pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21327 · v1 · pith:KNTXP2ILnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🧮 math-ph · cond-mat.str-el· hep-th· math.MP· math.OA· math.QA

Universal fusion category symmetries on tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath.MPmath.OAmath.QA
keywords fusion categoriesanyon chainsinfinite-dimensional Hilbert spacestensor productsLevin-Wen modelstopological ordersymmetry realizationslattice models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Any unitary fusion category can be realized as symmetries on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces after stabilizing anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that anyon chains stabilized by infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces factorize locally as tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. This factorization lets any unitary fusion category act as symmetries on such tensor product spaces. The authors further prove that any two anyon chains with the same symmetry category become related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after stabilization, establishing a single stable equivalence class for each fixed fusion category. A corollary establishes that physical boundary algebras of Levin-Wen type models are bounded-spread isomorphic after stabilization if and only if they share the same bulk topological order.

Core claim

After stabilizing anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces, these chains factorize locally as tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. This implies that any unitary fusion category can be realized as symmetries on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Any two anyon chains with the same symmetry category are related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after stabilization, so that for a fixed fusion category there is a single stable equivalence class of symmetry realizations on the lattice via anyon chains.

What carries the argument

Stabilization of anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces, which induces a local factorization into tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces while preserving the fusion category action.

If this is right

  • Any unitary fusion category admits a realization as symmetries on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
  • For each fixed fusion category, all stabilized anyon chain realizations belong to one equivalence class under symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitaries.
  • Physical boundary algebras of Levin-Wen type models are bounded spread isomorphic after stabilization precisely when the models share the same bulk topological order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction supplies a uniform infinite-dimensional lattice representative for each fusion category symmetry, bypassing finite-dimensional restrictions typical in many-body models.
  • Different microscopic anyon chain constructions of the same topological order can be connected through stabilization without altering the symmetry category.
  • The result may enable new model-building techniques that embed given fusion category symmetries into infinite-dimensional degrees of freedom while keeping locality.

Load-bearing premise

Stabilizing anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces produces a well-defined factorization into tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces that preserves the fusion category action.

What would settle it

A concrete unitary fusion category for which no stabilization procedure yields a symmetry-preserving local tensor product factorization into infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, or two anyon chains with identical symmetry categories that remain inequivalent under symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitaries after stabilization.

read the original abstract

We show that anyon chains, after stabilizing with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces, factorize locally as tensor products of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. This implies that any unitary fusion category can be realized as symmetries on a tensor product of infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. We then show that any two anyon chains with the same symmetry category are related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after stabilizing with infinite-dimensional ancilla, showing that for a fixed fusion category, there is a single stable equivalence class of symmetry realizations on the lattice via anyon chains. As a corollary of our proof, we show that the physical boundary algebras of Levin-Wen type models are bounded spread isomorphic after stabilization if and only if they have the same bulk topological order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that stabilizing anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces yields a local factorization of the total Hilbert space into a tensor product of infinite-dimensional factors, thereby realizing any unitary fusion category as symmetries on such a space. It further asserts that any two anyon chains sharing the same symmetry category become related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after this stabilization, implying a unique stable equivalence class, and derives a corollary that physical boundary algebras of Levin-Wen models are bounded-spread isomorphic after stabilization if and only if they share the same bulk topological order.

