setup and Seidov diagram): the parameter-space mapping is performed exclusively for a constant-speed-of-sound quark-matter EoS with a sharp first-order transition; the title and abstract present the exclusion as applying to hybrid stars in general, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that other constructions (density-dependent vector couplings, crossover transitions, or different high-density extrapolations) are unable to populate the mass-gap window while remaining consistent with the same M-R constraints.

    Authors: The analysis employs the constant-speed-of-sound parametrization because it permits a transparent exploration of the onset density and energy-density jump in the Seidov diagram while remaining consistent with a first-order transition. This is a standard and widely used approach for such mappings. We acknowledge that the title and abstract refer to “hybrid stars” without qualification. We will revise the title, abstract, and §2.1 to specify that the conclusions apply to hybrid stars with a sharp first-order deconfinement transition and constant-speed-of-sound quark matter. While a comprehensive survey of all alternative constructions lies beyond the scope of the present work, the CSS framework captures the essential features relevant to the mass-gap question. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4: the statement that mass-gap hybrids “require an extremely early onset … and very stiff quark matter” is derived from the boundaries of the allowed Seidov region, but the quantitative thresholds (onset density < 2 n_sat and c_s^2 > 0.8, for example) are not shown to be robust against reasonable variations in the nuclear-matter EoS or the precise mass-radius data selection.

    Authors: The reported thresholds are obtained for the specific nuclear EoS and mass-radius data set adopted in the analysis. We will add a dedicated paragraph in §4 (and, if space permits, a short appendix) that tests the sensitivity of the Seidov boundaries to (i) alternative nuclear-matter parametrizations consistent with the same low-density constraints and (ii) subsets or alternative selections of the observational data. This will quantify the robustness of the quoted thresholds. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Bayesian posterior on external M-R data is independent of the Seidov mapping

full rationale

The paper maps the hybrid EoS parameter space (onset density vs. density jump) in a Seidov diagram and directly confronts it with external observational mass-radius constraints. The Bayesian analysis is performed inside the same model family but uses those same external constraints to obtain a posterior; the favored region happens to lie at ~1.4 M_⊙ with twins. This is ordinary parameter inference, not a self-referential loop in which a fitted quantity is relabeled as an independent prediction or in which the central claim reduces to a definition or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step equates the output to the input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a parameterized hybrid EOS model whose transition parameters are varied and then constrained by data; no new entities are postulated beyond standard hybrid-star assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • deconfinement onset density or pressure
    Varied across Seidov-type diagram to identify region allowing mass-gap hybrids; must be extremely early for those solutions.
  • quark-matter stiffness parameter
    Must be very high to support mass-gap hybrids; constrained by Bayesian analysis.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hybrid stars are described by a generic EOS with a first-order deconfinement phase transition
    Invoked to map the allowed parameter space for hybrid configurations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5675 in / 1395 out tokens · 38110 ms · 2026-06-30T15:53:20.160337+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

144 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages · 72 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A strange star scenario for the formation of eccentric millisecond pulsar PSR J1946+3417

    Jiang, Long and Wang, Na and Chen, Wen-Cong and Liu, Wei-Min and Leng, Chun-wei and Yuan, Jian-Ping and Qian, Xiang-Li. A strange star scenario for the formation of eccentric millisecond pulsar PSR J1946+3417. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2021. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/9/231. arXiv:2106.05717

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/9/231 2021

  2. [2]

    and others

    Serylak, M. and others. The eccentric millisecond pulsar, PSR J0955 - 6150 - I. Pulse profile analysis, mass measurements, and constraints on binary evolution. Astron. Astrophys. 2022. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142670. arXiv:2203.00607

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142670 2022

  3. [3]

    PSR J1903+0327 : A Unique Milli-Second Pulsar with a Main-Sequence Companion Star

    PSR J1903+0327: A Unique Millisecond Pulsar with a Main-sequence Companion Star. Astrophysics. J. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/183 , archivePrefix =. 1110.0507 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/744/2/183

