When Video Misreads: Closed-Loop Distillation of Reading Heuristics for Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA

Guyue Zhou; Haizhou Ge; Lei Han; Lu Shi; Ruqi Huang; Yue Li; Yufei Jia; Zhixing Chen

arxiv: 2606.08542 · v1 · pith:JZXGMO7Pnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.CV

When Video Misreads: Closed-Loop Distillation of Reading Heuristics for Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA

Haizhou Ge , Yufei Jia , Yue Li , Zhixing Chen , Lu Shi , Lei Han , Guyue Zhou , Ruqi Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV

keywords Exploratory Manipulation Trace QADistilled Reading HeuristicClosed-Loop Trace DistillationVision-Language ModelsRobotic ManipulationAction Chain PredictionTrace InterpretationLatent Precondition Recovery

0 comments

The pith

Distilling one-line natural-language heuristics from training traces lets frozen VLMs recover minimal-success action chains from exploratory robot traces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that state-of-the-art vision-language models fail to recover the minimal-success action chain from raw video, proprioception, or their combination in exploratory manipulation traces, where a failed probe often reveals a latent precondition. It introduces Closed-Loop Trace Distillation: a per-task coding agent inspects labeled training traces to produce a one-line Distilled Reading Heuristic (DRH) that is then supplied as a prompt entry to a frozen VLM at inference. Across simulator and real-robot tasks the DRH raises chain accuracy by 0.38 to 0.47 over the best raw-modality baseline. The same DRH alone can also serve as the complete specification for one-shot programmatic classifiers that match the performance of the prompted VLM. A sympathetic reader would care because correctly reading these traces is the prerequisite for recovering the fewest actions that complete the task once the precondition is known.

Core claim

We formalize Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA (EMT-QA) as the problem of predicting the minimal-success action chain from synchronized video and proprioception given the latent precondition revealed by the exploratory probe. Even state-of-the-art VLMs and embodied multimodal LLMs misread this evidence from raw modalities. Closed-Loop Trace Distillation uses a per-task coding agent to inspect labeled training traces and distill a one-line natural-language prompt called the Distilled Reading Heuristic (DRH). At inference a frozen VLM receives the raw trace plus the DRH and achieves +0.38 to +0.47 chain accuracy over the best raw-modality baseline. The same DRH serves as the sole specification

What carries the argument

Distilled Reading Heuristic (DRH): a one-line natural-language prompt over the trace, produced by a coding agent from labeled training examples, that guides a frozen VLM or defines a programmatic classifier to recover the minimal-success action chain.

If this is right

Raw video and proprioception alone are insufficient for reliable chain recovery in EMT-QA; an explicit reading heuristic is required.
The DRH can be used at inference with no coding agent and no model updates.
The identical DRH text can replace the VLM with a lightweight programmatic classifier that matches its accuracy.
The improvement holds across three simulator tasks and two real-robot tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Many VLM failures on embodied trace data may stem from missing explicit reading instructions rather than from limits in visual or reasoning capacity.
The distillation procedure could be applied to other trace-interpretation problems such as failure analysis in navigation or assembly logs.
If the DRH generalizes across VLMs, it could be used to create consistent behavior even when swapping the underlying vision-language model.

Load-bearing premise

A per-task coding agent inspecting labeled training traces can reliably distill a one-line natural-language heuristic that generalizes to new traces of the same task without further adaptation or model changes.

