pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11940 · v1 · pith:LBZD6IAOnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Self-Pulsing Microring Resonator Networks for Bandwidth-Efficient Event Detection in an Optical Fiber Sensor

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords microring resonatorself-pulsingoptical fiber sensorsampling rate reductionphotonic signal processingevent detectionintegrated photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-pulsing dynamics in a microring resonator network retain information from fiber sensor perturbations, reducing the required sampling rate by at least an order of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that optical circuits struggle with slow sensor signals due to short memory but can overcome this using self-pulsing in microring resonator networks. These dynamics expand and retain details about perturbations sensed in an optical fiber. Combining data from multiple MRR output ports, input powers, laser wavelengths, and two sensor locations allows the minimum sampling rate for digitization to drop by at least ten times. This reduces dependence on fast electronics for sub-MHz signals and points toward direct optical processing of time-dependent sensor data.

Core claim

We experimentally show that these limitations can be overcome by exploiting the self-pulsing dynamics in a microring resonator network. In particular, we demonstrate that such dynamics can expand and retain information about perturbations sensed by a fiber sensor. This reduces the minimum sampling rate for the digitization of the sensor signal by at least one order of magnitude. The reduction is achieved by combining fiber sensing measurements at two different perturbation locations and frequencies with MRR network measurements at multiple output ports, input power levels and laser wavelengths.

What carries the argument

Self-pulsing dynamics in the MRR network that expand and retain perturbation information when combined across multiple output ports, input power levels, and laser wavelengths.

If this is right

  • Fiber sensor signals with sub-MHz dynamics can be processed optically with far lower digitization rates.
  • Native photonic processing reduces the need for fast digital electronics and associated power use.
  • Multiple MRR measurement conditions together create independent channels sufficient for event detection.
  • The approach directly connects time-dependent optical operations to sensing at sub-microsecond scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same retention mechanism could apply to other slow optical signals in integrated photonics beyond fiber sensing.
  • Lower sampling demands may enable denser or lower-power distributed sensor networks.
  • Full integration of the MRR network with the sensor could eliminate electronic digitization steps entirely.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of measurements from multiple MRR output ports, input power levels, and laser wavelengths supplies enough independent information to recover or detect the original sensor perturbations despite the reduced sampling rate.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the original perturbation locations and frequencies cannot be recovered from the combined low-rate MRR outputs and sensor data would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11940 by Alessio Lugnan, Claudio J. Oton, Fabrizio Di Pasquale, Ilya Auslender, Lorenzo Pavesi, Stefano Biasi, Yonas Seifu Muanenda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sensing and signal processing pipeline. A 395 m long DAS fiber sensor is perturbed by two piezoelectric actuators placed in the middle and at the end of the fiber (more details are in Section 4.1). The sensor’s output signal (i.e., the reflections of 100 ns input laser pulses at around 1550 nm wavelength) is amplified, and an offset optical power (to sustain the MRR network dynamics) and low-power breaks (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Frequency detection without MRR network (baseline) - example plots. In this example the FUT is perturbed with a 2 kHz oscillation at position 2 (end of the fiber). As expected in DAS measurements, the perturbation results in an oscillation of the pulse reflections at a specific time interval corresponding to the time the pulse takes to arrive at and propagate back from the location of the perturbation alon… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Frequency detection using the MRR network - example plots. Similarly to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency detection error. (a) Exemplary colormap of the average (frequency detection) error as a function of the input laser frequency and (on-chip average) power, at output port 1 and with 0.46 MHz sampling frequency. Most points in the map present high error (yellow), but a few can detect the perturbation frequency with low error (dark blue). (b) Total average error (the best over the MRR network parame… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Perturbation detection events. In the first column, the 7 perturbations types are schematized (a reference and combinations of two perturbation frequencies and 2 locations). The second column shows the target output for the frequency detection task (Section 2.1). The other 4 columns represent the other 4 detection tasks with different target event (specific frequency and location). Symbols: yellow light = … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Event (frequency and location) detection accuracy. (a) Color-maps showing the detection average accuracy as a function of the MRR network control parameters, using output port 1, of the four events described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: DAS experimental setup and background variations over multiple measurement repetitions. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup of reservoir computing with a DAS based on Φ-OTDR. (NLL: Narrow Linewidth Laser; EDFA Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifier; OBPF: Optical Bandpass Filter; AOM: Acousto-Optic Modulator; AWG: Arbitrary Waveform Generator; DAQ: Digital Acquisition; FUT: Fiber Under Test, PD: Photodiode; PZT:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Experimental setup for the MRR network measurements. (a) Schematic of the setup employed to produce the MRR responses to the previously measured DAS reflection signals. (b) Example preprocessed signal (showing only 3 reflection signals in the considered sequence), containing traces from the DAS, used to modulate the laser beam injected into the MRR network. The backscattering signals obtained in the DAS me… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The native processing of time-dependent signals from optical sensors by integrated photonic circuits can potentially bring significant advantages in terms of energy consumption, latency and processing power, as it allows skipping or reducing the use of fast digital electronics and directly exploiting optical degrees of freedom and parallelism. However, due to a short memory, optical operations usually struggle to directly process optical signals with relatively slow (<MHz) dynamics from optical sensors. In this work, we experimentally show that these limitations can be overcome by exploiting the self-pulsing dynamics in a microring resonator (MRR) network. In particular, we demonstrate that such dynamics can expand and retain information about perturbations sensed by a fiber sensor. This reduces the minimum sampling rate for the digitization of the sensor signal by at least one order of magnitude. The reduction is achieved by combining fiber sensing measurements at two different perturbation locations and frequencies with MRR network measurements at multiple output ports, input power levels and laser wavelengths. This work represents a first step in bridging time-dependent optical processing and optical sensing at sub-{\mu}s time scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that exploiting self-pulsing dynamics in a microring resonator (MRR) network can expand and retain information about perturbations sensed by a fiber sensor, reducing the minimum sampling rate for digitization by at least one order of magnitude. This is demonstrated experimentally by combining fiber sensing measurements at two different perturbation locations and frequencies with MRR network measurements at multiple output ports, input power levels and laser wavelengths.