  4. [4]

    Einstein@Home Discovery of a PALFA Millisecond Pulsar in an Eccentric Binary Orbit

    Knispel, B. and others. Einstein@Home Discovery of a PALFA Millisecond Pulsar in an Eccentric Binary Orbit. Astrophys. J. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/140. arXiv:1504.03684

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/806/1/140 2015

  5. [5]

    Zhu, W. W. and others. Mass measurements for two binary pulsars discovered in the PALFA survey. Astrophys. J. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bef. arXiv:1907.05046

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bef 2019

  6. [6]

    and others

    Grunthal, K. and others. Triple trouble with PSR J1618 - 3921: Mass measurements and orbital dynamics of an eccentric millisecond pulsar. Astron. Astrophys. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347482. arXiv:2409.03615

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347482 2024

  7. [7]

    Chirally improved quark Pauli blocking in nuclear matter and applications to quark deconfinement in neutron stars

    Blaschke, David and Grigorian, Hovik and R. Chirally improved quark Pauli blocking in nuclear matter and applications to quark deconfinement in neutron stars. Particles. 2020. doi:10.3390/particles3020033. arXiv:2005.10218

    work page doi:10.3390/particles3020033 2020

  8. [8]

    Contrera, G. A. and Blaschke, D. and Carlomagno, J. P. and Grunfeld, A. G. and Liebing, S. Quark-nuclear hybrid equation of state for neutron stars under modern observational constraints. Phys. Rev. C. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.045808. arXiv:2201.00477

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.045808 2022

  9. [9]

    Revisiting the Rhoades-Ruffini bound

    Blaschke, David and Wojcik, Adrian. Revisiting the Rhoades-Ruffini bound. 2026. arXiv:2604.03204

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    A NICER View of the 1.4 M _ ⊙ Edge-on Pulsar PSR J0614-3329

    Mauviard, Lucien and others. A NICER View of the 1.4 M _ ⊙ Edge-on Pulsar PSR J0614-3329. Astrophys. J. 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae145d. arXiv:2506.14883

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae145d 2025

  11. [11]

    Miller, M. C. and others. The Radius of PSR J0437 4715 from NICER Data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2026. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae5057. arXiv:2512.08790

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae5057 2026

  12. [12]

    Signal of Quark Deconfinement in the Timing Structure of Pulsar Spin-Down

    Glendenning, Norman K. and Pei, S. and Weber, F. Signal of quark deconfinement in the timing structure of pulsar spindown. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1603. arXiv:astro-ph/9705235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.1603 1997

  13. [13]

    GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object

    Abbott, R. and others. GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f. arXiv:2006.12611

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f 2020

  14. [14]

    Abac, A. G. and others. Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5 4.5 M _ ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb. arXiv:2404.04248

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5beb 2024

  15. [15]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. arXiv:1710.05832

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  16. [16]

    Equation of State at Supranuclear Densities and the Existence of a Third Family of Superdense Stars

    Gerlach, Ulrich H. Equation of State at Supranuclear Densities and the Existence of a Third Family of Superdense Stars. Phys. Rev. 1968. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.172.1325

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.172.1325 1968

  17. [17]

    Upper bound on the speed of sound in nuclear matter from transport

    Hippert, Mauricio and Noronha, Jorge and Romatschke, Paul. Upper bound on the speed of sound in nuclear matter from transport. Phys. Lett. B. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139184. arXiv:2402.14085

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139184 2025

  18. [18]

    Impact of massive neutron star radii on the nature of phase transitions in dense matter

    Somasundaram, Rahul and Margueron, J \'e r \^o me. Impact of massive neutron star radii on the nature of phase transitions in dense matter. EPL. 2022. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac63de. arXiv:2104.13612

    work page doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ac63de 2022

  19. [19]

    and Ruffini, Remo

    Rhoades, Jr., Clifford E. and Ruffini, Remo. Maximum mass of a neutron star. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1974. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.324