What would settle it

Run the distillation on training traces for one of the reported tasks, then measure chain accuracy on held-out test traces both with and without the resulting DRH; if accuracy does not rise by at least 0.3 or if the DRH-derived programmatic classifier underperforms the prompted VLM, the central claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08542 by Guyue Zhou, Haizhou Ge, Lei Han, Lu Shi, Ruqi Huang, Yue Li, Yufei Jia, Zhixing Chen.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Closed-Loop Trace Distillation. (1) EMT-QA: given an exploratory manipulation trace pairing video with a proprioceptive trajectory, predict the minimal-success action chain (e.g., [CCW turn-knob, pull-door]); current VLMs misread the trace and fail to recover the chain from raw modalities. (2) A closed-loop coding agent iterates on training traces, discovers how to interpret the trace, and distills the fi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Closed-Loop Trace Distillation training loop. A coding agent iterates on the task’s traces, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Door per-truth-chain accuracy for HY-Embodied-0.5-X. The video-only and proprio-only [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Representative frames for the five evaluation tasks. Each row corresponds to one task; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Exploratory manipulation often turns an apparent failed attempt into the key evidence for what to do next. For example, a robot pulls a locked cabinet drawer, fails, and only succeeds after opening the lock. The failed pull reveals a latent precondition (the drawer is locked) that determines the minimal-success action chain (the fewest actions that complete the task), here [lock-open, drawer-pull]. Correctly reading this trace is therefore the prerequisite for recovering that chain. We formalize this setting as Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA (EMT-QA): given synchronized video and proprioception from an exploratory trace, predict the minimal-success action chain under the latent precondition revealed by the probe. However, even state-of-the-art VLMs and embodied multimodal LLMs misread this evidence: they do not reliably recover the chain from raw video, raw proprioception, or their combination. We introduce Closed-Loop Trace Distillation, a pipeline that uses a per-task coding agent to inspect labeled training traces and distill a one-line natural-language prompt over the trace, which we call the Distilled Reading Heuristic (DRH). At inference, no agent is invoked and no model weights are updated; a frozen VLM receives the raw trace plus the DRH as a prompt entry. Across three simulator and two real-robot tasks, the DRH improves chain accuracy by +0.38 to +0.47 over the best raw-modality baseline. The same DRH also serves as the sole specification for one-shot programmatic classifiers that match the prompted VLM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper defines EMT-QA for reading exploratory robot traces and shows that distilling a one-line heuristic from labeled training traces lifts VLM chain accuracy by 0.38-0.47 while also enabling matching programmatic classifiers.

read the letter

The main thing here is a new task setup called EMT-QA that treats failed exploratory manipulation traces as evidence for the minimal success action chain under a latent precondition. They then run a per-task coding agent over labeled training traces to produce a single natural-language sentence (the DRH) that gets appended to a frozen VLM prompt at test time. No weights change and no agent runs at inference.

What stands out is the reported lift: +0.38 to +0.47 chain accuracy over raw-modality baselines on three simulator and two real-robot tasks, plus the claim that the same one-line DRH can be turned into a zero-shot programmatic classifier that matches the prompted VLM performance. That second part is a nice check on whether the heuristic actually captures the decision rule.

The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags. The abstract gives no numbers on how many training traces the agent sees, no description of the agent's own prompt or model, and no ablation that rules out the DRH simply restating patterns visible only in the labeled set. If the distilled sentence encodes task-specific logic that does not transfer to genuinely new traces, both the accuracy gains and the classifier equivalence would not hold. The paper would need to show the agent prompt, the trace counts, and at least one control where the heuristic is tested on traces the agent never inspected.

This is for people working on embodied VLMs and manipulation planning who already deal with failure traces. It is not a broad theoretical advance, but the formulation and the distillation pipeline are concrete enough that a serious referee could evaluate whether the missing controls are present in the full text. I would send it to review if the experiments section supplies those details and the generalization checks.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper formalizes Exploratory Manipulation Trace QA (EMT-QA), where a robot's exploratory trace (video + proprioception) reveals a latent precondition that determines the minimal-success action chain. It claims that VLMs and multimodal LLMs fail on raw modalities, but Closed-Loop Trace Distillation uses a per-task coding agent to inspect labeled training traces and produce a one-line Distilled Reading Heuristic (DRH). At inference the frozen VLM receives the raw trace plus the DRH, yielding claimed chain-accuracy gains of +0.38 to +0.47 over the best raw-modality baseline across three simulator and two real-robot tasks; the same DRH is asserted to serve as the sole specification for one-shot programmatic classifiers that match the prompted VLM.

Significance. If the distillation step is shown to produce heuristics that genuinely generalize beyond the labeled training traces, the method supplies a lightweight, training-free way to improve VLM reasoning on embodied traces while also yielding directly executable programmatic classifiers. The dual-use property of the DRH is a concrete strength that increases interpretability and reduces reliance on the VLM at deployment time.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the headline quantitative claim (+0.38 to +0.47 chain accuracy) is presented without error bars, statistical tests, data-split descriptions, number of training traces per task, or exclusion criteria, rendering the central empirical result impossible to evaluate for reliability.
[Abstract] Abstract (distillation pipeline): the claim that a per-task coding agent can distill a single natural-language sentence that generalizes to unseen traces of the same task is load-bearing for both the accuracy gains and the programmatic-classifier equivalence, yet no count of training traces, agent prompt/model, or ablation against ground-truth re-statement is supplied.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The expansion of the EMT-QA acronym appears only after its first use; an earlier parenthetical definition would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We agree that additional details are needed for transparency and will revise the abstract accordingly while preserving the manuscript's core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline quantitative claim (+0.38 to +0.47 chain accuracy) is presented without error bars, statistical tests, data-split descriptions, number of training traces per task, or exclusion criteria, rendering the central empirical result impossible to evaluate for reliability.