Significance. If the stabilization and factorization arguments hold, the result would establish a universal construction embedding arbitrary unitary fusion categories into symmetries on infinite-dimensional tensor-product Hilbert spaces, bridging anyon-chain realizations to standard lattice models. The equivalence-class statement and the Levin-Wen boundary-algebra corollary would clarify when distinct symmetry realizations are stably equivalent, with potential implications for topological order and boundary theories. The technical use of infinite-dimensional ancilla to achieve clean local factorization is a distinctive contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first paragraph and stabilization construction] Abstract, first paragraph and stabilization construction: the claim that tensoring infinite-dimensional ancilla at each site produces a strict local tensor-product factorization while preserving the full fusion-category action is load-bearing for the central universality result. The argument must explicitly define the dense subspaces, operator domains, and continuity of the fusion-category representation under the stabilization map; without this, residual non-local correlations or domain issues in the infinite-dimensional tensor product could prevent a clean factorization carrying the original action.
  2. [Equivalence of stabilized anyon chains] Equivalence of stabilized anyon chains: the assertion that any two anyon chains with the same symmetry category are related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after stabilization requires an explicit construction of this unitary together with verification that it respects the infinite-dimensional factorization and commutes appropriately with the ancilla degrees of freedom.
  3. [Corollary on Levin-Wen boundary algebras] Corollary on Levin-Wen boundary algebras: the iff statement that physical boundary algebras are bounded-spread isomorphic after stabilization precisely when they share the same bulk topological order depends on the main stabilization result commuting with boundary conditions; any failure of the ancilla to preserve locality at the boundary would undermine the equivalence.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the stabilized local algebras and the precise meaning of 'bounded spread isomorphic' should be introduced with explicit definitions before the corollary is stated.
  2. A brief remark on the choice of dense subspaces in the infinite-dimensional tensor products would improve readability for readers outside functional analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments, which have helped us strengthen the technical foundations of the manuscript. We have revised the paper to provide the requested explicit definitions and constructions while preserving the original results. Below we address each major comment point by point.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract, first paragraph and stabilization construction] Abstract, first paragraph and stabilization construction: the claim that tensoring infinite-dimensional ancilla at each site produces a strict local tensor-product factorization while preserving the full fusion-category action is load-bearing for the central universality result. The argument must explicitly define the dense subspaces, operator domains, and continuity of the fusion-category representation under the stabilization map; without this, residual non-local correlations or domain issues in the infinite-dimensional tensor product could prevent a clean factorization carrying the original action.

    Authors: We agree that the functional-analytic details require explicit treatment to rule out domain or continuity issues. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a new subsection (Section 2.3) that (i) identifies the dense subspace of finite-support vectors in each stabilized factor, (ii) defines the domain of the fusion-category operators as the set of bounded operators that map this dense subspace into itself and are continuous in the strong operator topology, and (iii) proves that the stabilization map intertwines the original anyon-chain representation with the stabilized one without introducing non-local correlations. These additions make the local tensor-product factorization and preservation of the fusion-category action fully rigorous. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Equivalence of stabilized anyon chains] Equivalence of stabilized anyon chains: the assertion that any two anyon chains with the same symmetry category are related by a symmetry-compatible locality-preserving unitary after stabilization requires an explicit construction of this unitary together with verification that it respects the infinite-dimensional factorization and commutes appropriately with the ancilla degrees of freedom.

    Authors: The original manuscript established existence of the unitary via the uniqueness of the stable equivalence class. To meet the referee’s request for an explicit construction, the revised version now supplies a concrete map: at each site we tensor the original anyon Hilbert space with the infinite-dimensional ancilla and define a local isometry that absorbs the difference between the two chain realizations into the ancilla degrees of freedom. We verify that this isometry commutes with the ancilla projections, preserves the infinite-dimensional tensor-product factorization, and intertwines the two fusion-category actions. The resulting global unitary is therefore locality-preserving and symmetry-compatible by construction. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Corollary on Levin-Wen boundary algebras] Corollary on Levin-Wen boundary algebras: the iff statement that physical boundary algebras are bounded-spread isomorphic after stabilization precisely when they share the same bulk topological order depends on the main stabilization result commuting with boundary conditions; any failure of the ancilla to preserve locality at the boundary would undermine the equivalence.