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.32.324 1974

  20. [20]

    Quark Pauli principle and the transmutation of nuclear matter

    McLerran, Larry and Miller, Gerald A. Quark Pauli principle and the transmutation of nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.045203. arXiv:2405.11074

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.045203 2024

  21. [21]

    and Vovchenko, Volodymyr

    Koch, Volker and McLerran, Larry and Miller, Gerald A. and Vovchenko, Volodymyr. Examining the possibility that normal nuclear matter is quarkyonic. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.025201. arXiv:2403.15375

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.025201 2024

  22. [22]

    and Grunfeld, Ana Gabriela

    Ayriyan, Alexander and Blaschke, David and Carlomagno, Juan Pablo and Contrera, Gustavo A. and Grunfeld, Ana Gabriela. Bayesian Analysis of Hybrid Neutron Star EOS Constraints Within an Instantaneous Nonlocal Chiral Quark Matter Model. Universe. 2025. doi:10.3390/universe11050141. arXiv:2501.00115

    work page doi:10.3390/universe11050141 2025

  23. [23]

    Bayesian inference favors quark matter in neutron star interiors

    Ayriyan, Alexander and Ivanytskyi, Oleksii and Blaschke, David. Bayesian inference favors quark matter in neutron star interiors. 2025. arXiv:2509.02554

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Hyperon-mixed neutron star with universal many-body repulsion

    Yamamoto, Y. and Furumoto, T. and Yasutake, N. and Rijken, Th. A. Hyperon-mixed neutron star with universal many-body repulsion. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2016. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16019-0. arXiv:1510.06099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16019-0 2016

  25. [25]

    The Stability of a Star with a Phase Change in General Relativity Theory. Sov. Astron. , year = 1971, month = oct, volume =

    1971

  26. [26]

    and Ohse, D

    Chanlaridis, S. and Ohse, D. and Alvarez-Castillo, D. E. and Antoniadis, J. and Blaschke, D. and Danchev, V. and Langer, N. and Misra, D. Formation of twin compact stars in low-mass X-ray binaries - Implications for eccentric and isolated millisecond pulsar populations. Astron. Astrophys. 2025. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452259. arXiv:2409.04755

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452259 2025

  27. [27]

    Generic conditions for stable hybrid stars

    Alford, Mark G. and Han, Sophia and Prakash, Madappa. Generic conditions for stable hybrid stars. Phys. Rev. D. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083013. arXiv:1302.4732

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.083013 2013

  28. [28]

    Characteristics of hybrid compact stars with a sharp hadron-quark interface

    Alford, Mark G. and Han, Sophia. Characteristics of hybrid compact stars with a sharp hadron-quark interface. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2016. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16062-9. arXiv:1508.01261

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16062-9 2016

  29. [29]

    and Han, Sophia and Schwenzer, Kai

    Alford, Mark G. and Han, Sophia and Schwenzer, Kai. Signatures for quark matter from multi-messenger observations. J. Phys. G. 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab337a. arXiv:1904.05471

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab337a 2019

  30. [30]

    and Orsaria, Milva G

    Ranea-Sandoval, Ignacio F. and Orsaria, Milva G. and Han, Sophia and Weber, Fridolin and Spinella, William M. Color superconductivity in compact stellar hybrid configurations. Phys. Rev. C. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.065807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.065807 2017

  31. [31]

    The Constant-Sound-Speed parameterization for NJL models of quark matter in hybrid stars

    Ranea-Sandoval, Ignacio F. and Han, Sophia and Orsaria, Milva G. and Contrera, Gustavo A. and Weber, Fridolin and Alford, Mark G. Constant-sound-speed parametrization for Nambu Jona-Lasinio models of quark matter in hybrid stars. Phys. Rev. C. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.045812. arXiv:1512.09183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.045812 2016

  32. [32]

    Tidal deformability with sharp phase transitions in (binary) neutron stars

    Han, Sophia and Steiner, Andrew W. Tidal deformability with sharp phase transitions in (binary) neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083014. arXiv:1810.10967