Authors: We acknowledge the abstract omits these elements. In revision we will add error bars and statistical test descriptions to the reported gains, summarize the data splits and per-task training trace counts, and state exclusion criteria. These details already appear in the experimental sections; the abstract will be updated to include concise versions so the headline numbers can be evaluated directly. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (distillation pipeline): the claim that a per-task coding agent can distill a single natural-language sentence that generalizes to unseen traces of the same task is load-bearing for both the accuracy gains and the programmatic-classifier equivalence, yet no count of training traces, agent prompt/model, or ablation against ground-truth re-statement is supplied.

Authors: We agree the abstract should supply these specifics. Revision will state the number of training traces per task, name the coding agent model and prompt template, and report an ablation of the distilled heuristic versus a ground-truth re-statement. The full pipeline description and ablation already exist in the methods; we will condense them into the abstract for completeness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method uses held-out evaluation

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical pipeline that distills a one-line DRH from labeled training traces via a coding agent, then applies the frozen DRH to a VLM on held-out traces. No equations, derivations, or self-referential definitions appear. Results are reported as accuracy gains on separate test data, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction. This matches standard train/test separation and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that short natural-language rules extracted from training traces can serve as effective prompts; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption VLMs can reliably follow short natural-language heuristics added to prompts for interpreting manipulation traces
Central to the inference-time use of the DRH.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5840 in / 1156 out tokens · 18734 ms · 2026-06-27T18:24:59.680309+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

[1]

Y . Wang, X. Zhang, R. Wu, Y . Li, Y . Shen, M. Wu, Z. He, Y . Wang, and H. Dong. Adamanip: Adaptive articulated object manipulation environments and policy learning. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025. URLhttps://openreview.net/ forum?id=Luss2sa0vc. arXiv:2502.11124

work page arXiv 2025
[2]

Xiang, Y

F. Xiang, Y . Qin, K. Mo, Y . Xia, H. Zhu, F. Liu, M. Liu, H. Jiang, Y . Yuan, H. Wang, L. Yi, A. X. Chang, L. J. Guibas, and H. Su. SAPIEN: A simulated Part-Based interactive environment. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2020. URLhttps://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPR_2020/html/ Xiang_SAPIEN_A_SimulAted_P...

work page arXiv 2020
[3]

K. Mo, L. J. Guibas, M. Mukadam, A. Gupta, and S. Tulsiani. Where2Act: From pixels to actions for articulated 3D objects. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00674. arXiv:2101.02692

work page doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00674 2021
[4]

H. Geng, H. Xu, C. Zhao, C. Xu, L. Yi, S. Huang, and H. Wang. GAPartNet: Cross-category domain-generalizable object perception and manipulation via generalizable and actionable parts. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE,
[5]

In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00684. arXiv:2211.05272

work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00684 2023
[6]

J. Duan, W. Pumacay, N. Kumar, Y . R. Wang, S. Tian, W. Yuan, R. Krishna, D. Fox, A. Man- dlekar, and Y . Guo. Aha: A vision-language-model for detecting and reasoning over failures in robotic manipulation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00371. arXiv:2410.00371

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

Pacaud, R

P. Pacaud, R. Garcia, S. Chen, and C. Schmid. Scaling cross-environment failure reasoning data for vision-language robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01946, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01946

work page arXiv 2025
[8]

Motion-o: Trajectory-Grounded Video Reasoning

B. Galoaa, S. Moezzi, X. Bai, and S. Ostadabbas. Motion-o: Trajectory-grounded video rea- soning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18856, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603. 18856

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[9]

Schroeder, O

P. Schroeder, O. Biza, T. Weng, H. Luo, and J. Glass. Rover: Recursive reasoning over videos with vision-language models for embodied tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01943, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01943