    Authors: We have added a dedicated paragraph in the proof of the corollary (Section 4) showing that the stabilization procedure is applied uniformly to boundary sites. The ancilla spaces are chosen to be compatible with the Levin-Wen boundary conditions, and the bounded-spread isomorphism is shown to commute with the stabilization map at the boundary. Consequently, locality is preserved and the iff statement continues to hold after stabilization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation presented as independent construction from anyon-chain stabilization.

full rationale

The paper states its core results as theorems obtained by stabilizing anyon chains with infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces to obtain local tensor-product factorizations, then realizing fusion-category symmetries on the resulting spaces. No equations, self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided abstract or described proof outline. The stabilization step is introduced as an external construction whose properties are then shown to yield the claimed factorization and equivalence classes; it does not reduce to the target statement by definition or prior self-citation. The derivation therefore remains self-contained relative to standard anyon-chain models and fusion-category representations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result relies on standard background from fusion category theory and operator algebras on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. No free parameters or new invented entities are mentioned in the abstract. The key unstated premise is that the stabilization procedure is always possible and preserves the relevant algebraic structures.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Unitary fusion categories admit consistent anyon-chain realizations on lattices
    Invoked implicitly when the paper starts from anyon chains and stabilizes them.
  • domain assumption Infinite-dimensional ancilla spaces can be added without altering the fusion rules or locality properties
    Central to the stabilization step described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5659 in / 1358 out tokens · 34360 ms · 2026-05-21T03:33:49.454432+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized global symmetries.J

    Davide Gaiotto, Anton Kapustin, Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. Generalized global symmetries.J. High Energy Phys., 2015(2):172, 2015

  2. [2]

    Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry: A holographic and entanglement view of symmetry

    Liang Kong, Tian Lan, Xiao-Gang Wen, Zhi-Hao Zhang, and Hao Zheng. Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry: A holographic and entanglement view of symmetry. Phys. Rev. Res., 2:043086, Oct 2020

  3. [3]

    ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries.Physics Reports, 1063:1–55, 2024

    Sakura Sch¨ afer-Nameki. ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries.Physics Reports, 1063:1–55, 2024

  4. [4]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Shu-Heng Shao. What’s done cannot be undone: TASI lectures on non-invertible symmetries, 2024.arXiv:2308.00747

  5. [5]

    David Aasen, Roger S. K. Mong, and Paul Fendley. Topological defects on the lattice: I. The Ising model.J. Phys. A, 49(35):354001, 46, 2016

  6. [6]

    David Aasen, Paul Fendley, and Roger S. K. Mong. Topological defects on the lattice: Dualities and degeneracies. 2020.arXiv:2008.08598

  7. [7]

    Dualities in one- dimensional quantum lattice models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners.PRX Quantum, 4:020357, Jun 2023

    Laurens Lootens, Clement Delcamp, Gerardo Ortiz, and Frank Verstraete. Dualities in one- dimensional quantum lattice models: Symmetric Hamiltonians and matrix product operator intertwiners.PRX Quantum, 4:020357, Jun 2023

  8. [8]

    Dualities in one-dimensional quan- tum lattice models: Topological sectors.PRX Quantum, 5:010338, Mar 2024

    Laurens Lootens, Clement Delcamp, and Frank Verstraete. Dualities in one-dimensional quan- tum lattice models: Topological sectors.PRX Quantum, 5:010338, Mar 2024

  9. [9]

    On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries.J

    Kansei Inamura. On lattice models of gapped phases with fusion category symmetries.J. High Energy Phys., 2022(3):36, 2022

  10. [10]

    Ali Ahmad, M

    Shadi Ali Ahmad, Marc S. Klinger, and Yifan Wang. The many faces of non-invertible sym- metries, 2026.arXiv:2509.18072

  11. [11]

    Anyonic chains, topological defects, and conformal field theory.Comm

    Matthew Buican and Andrey Gromov. Anyonic chains, topological defects, and conformal field theory.Comm. Math. Phys., 356(3):1017–1056, 2017

  12. [12]

    Fusion category symmetry

    Ryan Thorngren and Yifan Wang. Fusion category symmetry. part I. Anomaly in-flow and gapped phases.J. High Energy Phys., 2024(4):132, 2024

  13. [13]

    Fusion category symmetry

    Ryan Thorngren and Yifan Wang. Fusion category symmetry. part ii. Categoriosities at c = 1 and beyond.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(7):51, 2024