Significance. If the result holds, it provides a first step in bridging time-dependent optical processing and optical sensing at sub-μs time scales, with potential advantages in energy consumption, latency and processing power by skipping or reducing the use of fast digital electronics.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The abstract states an experimental demonstration and reduction factor but supplies no quantitative data, error analysis, reconstruction method, or verification that the retained information suffices for event detection; full methods and results required.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: The abstract states an experimental demonstration and reduction factor but supplies no quantitative data, error analysis, reconstruction method, or verification that the retained information suffices for event detection; full methods and results required.

    Authors: Abstracts are length-limited summaries and cannot contain full methods, error bars, or complete verification. The manuscript body provides the experimental data from two perturbation locations/frequencies, MRR measurements at multiple ports/power levels/wavelengths, the reconstruction procedure, and verification that event information is retained at the reduced sampling rate. We will revise the abstract to include one concrete reduction factor (with uncertainty) drawn from the results section and a brief clause on the verification approach. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely experimental result

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental demonstration that self-pulsing MRR dynamics, combined with multi-port/power/wavelength measurements, can retain perturbation information sufficiently to allow an order-of-magnitude reduction in digitization sampling rate. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described claims. The result is settled by direct measurement and does not reduce to any input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work is an experimental demonstration relying on standard optical measurement techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5751 in / 1171 out tokens · 21459 ms · 2026-06-27T08:49:47.742514+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Integrated photonic computing beyond the von neumann architecture.ACS Photonics, 10(4):1027–1036, 2023

    Xiao-Yun Xu and Xian-Min Jin. Integrated photonic computing beyond the von neumann architecture.ACS Photonics, 10(4):1027–1036, 2023

  2. [2]

    Analog photonics computing for information processing, inference, and optimization.Advanced Quantum Technologies, 6(9):2300055, 2023

    Nikita Stroev and Natalia G Berloff. Analog photonics computing for information processing, inference, and optimization.Advanced Quantum Technologies, 6(9):2300055, 2023