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

F. Wang, P. Zhou, J. Qi, S. Lyu, D. Navarro-Alarcon, and G. Guo. Think proprioceptively: Embodied visual reasoning for vla manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06575, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06575

work page arXiv 2026
[11]

Zitkovich, T

B. Zitkovich, T. Yu, S. Xu, P. Xu, T. Xiao, F. Xia, J. Wu, P. Wohlhart, S. Welker, A. Wahid, Q. Vuong, V . Vanhoucke, H. Tran, R. Soricut, A. Singh, J. Singh, P. Sermanet, P. R. Sanketi, G. Salazar, M. S. Ryoo, K. Reymann, K. Rao, K. Pertsch, I. Mordatch, H. Michalewski, Y . Lu, S. Levine, L. Lee, T.-W. E. Lee, I. Leal, Y . Kuang, D. Kalashnikov, R. Julia...
[12]

RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control

PMLR, 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v229/zitkovich23a.html. arXiv:2307.15818

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[13]

M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Fos- ter, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, T. Kollar, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, D. Sadigh, S. Levine, P. Liang, and C. Finn. OpenVLA: An open-source vision-language-action model. InConfer- ence on Robot Learning (CoRL), volume 270. PMLR, 2024. URLhttps://proceedings. mlr....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[14]

PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model

D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. M. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, W. Huang, Y . Chebotar, P. Sermanet, D. Duckworth, S. Levine, V . Van- houcke, K. Hausman, M. Toussaint, K. Greff, A. Zeng, I. Mordatch, and P. Florence. PaLM-E: An embodied multimodal language model. InInternational Conference on Machine Learn- ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[16]

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311

P. Sermanet, T. Ding, J. Zhao, F. Xia, D. Dwibedi, K. Gopalakrishnan, C. W. Chan, G. Dulac- Arnold, S. Maddineni, N. J. Joshi, P. Florence, W. Han, R. Baruch, Y . Lu, S. Mirchandani, P. Xu, P. Sanketi, K. Hausman, I. Shafran, B. Ichter, and Y . Cao. Robovqa: Multimodal long- horizon reasoning for robotics.arXiv (Cornell University), 2023. doi:10.48550/arx...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311 2023
[17]

E. Zhao, V . Raval, H. Zhang, J. Mao, Z. Shangguan, S. Nikolaidis, Y . Wang, and D. Seita. Manipbench: Benchmarking vision-language models for low-level robot manipulation. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), volume 305. PMLR, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2505.09698. arXiv:2505.09698

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

L. Qiu, Y . Chen, Y . Ge, Y . Ge, Y . Shan, and X. Liu. Egoplan-bench2: A benchmark for multimodal large language model planning in real-world scenarios.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04447, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04447

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

X. Wang, Y . Chen, L. Yuan, Y . Zhang, Y . Li, H. Peng, and H. Ji. Executable code actions elicit better LLM agents. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 235. PMLR, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01030. arXiv:2402.01030

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

L. Fu, S. Salimpour, L. Militano, H. Edelman, J. P. Queralta, and G. Toffetti. Rosbag mcp server: Analyzing robot data with llms for agentic embodied ai applications.ArXiv.org, 2025. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497. URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497 2025
[21]

J. Liu, X. Zhao, X. Shang, and Z. Shen. Dive into claude code: The design space of today’s and future ai agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14228, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2604.14228

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[22]

S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y . Cao. ReAct: Syner- gizing reasoning and acting in language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=WE_vluYUL-X. arXiv:2210.03629

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[23]

Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning

N. Shinn, F. Cassano, E. Berman, A. Gopinath, K. Narasimhan, and S. Yao. Reflexion: Lan- guage agents with verbal reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, 2023. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/ paper/2023/hash/1b44b878bb782e6954cd888628510e90-Abstract-Conference. html. arXiv:2303.11366. 10

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[24]

Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback

A. Madaan, N. Tandon, P. Gupta, S. Hallinan, L. Gao, S. Wiegreffe, U. Alon, N. Dziri, S. Prabhumoye, Y . Yang, S. Gupta, B. P. Majumder, K. Hermann, S. Welleck, A. Yazdanbakhsh, and P. Clark. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, 2023. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[25]

T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Nee- lakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-V oss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. Mc- Candlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[26]

J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. H. Chi, Q. V . Le, and D. Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol- ume 35, 2022. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/ hash/9d5609613524ecf4f15af0f7b31abca4-Abstract-Conference.h...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[27]