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.083014 2019

  33. [33]

    Phase transition and nuclear symmetry energy from neutron star observations: Constraints in light of PSR J0614-3329

    Tang, Shao-Peng and Huang, Yong-Jia and Fan, Yi-Zhong. Phase transition and nuclear symmetry energy from neutron star observations: Constraints in light of PSR J0614-3329. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/bmsk-8n85. arXiv:2507.10025

    work page doi:10.1103/bmsk-8n85 2025

  34. [34]

    Strong model-agnostic constraints for twin-star solutions

    Blomqvist, Sofia and Ecker, Christian and Gorda, Tyler and Vuorinen, Aleksi. Strong model-agnostic constraints for twin-star solutions. 2025. arXiv:2512.19477

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    and Raduta, Adriana R

    Fortin, M. and Raduta, Adriana R. and Avancini, Sidney and Provid\^encia, Constan c a. Relativistic hypernuclear compact stars with calibrated equations of state. Phys. Rev. D. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034017. arXiv:2001.08036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.034017 2020

  36. [36]

    Ho, Wynn C. G. and Elshamouty, Khaled G. and Heinke, Craig O. and Potekhin, Alexander Y. Tests of the nuclear equation of state and superfluid and superconducting gaps using the Cassiopeia A neutron star. Phys. Rev. C. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.015806. arXiv:1412.7759

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.015806 2015

  37. [37]

    Thermal evolution of neutron stars described within the equation of state with induced surface tension

    Tsiopelas, Stefanos and Sagun, Violetta. Thermal evolution of neutron stars described within the equation of state with induced surface tension. Astron. Nachr. 2021. doi:10.1002/asna.202113929

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.202113929 2021

  38. [38]

    Neutron star cooling within the equation of state with induced surface tension

    Tsiopelas, Stefanos and Sagun, Violetta. Neutron star cooling within the equation of state with induced surface tension. Particles. 2020. doi:10.3390/particles3040045. arXiv:2006.06351

    work page doi:10.3390/particles3040045 2020

  39. [39]

    Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume =

    Takatsuka, Tatsuyuki , title = ". Progress of Theoretical Physics , volume =. 1972 , month =. doi:10.1143/PTP.48.1517 , url =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.48.1517 1972

  40. [40]

    The impact of magnetic field on the thermal evolution of neutron stars

    Aguilera, Deborah N. and Pons, Jose A. and Miralles, Juan A. The impact of magnetic field on the thermal evolution of neutron stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2008. doi:10.1086/527547. arXiv:0712.1353

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/527547 2008

  41. [41]

    Cooling of Accretion-Heated Neutron Stars

    Wijnands, Rudy and Degenaar, Nathalie and Page, Dany. Cooling of Accretion-Heated Neutron Stars. J. Astrophys. Astron. 2017. doi:10.1007/s12036-017-9466-5. arXiv:1709.07034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s12036-017-9466-5 2017

  42. [43]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass 3.4 M_. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5. arXiv:2001.01761

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 2020

  43. [44]

    and Greif, S

    Raaijmakers, G. and Greif, S. K. and Hebeler, K. and Hinderer, T. and Nissanke, S. and Schwenk, A. and Riley, T. E. and Watts, A. L. and Lattimer, J. M. and Ho, W. C. G. Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation of State and Neutron Star Properties from NICER s Mass Radius Estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and Multimessenger Observations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021...