  14. [14]

    Lattice Models for Phases and Transitions with Non-Invertible Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, and Apoorv Tiwari. Lattice models for phases and transitions with non-invertible symmetries, 2025.arXiv:2405.05964

  15. [15]

    Bottini, Sakura Sch¨ afer-Nameki, and Apoorv Tiwari

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Sakura Sch¨ afer-Nameki, and Apoorv Tiwari. Illustrating the categorical Landau paradigm in lattice models.Phys. Rev. B, 111:054432, Feb 2025

  16. [16]

    An operator algebraic approach to fusion category symmetry on the lattice

    David E. Evans and Corey Jones. An operator algebraic approach to fusion category symmetry on the lattice. 2026.arXiv:2507.05185

  17. [17]

    Freed, Gregory W

    Daniel S. Freed, Gregory W. Moore, and Constantin Teleman. Topological symmetry in quan- tum field theory.Quantum Topol. 15 (2024), no, 15(3/4):779–869, 2024

  18. [18]

    Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry- breaking and topological phase transitions.Phys

    Wenjie Ji and Xiao-Gang Wen. Categorical symmetry and noninvertible anomaly in symmetry- breaking and topological phase transitions.Phys. Rev. Res., 2:033417, Sep 2020

  19. [19]

    Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness.Phys

    Arkya Chatterjee and Xiao-Gang Wen. Holographic theory for continuous phase transitions: Emergence and symmetry protection of gaplessness.Phys. Rev. B, 108:075105, Aug 2023. 29

  20. [20]

    Topological holography: To- wards a unification of Landau and beyond-Landau physics.SciPost Phys

    Heidar Moradi, Seyed Faroogh Moosavian, and Apoorv Tiwari. Topological holography: To- wards a unification of Landau and beyond-Landau physics.SciPost Phys. Core, 6:066, 2023

  21. [21]

    Gapless edges of 2d topological orders and enriched monoidal categories.Nuclear Phys

    Liang Kong and Hao Zheng. Gapless edges of 2d topological orders and enriched monoidal categories.Nuclear Phys. B, 927:140–165, 2018

  22. [22]

    Williamson

    Meng Cheng and Dominic J. Williamson. Relative anomaly in (1+1)d rational conformal field theory.Phys. Rev. Res., 2:043044, Oct 2020

  23. [23]

    Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(9):93, 2020

    Liang Kong, Tian Lan, Xiao-Gang Wen, Zhi-Hao Zhang, and Hao Zheng. Classification of topological phases with finite internal symmetries in all dimensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(9):93, 2020

  24. [24]

    Noninvertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transforma- tion of anomalous partition functions.Phys

    Wenjie Ji and Xiao-Gang Wen. Noninvertible anomalies and mapping-class-group transforma- tion of anomalous partition functions.Phys. Rev. Res., 1:033054, Oct 2019

  25. [25]

    Categories of quantum liquids I.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(8):70, 2022

    Liang Kong and Hao Zheng. Categories of quantum liquids I.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(8):70, 2022

  26. [26]

    Categories of quantum liquids II.Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics, 405(9):203, 2024

    Liang Kong and Hao Zheng. Categories of quantum liquids II.Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics, 405(9):203, 2024

  27. [27]

    Categories of quantum liquids III

    Liang Kong and Hao Zheng. Categories of quantum liquids III. 2022.arXiv:2201.05726

  28. [28]

    Emergent generalized symmetry and max- imal symmetry topological order.Phys

    Arkya Chatterjee, Wenjie Ji, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Emergent generalized symmetry and max- imal symmetry topological order.Phys. Rev. B, 112:115142, Sep 2025

  29. [29]

    Generalized orbifold construction for conformal nets.Rev

    Marcel Bischoff. Generalized orbifold construction for conformal nets.Rev. Math. Phys., 29(1):1750002, 53, 2017

  30. [30]

    Generalized symmetries from fusion actions

    Chongying Dong, Siu-Hung Ng, Li Ren, and Feng Xu. Generalized symmetries from fusion actions. 2025.arXiv:2508.13063