Liang, W

J. Liang, W. Huang, F. Xia, P. Xu, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, P. Florence, and A. Zeng. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. InIEEE International Confer- ence on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ ICRA48891.2023.10160591. arXiv:2209.07753

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Liang, W

I. Singh, V . Blukis, A. Mousavian, A. Goyal, D. Xu, J. Tremblay, D. Fox, J. Thomason, and A. Garg. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161317. arXiv:2209.11302

work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161317 2023
[29]

VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models

W. Huang, C. Wang, R. Zhang, Y . Li, J. Wu, and L. Fei-Fei. V oxposer: Composable 3D value maps for robotic manipulation with language models. InConference on Robot Learn- ing (CoRL), volume 229. PMLR, 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v229/ huang23b.html. arXiv:2307.05973

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[30]

J. Chen, Y . Mu, Q. Yu, T. Wei, S. Wu, Z. Yuan, Z. Liang, C. Yang, K. Zhang, W. Shao, Y . Qiao, H. Xu, M. Ding, and P. Luo. Roboscript: Code generation for free-form manipulation tasks across real and simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14623, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2402.14623

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14623 2024
[31]

G. R. Team, S. Abeyruwan, J. Ainslie, J.-B. Alayrac, M. G. Arenas, T. Armstrong, A. Balakr- ishna, R. Baruch, M. Bauza, M. Blokzijl, S. Bohez, K. Bousmalis, A. Brohan, T. Buschmann, A. Byravan, S. Cabi, K. Caluwaerts, F. Casarini, O. Chang, J. E. Chen, X. Chen, H.-T. L. Chi- ang, K. Choromanski, D. D’Ambrosio, S. Dasari, T. Davchev, C. Devin, N. D. Palo, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[32]

T. R. X, X. Yu, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, Y . Rao, F. Liu, Y . Zhang, R. Zhao, O. Wang, Y . Liang, H. Lin, M. Wang, Y . Dong, K. Cheng, B. Ni, R. Huang, H. Hu, Z. Zhang, Li- nus, and S. Yao. HY-Embodied-0.5: Embodied foundation models for real-world agents. CoRR, abs/2604.07430, 2026. doi:10.48550/ARXIV .2604.07430. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07430

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026
[33]

Makoviychuk, L

V . Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y . Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Macklin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa, and G. State. Isaac gym: High performance GPU based physics simulation for robot learning. In J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung, edi- tors,Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks 1, NeurIPS Datasets...

2021
[34]

t": 0, "action

F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V . Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Pret- tenhofer, R. Weiss, V . Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Per- rot, and ´E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.Journal of Machine Learn- ing Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011. URLhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1953048...

work page doi:10.5555/1953048 2011

[1] [1]

Y . Wang, X. Zhang, R. Wu, Y . Li, Y . Shen, M. Wu, Z. He, Y . Wang, and H. Dong. Adamanip: Adaptive articulated object manipulation environments and policy learning. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025. URLhttps://openreview.net/ forum?id=Luss2sa0vc. arXiv:2502.11124

work page arXiv 2025

[2] [2]

Xiang, Y

F. Xiang, Y . Qin, K. Mo, Y . Xia, H. Zhu, F. Liu, M. Liu, H. Jiang, Y . Yuan, H. Wang, L. Yi, A. X. Chang, L. J. Guibas, and H. Su. SAPIEN: A simulated Part-Based interactive environment. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2020. URLhttps://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPR_2020/html/ Xiang_SAPIEN_A_SimulAted_P...

work page arXiv 2020

[3] [3]

K. Mo, L. J. Guibas, M. Mukadam, A. Gupta, and S. Tulsiani. Where2Act: From pixels to actions for articulated 3D objects. InIEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2021. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00674. arXiv:2101.02692

work page doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00674 2021

[4] [4]

H. Geng, H. Xu, C. Zhao, C. Xu, L. Yi, S. Huang, and H. Wang. GAPartNet: Cross-category domain-generalizable object perception and manipulation via generalizable and actionable parts. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE,

[5] [5]

In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00684. arXiv:2211.05272

work page doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00684 2023

[6] [6]

J. Duan, W. Pumacay, N. Kumar, Y . R. Wang, S. Tian, W. Yuan, R. Krishna, D. Fox, A. Man- dlekar, and Y . Guo. Aha: A vision-language-model for detecting and reasoning over failures in robotic manipulation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00371. arXiv:2410.00371

work page arXiv 2025

[7] [7]