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089a 2021

  44. [45]

    and others

    Riley, Thomas E. and others. A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c. arXiv:1912.05702

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c 2019

  45. [46]

    Miller, M. C. and others. PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5. arXiv:1912.05705

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5 2019

  46. [47]

    Miller, M. C. and others. The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b. arXiv:2105.06979

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b 2021

  47. [48]

    and others

    Raaijmakers, G. and others. Constraining the dense matter equation of state with joint analysis of NICER and LIGO/Virgo measurements. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab822f. arXiv:1912.11031

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab822f 2020

  48. [49]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    Antoniadis, John and others. A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary. Science. 2013. doi:10.1126/science.1233232. arXiv:1304.6875

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.1233232 2013

  49. [50]

    and Kandel, D

    Romani, Roger W. and Kandel, D. and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Brink, Thomas G. and Zheng, WeiKang. PSR J1810+1744: Companion Darkening and a Precise High Neutron Star Mass. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe2b4. arXiv:2101.09822

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abe2b4 2021

  50. [51]

    and Kandel, D

    Romani, Roger W. and Kandel, D. and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Brink, Thomas G. and Zheng, WeiKang. PSR J0952 - 0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8007. arXiv:2207.05124

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac8007 2022

  51. [52]

    and others

    Riley, Thomas E. and others. A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81. arXiv:2105.06980

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac0a81 2021

  52. [53]

    Abbott, B. P. and others. GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101. arXiv:1805.11581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.161101 2018

  53. [54]

    and Suleimanov, V

    Doroshenko, V. and Suleimanov, V. and Pühlhofer, G. and et al. , doi =. 2022 , Journal =

    2022

  54. [55]

    Beznogov, M. V. and Yakovlev, D. G. Statistical theory of thermal evolution of neutron stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2015. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2506. arXiv:1411.6803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2506 2015

  55. [56]

    Lattimer, J. M. and Prakash, M. and Pethick, C. J. and Haensel, P. Direct URCA process in neutron stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2701 1991

  56. [57]

    What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object?

    Sagun, Violetta and Giangrandi, Edoardo and Dietrich, Tim and Ivanytskyi, Oleksii and Negreiros, Rodrigo and Provid\^encia, Constan c a. What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object?. Astrophys. J. 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfc9e. arXiv:2306.12326

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfc9e 2023

  57. [59]

    Potekhin, A. Y. and Chabrier, G. Magnetic neutron star cooling and microphysics. Astron. Astrophys. 2018. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731866. arXiv:1711.07662

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731866 2018

  58. [60]

    2D Cooling of Magnetized Neutron Stars

    Aguilera, Deborah N. and Pons, Jose A. and Miralles, Juan A. 2D Cooling of Magnetized Neutron Stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2008. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078786. arXiv:0710.0854

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078786 2008

  59. [61]

    Pons, J. A. and Miralles, J. A. and Geppert, U. Magneto--thermal evolution of neutron stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2009. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811229. arXiv:0812.3018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811229 2009

  60. [62]

    Baiko, D. A. and Yakovlev, D. G. Direct urca process in strong magnetic fields and neutron star cooling. Astron. Astrophys. 1999. arXiv:astro-ph/9812071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  61. [63]

    and Urpin, V

    Geppert, U. and Urpin, V. , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/271.2.490 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/271.2.490 1994

  62. [65]

    Nuclear medium cooling scenario in the light of new Cas A cooling data and the 2 M_sun pulsar mass measurements

    Blaschke, D. and Grigorian, H. and Voskresensky, D. N. Nuclear medium cooling scenario in the light of new Cas A cooling data and the 2 M_ pulsar mass measurements. Phys. Rev. C. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.065805. arXiv:1308.4093

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.065805 2013

  63. [66]

    Dense Matter in Compact Stars: Theoretical Developments and Observational Constraints

    Page, Dany and Reddy, Sanjay. Dense Matter in Compact Stars: Theoretical Developments and Observational Constraints. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2006. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140600. arXiv:astro-ph/0608360

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140600 2006

  64. [67]

    The Cooling of Compact Stars

    Page, Dany and Geppert, Ulrich and Weber, Fridolin. The Cooling of compact stars. Nucl. Phys. A. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.09.019. arXiv:astro-ph/0508056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.09.019 2006

  65. [68]

    Ho, Wynn C. G. and Heinke, Craig O. A Neutron Star with a Carbon Atmosphere in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant. Nature. 2009. doi:10.1038/nature08525. arXiv:0911.0672