  3. [3]

    The potential of multidimensional photonic computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 7(8):439–450, 2025

    Ivonne Bente, Shabnam Taheriniya, Francesco Lenzini, Frank Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, Michael Kues, Harish Bhaskaran, C David Wright, and Wolfram Pernice. The potential of multidimensional photonic computing.Nature Reviews Physics, 7(8):439–450, 2025

  4. [4]

    Roadmap on neuromorphic photonics,

    Daniel Brunner, Bhavin J Shastri, Mohammed A Al Qadasi, Hitesh Ballani, Sylvain Barbay, Stefano Biasi, Peter Bienstman, Simon Bilodeau, Wim Bogaerts, Fabian Böhm, et al. Roadmap on neuromorphic photonics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07917, 2025

  5. [5]

    Integrated in-sensor computing optoelectronic device for environment-adaptable artificial retina perception application.Nano letters, 22(1):81–89, 2021

    Jialin Meng, Tianyu Wang, Hao Zhu, Li Ji, Wenzhong Bao, Peng Zhou, Lin Chen, Qing-Qing Sun, and David Wei Zhang. Integrated in-sensor computing optoelectronic device for environment-adaptable artificial retina perception application.Nano letters, 22(1):81–89, 2021

  6. [6]

    Multimodal in-sensor computing system using integrated silicon photonic convolutional processor

    Zian Xiao, Zhihao Ren, Yangyang Zhuge, Zixuan Zhang, Jingkai Zhou, Siyu Xu, Cheng Xu, Bowei Dong, and Chengkuo Lee. Multimodal in-sensor computing system using integrated silicon photonic convolutional processor. Advanced Science, 11(47):2408597, 2024

  7. [7]

    Near-sensor edge computing system enabled by a cmos compatible photonic integrated circuit platform using bilayer aln/si waveguides.Nano-Micro Letters, 17(1):261, 2025

    Zhihao Ren, Zixuan Zhang, Yangyang Zhuge, Zian Xiao, Siyu Xu, Jingkai Zhou, and Chengkuo Lee. Near-sensor edge computing system enabled by a cmos compatible photonic integrated circuit platform using bilayer aln/si waveguides.Nano-Micro Letters, 17(1):261, 2025

  8. [8]

    Technology landscape review of in-sensor photonic intelligence: from optical sensors to smart devices.AI Sensors, 1(1):5, 2025

    Hong Zhou, Dongxiao Li, and Chengkuo Lee. Technology landscape review of in-sensor photonic intelligence: from optical sensors to smart devices.AI Sensors, 1(1):5, 2025

  9. [9]

    Nanosecond-latency all-optical fiber sensing with in-sensor computing

    Yu Tao, Yangyang Wan, Ziwen Long, Wenjia Zhang, Jiangbing Du, and Zuyuan He. Nanosecond-latency all-optical fiber sensing with in-sensor computing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15376, 2025

  10. [10]

    Memory in Integrated Photonic Neural Networks: From Physical Mechanisms to Neuromorphic Architectures

    Alessandro Foradori, Ilya Auslender, Stefano Biasi, Stefano Gretter, Alessio Lugnan, Emiliano Staffoli, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Memory in integrated photonic neural networks: From physical mechanisms to neuromorphic architectures.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.22620, 2026

  11. [11]

    Silicon microring resonators.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 6(1):47–73, 2012

    Wim Bogaerts, Peter De Heyn, Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Katrien De V os, Shankar Kumar Selvaraja, Tom Claes, Pieter Dumon, Peter Bienstman, Dries Van Thourhout, and Roel Baets. Silicon microring resonators.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 6(1):47–73, 2012

  12. [12]

    Nonlinear silicon photonics.Nature photonics, 4(8):535– 544, 2010

    Juerg Leuthold, Christian Koos, and Wolfgang Freude. Nonlinear silicon photonics.Nature photonics, 4(8):535– 544, 2010

  13. [13]

    Nonlinear silicon photonics.Journal of Optics, 19(9):093002, 2017

    Massimo Borghi, Claudio Castellan, Stefano Signorini, Alessandro Trenti, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Nonlinear silicon photonics.Journal of Optics, 19(9):093002, 2017