Pacaud, R

P. Pacaud, R. Garcia, S. Chen, and C. Schmid. Scaling cross-environment failure reasoning data for vision-language robotic manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.01946, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01946

work page arXiv 2025

[8] [8]

Motion-o: Trajectory-Grounded Video Reasoning

B. Galoaa, S. Moezzi, X. Bai, and S. Ostadabbas. Motion-o: Trajectory-grounded video rea- soning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18856, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603. 18856

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[9] [9]

Schroeder, O

P. Schroeder, O. Biza, T. Weng, H. Luo, and J. Glass. Rover: Recursive reasoning over videos with vision-language models for embodied tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01943, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01943

work page arXiv 2025

[10] [10]

F. Wang, P. Zhou, J. Qi, S. Lyu, D. Navarro-Alarcon, and G. Guo. Think proprioceptively: Embodied visual reasoning for vla manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.06575, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06575

work page arXiv 2026

[11] [11]

Zitkovich, T

B. Zitkovich, T. Yu, S. Xu, P. Xu, T. Xiao, F. Xia, J. Wu, P. Wohlhart, S. Welker, A. Wahid, Q. Vuong, V . Vanhoucke, H. Tran, R. Soricut, A. Singh, J. Singh, P. Sermanet, P. R. Sanketi, G. Salazar, M. S. Ryoo, K. Reymann, K. Rao, K. Pertsch, I. Mordatch, H. Michalewski, Y . Lu, S. Levine, L. Lee, T.-W. E. Lee, I. Leal, Y . Kuang, D. Kalashnikov, R. Julia...

[12] [12]

RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control

PMLR, 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v229/zitkovich23a.html. arXiv:2307.15818

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[13] [13]

M. J. Kim, K. Pertsch, S. Karamcheti, T. Xiao, A. Balakrishna, S. Nair, R. Rafailov, E. Fos- ter, G. Lam, P. Sanketi, Q. Vuong, T. Kollar, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, D. Sadigh, S. Levine, P. Liang, and C. Finn. OpenVLA: An open-source vision-language-action model. InConfer- ence on Robot Learning (CoRL), volume 270. PMLR, 2024. URLhttps://proceedings. mlr....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[14] [14]

PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model

D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. M. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu, W. Huang, Y . Chebotar, P. Sermanet, D. Duckworth, S. Levine, V . Van- houcke, K. Hausman, M. Toussaint, K. Greff, A. Zeng, I. Mordatch, and P. Florence. PaLM-E: An embodied multimodal language model. InInternational Conference on Machine Learn- ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[15] [16]

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311

P. Sermanet, T. Ding, J. Zhao, F. Xia, D. Dwibedi, K. Gopalakrishnan, C. W. Chan, G. Dulac- Arnold, S. Maddineni, N. J. Joshi, P. Florence, W. Han, R. Baruch, Y . Lu, S. Mirchandani, P. Xu, P. Sanketi, K. Hausman, I. Shafran, B. Ichter, and Y . Cao. Robovqa: Multimodal long- horizon reasoning for robotics.arXiv (Cornell University), 2023. doi:10.48550/arx...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311 2023

[16] [17]

E. Zhao, V . Raval, H. Zhang, J. Mao, Z. Shangguan, S. Nikolaidis, Y . Wang, and D. Seita. Manipbench: Benchmarking vision-language models for low-level robot manipulation. In Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), volume 305. PMLR, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2505.09698. arXiv:2505.09698

work page arXiv 2025

[17] [18]

L. Qiu, Y . Chen, Y . Ge, Y . Ge, Y . Shan, and X. Liu. Egoplan-bench2: A benchmark for multimodal large language model planning in real-world scenarios.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04447, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04447

work page arXiv 2024

[18] [19]

X. Wang, Y . Chen, L. Yuan, Y . Zhang, Y . Li, H. Peng, and H. Ji. Executable code actions elicit better LLM agents. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 235. PMLR, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01030. arXiv:2402.01030

work page arXiv 2024

[19] [20]

L. Fu, S. Salimpour, L. Militano, H. Edelman, J. P. Queralta, and G. Toffetti. Rosbag mcp server: Analyzing robot data with llms for agentic embodied ai applications.ArXiv.org, 2025. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497. URLhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.03497 2025

[20] [21]