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature08525 2009

  66. [69]

    Bardeen, John and Cooper, L. N. and Schrieffer, J. R. Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 1957

  67. [70]

    Potekhin, A. Y. and Pons, J. A. and Page, Dany. Neutron stars - cooling and transport. Space Sci. Rev. 2015. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0180-9. arXiv:1507.06186

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0180-9 2015

  68. [71]

    and van Riper, Kenneth A

    Lattimer, James M. and van Riper, Kenneth A. and Prakash, Madappa and Prakash, Manju. Rapid cooling and the structure of neutron stars. Astrophys. J. 1994. doi:10.1086/174025

    work page doi:10.1086/174025 1994

  69. [72]

    and Vautherin, D

    Negele, John W. and Vautherin, D. Neutron star matter at subnuclear densities. Nucl. Phys. A. 1973. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(73)90349-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(73)90349-7 1973

  70. [73]

    and Zdunik, J

    Haensel, P. and Zdunik, J. L. Non-equilibrium processes in the crust of an accreting neutron star. Astron. and Astrophys. 1990

    1990

  71. [74]

    The Equation of State for the Nucleonic and Hyperonic Core of Neutron Stars

    Tolos, Laura and Centelles, Mario and Ramos, Angels. The Equation of State for the Nucleonic and Hyperonic Core of Neutron Stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 2017. doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.60. arXiv:1708.08681

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1017/pasa.2017.60 2017

  72. [75]

    NSCool: Neutron star cooling code

  73. [76]

    Strangeness in Neutron Star Cooling

    Lim, Yeunhwan and Hyun, Chang Ho and Lee, Chang-Hwan. Strangeness in Neutron Star Cooling. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2019. doi:10.3938/jkps.74.547. arXiv:1608.02078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3938/jkps.74.547 2019

  74. [77]

    Roles of Hyperons in Neutron Stars

    Balberg, Shmuel and Lichtenstadt, Itamar and Cook, Gregory B. Roles of hyperons in neutron stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1999. doi:10.1086/313196. arXiv:astro-ph/9810361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/313196 1999

  75. [78]

    and Giangrandi, E

    Sagun, V. and Giangrandi, E. and Ivanytskyi, O. and Lopes, I. and Bugaev, K. A. Constraints on the fermionic dark matter from observations of neutron stars. PoS. 2022. doi:10.22323/1.380.0313. arXiv:2111.13289

    work page doi:10.22323/1.380.0313 2022

  76. [79]

    Renormalization group approach to neutron matter: quasiparticle interactions, superfluid gaps and the equation of state

    Schwenk, Achim and Friman, Bengt and Brown, Gerald E. Renormalization group approach to neutron matter: Quasiparticle interactions, superfluid gaps and the equation of state. Nucl. Phys. A. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01290-3. arXiv:nucl-th/0207004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(02)01290-3 2003

  77. [80]

    Chen, J. M. C. and Clark, J. W. and Dav\'e, R. D. and Khodel, V. V. Pairing gaps in nucleonic superfluids. Nucl. Phys. A. 1993. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90314-N

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90314-n 1993

  78. [81]

    and others

    Dittmann, Alexander J. and others. A More Precise Measurement of the Radius of PSR J0740+6620 Using Updated NICER Data. Astrophys. J. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1e. arXiv:2406.14467

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1e 2024

  79. [82]

    and Yakovlev, Dmitry G

    Shternin, Peter S. and Yakovlev, Dmitry G. and Heinke, Craig O. and Ho, Wynn C. G. and Patnaude, Daniel J. Cooling neutron star in the Cassiopeia A supernova remnant: Evidence for superfluidity in the core. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01015.x. arXiv:1012.0045

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01015.x 2011

  80. [83]

    and Ostgaard, E

    Amundsen, L. and Ostgaard, E. Superfluidity of neutron matter (II). triplet pairing. Nucl. Phys. A. 1985. doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(85)80012-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(85)80012-9 1985

Showing first 80 references.