  14. [14]

    Johnson, Matthew Borselli, and Oskar Painter

    Thomas J. Johnson, Matthew Borselli, and Oskar Painter. Self-induced optical modulation of the transmission through a high-q silicon microdisk resonator.Opt. Express, 14(2):817–831, Jan 2006

  15. [15]

    On the effect of the thermal cross-talk in a photonic feed-forward neural network based on silicon microresonators.Frontiers in Physics, 10:1093191, 2022

    Stefano Biasi, Riccardo Franchi, Davide Bazzanella, and Lorenzo Pavesi. On the effect of the thermal cross-talk in a photonic feed-forward neural network based on silicon microresonators.Frontiers in Physics, 10:1093191, 2022. 12

  16. [16]

    Simplified description of self- pulsation and excitability by thermal and free-carrier effects in semiconductor microcavities.Phys

    Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Martin Fiers, Joni Dambre, and Peter Bienstman. Simplified description of self- pulsation and excitability by thermal and free-carrier effects in semiconductor microcavities.Phys. Rev. A, 86:063808, Dec 2012

  17. [17]

    On the modeling of thermal and free carrier nonlinearities in silicon-on-insulator microring resonators.Optics Express, 29(3):4363–4377, 2021

    Massimo Borghi, Davide Bazzanella, Mattia Mancinelli, and Lorenzo Pavesi. On the modeling of thermal and free carrier nonlinearities in silicon-on-insulator microring resonators.Optics Express, 29(3):4363–4377, 2021

  18. [18]

    Optical bistability and pulsating behaviour in silicon-on-insulator ring resonator structures.Optics express, 13(23):9623– 9628, 2005

    Gino Priem, Pieter Dumon, Walter Bogaerts, Dries Van Thourhout, Geert Morthier, and Roel Baets. Optical bistability and pulsating behaviour in silicon-on-insulator ring resonator structures.Optics express, 13(23):9623– 9628, 2005

  19. [19]

    Thirty years in silicon photonics: a personal view.Frontiers in Physics, page 709, 2021

    Lorenzo Pavesi. Thirty years in silicon photonics: a personal view.Frontiers in Physics, page 709, 2021

  20. [20]

    Chaotic dynamics in coupled resonator sequences.Optics express, 22(12):14505–14516, 2014

    Mattia Mancinelli, Massimo Borghi, Fernando Ramiro-Manzano, JM Fedeli, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Chaotic dynamics in coupled resonator sequences.Optics express, 22(12):14505–14516, 2014

  21. [21]

    Photonic neural networks based on integrated silicon microresonators.Intelligent Computing, 3:0067, 2024

    Stefano Biasi, Giovanni Donati, Alessio Lugnan, Mattia Mancinelli, Emiliano Staffoli, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Photonic neural networks based on integrated silicon microresonators.Intelligent Computing, 3:0067, 2024

  22. [22]

    Recent advances in distributed acoustic sensing based on phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry.Journal of Sensors, 2018(1):3897873, 2018

    Yonas Muanenda. Recent advances in distributed acoustic sensing based on phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry.Journal of Sensors, 2018(1):3897873, 2018

  23. [23]

    CRC press, 2017

    Arthur H Hartog.An introduction to distributed optical fibre sensors. CRC press, 2017

  24. [24]

    Seismic monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing from the near-surface to the deep oceans.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 40(5):1453–1463, 2022

    María R Fernández-Ruiz, Hugo F Martins, Ethan F Williams, Carlos Becerril, Regina Magalhães, Luis Costa, Sonia Martin-Lopez, Zhensheng Jia, Zhongwen Zhan, and Miguel González-Herráez. Seismic monitoring with distributed acoustic sensing from the near-surface to the deep oceans.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 40(5):1453–1463, 2022

  25. [25]

    Distributed acoustic sensing (das) for large-scale urban monitoring and seismic hazard mitigation using preexisting telecommunication infrastructure

