Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Challenger to GPT-4V? Early Explorations of Gemini in Visual Expertise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.12436 v2 pith:O6DMJXIC submitted 2023-12-19 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.MM

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.MM
keywords geminigpt-4vvisualcapabilitiesmllmmulti-modalchallengerearly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The surge of interest towards Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), e.g., GPT-4V(ision) from OpenAI, has marked a significant trend in both academia and industry. They endow Large Language Models (LLMs) with powerful capabilities in visual understanding, enabling them to tackle diverse multi-modal tasks. Very recently, Google released Gemini, its newest and most capable MLLM built from the ground up for multi-modality. In light of the superior reasoning capabilities, can Gemini challenge GPT-4V's leading position in multi-modal learning? In this paper, we present a preliminary exploration of Gemini Pro's visual understanding proficiency, which comprehensively covers four domains: fundamental perception, advanced cognition, challenging vision tasks, and various expert capacities. We compare Gemini Pro with the state-of-the-art GPT-4V to evaluate its upper limits, along with the latest open-sourced MLLM, Sphinx, which reveals the gap between manual efforts and black-box systems. The qualitative samples indicate that, while GPT-4V and Gemini showcase different answering styles and preferences, they can exhibit comparable visual reasoning capabilities, and Sphinx still trails behind them concerning domain generalizability. Specifically, GPT-4V tends to elaborate detailed explanations and intermediate steps, and Gemini prefers to output a direct and concise answer. The quantitative evaluation on the popular MME benchmark also demonstrates the potential of Gemini to be a strong challenger to GPT-4V. Our early investigation of Gemini also observes some common issues of MLLMs, indicating that there still remains a considerable distance towards artificial general intelligence. Our project for tracking the progress of MLLM is released at https://github.com/BradyFU/Awesome-Multimodal-Large-Language-Models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RapGuard: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models via Rationale-aware Defensive Prompting

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A rationale-aware defensive prompting framework uses multimodal chain-of-thought and self-checking to reduce harmful MLLM outputs while preserving benign utility.

  2. InternLM-XComposer2.5-OmniLive: A Comprehensive Multimodal System for Long-term Streaming Video and Audio Interactions

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors integrate streaming perception, compressed long-term memory, and a reasoning model into one open-source system, reporting SOTA open-source results on several video and audio benchmarks.

  3. Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Survey

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes VQA methods from feature extraction through MLLM reasoning, datasets, and metrics, without introducing new experimental results.

Pith tools