REVIEW
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can AI Mitigate Human Perceptual Biases? A Pilot Study
read the original abstract
We present results from a pilot experiment to measure if machine recommendations can debias human perceptual biases in visualization tasks. We specifically studied the ``pull-down'' effect, i.e., people underestimate the average position of lines, for the task of estimating the ensemble average of data points in line charts. These line charts can show for example temperature or precipitation in 12 months. Six participants estimated ensemble averages with or without an AI assistant. The assistant, when available, responded at three different speeds to assemble the conditions of a human collaborator who may delay his or her responses. Our pilot study showed that participants were faster with AI assistance in ensemble tasks, compared to the baseline without AI assistance. Although ``pull-down'' biases were reduced, the effect of AI assistance was not statistically significant. Also, delaying AI responses had no significant impact on human decision accuracy. We discuss the implications of these preliminary results for subsequent studies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.