    Rongyi Qian, Fantine Huot, Eileen Martin, Zack Spica, and Biondo Biondi. Distributed acoustic sensing (das) for large-scale urban monitoring and seismic hazard mitigation using preexisting telecommunication infrastructure. InSEG 2019 Workshop: Geophysics for Smart City Development, pages 1–1. GeoScienceWorld, 2019

  26. [26]

    Hugo F Martins, Sonia Martin-Lopez, Pedro Corredera, Massimo L Filograno, Orlando Frazão, and Miguel González-Herráez. Coherent noise reduction in high visibility phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometer for distributed sensing of ultrasonic waves.Journal of Lightwave Technology, 31(23):3631–3637, 2013

  27. [27]

    Machine-learning-assisted leak detection using distributed temperature and acoustic sensors.IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(2):1520–1531, 2023

    Hayden Gemeinhardt and Jyotsna Sharma. Machine-learning-assisted leak detection using distributed temperature and acoustic sensors.IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(2):1520–1531, 2023

  28. [28]

    Design and evaluation of a cloud computing system for real-time measurements in polarization-independent long-range das based on coherent detection.Sensors, 24(24):8194, 2024

    Abdusomad Nur, Almaz Demise, and Yonas Muanenda. Design and evaluation of a cloud computing system for real-time measurements in polarization-independent long-range das based on coherent detection.Sensors, 24(24):8194, 2024

  29. [29]

    Strategies for mitigating polarization fading in a das with homodyne detection and delayed self-mixing.Journal of Physics: Photonics, 7(4):045035, 2025

    Almaz Demise, Fabrizio Di Pasquale, and Yonas Muanenda. Strategies for mitigating polarization fading in a das with homodyne detection and delayed self-mixing.Journal of Physics: Photonics, 7(4):045035, 2025

  30. [30]

    Distributed optical fiber vibration sensing using phase-generated carrier demodulation algorithm

    Zhihua Yu, Qi Zhang, Mingyu Zhang, Haolong Dai, Jingjing Zhang, Li Liu, Lijun Zhang, Xing Jin, Gaifang Wang, and Guang Qi. Distributed optical fiber vibration sensing using phase-generated carrier demodulation algorithm. Applied Physics B, 124(5):84, 2018

  31. [31]

    Adaptable pulse compression in ϕ-OTDR with direct digital synthesis of probe waveforms and rigorously defined nonlinear chirping.IEEE Photonics Journal, 14(2):1–11, 2022

    Yonas Muanenda, Stefano Faralli, Claudio J Oton, Philippe Velha, and Fabrizio Di Pasquale. Adaptable pulse compression in ϕ-OTDR with direct digital synthesis of probe waveforms and rigorously defined nonlinear chirping.IEEE Photonics Journal, 14(2):1–11, 2022

  32. [32]

    Cascadable excitability in microrings.Optics express, 20(18):20292–20308, 2012

    Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Martin Fiers, Pauline Mechet, Thijs Spuesens, Rajesh Kumar, Geert Morthier, Ben- jamin Schrauwen, Joni Dambre, and Peter Bienstman. Cascadable excitability in microrings.Optics express, 20(18):20292–20308, 2012

  33. [33]

    All-optical silicon microring spiking neuron.Photonics Research, 10(4):939–946, 2022

    Jinlong Xiang, Yujia Zhang, Yaotian Zhao, Xuhan Guo, and Yikai Su. All-optical silicon microring spiking neuron.Photonics Research, 10(4):939–946, 2022

  34. [34]

    Rigorous dynamic model of a silicon ring resonator with phase change material for a neuromorphic node.Optics Express, 30(14):25177– 25194, 2022

    Alessio Lugnan, Santiago García-Cuevas Carrillo, C David Wright, and Peter Bienstman. Rigorous dynamic model of a silicon ring resonator with phase change material for a neuromorphic node.Optics Express, 30(14):25177– 25194, 2022

  35. [35]

    Exploring the potential of self-pulsing optical microresonators for spiking neural networks and sensing.Communications Physics, 7(1):380, 2024

