On the Potential of Lexico-logical Alignments for Semantic Parsing to SQL Queries
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:OEBOBILQrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Large-scale semantic parsing datasets annotated with logical forms have enabled major advances in supervised approaches. But can richer supervision help even more? To explore the utility of fine-grained, lexical-level supervision, we introduce Squall, a dataset that enriches 11,276 WikiTableQuestions English-language questions with manually created SQL equivalents plus alignments between SQL and question fragments. Our annotation enables new training possibilities for encoder-decoder models, including approaches from machine translation previously precluded by the absence of alignments. We propose and test two methods: (1) supervised attention; (2) adopting an auxiliary objective of disambiguating references in the input queries to table columns. In 5-fold cross validation, these strategies improve over strong baselines by 4.4% execution accuracy. Oracle experiments suggest that annotated alignments can support further accuracy gains of up to 23.9%.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Spider 2.0-AIFunc: Extending Real-World Text-to-SQL to AI-Native SQL Workflows
Spider 2.0-AIFunc is a 465-instance benchmark for evaluating text-to-SQL systems on queries that incorporate Snowflake Cortex AI functions, with evaluations of ten models showing proprietary models reach 67-70% accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.