  31. [31]

    Bottini, Daniel Pajer, and Sakura Sch¨ afer-Nameki

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Daniel Pajer, and Sakura Sch¨ afer-Nameki. Categorical Landau paradigm for gapped phases.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:161601, Oct 2024

  32. [32]

    Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states.Quantum, 7:927, February 2023

    Jos´ e Garre-Rubio, Laurens Lootens, and Andr´ as Moln´ ar. Classifying phases protected by matrix product operator symmetries using matrix product states.Quantum, 7:927, February 2023

  33. [33]

    Non-invertible symmetries and LSM- type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space.SciPost Phys., 16:154, 2024

    Nathan Seiberg, Sahand Seifnashri, and Shu-Heng Shao. Non-invertible symmetries and LSM- type constraints on a tensor product Hilbert space.SciPost Phys., 16:154, 2024

  34. [34]

    DHR bimodules of quasi-local algebras and symmetric quantum cellular au- tomata.Quantum Topol

    Corey Jones. DHR bimodules of quasi-local algebras and symmetric quantum cellular au- tomata.Quantum Topol. 15 (2024), no, 15(3/4):633–686, 2024

  35. [35]

    An index for quantum cellular automata on fusion spin chains

    Corey Jones and Junhwi Lim. An index for quantum cellular automata on fusion spin chains. Annales Henri Poincar´ e, 25(10):4399–4422, 2024

  36. [36]

    Williamson

    Corey Jones, Kylan Schatz, and Dominic J. Williamson. Quantum cellular automata and categorical dualities of spin chains.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 407:66, 2026

  37. [37]

    On the structure of categorical duality operators

    Corey Jones and Xinping Yang. On the structure of categorical duality operators. 2026. arXiv:2603.09949

  38. [38]

    Generalized Kramers– Wannier self-duality in Hopf–Ising models

    Da-Chuan Lu, Arkya Chatterjee, and Nathanan Tantivasadakarn. Generalized Kramers– Wannier self-duality in Hopf–Ising models. 2026.arXiv:2602.10183

  39. [39]

    Remarks on non-invertible symmetries on a tensor product hilbert space in 1+1 dimensions

    Kansei Inamura. Remarks on non-invertible symmetries on a tensor product hilbert space in 1+1 dimensions. 2026.arXiv:2602.12053

  40. [40]

    Non-Invertible Symmetries on Tensor-Product Hilbert Spaces and Quantum Cellular Automata

    Rui Wen, Kansei Inamura, and Sakura Schafer-Nameki. Non-invertible symmetries on tensor- product hilbert spaces and quantum cellular automata, 2026.arXiv:2605.15194

  41. [41]

    Adrian Feiguin, Simon Trebst, Andreas W. W. Ludwig, Matthias Troyer, Alexei Kitaev, Zheng- han Wang, and Michael H. Freedman. Interacting anyons in topological quantum liquids: The golden chain.Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:160409, Apr 2007

  42. [42]

    Bultinck, M

    N. Bultinck, M. Mari¨ en, D. J. Williamson, M. B. S ¸ahino˘ glu, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete. Anyons and matrix product operator algebras.Ann. Physics, 378:183–233, 2017. 30

  43. [43]

    M. B. Hastings and Xiao-Gang Wen. Quasiadiabatic continuation of quantum states: The stability of topological ground-state degeneracy and emergent gauge invariance.Phys. Rev. B, 72:045141, Jul 2005

  44. [44]

    Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order.Physical Review B, 82(15):155138, 2010

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Local unitary transformation, long-range quantum entanglement, wave function renormalization, and topological order.Physical Review B, 82(15):155138, 2010

  45. [45]

    Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems.Physical Review B, 83(3):035107, 2011

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems.Physical Review B, 83(3):035107, 2011

  46. [46]

    Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states.Phys

    Norbert Schuch, David P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, and Ignacio Cirac. Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states.Phys. Rev. B, 84:165139, Oct 2011

  47. [47]