    Stefano Biasi, Alessio Lugnan, Davide Micheli, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Exploring the potential of self-pulsing optical microresonators for spiking neural networks and sensing.Communications Physics, 7(1):380, 2024

  36. [36]

    All-optical spiking processing and reservoir computing with a passive silicon microring and wavelength-time division multiplexing.Photonics Research, 13(9):2641–2653, 2025

    Giovanni Donati, Stefano Biasi, Lorenzo Pavesi, and Antonio Hurtado. All-optical spiking processing and reservoir computing with a passive silicon microring and wavelength-time division multiplexing.Photonics Research, 13(9):2641–2653, 2025. 13

  37. [37]

    Photonic neuromorphic processing with on-chip electrically-driven microring spiking neuron.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 19(3):2400604, 2025

    Jinlong Xiang, Yaotian Zhao, An He, Jie Xiao, Yikai Su, and Xuhan Guo. Photonic neuromorphic processing with on-chip electrically-driven microring spiking neuron.Laser & Photonics Reviews, 19(3):2400604, 2025

  38. [38]

    Micro ring resonators as building blocks for an all-optical high-speed reservoir-computing bit-pattern-recognition system.JOSA B, 30(11):3048–3055, 2013

    Charis Mesaritakis, Vassilis Papataxiarhis, and Dimitris Syvridis. Micro ring resonators as building blocks for an all-optical high-speed reservoir-computing bit-pattern-recognition system.JOSA B, 30(11):3048–3055, 2013

  39. [39]

    Reservoir computing based on a silicon microring and time multiplexing for binary and analog operations.Scientific Reports, 11(1):15642, 2021

    Massimo Borghi, Stefano Biasi, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Reservoir computing based on a silicon microring and time multiplexing for binary and analog operations.Scientific Reports, 11(1):15642, 2021

  40. [40]

    Time delay reservoir computing with a silicon microring resonator and a fiber-based optical feedback loop.Optics Express, 32(8):13419–13437, 2024

    Giovanni Donati, Apostolos Argyris, Mattia Mancinelli, Claudio R Mirasso, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Time delay reservoir computing with a silicon microring resonator and a fiber-based optical feedback loop.Optics Express, 32(8):13419–13437, 2024

  41. [41]

    Emergent self-adaptation in an integrated photonic neural network for backpropagation-free learning.Advanced Science, 12(2):2404920, 2025

    Alessio Lugnan, Samarth Aggarwal, Frank Brückerhoff-Plückelmann, C David Wright, Wolfram HP Pernice, Harish Bhaskaran, and Peter Bienstman. Emergent self-adaptation in an integrated photonic neural network for backpropagation-free learning.Advanced Science, 12(2):2404920, 2025

  42. [42]

    Reservoir computing with all-optical non-fading memory in a self-pulsing microresonator network.Advanced Optical Materials, 13(11):2403133, 2025

    Alessio Lugnan, Stefano Biasi, Alessandro Foradori, Peter Bienstman, and Lorenzo Pavesi. Reservoir computing with all-optical non-fading memory in a self-pulsing microresonator network.Advanced Optical Materials, 13(11):2403133, 2025

  43. [43]

    Experimental Investigation of Time Series Classification using a Self-Pulsing Microring Resonator Network

    Alessandro Foradori, Alessio Lugnan, Lorenzo Pavesi, and Peter Bienstman. Neuromorphic photonic circuits with nonlinear dynamics and memory for time sequence classification.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11721, 2025

  44. [44]

    Photonic neuromorphic processing with coupled spiking silicon microrings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05918, 2026

    Giovanni Donati, Stefano Biasi, Lorenzo Pavesi, and Antonio Hurtado. Photonic neuromorphic processing with coupled spiking silicon microrings.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.05918, 2026

  45. [45]

    A compact source for a distributed acoustic sensor using a miniaturized EYDFA and a direct digital synthesis module

    Almaz Demise, Fabrizio Di Pasquale, and Yonas Muanenda. A compact source for a distributed acoustic sensor using a miniaturized EYDFA and a direct digital synthesis module. InSPIE Future Sensing Technologies 2023, volume 12327, page 1232720. SPIE, 2023. 14