Pith

open record

sign in
Browse

arxiv: 2308.15444 · v2 · pith:L5N4TR2L · submitted 2023-08-29 · cs.DM · math.CO

On the hardness of inclusion-wise minimal separators enumeration

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:L5N4TR2Lrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.DM math.CO
keywords minimalinclusion-wiseseparatorsenumerationalgorithmbeencomputationtreedepth
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Enumeration problems are often encountered as key subroutines in the exact computation of graph parameters such as chromatic number, treewidth, or treedepth. In the case of treedepth computation, the enumeration of inclusion-wise minimal separators plays a crucial role. However and quite surprisingly, the complexity status of this problem has not been settled since it has been posed as an open direction by Kloks and Kratsch in 1998. Recently at the PACE 2020 competition dedicated to treedepth computation, solvers have been circumventing that by listing all minimal $a$-$b$ separators and filtering out those that are not inclusion-wise minimal, at the cost of efficiency. Naturally, having an efficient algorithm for listing inclusion-wise minimal separators would drastically improve such practical algorithms. In this note, however, we show that no efficient algorithm is to be expected from an output-sensitive perspective, namely, we prove that there is no output-polynomial time algorithm for inclusion-wise minimal separators enumeration unless P = NP.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.