    Disentangling anomaly-free symmetries of quantum spin chains

    Sahand Seifnashri and Wilbur Shirley. Disentangling anomaly-free symmetries of quantum spin chains. 2025

  48. [48]

    Classification of locality preserving symmetries on spin chains

    Alex Bols, Wojciech De Roeck, Michiel De Wilde, and Bruno Oliveira. Classification of locality preserving symmetries on spin chains. 2025.arXiv:2503.15088

  49. [49]

    Local topological order and boundary algebras.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 13:e135, 2025

    Corey Jones, Pieter Naaijkens, David Penneys, and Daniel Wallick. Local topological order and boundary algebras.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 13:e135, 2025. With an appendix by Masaki Izumi

  50. [50]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group.Physical Review B, 87(15):155114, 2013

    Xie Chen, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Zheng-Xin Liu, and Xiao-Gang Wen. Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group.Physical Review B, 87(15):155114, 2013

  51. [51]

    Anomalous symmetries of quantum spin chains and a generalization of the lieb-schultz-mattis theorem.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(10):238, 2025

    Anton Kapustin and Nikita Sopenko. Anomalous symmetries of quantum spin chains and a generalization of the lieb-schultz-mattis theorem.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 406(10):238, 2025

  52. [52]

    Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle.Phys

    Arkya Chatterjee and Xiao-Gang Wen. Symmetry as a shadow of topological order and a derivation of topological holographic principle.Phys. Rev. B, 107:155136, Apr 2023

  53. [53]

    Holography for bulk-boundary local topo- logical order

    Corey Jones, Pieter Naaijkens, and David Penneys. Holography for bulk-boundary local topo- logical order. 2025.arXiv:2506.19969

  54. [54]

    Boundary algebras of the Kitaev quantum double model.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 65(10):102201, 2024

    Chian Yeong Chuah, Brett Hungar, Kyle Kawagoe, David Penneys, Mario Tomba, Daniel Wallick, and Shuqi Wei. Boundary algebras of the Kitaev quantum double model.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 65(10):102201, 2024

  55. [55]

    Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics

    Ola Bratteli and Derek W. Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics. 2. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 1997. Equilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics

  56. [56]

    Benjamin Schumacher and Reinhard F. Werner. Reversible quantum cellular automata.arXiv preprint quant-ph/0405174, 2004

  57. [57]

    Texts and Monographs in Physics

    Rudolf Haag.Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2nd revised and enlarged edition, 1996

  58. [58]

    A review of Quantum Cellular Automata.Quantum, 4:368, November 2020

    Terry Farrelly. A review of Quantum Cellular Automata.Quantum, 4:368, November 2020

  59. [59]

    A lattice of von neumann algebras associated with the quantum theory of a free bose field.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(10):1343–1362, 1963

    Huzihiro Araki. A lattice of von neumann algebras associated with the quantum theory of a free bose field.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(10):1343–1362, 1963

  60. [60]

    Evans and Yasuyuki Kawahigashi.Quantum Symmetries on Operator Algebras

    David E. Evans and Yasuyuki Kawahigashi.Quantum Symmetries on Operator Algebras. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998. xvi+829 pp. ISBN: 0-19-851175-2,MR1642584

  61. [61]

    Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen

    Michael A. Levin and Xiao-Gang Wen. String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases.Physical Review B, 71(4):045110, 2005

  62. [62]

    Sector theory of levin-wen models i: Classification of anyon sectors, 2025.arXiv:2511.21521

    Alex Bols and Boris Kjær. Sector theory of levin-wen models i: Classification of anyon sectors, 2025.arXiv:2511.21521

  63. [63]

    Sector theory of levin-wen models ii: Fusion and braiding, 2026

    Alex Bols and Boris Kjær. Sector theory of levin-wen models ii: Fusion and braiding, 2026. arXiv:2603.01936. 31

  64. [64]

    Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics

    Ola Bratteli and Derek W. Robinson.Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics. 1. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1987.C ∗- and W ∗-algebras, symmetry groups, decomposition of states

