Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.05418 v1 pith:NV2SATSM submitted 2023-10-09 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HC

Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.HC
keywords agentselementshumanoidhumanoidagentsplatformsystembehaviorgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Just as computational simulations of atoms, molecules and cells have shaped the way we study the sciences, true-to-life simulations of human-like agents can be valuable tools for studying human behavior. We propose Humanoid Agents, a system that guides Generative Agents to behave more like humans by introducing three elements of System 1 processing: Basic needs (e.g. hunger, health and energy), Emotion and Closeness in Relationships. Humanoid Agents are able to use these dynamic elements to adapt their daily activities and conversations with other agents, as supported with empirical experiments. Our system is designed to be extensible to various settings, three of which we demonstrate, as well as to other elements influencing human behavior (e.g. empathy, moral values and cultural background). Our platform also includes a Unity WebGL game interface for visualization and an interactive analytics dashboard to show agent statuses over time. Our platform is available on https://www.humanoidagents.com/ and code is on https://github.com/HumanoidAgents/HumanoidAgents

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale to distinguish generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.

  2. LLM Agents for Deliberative Collaboration: A Study on Joint Decision Making Under Partial Observability

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A benchmark for LLM agents in partially observable joint decision-making reveals that deliberation challenges current models but can enable reflection and error correction.

  3. Mechanism Plausibility in Generative Agent-Based Modeling

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces the Mechanism Plausibility Scale, a four-level framework separating generative sufficiency from mechanistic plausibility in LLM-based agent-based models.