Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards Unified Multi-Modal Personalization: Large Vision-Language Models for Generative Recommendation and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.10667 v2 pith:NT5EDROB submitted 2024-03-15 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.MM

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CLcs.MM
keywords multi-modalpersonalizedpersonalizationgenerativerecommendationtasksuserbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Developing a universal model that can effectively harness heterogeneous resources and respond to a wide range of personalized needs has been a longstanding community aspiration. Our daily choices, especially in domains like fashion and retail, are substantially shaped by multi-modal data, such as pictures and textual descriptions. These modalities not only offer intuitive guidance but also cater to personalized user preferences. However, the predominant personalization approaches mainly focus on the ID or text-based recommendation problem, failing to comprehend the information spanning various tasks or modalities. In this paper, our goal is to establish a Unified paradigm for Multi-modal Personalization systems (UniMP), which effectively leverages multi-modal data while eliminating the complexities associated with task- and modality-specific customization. We argue that the advancements in foundational generative modeling have provided the flexibility and effectiveness necessary to achieve the objective. In light of this, we develop a generic and extensible personalization generative framework, that can handle a wide range of personalized needs including item recommendation, product search, preference prediction, explanation generation, and further user-guided image generation. Our methodology enhances the capabilities of foundational language models for personalized tasks by seamlessly ingesting interleaved cross-modal user history information, ensuring a more precise and customized experience for users. To train and evaluate the proposed multi-modal personalized tasks, we also introduce a novel and comprehensive benchmark covering a variety of user requirements. Our experiments on the real-world benchmark showcase the model's potential, outperforming competitive methods specialized for each task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coloring Between the Lines: Personalization in the Null Space of Planning Constraints

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CBTL learns parameterized personalization constraints inside the safe solution space of robot planning CSPs, using entropy-based active queries to adapt quickly.

  2. SelfElicit: Your Language Model Secretly Knows Where is the Relevant Evidence

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SelfElicit uses deep-layer attention to automatically highlight relevant evidence sentences in the input context, yielding consistent QA accuracy gains across six instruction-tuned LLMs.

  3. Breaking Silos: Adaptive Model Fusion Unlocks Better Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A learnable fusor that reads meta-features of an input time series and weights 13 pre-trained forecasters per sample outperforms each individual model on most benchmark samples, including zero-shot settings.

  4. Temporal Interest-Driven Multimodal Personalized Content Generation

    cs.IR 2025-09 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    TIMGen is an unvalidated architecture proposal that combines Transformer temporal interest modeling, attention-based multimodal fusion, and VAE generation; the paper reports no experiments and no evaluation.

Pith tools