  65. [65]

    Baudier, Bruno M

    Florent P. Baudier, Bruno M. Braga, Ilijas Farah, Alessandro Vignati, and Rufus Willett. Embeddings of von Neumann algebras into uniform Roe algebras and quasi-local algebras. Journal of Functional Analysis, 286:110186, 2024

  66. [66]

    P. Ghez, R. Lima, and J. E. Roberts.W ∗-categories.Pacific J. Math., 120(1):79–109, 1985. MR808930

  67. [67]

    Operator algebras in rigid C ∗-tensor categories.Comm

    Corey Jones and David Penneys. Operator algebras in rigid C ∗-tensor categories.Comm. Math. Phys., 355(3):1121–1188, 2017

  68. [68]

    Q-system completion for C ∗ 2-categories.J

    Quan Chen, Roberto Hern´ andez Palomares, Corey Jones, and David Penneys. Q-system completion for C ∗ 2-categories.J. Funct. Anal., 283(3):Paper No. 109524, 2022

  69. [69]

    Drinfeld center and representation the- ory for monoidal categories.Comm

    Sergey Neshveyev and Makoto Yamashita. Drinfeld center and representation the- ory for monoidal categories.Comm. Math. Phys., 345(1):385–434, 2016.MR3509018 DOI:10.1007/s00220-016-2642-7 arXiv:1501.07390

  70. [70]

    On fusion categories.Ann

    Pavel Etingof, Dmitri Nikshych, and Viktor Ostrik. On fusion categories.Ann. of Math. (2), 162(2):581–642, 2005.MR2183279 DOI:10.4007/annals.2005.162.581 arXiv:math.QA/0203060

  71. [71]

    205, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015

    Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik.Tensor categories, volume 205 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015.MR3242743 DOI:10.1090/surv/205

  72. [72]

    Longo and J

    R. Longo and J. E. Roberts. A theory of dimension.K-Theory, 11(2):103–159, 1997.MR1444286 DOI:10.1023/A:1007714415067

  73. [73]

    E. C. Lance.HilbertC ∗-modules, volume 210 ofLondon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. A toolkit for operator algebraists

  74. [74]

    A categorical Connes’χ(m).Mathematische Annalen, 389:2051–2121, 2024

    Quan Chen, Corey Jones, and David Penneys. A categorical Connes’χ(m).Mathematische Annalen, 389:2051–2121, 2024

  75. [75]

    Evans, and Yasuyuki Kawahigashi

    Jens B¨ ockenhauer, David E. Evans, and Yasuyuki Kawahigashi. Onα-induction, chiral gener- ators and modular invariants for subfactors.Comm. Math. Phys., 208(2):429–487, 1999

  76. [76]

    From subfactors to categories and topology

    Michael M¨ uger. From subfactors to categories and topology. II. The quantum double of ten- sor categories and subfactors.J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 180(1-2):159–219, 2003.MR1966525 DOI:10.1016/S0022-4049(02)00248-7 arXiv:math.CT/0111205

  77. [77]

    The structure of sectors associated with Longo–Rehren inclusions i

    Masaki Izumi. The structure of sectors associated with Longo–Rehren inclusions i. general theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 213:127–179, 2000

  78. [78]

    On the structure of DHR bimodules of abstract spin chains

    Lucas Hataishi, David Jaklitsch, Corey Jones, and Makoto Yamashita. On the structure of DHR bimodules of abstract spin chains. 2025.arXiv:2504.06094

  79. [79]

    K-theoretic Classification of In- ductive Limit Actions of Fusion Categories on AF-algebras.Comm

    Quan Chen, Roberto Hern´ andez Palomares, and Corey Jones. K-theoretic Classification of In- ductive Limit Actions of Fusion Categories on AF-algebras.Comm. Math. Phys., 405(3):Paper No. 83, 2024

  80. [80]

    Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants

    Victor Ostrik. Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants.Transform. Groups, 8(2):177–206, 2003.MR1976459 arXiv:math/0111139

Showing first 80 references.