J. Liu, X. Zhao, X. Shang, and Z. Shen. Dive into claude code: The design space of today’s and future ai agent systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14228, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2604.14228

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

[21] [22]

S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, and Y . Cao. ReAct: Syner- gizing reasoning and acting in language models. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. URLhttps://openreview.net/forum?id=WE_vluYUL-X. arXiv:2210.03629

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[22] [23]

Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning

N. Shinn, F. Cassano, E. Berman, A. Gopinath, K. Narasimhan, and S. Yao. Reflexion: Lan- guage agents with verbal reinforcement learning. InAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, 2023. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/ paper/2023/hash/1b44b878bb782e6954cd888628510e90-Abstract-Conference. html. arXiv:2303.11366. 10

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[23] [24]

Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback

A. Madaan, N. Tandon, P. Gupta, S. Hallinan, L. Gao, S. Wiegreffe, U. Alon, N. Dziri, S. Prabhumoye, Y . Yang, S. Gupta, B. P. Majumder, K. Hermann, S. Welleck, A. Yazdanbakhsh, and P. Clark. Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, 2023. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[24] [25]

T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Nee- lakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, A. Herbert-V oss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. M. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. Mc- Candlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, and D....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[25] [26]

J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, B. Ichter, F. Xia, E. H. Chi, Q. V . Le, and D. Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol- ume 35, 2022. URLhttp://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/ hash/9d5609613524ecf4f15af0f7b31abca4-Abstract-Conference.h...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

[26] [27]

Liang, W

J. Liang, W. Huang, F. Xia, P. Xu, K. Hausman, B. Ichter, P. Florence, and A. Zeng. Code as policies: Language model programs for embodied control. InIEEE International Confer- ence on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ ICRA48891.2023.10160591. arXiv:2209.07753

work page arXiv 2023

[27] [28]

Liang, W

I. Singh, V . Blukis, A. Mousavian, A. Goyal, D. Xu, J. Tremblay, D. Fox, J. Thomason, and A. Garg. Progprompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10161317. arXiv:2209.11302

work page doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161317 2023

[28] [29]

VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Models

W. Huang, C. Wang, R. Zhang, Y . Li, J. Wu, and L. Fei-Fei. V oxposer: Composable 3D value maps for robotic manipulation with language models. InConference on Robot Learn- ing (CoRL), volume 229. PMLR, 2023. URLhttps://proceedings.mlr.press/v229/ huang23b.html. arXiv:2307.05973

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[29] [30]

J. Chen, Y . Mu, Q. Yu, T. Wei, S. Wu, Z. Yuan, Z. Liang, C. Yang, K. Zhang, W. Shao, Y . Qiao, H. Xu, M. Ding, and P. Luo. Roboscript: Code generation for free-form manipulation tasks across real and simulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14623, 2024. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2402.14623

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14623 2024

[30] [31]

G. R. Team, S. Abeyruwan, J. Ainslie, J.-B. Alayrac, M. G. Arenas, T. Armstrong, A. Balakr- ishna, R. Baruch, M. Bauza, M. Blokzijl, S. Bohez, K. Bousmalis, A. Brohan, T. Buschmann, A. Byravan, S. Cabi, K. Caluwaerts, F. Casarini, O. Chang, J. E. Chen, X. Chen, H.-T. L. Chi- ang, K. Choromanski, D. D’Ambrosio, S. Dasari, T. Davchev, C. Devin, N. D. Palo, ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[31] [32]

T. R. X, X. Yu, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, Y . Rao, F. Liu, Y . Zhang, R. Zhao, O. Wang, Y . Liang, H. Lin, M. Wang, Y . Dong, K. Cheng, B. Ni, R. Huang, H. Hu, Z. Zhang, Li- nus, and S. Yao. HY-Embodied-0.5: Embodied foundation models for real-world agents. CoRR, abs/2604.07430, 2026. doi:10.48550/ARXIV .2604.07430. URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07430

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2026

[32] [33]

Makoviychuk, L

V . Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y . Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Macklin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa, and G. State. Isaac gym: High performance GPU based physics simulation for robot learning. In J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung, edi- tors,Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks 1, NeurIPS Datasets...

2021

[33] [34]

t": 0, "action

F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V . Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Pret- tenhofer, R. Weiss, V . Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Per- rot, and ´E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python.Journal of Machine Learn- ing Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011. URLhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1953048...

work page doi:10.5555/1953048 2011